example of an introduction to a literature review

How to write a literature review introduction (+ examples)

The introduction to a literature review serves as your reader’s guide through your academic work and thought process. Explore the significance of literature review introductions in review papers, academic papers, essays, theses, and dissertations. We delve into the purpose and necessity of these introductions, explore the essential components of literature review introductions, and provide step-by-step guidance on how to craft your own, along with examples.

Why you need an introduction for a literature review

In academic writing , the introduction for a literature review is an indispensable component. Effective academic writing requires proper paragraph structuring to guide your reader through your argumentation. This includes providing an introduction to your literature review.

It is imperative to remember that you should never start sharing your findings abruptly. Even if there isn’t a dedicated introduction section .

When you need an introduction for a literature review

There are three main scenarios in which you need an introduction for a literature review:

What to include in a literature review introduction

It is crucial to customize the content and depth of your literature review introduction according to the specific format of your academic work.

In practical terms, this implies, for instance, that the introduction in an academic literature review paper, especially one derived from a systematic literature review , is quite comprehensive. Particularly compared to the rather brief one or two introductory sentences that are often found at the beginning of a literature review section in a standard academic paper. The introduction to the literature review chapter in a thesis or dissertation again adheres to different standards.

Academic literature review paper

The introduction of an academic literature review paper, which does not rely on empirical data, often necessitates a more extensive introduction than the brief literature review introductions typically found in empirical papers. It should encompass:

Regular literature review section in an academic article or essay

In a standard 8000-word journal article, the literature review section typically spans between 750 and 1250 words. The first few sentences or the first paragraph within this section often serve as an introduction. It should encompass:

In some cases, you might include:

Introduction to a literature review chapter in thesis or dissertation

Some students choose to incorporate a brief introductory section at the beginning of each chapter, including the literature review chapter. Alternatively, others opt to seamlessly integrate the introduction into the initial sentences of the literature review itself. Both approaches are acceptable, provided that you incorporate the following elements:

Examples of literature review introductions

Example 1: an effective introduction for an academic literature review paper.

To begin, let’s delve into the introduction of an academic literature review paper. We will examine the paper “How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review”, which was published in 2018 in the journal Management Decision.

Example 2: An effective introduction to a literature review section in an academic paper

The second example represents a typical academic paper, encompassing not only a literature review section but also empirical data, a case study, and other elements. We will closely examine the introduction to the literature review section in the paper “The environmentalism of the subalterns: a case study of environmental activism in Eastern Kurdistan/Rojhelat”, which was published in 2021 in the journal Local Environment.

Thus, the author successfully introduces the literature review, from which point onward it dives into the main concept (‘subalternity’) of the research, and reviews the literature on socio-economic justice and environmental degradation.

Examples 3-5: Effective introductions to literature review chapters

Numerous universities offer online repositories where you can access theses and dissertations from previous years, serving as valuable sources of reference. Many of these repositories, however, may require you to log in through your university account. Nevertheless, a few open-access repositories are accessible to anyone, such as the one by the University of Manchester . It’s important to note though that copyright restrictions apply to these resources, just as they would with published papers.

Master’s thesis literature review introduction

Phd thesis literature review chapter introduction, phd thesis literature review introduction.

The last example is the doctoral thesis Metacognitive strategies and beliefs: Child correlates and early experiences Chan, K. Y. M. (Author). 31 Dec 2020 . The author clearly conducted a systematic literature review, commencing the review section with a discussion of the methodology and approach employed in locating and analyzing the selected records.

Steps to write your own literature review introduction

Master academia, get new content delivered directly to your inbox, the best answers to "what are your plans for the future", 10 tips for engaging your audience in academic writing, related articles, how to develop an awesome phd timeline step-by-step, how to introduce yourself in a conference presentation (in six simple steps), the best way to cold emailing professors, reviewer comments: examples for common peer review decisions.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

• UConn Library
• Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
• Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

• Getting Started
• How to Pick a Topic
• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

• A research paper assigned in a course
• A thesis or dissertation
• A grant proposal
• An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

• Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

• Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

• Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

• Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

• UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
• Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

 CREATE ACCOUNT  LOG IN

Writing: Literature Review Basics

• What is Synthesis?
• Organizing Your Research
• Paraphrasing, Summary, or Direct Quotation?
• Introductions
• Conclusions
• All Writing Guides: Home
• CORE Library Home

The Most Important Thing

The best time to write an introduction is AFTER you write the body of your paper.

Well, how do you know what to introduce until after you've figured out what you want to say?

The best time to write an introduction is as one of the last things you do.

Basic Introduction Template

For any other sort of scholarly writing, the following basic structure works well for an introduction:

• What has been said or done on this topic?  
• What is the problem with what has been said or done?
• What will you offer to solve the problem?  (The answer to this is your thesis statement.)
• How does your solution address necessary change?

Writing an Introduction

The job of an introduction is to preview what you are going to say so the audience knows what is coming.  A good introduction starts out generally and works towards a specific statement of what you intend to discuss in your writing. 

The introduction explains the focus and establishes the importance of the subject. It discusses what kind of work has been done on the topic and identifies any controversies within the field or any recent research which has raised questions about earlier assumptions. It may provide background or history, and it indicates why the topic is important, interesting, problematic, or relevant in some way.  It concludes with a purpose or thesis statement. In a stand-alone literature review, this statement will sum up and evaluate the state of the art in this field of research; in a review that is an introduction or preparatory to a larger work, such as the Culminating Project, it will suggest how the review findings will lead to the research the writer proposes to undertake.

In a literature review, an introduction may contain the following:

• A concise definition of a topic under consideration (this may be a descriptive or argumentative thesis, or proposal), as well as the scope of the related literature being investigated. (Example: If the topic under consideration is ‘women’s wartime diaries’, the scope of the review may be limited to published or unpublished works, works in English, works from a particular location, time period, or conflict, etc.)  
• The introduction should also note what topics are being included and what are intentional exclusions. (Example: “This review will not explore the diaries of adolescent girls.”)
• A final sentence should signal the list of key topics that will be used to discuss the selected sources.

Many theories have been proposed to explain what motivates human behavior. Although the literature covers a wide variety of such theories, this review will focus on five major themes which emerge repeatedly throughout the literature reviewed. These themes are incorporation of the self-concept into traditional theories of motivation, the influence of rewards on motivation, the increasing importance of internal forces of motivation, autonomy and self-control as sources of motivation, and narcissism as an essential component of motivation. Although the literature presents these themes in a variety of contexts, this paper will primarily focus on their application to self-motivation.

Let's break that apart.

• << Previous: Paraphrasing, Summary, or Direct Quotation?
• Next: Conclusions >>
• Last Updated: Feb 12, 2024 9:02 AM
• URL: https://azhin.org/cummings/basiclitreview

© 2015 - 2024

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation
• What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

Published on 22 February 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 7 June 2022.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarise sources – it analyses, synthesises, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

Table of contents

Why write a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write your literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a dissertation or thesis, you will have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate

You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic.

The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Correct my document today

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research objectives and questions .

If you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your search. Unlike a dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without collecting original data. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications.

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can use boolean operators to help narrow down your search:

Read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

To identify the most important publications on your topic, take note of recurring citations. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out.

You probably won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on the topic – you’ll have to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your questions.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models and methods? Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic? What are its key insights and arguments?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can find out how many times an article has been cited on Google Scholar – a high citation count means the article has been influential in the field, and should certainly be included in your literature review.

The scope of your review will depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over time).

Remember that you can use our template to summarise and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using!

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

You can use our free APA Reference Generator for quick, correct, consistent citations.

To begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly-visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat – this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organising the body of a literature review. You should have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order.

Try to analyse patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organise your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

If you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap in the literature (“while there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into consideration”).

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, make sure to follow these tips:

• Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole.
• Analyse and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole.
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources.
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts.

In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasise their significance.

If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. This can lead directly into your methodology section.

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a dissertation , thesis, research paper , or proposal .

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarise yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your  dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, June 07). What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 24 June 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a dissertation proposal | a step-by-step guide, what is a theoretical framework | a step-by-step guide, what is a research methodology | steps & tips.

The Sheridan Libraries

• Write a Literature Review
• Sheridan Libraries
• Find This link opens in a new window
• Evaluate This link opens in a new window

What Will You Do Differently?

Please help your librarians by filling out this two-minute survey of today's class session..

Professor, this one's for you .

Introduction

Literature reviews take time. here is some general information to know before you start.  .

•  VIDEO -- This video is a great overview of the entire process.  (2020; North Carolina State University Libraries) --The transcript is included --This is for everyone; ignore the mention of "graduate students" --9.5 minutes, and every second is important  
• OVERVIEW -- Read this page from Purdue's OWL. It's not long, and gives some tips to fill in what you just learned from the video.  
• NOT A RESEARCH ARTICLE -- A literature review follows a different style, format, and structure from a research article.  

Steps to Completing a Literature Review

• Next: Find >>
• Last Updated: Sep 26, 2023 10:25 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.jhu.edu/lit-review

Literature Review Guide: Examples of Literature Reviews

• What is a Literature Review?
• How to start?
• Search strategies and Databases
• Examples of Literature Reviews
• How to organise the review
• Library summary
• Emerald Infographic

All good quality journal articles will include a small Literature Review after the Introduction paragraph.  It may not be called a Literature Review but gives you an idea of how one is created in miniature.

Sample Literature Reviews as part of a articles or Theses

• Sample Literature Review on Critical Thinking (Gwendolyn Reece, American University Library)
• Hackett, G and Melia, D . The hotel as the holiday/stay destination:trends and innovations. Presented at TRIC Conference, Belfast, Ireland- June 2012 and EuroCHRIE Conference

Links to sample Literature Reviews from other libraries

• Sample literature reviews from University of West Florida

Standalone Literature Reviews

• Attitudes towards the Disability in Ireland
• Martin, A., O'Connor-Fenelon, M. and Lyons, R. (2010). Non-verbal communication between nurses and people with an intellectual disability: A review of the literature. Journal of Intellectual Diabilities, 14(4), 303-314.

Irish Theses

• Phillips, Martin (2015) European airline performance: a data envelopment analysis with extrapolations based on model outputs. Master of Business Studies thesis, Dublin City University.
• The customers’ perception of servicescape’s influence on their behaviours, in the food retail industry : Dublin Business School 2015
• Coughlan, Ray (2015) What was the role of leadership in the transformation of a failing Irish Insurance business. Masters thesis, Dublin, National College of Ireland.
• << Previous: Search strategies and Databases
• Next: Tutorials >>
• Last Updated: Jun 26, 2024 10:32 AM
• URL: https://ait.libguides.com/literaturereview

Reference management. Clean and simple.

What is a literature review? [with examples]

What is a literature review?

The purpose of a literature review, how to write a literature review, the format of a literature review, general formatting rules, the length of a literature review, literature review examples, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, related articles.

A literature review is an assessment of the sources in a chosen topic of research.

In a literature review, you’re expected to report on the existing scholarly conversation, without adding new contributions.

If you are currently writing one, you've come to the right place. In the following paragraphs, we will explain:

• the objective of a literature review
• how to write a literature review
• the basic format of a literature review

Tip: It’s not always mandatory to add a literature review in a paper. Theses and dissertations often include them, whereas research papers may not. Make sure to consult with your instructor for exact requirements.

The four main objectives of a literature review are:

• Studying the references of your research area
• Summarizing the main arguments
• Identifying current gaps, stances, and issues
• Presenting all of the above in a text

Ultimately, the main goal of a literature review is to provide the researcher with sufficient knowledge about the topic in question so that they can eventually make an intervention.

The format of a literature review is fairly standard. It includes an:

• introduction that briefly introduces the main topic
• body that includes the main discussion of the key arguments
• conclusion that highlights the gaps and issues of the literature

➡️ Take a look at our guide on how to write a literature review to learn more about how to structure a literature review.

First of all, a literature review should have its own labeled section. You should indicate clearly in the table of contents where the literature can be found, and you should label this section as “Literature Review.”

➡️ For more information on writing a thesis, visit our guide on how to structure a thesis .

There is no set amount of words for a literature review, so the length depends on the research. If you are working with a large amount of sources, it will be long. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, it will be short.

Take a look at these three theses featuring great literature reviews:

• School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist's Perceptions of Sensory Food Aversions in Children [ PDF , see page 20]
• Who's Writing What We Read: Authorship in Criminological Research [ PDF , see page 4]
• A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experience of Online Instructors of Theological Reflection at Christian Institutions Accredited by the Association of Theological Schools [ PDF , see page 56]

Literature reviews are most commonly found in theses and dissertations. However, you find them in research papers as well.

There is no set amount of words for a literature review, so the length depends on the research. If you are working with a large amount of sources, then it will be long. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, then it will be short.

No. A literature review should have its own independent section. You should indicate clearly in the table of contents where the literature review can be found, and label this section as “Literature Review.”

The main goal of a literature review is to provide the researcher with sufficient knowledge about the topic in question so that they can eventually make an intervention.

• Writing well

How to write a literature review

• Starting well
• How to write an annotated bibliography
• How to write a case study response
• How to write a critique
• How to write an empirical article
• How to write an essay
• How to write a reflective task
• How to write a report
• Finishing well

Structure of a literature review

Determine your purpose.

Work out what you need to address in the literature review. What are you being asked to do in your literature review? What are you searching the literature to discover? Check your assignment question and your criteria sheet to know what to focus on.

Do an extensive search of the literature

Find out what has been written on the topic.

What kind of literature?

Select appropriate source material: Use a variety of academic or scholarly sources that are relevant, current and authoritative. An extensive review of relevant material will include — books, journal articles, reports, government documents, conference proceedings and web resources. The Library would be the best place to search for your sources.

How many resources?

The number of sources that you will be required to review will depend on what the literature review is for and how advanced you are in your studies. It could be from five sources at first year undergraduate level to more than fifty for a thesis. Your lecturer will advise you on these details.

Note the bibliographical details of your sources

Keep a note of the publication title, date, authors’ names, page numbers and publishers. These details will save you time later.

Read the literature

• Critically read each source, look for the arguments presented rather than for facts.
• Take notes as you read and start to organise your review around themes and ideas.
• Consider using a table, matrix or concept map to identify how the different sources relate to each other.

Analyse the literature you have found

In order for your writing to reflect strong critical analysis, you need to evaluate the sources. For each source you are reviewing ask yourself these questions:

• What are the key terms and concepts?
• How relevant is this article to my specific topic?
• What are the major relationships, trends and patterns?
• How has the author structured the arguments?
• How authoritative and credible is this source?
• What are the differences and similarities between the sources?
• Are there any gaps in the literature that require further study?

Write the review

• Start by writing your thesis statement. This is an important introductory sentence that will tell your reader what the topic is and the overall perspective or argument you will be presenting.
• Like essays, a literature review must have an introduction, a body and a conclusion.

Introduction

Your introduction should give an outline of:

• why you are writing a review, and why the topic is important
• the scope of the review — what aspects of the topic will be discussed
• the criteria used for your literature selection (e.g. type of sources used, date range)
• the organisational pattern of the review.

Body paragraphs

Each body paragraph should deal with a different theme that is relevant to your topic. You will need to synthesise several of your reviewed readings into each paragraph, so that there is a clear connection between the various sources. You will need to critically analyse each source for how they contribute to the themes you are researching.

The body could include paragraphs on:

• historical background
• methodologies
• previous studies on the topic
• mainstream versus alternative viewpoints
• principal questions being asked
• general conclusions that are being drawn.

Your conclusion should give a summary of:

• the main agreements and disagreements in the literature
• any gaps or areas for further research
• your overall perspective on the topic.
• outlined the purpose and scope?
• identified appropriate and credible (academic/scholarly) literature?
• recorded the bibliographical details of the sources?
• analysed and critiqued your readings?
• identified gaps in the literature and research?
• explored methodologies / theories / hypotheses / models?
• discussed the varying viewpoints?
• written an introduction, body and conclusion?
• checked punctuation and spelling?

Further information

• HiQ: Managing weekly readings
• HiQ: Notetaking
• HiQ: Structuring your assignment
• RMIT University: Literature review - Overview

Global links and information

• Referencing and using sources
• Background and development
• Changes to QUT cite|write
• Need more help?
• Current students
• Current staff
• TEQSA Provider ID: PRV12079 (Australian University)
• CRICOS No. 00213J
• ABN 83 791 724 622
• Last modified: 28-May-2024
• Accessibility
• Right to Information
• Feedback and suggestions

Acknowledgement of Traditional Owners

QUT acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the lands where QUT now stands.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Writing a Stellar Literature Review (with Help from AI)

Table of contents

Aren’t all of us mini versions of Sherlock Holmes when browsing data and archives for a research piece? As we go through the process, a comprehensive literature review is an essential toolkit to make your research shine.

A literature review consists of scholarly sources that validate the content. Its primary objective is to offer a concise summary of the research and to let you explore relevant theories and methodologies. Through this review, you can identify gaps in the existing research and bridge them with your contribution. 

The real challenge is how to write an excellent literature review. Let’s learn.

What is the purpose of a literature review?

A literature review is an introduction to your research. It helps you put your perspective to the table, along with a summary of the theme.

What does my literature review communicate?

• Explanation of your research: how the information was collected, the research method, the justification of the chosen data sources, and an overview of the data analysis.
• Framework: the journey from where the concept began and how it is presented.
• Connects the previous and current research: 

It presents the broader scope of your research by connecting it to the existing data and debates and underlining how your content fits the prevailing studies. 

In an era of information overload, a literature review must be well-structured. 

Let’s learn all about the structure and style of a literature review that’ll help you strengthen your research.

Literature review– structure and style

Begin with a question and end it with the solution– the key to structuring a literature review. It resembles an essay’s format, with the first paragraph introducing the readers to the topic and the following explaining the research in-depth.

The conclusion reiterates the question and summarizes the overall insights of your research. There’s no word count restriction. —it depends on the type of research. For example, a dissertation demands lengthy work, whereas a short paper needs a few pages. 

In a literature review, maintaining high quality is vital, with a focus on academic writing style. Informal language should be avoided in favor of a more formal tone. 

The content avoids contractions, clearly differentiating between previous and current research through the use of past and present tense. Wordtune assists in establishing a formal tone, enhancing your work with pertinent suggestions. This AI-powered tool ensures your writing remains genuine, lucid, and engaging. 

The option of refining the tonality offers multiple possibilities for rephrasing a single sentence. Thus, pick the best and keep writing.

Get Wordtune for free > Get Wordtune for free >

Your friendly step-by-step guide to writing a literary review (with help from AI)

Do you find it challenging to begin the literature review? Don’t worry! We’re here to get you started with our step-by-step guide.

1. Narrow down the research scope

Simply begin with the question: What am I answering through my research?

Whether it’s cooking or painting, the real challenge is the prep-up for it rather than performing the task. Once you’re done, it smoothly progresses. Similarly, for your literature review, prepare the groundwork by narrowing down the research scope.

Browse and scoop out relevant data inclining well with your research. While you can’t cover every aspect of your research, pick a topic that isn’t too narrow nor too broad to keep your literature review well-balanced. 

2. Hunt relevant literature

The next question: Does this data align with the issue I’m trying to address?

As you review sources of information, hunt out the best ones. Determine which findings help in offering a focused insight on your topic. The best way to pick primary sources is to opt for the ones featured in reliable publications. You can also choose secondary sources from other researchers from a reasonable time frame and a relevant background.

For example, if your research focuses on the Historical Architecture of 18th-century Europe, the first-hand accounts and surveys from the past would hold more weight than the new-age publications. 

3. Observe the themes and patterns in sources

Next comes: What is the core viewpoint in most of the research? Has it stayed constant over time, or have the authors differed in their points of view?

Ensure to scoop out the essential aspects of what each source represents. Once you have collected all this information, combine it and add your interpretations at the end. This process is known as synthesis.

Synthesize ideas by combining arguments, findings and forming your new version.

4. Generate an outline

The next question: How can I organize my review effectively? When navigating multiple data sources, you must have noticed a structure throughout the research. Develop an outline to make the process easier. An outline is a skeletal format of the review, helping you connect the information more strategically.

Here are the three different ways to organize an outline– Chronologically, Thematically, or by Methodology.You can develop the outline chronologically, starting from the older sources and leading to the latest pieces. Another way of organizing is to thematically divide the sections and discuss each under the designated sub-heading.

You can even organize it per the research methods used by the respective authors. The choice of outline depends on the subject. For example, in the case of a science paper, you can divide the information into sections like introduction, types of equipment, method, procedure, findings, etc. In contrast, it’s best to present it in divisions based on timelines like Ancient, Middle Ages, Industrial revolutions, etc., for a history paper.

If you’re confused about how to structure the data, work with Wordtune. 

With the Generate with AI feature, you can mention your research topic and let Wordtune curate a comprehensive outline for your study.

Having a precise prompt is the key to getting the best results.

5. Start filling!

Your next question must be: Am I ready to compose all the parts of the literature review?

Once you’re ready with the basic outline and relevant sources, start filling in the data. Go for an introductory paragraph first to ensure your readers understand the topic and how you will present it. Ensure you clearly explain the section in the first sentence.

However, if beginning from the first paragraph seems intimidating, don’t worry! Add the main body content to the sub-headings, then jump to the introduction. 

Add headings wherever possible to make it more straightforward and guide your readers logically through different sources. Lastly, conclude your study by presenting a key takeaway and summarizing your findings. To make your task easier, work with Wordtune. It helps align your content with the desired tone and refine the structure.

6. Give attention to detail and edit

The last question: Am I satisfied with the language and content written in the literature review? Is it easy to understand?

Once you’re done writing the first draft of a literature review, it’s time to refine it. Take time between writing and reading the draft to ensure a fresh perspective. It makes it easier to spot errors when you disconnect from the content for some time. Start by looking at the document from a bird's eye to ensure the formatting and structure are in order. 

After reviewing the content format, you must thoroughly check your work for grammar, spelling, and punctuation. One of the best approaches to editing and proofreading is to use Wordtune . It helps simplify complex sentences, enhance the content quality, and gain prowess over the tonality.

The dos and don’ts of writing a literature review

Writing a stellar literature review requires following a few dos and don'ts. Just like Sherlock Holmes would never overlook a hint, you must pay attention to every minute detail while writing a perfect narrative. To help you write, below are some dos and don'ts to remember.

Composing a literature review demands a holistic research summary, each part exhibiting your understanding and approach. As you write the content, make sure to cover the following points:

• Keep a historical background of the field of research. Highlight the relevant relation between the old studies and your new research.
• Discuss the core issue, question, and debate of your topic.
• Theories lay the foundation of research. While you’re writing a literature review, make sure to add relevant concepts and ideas to support your statements.
• Another critical thing to keep in mind is to define complex terminologies. It helps the readers understand the content with better clarity. 

Examples of comprehensive literature reviews

Aren’t good examples the best way to understand a subject? Let’s look into a few examples of literature reviews and analyze what makes them well-written.

1. Critical Thinking and Transferability: A Review of the Literature (Gwendolyn Reece)

An overview of scholarly sources is included in the literature review, which explores critical thinking in American education. The introduction stating the subject’s importance makes it a winning literature review. Following the introduction is a well-defined purpose that highlights the importance of research.

As one keeps reading, there is more clarity on the pros and cons of the research. By dividing information into parts with relevant subheadings, the author breaks a lengthy literature review into manageable chunks, defining the overall structure.

Along with other studies and presented perspectives, the author also expresses her opinion. It is presented with minimal usage of ‘I,’ keeping it person-poised yet general. Toward the conclusion, the author again offers an overview of the study. A summary is further strengthened by presenting suggestions for future research as well. 

2. The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review

This literature review is thematically organized on how technology affects language acquisition. The study begins with an introduction to the topic with well-cited sources. It presents the views of different studies to help readers get a sense of different perspectives. After giving these perspectives, the author offers a personalized opinion.

One of the critical aspects that makes this a good literature review is a dedicated paragraph for definitions. It helps readers proceed further with a clear understanding of the crucial terminologies. There’s a comparison of the modern and previous studies and approaches to give an overall picture of the research.

Once the main body is composed, the author integrates recommendations for action-based tips. Thus, the literature review isn’t just summarizing the sources but offering actions relevant to the topics. Finally, the concluding paragraph has a brief overview with key takeaways.

Wordtune: your writing buddy!

A literature review demands the right balance of language and clarity. You must refine the content to achieve a formal tone and clear structure. Do you know what will help you the most? Wordtune !. 

The real-time grammar checker leaves no scope for errors and lets you retain precision in writing. This writing companion is all you need for stress-free working and comprehensive literature review development.

Let the narrative begin

A literary review isn't just about summarizing sources; it's about seamlessly bringing your perspective to the table. Always remember to set a narrative for added interest and a brilliant composition. With structure and style being the pillars of a stellar literature review, work with Wordtune to ensure zero compromises on the quality.

Share This Article:

Grammarly Alternatives: Which Writing Assistant is the Best Choice for You?

The Dos and Don’ts of Using AI to Study

How to Use Modal Verbs for Clear Communication

Looking for fresh content, thank you your submission has been received.

How do I Write a Literature Review?: #5 Writing the Review

• Step #1: Choosing a Topic
• Step #2: Finding Information
• Step #3: Evaluating Content
• Step #4: Synthesizing Content
• #5 Writing the Review
• Citing Your Sources

WRITING THE REVIEW 

You've done the research and now you're ready to put your findings down on paper. When preparing to write your review, first consider how will you organize your review.

The actual review generally has 5 components:

Abstract  -  An abstract is a summary of your literature review. It is made up of the following parts:

• A contextual sentence about your motivation behind your research topic
• Your thesis statement
• A descriptive statement about the types of literature used in the review
• Summarize your findings
• Conclusion(s) based upon your findings

Introduction :   Like a typical research paper introduction, provide the reader with a quick idea of the topic of the literature review:

• Define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern. This provides the reader with context for reviewing the literature.
• Identify related trends in what has already been published about the topic; or conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or a single problem or new perspective of immediate interest.
• Establish your reason (point of view) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included (scope)  - 

Body :  The body of a literature review contains your discussion of sources and can be organized in 3 ways-

• Chronological -  by publication or by trend
• Thematic -  organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time
• Methodical -  the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Instead, it focuses on the "methods" of the literature's researcher or writer that you are reviewing

You may also want to include a section on "questions for further research" and discuss what questions the review has sparked about the topic/field or offer suggestions for future studies/examinations that build on your current findings.

Conclusion :  In the conclusion, you should:

Conclude your paper by providing your reader with some perspective on the relationship between your literature review's specific topic and how it's related to it's parent discipline, scientific endeavor, or profession.

Bibliography :   Since a literature review is composed of pieces of research, it is very important that your correctly cite the literature you are reviewing, both in the reviews body as well as in a bibliography/works cited. To learn more about different citation styles, visit the " Citing Your Sources " tab.

• Writing a Literature Review: Wesleyan University
• Literature Review: Edith Cowan University
• << Previous: Step #4: Synthesizing Content
• Next: Citing Your Sources >>
• Last Updated: Aug 22, 2023 1:35 PM
• URL: https://libguides.eastern.edu/literature_reviews

About the Library

• Collection Development
• Circulation Policies
• Mission Statement
• Staff Directory

Using the Library

• A to Z Journal List
• Library Catalog
• Research Guides

Interlibrary Services

• Research Help

Warner Memorial Library

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

• UWF Libraries

Literature Review: Conducting & Writing

• Sample Literature Reviews
• Steps for Conducting a Lit Review
• Finding "The Literature"
• Organizing/Writing
• APA Style This link opens in a new window
• Chicago: Notes Bibliography This link opens in a new window
• MLA Style This link opens in a new window

Sample Lit Reviews from Communication Arts

Have an exemplary literature review.

• Literature Review Sample 1
• Literature Review Sample 2
• Literature Review Sample 3

Have you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes?

Are you an instructor who has received an exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to post?

Please contact Britt McGowan at [email protected] for inclusion in this guide. All disciplines welcome and encouraged.

• << Previous: MLA Style
• Next: Get Help! >>
• Last Updated: Mar 22, 2024 9:37 AM
• URL: https://libguides.uwf.edu/litreview

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library

• Collections
• Research Help

YSN Doctoral Programs: Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

• Biomedical Databases
• Global (Public Health) Databases
• Soc. Sci., History, and Law Databases
• Grey Literature
• Trials Registers
• Data and Statistics
• Public Policy
• Google Tips
• Recommended Books
• Steps in Conducting a Literature Review

What is a literature review?

A literature review is an integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question.  That is, it represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows a association between the evidence and your research question.

A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment.  Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you.

Why is it important?

A literature review is important because it:

• Explains the background of research on a topic.
• Demonstrates why a topic is significant to a subject area.
• Discovers relationships between research studies/ideas.
• Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
• Identifies critical gaps and points of disagreement.
• Discusses further research questions that logically come out of the previous studies.

APA7 Style resources

APA Style Blog - for those harder to find answers

1. Choose a topic. Define your research question.

Your literature review should be guided by your central research question.  The literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way.

• Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow.  Is it manageable?
• Begin writing down terms that are related to your question. These will be useful for searches later.
• If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor and your class mates.

2. Decide on the scope of your review

How many studies do you need to look at? How comprehensive should it be? How many years should it cover? 

• This may depend on your assignment.  How many sources does the assignment require?

3. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches.

Make a list of the databases you will search. 

Where to find databases:

• use the tabs on this guide
• Find other databases in the Nursing Information Resources web page
• More on the Medical Library web page
• ... and more on the Yale University Library web page

4. Conduct your searches to find the evidence. Keep track of your searches.

• Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. Use the database tutorials for help.
• Save the searches in the databases. This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. It is also helpful to use as a guide is the searches are not finding any useful results.
• Review the abstracts of research studies carefully. This will save you time.
• Use the bibliographies and references of research studies you find to locate others.
• Check with your professor, or a subject expert in the field, if you are missing any key works in the field.
• Ask your librarian for help at any time.
• Use a citation manager, such as EndNote as the repository for your citations. See the EndNote tutorials for help.

Review the literature

Some questions to help you analyze the research:

• What was the research question of the study you are reviewing? What were the authors trying to discover?
• Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings?
• What were the research methodologies? Analyze its literature review, the samples and variables used, the results, and the conclusions.
• Does the research seem to be complete? Could it have been conducted more soundly? What further questions does it raise?
• If there are conflicting studies, why do you think that is?
• How are the authors viewed in the field? Has this study been cited? If so, how has it been analyzed?

Tips: 

• Review the abstracts carefully.  
• Keep careful notes so that you may track your thought processes during the research process.
• Create a matrix of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of the studies.
• << Previous: Recommended Books
• Last Updated: Jun 20, 2024 9:08 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.yale.edu/YSNDoctoral

• Privacy Policy

Home » Literature Review – Types Writing Guide and Examples

Literature Review – Types Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

Literature Review

Definition:

A literature review is a comprehensive and critical analysis of the existing literature on a particular topic or research question. It involves identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing relevant literature, including scholarly articles, books, and other sources, to provide a summary and critical assessment of what is known about the topic.

Types of Literature Review

Types of Literature Review are as follows:

• Narrative literature review : This type of review involves a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature on a particular topic or research question. It is often used as an introductory section of a research paper.
• Systematic literature review: This is a rigorous and structured review that follows a pre-defined protocol to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific research question. It is often used in evidence-based practice and systematic reviews.
• Meta-analysis: This is a quantitative review that uses statistical methods to combine data from multiple studies to derive a summary effect size. It provides a more precise estimate of the overall effect than any individual study.
• Scoping review: This is a preliminary review that aims to map the existing literature on a broad topic area to identify research gaps and areas for further investigation.
• Critical literature review : This type of review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature on a particular topic or research question. It aims to provide a critical analysis of the literature and identify areas where further research is needed.
• Conceptual literature review: This review synthesizes and integrates theories and concepts from multiple sources to provide a new perspective on a particular topic. It aims to provide a theoretical framework for understanding a particular research question.
• Rapid literature review: This is a quick review that provides a snapshot of the current state of knowledge on a specific research question or topic. It is often used when time and resources are limited.
• Thematic literature review : This review identifies and analyzes common themes and patterns across a body of literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature and identify key themes and concepts.
• Realist literature review: This review is often used in social science research and aims to identify how and why certain interventions work in certain contexts. It takes into account the context and complexities of real-world situations.
• State-of-the-art literature review : This type of review provides an overview of the current state of knowledge in a particular field, highlighting the most recent and relevant research. It is often used in fields where knowledge is rapidly evolving, such as technology or medicine.
• Integrative literature review: This type of review synthesizes and integrates findings from multiple studies on a particular topic to identify patterns, themes, and gaps in the literature. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic.
• Umbrella literature review : This review is used to provide a broad overview of a large and diverse body of literature on a particular topic. It aims to identify common themes and patterns across different areas of research.
• Historical literature review: This type of review examines the historical development of research on a particular topic or research question. It aims to provide a historical context for understanding the current state of knowledge on a particular topic.
• Problem-oriented literature review : This review focuses on a specific problem or issue and examines the literature to identify potential solutions or interventions. It aims to provide practical recommendations for addressing a particular problem or issue.
• Mixed-methods literature review : This type of review combines quantitative and qualitative methods to synthesize and analyze the available literature on a particular topic. It aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research question by combining different types of evidence.

Parts of Literature Review

Parts of a literature review are as follows:

Introduction

The introduction of a literature review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is important. It outlines the objectives of the review, the research question or hypothesis, and the scope of the review.

Literature Search

This section outlines the search strategy and databases used to identify relevant literature. The search terms used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and any limitations of the search are described.

Literature Analysis

The literature analysis is the main body of the literature review. This section summarizes and synthesizes the literature that is relevant to the research question or hypothesis. The review should be organized thematically, chronologically, or by methodology, depending on the research objectives.

Critical Evaluation

Critical evaluation involves assessing the quality and validity of the literature. This includes evaluating the reliability and validity of the studies reviewed, the methodology used, and the strength of the evidence.

The conclusion of the literature review should summarize the main findings, identify any gaps in the literature, and suggest areas for future research. It should also reiterate the importance of the research question or hypothesis and the contribution of the literature review to the overall research project.

The references list includes all the sources cited in the literature review, and follows a specific referencing style (e.g., APA, MLA, Harvard).

How to write Literature Review

Here are some steps to follow when writing a literature review:

• Define your research question or topic : Before starting your literature review, it is essential to define your research question or topic. This will help you identify relevant literature and determine the scope of your review.
• Conduct a comprehensive search: Use databases and search engines to find relevant literature. Look for peer-reviewed articles, books, and other academic sources that are relevant to your research question or topic.
• Evaluate the sources: Once you have found potential sources, evaluate them critically to determine their relevance, credibility, and quality. Look for recent publications, reputable authors, and reliable sources of data and evidence.
• Organize your sources: Group the sources by theme, method, or research question. This will help you identify similarities and differences among the literature, and provide a structure for your literature review.
• Analyze and synthesize the literature : Analyze each source in depth, identifying the key findings, methodologies, and conclusions. Then, synthesize the information from the sources, identifying patterns and themes in the literature.
• Write the literature review : Start with an introduction that provides an overview of the topic and the purpose of the literature review. Then, organize the literature according to your chosen structure, and analyze and synthesize the sources. Finally, provide a conclusion that summarizes the key findings of the literature review, identifies gaps in knowledge, and suggests areas for future research.
• Edit and proofread: Once you have written your literature review, edit and proofread it carefully to ensure that it is well-organized, clear, and concise.

Examples of Literature Review

Here’s an example of how a literature review can be conducted for a thesis on the topic of “ The Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Mental Health”:

• Start by identifying the key terms related to your research topic. In this case, the key terms are “social media,” “teenagers,” and “mental health.”
• Use academic databases like Google Scholar, JSTOR, or PubMed to search for relevant articles, books, and other publications. Use these keywords in your search to narrow down your results.
• Evaluate the sources you find to determine if they are relevant to your research question. You may want to consider the publication date, author’s credentials, and the journal or book publisher.
• Begin reading and taking notes on each source, paying attention to key findings, methodologies used, and any gaps in the research.
• Organize your findings into themes or categories. For example, you might categorize your sources into those that examine the impact of social media on self-esteem, those that explore the effects of cyberbullying, and those that investigate the relationship between social media use and depression.
• Synthesize your findings by summarizing the key themes and highlighting any gaps or inconsistencies in the research. Identify areas where further research is needed.
• Use your literature review to inform your research questions and hypotheses for your thesis.

For example, after conducting a literature review on the impact of social media on teenagers’ mental health, a thesis might look like this:

“Using a mixed-methods approach, this study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes in teenagers. Specifically, the study will examine the effects of cyberbullying, social comparison, and excessive social media use on self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. Through an analysis of survey data and qualitative interviews with teenagers, the study will provide insight into the complex relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes, and identify strategies for promoting positive mental health outcomes in young people.”

Reference: Smith, J., Jones, M., & Lee, S. (2019). The effects of social media use on adolescent mental health: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(2), 154-165. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.03.024

Reference Example: Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number(issue number), page range. doi:0000000/000000000000 or URL

Applications of Literature Review

some applications of literature review in different fields:

• Social Sciences: In social sciences, literature reviews are used to identify gaps in existing research, to develop research questions, and to provide a theoretical framework for research. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and political science.
• Natural Sciences: In natural sciences, literature reviews are used to summarize and evaluate the current state of knowledge in a particular field or subfield. Literature reviews can help researchers identify areas where more research is needed and provide insights into the latest developments in a particular field. Fields such as biology, chemistry, and physics commonly use literature reviews.
• Health Sciences: In health sciences, literature reviews are used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, identify best practices, and determine areas where more research is needed. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as medicine, nursing, and public health.
• Humanities: In humanities, literature reviews are used to identify gaps in existing knowledge, develop new interpretations of texts or cultural artifacts, and provide a theoretical framework for research. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as history, literary studies, and philosophy.

Role of Literature Review in Research

Here are some applications of literature review in research:

• Identifying Research Gaps : Literature review helps researchers identify gaps in existing research and literature related to their research question. This allows them to develop new research questions and hypotheses to fill those gaps.
• Developing Theoretical Framework: Literature review helps researchers develop a theoretical framework for their research. By analyzing and synthesizing existing literature, researchers can identify the key concepts, theories, and models that are relevant to their research.
• Selecting Research Methods : Literature review helps researchers select appropriate research methods and techniques based on previous research. It also helps researchers to identify potential biases or limitations of certain methods and techniques.
• Data Collection and Analysis: Literature review helps researchers in data collection and analysis by providing a foundation for the development of data collection instruments and methods. It also helps researchers to identify relevant data sources and identify potential data analysis techniques.
• Communicating Results: Literature review helps researchers to communicate their results effectively by providing a context for their research. It also helps to justify the significance of their findings in relation to existing research and literature.

Purpose of Literature Review

Some of the specific purposes of a literature review are as follows:

• To provide context: A literature review helps to provide context for your research by situating it within the broader body of literature on the topic.
• To identify gaps and inconsistencies: A literature review helps to identify areas where further research is needed or where there are inconsistencies in the existing literature.
• To synthesize information: A literature review helps to synthesize the information from multiple sources and present a coherent and comprehensive picture of the current state of knowledge on the topic.
• To identify key concepts and theories : A literature review helps to identify key concepts and theories that are relevant to your research question and provide a theoretical framework for your study.
• To inform research design: A literature review can inform the design of your research study by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions.

Characteristics of Literature Review

Some Characteristics of Literature Review are as follows:

• Identifying gaps in knowledge: A literature review helps to identify gaps in the existing knowledge and research on a specific topic or research question. By analyzing and synthesizing the literature, you can identify areas where further research is needed and where new insights can be gained.
• Establishing the significance of your research: A literature review helps to establish the significance of your own research by placing it in the context of existing research. By demonstrating the relevance of your research to the existing literature, you can establish its importance and value.
• Informing research design and methodology : A literature review helps to inform research design and methodology by identifying the most appropriate research methods, techniques, and instruments. By reviewing the literature, you can identify the strengths and limitations of different research methods and techniques, and select the most appropriate ones for your own research.
• Supporting arguments and claims: A literature review provides evidence to support arguments and claims made in academic writing. By citing and analyzing the literature, you can provide a solid foundation for your own arguments and claims.
• I dentifying potential collaborators and mentors: A literature review can help identify potential collaborators and mentors by identifying researchers and practitioners who are working on related topics or using similar methods. By building relationships with these individuals, you can gain valuable insights and support for your own research and practice.
• Keeping up-to-date with the latest research : A literature review helps to keep you up-to-date with the latest research on a specific topic or research question. By regularly reviewing the literature, you can stay informed about the latest findings and developments in your field.

Advantages of Literature Review

There are several advantages to conducting a literature review as part of a research project, including:

• Establishing the significance of the research : A literature review helps to establish the significance of the research by demonstrating the gap or problem in the existing literature that the study aims to address.
• Identifying key concepts and theories: A literature review can help to identify key concepts and theories that are relevant to the research question, and provide a theoretical framework for the study.
• Supporting the research methodology : A literature review can inform the research methodology by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions.
• Providing a comprehensive overview of the literature : A literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a topic, allowing the researcher to identify key themes, debates, and areas of agreement or disagreement.
• Identifying potential research questions: A literature review can help to identify potential research questions and areas for further investigation.
• Avoiding duplication of research: A literature review can help to avoid duplication of research by identifying what has already been done on a topic, and what remains to be done.
• Enhancing the credibility of the research : A literature review helps to enhance the credibility of the research by demonstrating the researcher’s knowledge of the existing literature and their ability to situate their research within a broader context.

Limitations of Literature Review

Limitations of Literature Review are as follows:

• Limited scope : Literature reviews can only cover the existing literature on a particular topic, which may be limited in scope or depth.
• Publication bias : Literature reviews may be influenced by publication bias, which occurs when researchers are more likely to publish positive results than negative ones. This can lead to an incomplete or biased picture of the literature.
• Quality of sources : The quality of the literature reviewed can vary widely, and not all sources may be reliable or valid.
• Time-limited: Literature reviews can become quickly outdated as new research is published, making it difficult to keep up with the latest developments in a field.
• Subjective interpretation : Literature reviews can be subjective, and the interpretation of the findings can vary depending on the researcher’s perspective or bias.
• Lack of original data : Literature reviews do not generate new data, but rather rely on the analysis of existing studies.
• Risk of plagiarism: It is important to ensure that literature reviews do not inadvertently contain plagiarism, which can occur when researchers use the work of others without proper attribution.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Dissertation vs Thesis – Key Differences

Research Approach – Types Methods and Examples

Limitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Appendix in Research Paper – Examples and...

Theoretical Framework – Types, Examples and...

Research Summary – Structure, Examples and...

Literature Review Outline

Ai generator.

Literature Review. We all been there, especially those who are currently in high school or college. We get to review different types of literary pieces ranging from short stories , poem , and novels just to name a few. It can be confusing when you have a lot of ideas but you have no idea how to formulate them into one clean thought. It can also be quite frustrating if you have to start from the beginning or back to square one if you forgot a single part of the whole, but don’t worry, here are some literature review outline examples you can download to help you with your problems. Let’s check them out.

What is a Literature Review Outline?

A literature review outline is a structured framework that organizes and summarizes existing research on a specific topic. It helps identify key themes, gaps, and methodologies in the literature. The outline typically includes sections such as introduction, major themes, sub-themes, methodologies, and conclusions, facilitating a clear and comprehensive review of the literature.

Literature Review Format

A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. It includes a systematic examination of scholarly article , book , and other sources relevant to the research area. Here’s a guide to structuring a literature review effectively:

Introduction

• Explain the purpose of the literature review.
• Define the scope of the review – what is included and what is excluded.
• State the research question or objective .
• Provide context or background information necessary to understand the literature review.
• Highlight the significance of the topic.
• Organize the literature review by themes, trends, or methodological approaches rather than by individual sources.
• Use headings and subheadings to categorize different themes or topics.
• For each theme or section, summarize the key findings of the relevant literature.
• Highlight major theories, methodologies, and conclusions.
• Note any significant debates or controversies.
• Critically evaluate the sources.
• Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the existing research.
• Identify gaps or inconsistencies in the literature.
• Compare and contrast different sources.
• Synthesize the information to provide a coherent narrative.
• Show how the different studies are related to one another.
• Summarize the main findings from the literature review.
• Highlight the most important insights and their implications.
• Identify any gaps in the existing research that require further investigation.
• Suggest areas for future research.
• Discuss the overall significance of the literature review.
• Explain how it contributes to the field of study and the specific research question.
• List all the sources cited in the literature review.
• Follow the appropriate citation style (APA, MLA , Chicago, etc.) as required by your academic institution.

Research Literature Review Outline Example

I. Introduction Background Information: Provide context and background on the research topic. Explain the importance of the topic in the current research landscape. Purpose of the Review: State the main objectives of the literature review. Clarify the research questions or hypotheses guiding the review. Scope of the Review: Define the scope, including time frame, types of studies, and key themes. Explain any limitations or boundaries set for the review. II. Search Strategy Databases and Sources: List the databases and other sources used to find relevant literature. Keywords and Search Terms: Detail the specific keywords and search terms employed. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Describe the criteria for including or excluding studies. III. Theoretical Framework Relevant Theories: Introduce and explain the key theories and models related to the research topic. Application of Theories: Discuss how these theories provide a foundation for understanding the literature. IV. Review of Literature Thematic Organization: Organize the literature into themes or categories based on common findings or approaches. Example Structure: Theme 1: Impact of Rising Temperatures Summarize key studies and findings. Compare and contrast different research approaches. Theme 2: Changing Precipitation Patterns Highlight significant studies and their results. Discuss any conflicting findings or perspectives. Theme 3: Socioeconomic Factors Review literature focusing on socioeconomic impacts. Analyze how these factors interact with environmental changes. V. Critical Analysis Strengths and Weaknesses: Evaluate the strengths and limitations of the reviewed studies. Discuss the reliability and validity of the methodologies used. Methodological Critique: Assess the methodologies for potential biases and gaps. VI. Discussion and Synthesis Integration of Findings: Synthesize the findings from the literature into a cohesive narrative. Highlight common themes, trends, and gaps. Research Gaps: Identify areas where further research is needed. Suggest potential future research directions. VII. Conclusion Summary of Main Findings: Summarize the key insights and conclusions drawn from the literature review. Importance of the Topic: Reiterate the significance of the research topic. Implications for Future Research: Outline the implications of the findings for future research. VIII. References Citation List: Provide a complete list of all sources cited in the literature review. Follow a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago). IX. Appendices (if applicable) Supplementary Material: Include tables, charts, or detailed methodological information that supports the review but is too extensive for the main text.

Thematic Literature Review Outline Example

I. Introduction Background Information: Provide context and background on the research topic. Explain the importance of the topic in the current research landscape. Purpose of the Review: State the main objectives of the literature review. Clarify the research questions or hypotheses guiding the review. Scope of the Review: Define the scope, including time frame, types of studies, and key themes. Explain any limitations or boundaries set for the review. II. Search Strategy Databases and Sources: List the databases and other sources used to find relevant literature. Keywords and Search Terms: Detail the specific keywords and search terms employed. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Describe the criteria for including or excluding studies. III. Thematic Review of Literature Theme 1: Impact of Rising Temperatures Summary of Key Studies: Summarize the findings of major studies related to rising temperatures. Example: “Smith et al. (2020) found that increasing temperatures have led to a 5% decline in crop yields globally.” Comparison of Research Approaches: Compare different methodologies and approaches used in the studies. Example: “While Jones (2018) used a longitudinal study, Brown (2019) employed a cross-sectional analysis.” Theme 2: Changing Precipitation Patterns Summary of Key Studies: Highlight significant studies and their results. Example: “Lee and Wang (2021) reported that altered precipitation patterns have increased the frequency of droughts.” Discussion of Conflicting Findings: Discuss any contradictory findings or differing perspectives. Example: “Contrary to Lee and Wang, Garcia (2020) found minimal impact of precipitation changes on crop health.” Theme 3: Socioeconomic Factors Summary of Key Studies: Review literature focusing on the socioeconomic impacts of climate change. Example: “Davis (2017) highlighted the disproportionate effects on small-scale farmers.” Analysis of Interactions: Analyze how socioeconomic factors interact with environmental changes. Example: “Economic instability exacerbates the vulnerability to climate impacts (Green, 2018).” IV. Critical Analysis Strengths and Weaknesses: Evaluate the strengths and limitations of the reviewed studies. Example: “Many studies provide robust data but often lack consideration of regional variability.” Methodological Critique: Assess the methodologies for potential biases and gaps. Example: “There is a notable reliance on regional data, limiting the generalizability of findings.” V. Discussion and Synthesis Integration of Findings: Synthesize the findings from the literature into a cohesive narrative. Example: “The review indicates a clear trend of climate change negatively impacting agriculture, though the extent varies regionally.” Identification of Gaps: Identify areas where further research is needed. Example: “There is a gap in research on adaptive farming practices and their effectiveness.” VI. Conclusion Summary of Main Findings: Summarize the key insights and conclusions drawn from the literature review. Example: “Overall, rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns are significantly affecting agricultural productivity.” Importance of the Topic: Reiterate the significance of the research topic. Example: “Understanding these impacts is crucial for developing effective adaptation strategies.” Implications for Future Research: Outline the implications of the findings for future research. Example: “Future research should focus on adaptive measures to mitigate the adverse effects on agriculture.” VII. References Citation List: Provide a complete list of all sources cited in the literature review. Example: Smith, J. et al. (2020). Impact of Rising Temperatures on Global Crop Yields . Journal of Environmental Studies, 45(3), 234-250. Lee, S. & Wang, H. (2021). Precipitation Patterns and Drought Frequency . Climate Research Journal, 29(2), 98-115. VIII. Appendices (if applicable) Supplementary Material: Include tables, charts, or detailed methodological information that supports the review but is too extensive for the main text. Example: “Appendix A includes a table of regional crop yield changes from 2000 to 2020.”

Literature Review Outline Example in APA Format

1. Title Page Title of the Review Author’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Name and Number Instructor’s Name Due Date 2. Abstract Summary of the Literature Review Brief overview of the main points Research question or thesis Key findings Implications 3. Introduction Introduction to the Topic General introduction to the subject area Importance of the topic Purpose of the Review Specific objectives of the literature review Research Questions or Hypotheses Main research question(s) or hypotheses guiding the review Organization of the Review Brief outline of the structure of the literature review 4. Theoretical Framework Relevant Theories and Models Description of key theories and models relevant to the topic Application of Theories Explanation of how these theories are applied to the research problem 5. Review of the Literature Historical Context Background and historical development of the research topic Current Research Summary of recent studies and their findings Methodologies Used Overview of research methods used in the studies Themes and Patterns Common themes and patterns identified in the literature Contradictions and Gaps Conflicting findings and gaps in the literature 6. Critical Analysis Evaluation of Key Studies Critical analysis of the most influential studies Strengths and limitations of these studies Comparison of Different Approaches Comparative analysis of different perspectives and methodologies 7. Synthesis of Findings Integration of Theories and Results How the findings integrate with the theoretical framework Overall Trends Summary of the major trends in the literature Gaps in the Research Identification of gaps and areas for further research 8. Conclusion Summary of Main Findings Recap of the most significant findings from the review Implications for Future Research Suggestions for future research directions Practical Applications Implications for practice or policy 9. References Complete Citation of Sources Proper APA format for all sources cited in the literature review 10. Appendices (if necessary) Additional Material Any supplementary material such as tables, figures, or questionnaires

Literature Review Outline Templates & Samples in PDF

1. literature review template.

3. Literature Review Outline Template

6. Preliminary Outline of Literature Review

7. Literature Review Outline Example

8. Printable Literature Review Outline

Types of Literature Review

A literature review is an essential part of academic research, providing a comprehensive summary of previous studies on a particular topic. There are various types of literature reviews, each serving a different purpose and following a unique structure. Here, we explore the main types:

1. Narrative Review

A narrative review, also known as a traditional or descriptive review, provides a comprehensive synthesis of the existing literature on a specific topic. It focuses on summarizing and interpreting the findings rather than conducting a systematic analysis.

2. Systematic Review

A systematic review follows a rigorous and predefined methodology to collect, analyze, and synthesize all relevant studies on a particular research question. It aims to minimize bias and provide reliable findings.

3. Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis is a subset of systematic reviews that statistically combines the results of multiple studies to arrive at a single conclusion. It provides a higher level of evidence by increasing the sample size and improving the precision of the results.

4. Scoping Review

A scoping review aims to map the existing literature on a broad topic, identify key concepts, theories, and sources, and clarify research gaps. It is often used to determine the scope of future research.

5. Critical Review

A critical review evaluates the quality and validity of the existing literature, often questioning the methodology and findings. It provides a critical assessment and aims to present a deeper understanding of the topic.

6. Theoretical Review

A theoretical review focuses on analyzing and synthesizing theories related to a specific topic. It aims to understand how theories have evolved over time and how they can be applied to current research.

7. Integrative Review

An integrative review synthesizes research on a topic in a more holistic manner, combining perspectives from both qualitative and quantitative studies. It aims to generate new frameworks and perspectives.

8. Annotated Bibliography

An annotated bibliography provides a summary and evaluation of each source in a list of references. It includes a brief description of the content, relevance, and quality of each source.

9. Rapid Review

A rapid review streamlines the systematic review process to provide evidence in a timely manner. It is often used in healthcare and policy-making to inform decisions quickly.

10. Umbrella Review

An umbrella review, or overview of reviews, synthesizes the findings of multiple systematic reviews on a particular topic. It provides a high-level summary and identifies broader patterns and trends.

Purpose of a Literature Review

A literature review is a critical component of academic research, serving multiple important purposes. It provides a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge on a topic, helps identify research gaps, and sets the context for new research. Here are the key purposes of a literature review:

1. Summarizing Existing Research

A literature review summarizes and synthesizes the findings of previous studies related to a specific topic. This helps researchers understand what is already known and what remains to be explored.

2. Identifying Research Gaps

By reviewing existing literature, researchers can identify gaps or inconsistencies in the current knowledge. This allows them to pinpoint areas where further investigation is needed and justify the need for their research.

3. Providing Context and Background

A literature review sets the context for new research by providing background information. It helps readers understand the broader landscape of the topic and how the current study fits into it.

4. Establishing the Theoretical Framework

Literature reviews often involve discussing various theories and models relevant to the topic. This helps establish a theoretical framework for the research, guiding the study’s design and methodology.

5. Demonstrating Researcher Knowledge

Conducting a thorough literature review demonstrates that the researcher is knowledgeable about the field. It shows that they are aware of the key studies, debates, and trends in their area of research.

6. Justifying Research Questions and Methodology

A literature review helps justify the research questions and methodology of a study. By showing how previous studies were conducted and what their limitations were, researchers can argue for their chosen approach.

7. Avoiding Duplication

Reviewing existing literature ensures that researchers do not duplicate previous studies unnecessarily. It helps them build on existing work rather than repeating it.

8. Highlighting Key Findings and Trends

A literature review highlights significant findings and trends in the research area. This helps researchers understand the development of the field and identify influential studies and seminal works.

9. Informing Practice and Policy

In applied fields, literature reviews can inform practice and policy by summarizing evidence on what works and what doesn’t. This helps practitioners and policymakers make evidence-based decisions.

10. Facilitating a Comprehensive Understanding

Overall, a literature review facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the topic. It integrates various perspectives, findings, and approaches, providing a well-rounded view of the research area.

Components of a Literature Review

A well-structured literature review is essential for providing a clear and comprehensive overview of existing research on a particular topic. The following components are typically included in a literature review:

1. Introduction

The introduction sets the stage for the literature review. It provides background information on the topic, explains the review’s purpose, and outlines its scope.

Example: “Over the past decade, research on climate change’s impact on agriculture has proliferated. This literature review aims to synthesize these studies, focusing on the effects of rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns on crop yields.”

2. Search Strategy

The search strategy describes how the literature was identified. This includes the databases and search engines used, search terms and keywords, and any inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Example: “The literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and JSTOR. Keywords included ‘climate change,’ ‘agriculture,’ ‘crop yields,’ and ‘precipitation patterns.’ Studies published between 2000 and 2023 were included.”

3. Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework presents the theories and models relevant to the research topic. This section provides a foundation for understanding the studies reviewed.

Example: “This review utilizes the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework to analyze the impact of climate change on agricultural communities, focusing on how environmental changes affect economic stability and food security.”

4. Review of Literature

The core of the literature review, this section summarizes and synthesizes the findings of the selected studies. It is often organized thematically, chronologically, or methodologically.

Example: “Studies from the early 2000s focused on temperature changes, while recent research has shifted to examining precipitation patterns. Common findings include a general decline in crop yields, with significant regional variations.”

5. Critical Analysis

A critical analysis evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing research. This involves assessing the methodology, data, and conclusions of the studies reviewed.

Example: “Many studies used longitudinal data to track changes over time, but few incorporated socioeconomic factors. Additionally, the reliance on regional data limits the generalizability of some findings.”

6. Discussion and Synthesis

The discussion and synthesis section integrates the findings from the literature review, highlighting common themes, trends, and gaps. It connects the reviewed studies to the current research question.

Example: “The literature consistently shows that rising temperatures negatively affect crop yields. However, there is a gap in understanding the role of adaptive farming practices, suggesting a need for further research in this area.”

7. Conclusion

The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the literature review. It reiterates the importance of the research topic and outlines the implications for future research.

Example: “In summary, climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural productivity. Future research should focus on adaptive strategies to mitigate these effects and ensure food security.”

8. References

The references section lists all the sources cited in the literature review. It should follow a specific citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago.

• Smith, J. (2021). Climate Change and Crop Yields . Journal of Environmental Science, 12(3), 45-60.
• Brown, A., & Jones, B. (2019). Precipitation Patterns and Agriculture . Climate Research, 8(2), 34-48.

9. Appendices (if applicable)

Appendices may include supplementary material that is relevant to the literature review but would disrupt the flow of the main text. This could include tables, charts, or detailed methodological information.

Example: “Appendix A includes a table of regional crop yield changes from 2000 to 2020. Appendix B provides a detailed description of the data collection methods used in the reviewed studies.”

How to Write a Literature Review

Writing a literature review involves several steps to ensure that you provide a comprehensive, critical, and coherent summary of existing research on a specific topic. Here is a step-by-step guide to help you write an effective literature review:

1. Define Your Topic and Scope

• Identify your research question or thesis.
• Decide on the scope (broad topic or specific aspect, time frame, types of studies).

2. Conduct a Comprehensive Literature Search

• Identify key sources (use academic databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, JSTOR).
• Use relevant keywords to search for literature.
• Select relevant studies by reviewing abstracts.

3. Organize the Literature

• Group studies by themes (methodology, findings, theoretical perspective).
• Create an outline to structure your review.

4. Summarize and Synthesize the Literature

• Summarize key findings for each study.
• Synthesize information by comparing and contrasting studies.

5. Write the Literature Review

• Introduce the topic.
• Explain the purpose of the review.
• Outline the scope.
• Discuss literature thematically or chronologically.
• Present summaries and syntheses.
• Highlight patterns, contradictions, and gaps.
• Evaluate methodologies and findings.
• Discuss strengths and weaknesses of studies.
• Summarize main findings.
• Reiterate the importance of the topic.

6. Cite Your Sources

• Use a consistent citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago).

7. Review and Revise

• Proofread for grammatical errors and clarity.
• Revise for coherence and logical flow.

How do I start a literature review?

Begin by defining your research question and scope, then conduct a comprehensive search for relevant literature using academic databases.

What is the purpose of a theoretical framework?

It provides a foundation for understanding the literature and guides the analysis of existing studies.

How should I organize the literature review?

Organize it thematically, chronologically, or methodologically, depending on what best suits your research question.

How do I choose which studies to include?

Use inclusion and exclusion criteria based on relevance, publication date, and quality of the studies.

What is the difference between a thematic and chronological organization?

Thematic organization groups studies by topics or themes, while chronological organization arranges them by the date of publication.

How do I critically analyze the literature?

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study, assess methodologies, and discuss biases or gaps.

What should be included in the introduction?

Provide background information, state the purpose of the review, and outline its scope.

How can I synthesize findings from different studies?

Integrate the results to highlight common themes, trends, and gaps, providing a cohesive narrative.

Why are references important in a literature review?

References provide evidence for your review, ensure academic integrity, and allow readers to locate the original sources.

What role do appendices play in a literature review?

Appendices include supplementary material like tables or detailed methodologies that support the review but are too extensive for the main text.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Literature Review Introduction Example

T he literature review is an article that critically analyzes previously published works on a subject.

Thus, it is a review, not a report. The “Introduction” is crucial to writing. It should clarify the topic and prepare readers for the content. 

The beginning of a literature review sets the setting for reviewing the literature on your topic. This article explains how to write a literature review introduction and provides examples.

Table of Contents

Tips for writing an Introduction for a literature review

A well-crafted introduction for a literature review identifies the tone of your article and helps the reader realize the context and aims of your review.

The introduction should be informative and engaging enough to guide the reader through the complex landscape of existing research.

Let’s get familiar with important tips for writing a literature review introduction:

·         Start with a hook

begin with an engaging opening sentence that captures the reader’s attention on the article’s Topic.

You can use a thought-provoking question, a surprising fact, or a brief story in the literature review introduction. The goal is to make your introduction persuasive and relevant to your research.

After the starting sentence, which we call a hook, you need to provide some background information about the general subject area or field of study.

Explain why the Topic is important right now and relevant, and highlight any gaps or issues that your literature review will address.

·         Define the scope

Clearly define the scope of your literature review in the introduction part. Explain the specific aspects of the Topic or the research questions, which helps the reader understand what to expect and the boundaries of your review.

·         Give a brief & organized Literature.

You need to give a brief overview of how you’ve organized the literature review in the introduction. Reference the key themes, categories, or methods you will be using to categorize and analyze the reviewed sources.

·         Smoothly shift to the Main Body.

To end the literature review’s introduction more conveniently, you can summarize the key points that you will discuss in the subsequent sections and present an outline of the review’s structure. Or just simply state that you will explore the existing Literature in the next part.

·         Be Clear & Concise

To have the best intro, keep the literature review introduction concise and focused. Stay away from unnecessary jargon or overly complex language. The primary aim is to write a clear and engaging opening for the literature review.

·         Read, revise, and edit. Then do it again.

Finally, it is vital to revise and edit your introduction to confirm its clarity, coherence, and smooth flow of ideas. It should align with the overall tone and structure of your paper.

If you are still confused by all the tips, let’s make this clearer with some examples:

Literature review Introduction examples

It is better to explore some of the great examples in the literature review introductions and gain some ideas about how to start writing our own.

Look at the introduction below:

1.      The field of [Your Research Topic] has witnessed significant development over the past several decades. As researchers have delved into this subject, they have generated a vast body of Literature. This literature review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the key themes, concepts, and findings within [the article’s Topic].

2.      [Your Research Topic] is of particular interest due to its relevance and importance in [Explain the significance of the article’s Topic]. As society grapples with [Relevant issues or challenges], understanding the nuances of [Your Research Topic] is crucial for [Potential applications or solutions].

3.      This review is organized into several sections to offer a comprehensive overview of the existing Literature. First, we will explore the historical context and the evolution of [the article’s Topic]. We will then examine the main theories and frameworks that have shaped the field.

4.      The objective of this literature review is not only to provide a synthesis of current knowledge but also to identify areas where further research is needed. By offering an understanding of [Your Research Topic], this review aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse in the field and provide valuable insights for future investigations.

Read More: AI for Writing Scientific Papers

Final speech

As you embark on your writing process, consider the introduction as an opportunity to make a lasting first impression, setting the tone for the insightful knowledge and discovery that your literature review promises to be.

If you have any other points that will help other researchers write an introduction for a literature review, please mention them in the comments below.

The introduction sets the tone for the article and prepares readers for the content. It clarifies the topic and aims of the review, ensuring a strong start to the literature analysis.

The hook should be an engaging opening sentence that captures the reader’s attention. It can be a thought-provoking question, a surprising fact, or a brief story relevant to the research topic.

The introduction should start with a hook, provide background information, define the scope, give a brief overview of the literature, smoothly transition to the main body, and be clear and concise in presenting the key points.

Can We Use AI for Writing Scientific Papers?

Can you use “we” in a research paper, related articles.

How To Mention Corresponding Author in Paper?

What Is Article Number in Journal?

What Is Affiliation in Research Paper?

Independent researcher affiliation

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Next steps after introduction and literature review

Hi My topic about ''screaning of type2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes ''What should I do after I finish litreture review in the dessertaion ?

Thanks for your question! Here are some initial thoughts to get the conversation started.

After you finish your literature review, the next step is typically to outline and conduct your research methodology. This section will explain how you plan to carry out your research on screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes. You’ll need to detail the design of your study, the population you’ll be examining, the types of data you’ll collect, and the methods you’ll use to analyze that data.

Key things to consider:

• Research Design: Determine if you’ll use a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods approach.
• Population & Sample: Define the group you’ll be studying and how you’ll select your sample.
• Data Collection: Decide what data you need and how you’ll collect it (e.g., surveys, medical records, interviews).
• Data Analysis: Choose the methods you’ll use to analyze your data, such as statistical tests or thematic analysis.

Once your methodology is solid, you can move on to conducting your research and then writing up your findings.

Best of luck with your project!

PS - gc_helper is an AI-powered helper. If you’d like 1:1 assistance, check out Grad Coach’s award-winning coaching service @ 1-On-1 Dissertation Coaching & Thesis Coaching - Grad Coach

Thank you for your answer now I create my methodology What should I do after that in dessertation?

Related Topics

The good, the bad, and the ugly: how counterfeiting is addressed in operations and supply chain management literature

• Published: 28 June 2024

Cite this article

• Raul Beal Partyka   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7941-2152 1 ,
• Rafael Teixeira   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-6084 2 ,
• Roger Augusto Luna   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2827-4719 1 &
• Ely Laureano Paiva   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-0584 1  

This article aims to identify counterfeiting state-of-the-art and expand the Operations and Supply chain Management (OSCM) field from the identified gaps and bottlenecks to understand the real-life phenomenon and critically evaluate the existing body of knowledge. This is a systematic literature review from 63 relevant articles identified from Scopus and Web of Science. This is a reflection exercise to identify gaps and bottlenecks to subsidy research opportunities. Clearly, the strategies for combating counterfeiting could be more reactive or proactive, for example, reactive in the purchasing/co-opting offenders and proactive by blockchain adoption and marketing communication with tips to identify fake products. Therefore, the results also identified some central aspects related to the evolution of counterfeiting studies in the OSCM field and relevant gaps. We provide theoretical evidence that an interesting and broad field exists to expand from the identified gaps and bottlenecks. We also present up-to-date, state-of-the-art literature on all the aspects and facets of counterfeiting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Data availability

The author confirms that all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article, including the Supplementary File.

Agrawal TK, Koehl L, Campagne C (2018) A secured tag for implementation of traceability in textile and clothing supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2638-x

Article   Google Scholar  

Amaral NB (2020) What can be done to address luxury counterfeiting? An integrative review of tactics and strategies. J Brand Manage Palgrave Macmillan UK 27(6):691–709. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00206-6

Ames J, Souza DZ (2012) Counterfeiting of drugs in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 46(1):154–159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012005000005

Berman B (2008) Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Bus Horiz 51(3):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.01.002

Bian X, Moutinho L (2011) Counterfeits and branded products: effects of counterfeit ownership. J Prod Brand Manage 20(5):379–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111157900

Böhle C, Hellingrath B, Deuter P (2014) Towards process reference models for secure supply chains. J Transp Secur 7(3):255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-014-0142-6

Busby JS (2019) The co-evolution of competition and parasitism in the resource-based view: a risk model of product counterfeiting. Eur J Oper Res 276(1):300–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.039

Cataldo A, Grieco A, Prete A, Del, Cannazza G, Benedetto E, De (2016) Innovative method for traceability of hides throughout the leather manufacturing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8489-4

Cho SH, Fang X, Tayur S (2015) Combating strategic counterfeiters in licit and illicit supply chains. Manuf Service Oper Manage 17(3):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2015.0524

Choi TM, Feng L, Li R, Elsevier BV (2020) Vol. 221 No. July 2019, 107473, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.008

Cole R, Stevenson M, Aitken J (2019) Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Manage 24(4):469–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0309

Cordell VV, Wongtada N, Kieschnick RL Jr. (1996) Counterfeit purchase intentions: role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. J Bus Res 35(95):41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7

Crettez B, Hayek N, Zaccour G (2018) Brand imitation: A dynamic-game approach, International Journal of Production Economics , Vol. 205 No. November, pp. 139–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.010

Danese P, Mocellin R, Romano P (2021) Designing blockchain systems to prevent counterfeiting in wine supply chains: a multiple-case study. Int J Oper Prod Manage 41:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2019-0781

Durach CF, Kembro JH, Wieland A (2021) How to advance theory through literature reviews in logistics and supply chain management. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manage ahead–of–p(No ahead–of–print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2020-0381

Falasca M, Dellana S, Rowe WJ, Kros JF (2021) The impact of counterfeit risk management on healthcare supply chain performance: an empirical analysis. Int J Productivity Perform Manage. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2020-0426

Gao SY, Lim WS, Tang C (2017) The impact of the potential entry of copycats: Entry conditions, Consumer Welfare, and Social Welfare. Decis Sci 48(4):594–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12235

Garg P, Gupta B, Chauhan AK, Sivarajah U, Gupta S, Modgil S (2021) Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector, Technological Forecasting and Social Change , Elsevier Inc., Vol. 163 No. June 2020, p. 120407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120407

Ghadge A, Duck A, Er M, Caldwell N (2021) Deceptive counterfeit risk in global supply chains, Supply Chain Forum , Taylor & Francis, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 87–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1908844

Ghamat S, Pun H, Critchley G, Hou P (2021) Using intellectual property agreements in the presence of supplier and third-party copycatting, European Journal of Operational Research , Elsevier B.V., Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, 64 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C7, Canada, Vol. 291 No. 2, pp. 680–692, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.041

Gnezdova JV, Barilenko VI, Kozenkova TA, Chernyshev AV, Vasina NV (2018) evna. Food safety auditing in Russia in a climate of foreign sanctions and a policy of import substitution, Quality - Access to Success , Vol. 19 No. 167, pp. 155–158

Hoecht A, Trott P (2014) How should firms deal withcounterfeiting? A review of the success conditions of anti-counterfeiting strategies. Int J Emerg Markets 9(1):98–119

Itkis D, Daim T, Basoglu N (2009) Balancing efficiency and competitiveness in outsourcing decisions. Int J Serv Oper Manage 5(5):662–686. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2009.025120

Jaeger SR, Worch T, Phelps T, Jin D, Cardello AV (2021) Effects of ‘craft’ vs. ‘traditional’ labels to beer consumers with different flavor preferences: a comprehensive multi-response approach. Food Qual Prefer 87(No May 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104043

Jæger B, Menebo MM, Upadhyay A (2021) Identification of environmental supply chain bottlenecks: a case study of the Ethiopian healthcare supply chain. Manage Environ Quality: Int J 32(6):1233–1254. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0277

Kamenivskyy Y, Palisetti A, Hamze L, Saberi S (2022) A blockchain-based solution for COVID-19 vaccine distribution. IEEE Eng Manage Rev 50(1):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2022.3145656

Kasuma J, Noor NM, Abdurahman AZA, Sawangchai A, Jemari MA (2020) The influence of information susceptibility and normative susceptibility on counterfeit manufacturing products purchase intention. Int J Supply Chain Manage 9(2):234–239

Google Scholar  

Kros JF, Falasca M, Dellana S, Rowe WJ (2020) Mitigating counterfeit risk in the supply chain: an empirical study. TQM J 32(5):983–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2019-0054

Kumar S, Dieveney E, Dieveney A (2009) Reverse logistic process control measures for the pharmaceutical industry supply chain. Int J Productivity Perform Manage 58(2):188–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400910928761

Kwong KK, Yau OHM, Lee JSY, Sin LYM, Tse ACB (2003) The effects of Attitudinal and demographic factors on intention to Buy Pirated CDs: the case of Chinese consumers. J Bus Ethics 47(3):223–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026269003472

Leng J, Jiang P, Xu K, Liu Q, Zhao JL, Bian Y, Shi R (2019) Makerchain: a blockchain with chemical signature for self-organizing process in social manufacturing. J Clean Prod 234:767–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.265

Li Z, Xu X, Bai Q, Guan X, Zeng K (2021) The interplay between blockchain adoption and channel selection in combating counterfeits, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , Vol. 155 No. December 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102451

Lima FRP, Da de AL, Godinho Filho M, Dias EM (2018) Systematic review: resilience enablers to combat counterfeit medicines. Supply Chain Manage 23(2):117–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-04-2017-0155

Liu K, Li JA, Lai KK (2004) Single period, single product newsvendor model with random supply shock. Eur J Oper Res 158(3):609–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00382-5

Liu K, Li JA, Wu Y, Lai KK (2005) Analysis of monitoring and limiting of commercial cheating: a newsvendor model. J Oper Res Soc 56(7):844–854. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601913

Liu F, Liu K, Xie XL (2016) Monitoring and limiting deceptive counterfeiting: a two-stage model. J Oper Res Soc China 4(3):265–308. Operations Research Society of China10.1007/s40305-016-0130-6

Lohne J, Kjesbu NE, Engebø A, Young B, Lædre O (2019) Scoping Literature Review of Crime in the AEC industry. J Constr Eng Manag 145(6):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001648

Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A, d’Atri G, Forte M (2019) Blockchain-enabled supply chain: an experimental study. Computers Industrial Eng 136(No July):pp57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.026

Lu W, Jiang Y, Chen Z, Ji X (2022) Blockchain adoption in a supply chain system to combat counterfeiting, Computers and Industrial Engineering , Vol. 171 No. July, p. 108408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108408

Machado SM, Paiva EL, da Silva EM (2018) Counterfeiting: addressing mitigation and resilience in supply chains. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manage 48(2):139–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0004

Manchanda M, Deb M, Lomo-David E (2021) Scrutinizing the efficacy of branded apps quality to counter counterfeiting and restore trust in m-commerce, Quality Management Journal , Taylor & Francis, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 156–174, https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2021.1920869

Minchin RE, Cui S, Walters RC, Issa R, Pan J (2013) Sino-american opinions and perceptions of counterfeiting in the Construction Supply Chain. J Constr Eng Manag 139(1):1–8

Naderpajouh N, Hastak M, Gokhale S, Bayraktar ME, Iyer A, Arif F (2015) Counterfeiting risk governance in the Capital projects Supply Chain. J Constr Eng Manag 141(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000943

O’Leary DE (2017) Configuring blockchain architectures for transaction information in blockchain consortiums: the case of accounting and supply chain systems. Intell Syst Acc Finance Manage 24(4):138–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1417

OECD (2021) Global Trade in fakes: a worrying threat. OECD Publishing, Paris

Book   Google Scholar  

OECD (2022) Dangerous fakes: Trade in Counterfeit Goods that Pose Health, Safety and Environmental risks. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/117e352b-en

Pecht BM, Tiku S (2006) Bogus! IEEE Spectr 43(5):37–46

Pour PD, Nazzal MA, Darras BM (2022) The role of industry 4.0 technologies in overcoming pandemic challenges for the manufacturing sector. Concur Eng Res Appl 30(2):190–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X221082681

Pun H, Swaminathan JM, Hou P (2021) Blockchain Adoption for combating deceptive counterfeits. Prod Oper Manage 30(4):864–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13348

Qian Y (2008) Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. Quart J Econ 123(4):1577–1609. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1577

Qian Y, Gong Q, Chen Y (2015) Untangling searchable and experiential quality responses to counterfeits. Mark Sci 34(4):522–538. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0867

Rogerson M, Parry GC (2020) Blockchain: case studies in food supply chain visibility. Supply Chain Manage 25:601–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2019-0300

Sandborn M, Olea C, White J, Williams C, Tarazaga PA, Sturm L, Albakri M et al (2021) Towards secure cyber-physical information association for parts, Journal of Manufacturing Systems , Vol. 59 No. October 2020, pp. 27–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.003

Scuderi A, Foti V, Timpanaro G (2019) The supply chain value of pod and pgi food products through the application of blockchain. Qual - Access Success 20(S2):580–587

Şerbancea F, Stănescu A, Lazăr V (2018) Ethics in Knowledge Management. Food Saf Manage 19(167):159–165

Shen B, Xu X, Yuan Q (2020) Selling secondhand products through an online platform with blockchain, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , Elsevier, Vol. 142 No. August, p. 102066, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102066

Shen B, Cheng M, Dong C, Xiao Y (2023) Battling counterfeit masks during the COVID-19 outbreak: quality inspection vs. blockchain adoption. Int J Prod Res 61(11):3634–3650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1961038

Shi J, Zhou J, Zhu Q (2019) Barriers of a closed-loop cartridge remanufacturing supply chain for urban waste recovery governance in China. J Clean Prod 212:1544–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.114

Shultz CJ, Saporito B (1996) Protecting intellectual property: strategies and recommendations to Deter Counterfeiting and Brand Piracy in Global Markets. Columbia J World Bus 31(1):18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90003-4

Stevenson M, Busby J (2015) An exploratory analysis of counterfeiting strategies: towards counterfeit-resilient supply chains. Int J Oper Prod Manage 35(1):110–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2012-0174

Sun Z, Xu Q, Shi B (2022) Price and product quality decisions for a two-Echelon Supply Chain in the Blockchain era. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 39(1):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595921400169

Thaichon P, Quach S (2016) Dark motives-counterfeit purchase framework: Internal and external motives behind counterfeit purchase via digital platforms, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Elsevier, Vol. 33, pp. 82–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.003

Ting SL, Tsang AHC (2014) Using social network analysis to combat counterfeiting. Int J Prod Res 52:4456–4468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.861947

Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Urciuoli L (2010) Supply chain security-mitigation measures and a logistics multi-layered framework. J Transp Secur 3(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-009-0034-3

Urciuoli L, Paulraj A, Näslund D (2013) The role of the law enforcement agencies in transport security, a survey with Swedish operators. Logistics Res 6(4):145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-013-0102-8

Wagner L, Gürbüz M, Ҫagri, Parlar M (2019) Is it fake? Using potentially low quality suppliers as back-up when genuine suppliers are unavailable, International Journal of Production Economics , Vol. 213 No. August 2018, pp. 185–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.016

Wang L, Kowk SK, Ip WH (2012) A radio frequency identification-based quality evaluation system design for the wine industry. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 25(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.562542

Wang Y, Lin J, Choi TM (2020) Gray market and counterfeiting in supply chains: A review of the operations literature and implications to luxury industries, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , Vol. 133 No. November 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.101823

Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26(2):xiii–xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319

Whittemore R, Knafl K (2005) The integrative review: updated methodology, Journal of Advanced Nursing , John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Vol. 52 No. 5, pp. 546–553, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Wyld DC, Jones MA (2007) RFID is no fake: the adoption of radio frequency identification technology in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Int J Integr Supply Manage 3(2):156–171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2007.011974

Xie D, Zhu W, Zhao X, Xie J (2021) An experimental study on the sale of counterfeit products under monitoring policies, Journal of the Operational Research Society , Taylor & Francis, Vol. 72 No. 1, pp. 93–108, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1650623

Yi Z, Yu M, Cheung KL (2022) Impacts of counterfeiting on a global supply chain. Manuf Service Oper Manage 24(1):159–178. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0912

Zhang J, Zhang RQ (2015) Supply chain structure in a market with deceptive counterfeits. Eur J Oper Res 240(1):84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.041

Zhang J, Hong LJ, Zhang RQ (2012) Fighting strategies in a market with counterfeits. Ann Oper Res 192(1):49–66

Download references

This work was supported by the Coordination for the improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), foundations within The Brazilian Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Fundação Getulio Vargas’s Sao Paulo, School of Business Administration (FGV EAESP), 474 Itapeva St, 8th Floor, Bela Vista, São Paulo, 01332-000, SP, Brazil

Raul Beal Partyka, Roger Augusto Luna & Ely Laureano Paiva

Department of Supply Chain and Information Management, School of Business, College of Charleston, 66 George St, Beatty 334, Charleston, SC, 29424, USA

Rafael Teixeira

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Beal Partyka .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Partyka, R.B., Teixeira, R., Luna, R.A. et al. The good, the bad, and the ugly: how counterfeiting is addressed in operations and supply chain management literature. Manag Rev Q (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00453-w

Download citation

Received : 18 July 2023

Accepted : 19 June 2024

Published : 28 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00453-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Counterfeiting
• Operations management
• Supply chain management
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 27 June 2024

Optimization of electric charging infrastructure: integrated model for routing and charging coordination with power-aware operations

• Hamid R. Sayarshad 1  

npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport volume  1 , Article number:  4 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Energy and society
• Energy science and technology
• Engineering

With the increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs), optimizing charging operations has become imperative to ensure efficient and sustainable mobility. This study proposes an optimization model for the charging and routing of electric vehicles between Origin-Destination (OD) demands. The objective is to develop an efficient and reliable charging plan that ensures the successful completion of trips while considering the limited range and charging requirements of electric vehicles. This paper presents an integrated model for optimizing electric vehicle (EV) charging operations, considering additional factors of setup time, charging time, bidding price estimation, and power availability from three sources: the electricity grid, solar energy, and wind energy. One crucial aspect addressed by the model is the estimation of bidding prices for both day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets. The model also considers the total power availability from the electricity grid, solar energy, and wind energy. The alignment of charging operations with the capacity of the grid and prevailing bidding prices is essential.This ensures that the charging process is optimized and can effectively adapt to the available grid capacity and market conditions. The utilization of renewable energies led to a 42% decrease in the electricity storage capacity available in batteries at charging stations. Furthermore, this integration leads to a substantial cost reduction of approximately 69% compared to scenarios where renewable energy is not utilized. Hence, the proposed model can design renewable energy systems based on the required electricity capacity at charging stations. These findings highlight the compelling financial advantages associated with the adoption of sustainable power sources.

Similar content being viewed by others

A matched case-control analysis of autonomous vs human-driven vehicle accidents

Capturing carbon dioxide from air with charged-sorbents

Zn2+-mediated catalysis for fast-charging aqueous Zn-ion batteries

Introduction.

The widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) has ushered in a new era of sustainable transportation, addressing concerns about environmental impact and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. However, the transition to electric mobility brings with it the need for efficient and reliable charging infrastructure. By the end of 2022, the global number of public charging points reached 2.7 million, with over 900,000 installations taking place during that year. This signifies a notable growth of approximately 55% compared to the charging point stock in 2021 1 . While this represents a significant increase, it still falls short of meeting the growing demand for EV charging. The limited availability of charging stations poses a significant obstacle, leading to long waiting times and inconvenience for EV owners 2 . As EVs travel across a transportation network, the allocation of charging resources among multiple charging stations becomes crucial to ensure seamless charging accessibility.

EVs are gaining popularity as a sustainable and eco-friendly transportation option. The coupling of transportation and energy markets captures the interconnectedness between EV charging infrastructure and the energy market. Power-aware operations, on the other hand, involve managing power constraints to optimize the use of available electrical resources and provide efficient charging services for EVs. In the context of charging infrastructure, power-aware operations ensure that charging stations maximize the utilization of electricity resources while delivering reliable charging services. This involves considering factors such as power capacity, load balancing, and dynamic power scheduling to efficiently manage the charging process. Figure 1 depicts a charging station with battery storage, charging equipment, and EVs, all powered by the grid for sustainable and efficient charging.

Electric charging station.

Charging stations equipped with batteries offer a transformative solution to enhance grid efficiency and optimize EV charging operations. By participating in demand response programs, these stations can assist grid operators and utility companies in managing electricity demand during peak periods. The integrated batteries allow for load shifting, storing excess electricity during low-demand periods and releasing it during high-demand hours, reducing strain on the grid. Furthermore, by leveraging time-of-use (TOU) rates, charging stations can strategically charge their batteries during times of lower electricity prices and utilize the stored energy to charge EVs when rates are higher. This combination of demand response programs and TOU rates empowers charging stations to minimize costs and contribute to a more resilient, cost-effective, and sustainable electrical grid.

Renewable energy sources are often decentralized and can be integrated into the charging station infrastructure itself. This localization of generation reduces the need for long-distance power transmission and associated energy losses. By generating electricity closer to the point of consumption, charging stations powered by renewable energy can minimize transmission constraints and enhance overall system efficiency. The integration of renewable energy into charging operations allows for efficient utilization of available resources. During periods of high renewable energy generation, excess electricity can be directed towards charging electric vehicle batteries, effectively using surplus power that might otherwise go unused. Furthermore, renewable energy sources generally have lower operating costs compared to conventional fossil fuel-based generation. In this study, we investigate the influence of renewable energy sources, specifically wind turbines (WT) and photovoltaic (PV) systems, on the power grid. Our analysis focuses on examining the behavior and characteristics of WT and PV systems to gain insights into their impact on grid stability and charging operations at EV charging stations. By studying these factors, we aim to enhance our understanding of the implications associated with integrating renewable energy sources into the power grid. However, the widespread adoption of EVs faces several challenges, including the optimization and improvement of EV charging operations.

The current charging infrastructure for EVs faces several challenges that hinder its optimal performance. Range anxiety, a term used to describe the fear of running out of battery power before reaching a charging station, is a prominent concern among both current EV owners and potential buyers. According to a survey conducted by the American Automobile Association in the United States 3 , 58% of respondents identified range anxiety as a significant deterrent to purchasing an electric vehicle. Similarly, according to a survey by the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association 4 , 51% of potential EV buyers in Europe are concerned about the driving range and availability of charging infrastructure. This anxiety arises from the perceived limitations in EV driving range when compared to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles, as well as the necessity for accessible and dependable charging infrastructure. The apprehension surrounding range anxiety underscores the importance of expanding charging networks and enhancing EV battery technology to alleviate concerns and promote wider EV adoption.

The time required to charge an electric vehicle is another challenge. While EV charging technology has improved, it still takes significantly longer to charge an EV compared to charging a conventional vehicle with gasoline or diesel. Fast-charging stations can partially alleviate this issue, but their availability is limited. According to a study by the European Commission 5 , 6 , the average charging time for an EV can range from 30 minutes to several hours, depending on the charging station’s power output. However, fast-charging stations can significantly reduce charging time. For example, Tesla’s Supercharger network can provide up to 170 miles of range in just 30 min 7 . In addition to traditional charging methods, there are other faster charging methods, such as swapping, that are also considered in the context of electric vehicle charging. In a study by 8 , the optimization of the charging process at battery swapping stations is explored. The research specifically investigates the significance of a non-myopic routing policy for electric taxis, considering factors such as the limited battery capacity and customer delay.

Charging demands can vary greatly depending on factors such as the time of day, day of the week, and location. This variability makes it difficult for charging infrastructure providers to accurately anticipate and meet the charging needs of EV owners. Consequently, charging stations may experience periods of high demand where they are overwhelmed, leading to long wait times and inconvenience for EV owners. Conversely, during periods of low demand, charging stations may remain underutilized, resulting in wasted resources and inefficient operation. We develop a model that accurately estimates electric charging demands by integrating a charging plan and routing problem. By integrating these two components, the model can effectively determine the charging requirements of electric vehicles.

According to a report by the 9 , the number of EVs in Europe could reach 44 million by 2030, resulting in an additional electricity demand of 15%. The increased demand for electricity from charging stations, including those powered by renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, can strain the existing power grid infrastructure. Simultaneous charging of multiple EVs in a localized area can lead to peak demand that surpasses the grid’s capacity, potentially causing power outages or grid instability. Therefore, the integration of EV charging with smart grid technologies and load management strategies becomes crucial to balance power demand and ensure the stable operation of the electricity grid.

Ensuring an adequate power supply to meet the charging demands of multiple stations simultaneously can be challenging, particularly in areas with inadequate electrical infrastructure. The limited availability of charging resources constrains the charging infrastructure’s capacity to efficiently meet the growing demands of EV owners. However, our innovative approach addresses this challenge by considering the remaining energy between origin-destination (OD) demands, while also taking advantage of renewable energy sources. By precisely calculating and efficiently allocating charging resources, including those from renewable energy such as wind and solar, our approach significantly enhances the effectiveness of the charging infrastructure. This enables electric vehicles to seamlessly meet their energy requirements throughout their journeys, contributing to a sustainable and reliable transportation ecosystem.

The costs associated with electricity procurement and operational expenses further compound the challenges faced by charging stations. Electricity costs can vary depending on market dynamics, and procuring electricity at competitive rates while ensuring a reliable supply can be a complex task. These financial hurdles impact the profitability and long-term sustainability of charging stations, making it crucial to optimize resource allocation and minimize costs. The proposed model enables strategic decision-making through its bidding strategy formulation. By determining the optimal quantity of electricity to bid and the corresponding bidding price in the day-ahead market, charging stations can minimize their costs while meeting the power requirements of the stations. The model also incorporates real-time pricing adjustments in the intra-day market, allowing charging stations to adapt to changing market conditions and optimize their financial outcomes.

In response to these challenges, we develop an optimization model that determines the optimal allocation of charging resources among the charging stations. This model would consider factors such as the estimated power needed for each charging station based on the charging requirements of the EVs at each OD demand, the available battery capacities of the charging stations, and the charge efficiency. The model aims to minimize costs associated with electricity procurement and operational expenses while meeting the estimated power needs of each charging station. The following section outlines our significant contributions to electric charging features.

We integrate an optimization model that combines charging and routing plans with the electricity market, aiming to minimize social costs for both users and charging providers.

We concentrate on estimating the charging demands of electric vehicles at charging stations and evaluating the overall power grid requirements necessary to efficiently meet these demands.

We integrate renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, into the charging infrastructure, optimizing their utilization based on availability and variability to create a more sustainable and environmentally friendly charging ecosystem.

We consider the bidding strategy of charging stations in both the day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets, optimizing the quantity of electricity to bid and corresponding bidding prices based on estimated power needs and real-time pricing. Our goal is to dynamically adjust the bidding prices to optimize financial outcomes while meeting the power needs of the stations.

This model actively monitors the state of charge (SOC) of the charging station batteries, optimizing energy storage system utilization and ensuring a reliable power supply for vehicle charging.

This study considers additional operational factors associated with charging stations, such as the total setup time at each station, the charging time, and the state of charge for the battery.

The proposed study introduced a novel model that simultaneously considers both user-centric and charging provider-centric aspects. This novel approach takes into account the needs and preferences of EV users as well as the operational requirements and constraints of charging providers. By integrating these dual perspectives, the model provides a comprehensive and balanced solution for optimizing charging operations. This unique approach enhances the overall user experience while ensuring the efficiency and sustainability of charging operations. The consideration of both user-centric and charging provider-centric aspects sets this model apart from previous studies, making it a pioneering contribution to the field of EV charging optimization.

The optimization model that was proposed in this study focused on addressing the challenges associated with charging and routing EVs. One of the key considerations was the limited range of EVs and their specific charging requirements. The objective of the model was to optimize the charging plan by strategically planning charging operations to ensure that EVs could successfully complete their trips without running out of battery power. To capture the complexity of EV charging operations, the model took into account various factors. These factors included setup time, which considered the time required to prepare the charging station for the arrival of an EV, and charging time, which reflected the time needed to charge the vehicle’s battery to the desired level.

A critical aspect of the model was the estimation of bidding prices for both day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets. By estimating these prices, the system was able to make informed decisions regarding electricity procurement, optimizing the cost of charging EVs at the charging stations. This estimation also considered the varying prices associated with different energy sources, allowing the model to select the most cost-effective option for charging. Furthermore, the model incorporated the total power availability from three sources: the electricity grid, solar energy, and wind energy. This consideration was essential for aligning the charging operations with the capacity of the grid and the prevailing bidding prices. By incorporating this information, the model ensured that the charging plan optimally utilized the available power resources from all three sources, avoiding overloading the grid and promoting efficient and cost-effective charging operations. The proposed optimization model not only focused on efficiency but also emphasized sustainability. By maximizing the use of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind energy, the model contributed to the overall goal of reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable transportation.

Our analysis showed that integrating renewable energy sources into electric vehicle charging infrastructure brings significant advantages. By leveraging renewable energy, we observed a notable reduction in electricity demand for charging batteries at charging stations, with a substantial decrease of up to 42% at charging stations. Additionally, the integration of renewable energy resulted in a significant cost reduction of approximately 69% compared to scenarios without renewable energy. These findings highlight the tangible benefits of utilizing sustainable power, including reduced reliance on non-renewable energy and substantial cost savings. Furthermore, strategically aligning charging sessions with periods of high renewable energy generation enabled optimal utilization of renewable sources, minimizing the need for energy storage or grid reliance. Overall, these results emphasized the potential of renewable energy integration in advancing sustainable transportation practices and contributing to sector-wide decarbonization.

Literature review

Existing literature in the field of charging infrastructure planning often adopts either a user-centric or charging provider-centric approach. User-centric studies prioritize minimizing the distance traveled or time spent on charging operations from the perspective of electric vehicle users. These studies aim to optimize the charging experience for individual users, focusing on factors such as charging station availability, proximity, and convenience. However, user-centric approaches may not fully consider the impact on infrastructure and overall system efficiency. In contrast, charging provider-centric approaches concentrate on optimizing the operations of charging stations. These studies aim to minimize operational costs and ensure efficient service provision. However, charging provider-centric approaches may overlook user preferences and the overall charging experience.

To bridge this gap, our proposed method aims to consider both user-centric and charging provider-centric aspects simultaneously. By embracing a comprehensive approach, we can optimize the charging infrastructure planning process to benefit both electric vehicle users and charging providers. This approach takes into account user preferences, such as minimizing travel distance and charging time, while also considering the efficient utilization of charging infrastructure resources and the overall system efficiency. By integrating both perspectives, our proposed method can provide a more comprehensive and balanced approach to charging infrastructure planning. It ensures that the needs and preferences of electric vehicle users are met while also optimizing the operations and efficiency of charging stations. This integrated approach contributes to the development of a charging infrastructure network that is user-friendly, cost-effective, and sustainable.

Charging and routing problem

This section aims to explore the existing research on charging plans and routing problems for electric vehicles, highlighting the strategies and solutions proposed in the literature. Efficient routing of EVs involves identifying the most suitable charging stations along the route. Studies have proposed approaches that consider the routing challenges specific to electric vehicles, considering their limited driving range and the need for charging stops. For example 10 , introduced a dynamic routing approach for electric taxis using a Markov decision process (MDP) that considers limited battery capacity, battery swapping stations, customer delay, and system cost 11 . proposed a dynamic routing and pricing problem under a mixed fleet of electric and conventional vehicles. A comprehensive examination of the latest advancements in mathematical modeling-based literature on EV operations management is presented in 12 .

Optimally deploying public charging stations plays a vital role in facilitating convenient and efficient travel for EV drivers. This deployment strategy enables drivers to make spontaneous adjustments and interact with their travel and recharging decisions. Additionally, it helps maintain multi-class tour-based network equilibrium conditions, ensuring a balanced and sustainable transportation system for EV users 13 . Real-time traffic conditions and the availability of charging stations can significantly impact route planning for EVs. Researchers have explored techniques that integrate real-time traffic data and charging station availability information into routing algorithms. These approaches aim to optimize the route considering both traffic congestion and charging station availability to minimize travel time and charging delays 14 . proposed routing and charging plans for alternative fuel vehicles that aim to minimize travel time 15 . introduced an adaptive charging and routing strategy that reduces waiting times at charging stations by considering driving, waiting, and charging time 16 . investigated a route planning and charging navigation strategy based on real-time traffic information and grid information, optimizing driving and charging paths to minimize travel time and charging station load 17 . considered an EV route selection and charging navigation optimization model that utilizes crowd sensing for road velocity estimation and addresses waiting time at charging stations.

The optimal location of charging stations is a key research area within the field of electric vehicle infrastructure planning. Many papers and studies specifically address this topic with the aim of determining the most efficient and effective locations for charging stations 18 . determined the optimal number and locations of fast-charging stations for range-limited alternative fuel vehicles, considering both cost minimization and maximum coverage objectives 13 . investigated the optimal placement of public charging stations for electric vehicles within a road network, taking into account the dynamic nature of drivers’ travel and recharging decisions and their spontaneous adjustments and interactions.

Range anxiety refers to the fear of running out of battery power before reaching the destination. Researchers have developed routing algorithms that consider both the available charging infrastructure and the energy consumption characteristics of EVs. These algorithms aim to optimize the route selection to minimize energy consumption while ensuring that the vehicle reaches its destination without depleting the battery 19 . addressed the battery charging station location problem by considering users’ range anxiety and distance deviations, two key barriers to EV mass adoption 20 . focused on the optimal location of charging stations in a specific neighborhood, optimizing demand coverage and station capacity 21 . investigated the optimal locations of wireless charging facilities, incorporating traffic flow patterns and user equilibrium principles. These papers provide insights into the strategic allocation and placement of charging stations to alleviate range anxiety and optimize EV infrastructure planning.

Electricity market

A range of studies have explored the use of stochastic operational models for controlling EV charging to provide frequency regulation 22 . and 23 proposed two-stage stochastic problems to optimize the charging of EVs. They also co-optimized the utilization of distributed energy resources 24 . further enhanced this approach by applying stochastic dynamic programming to the optimization of charging and frequency regulation capacity bids 25 . extended this work by considering the management of EV loads to mitigate renewable generation intermittency and distribution network congestion, using a hierarchical decision-making methodology. These studies collectively highlight the potential of stochastic operational models in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of EV charging for frequency regulation.

In the electricity market, charging station operators can participate in bidding processes to procure electricity at competitive prices. A range of studies have explored the optimization of bidding strategies for charging station operators in the electricity market. These studies emphasize the importance of considering factors such as electricity prices, charging demand, and station capacity in these strategies. Specifically, probabilistic estimates of demand and competitor behavior have been highlighted as crucial aspects 26 , 27 . The role of Electric Vehicle Aggregators (EVAs) has also been investigated in this context 28 . proposed a power price control strategy for the charging of electric vehicles, which involves centrally managing the batteries of electric vehicles and adjusting the demand for charging through electricity price control. Effective bidding strategies can help charging station operators secure electricity supply at favorable prices, reducing operational costs and maximizing revenue 29 . introduced a stochastic linear programming model to construct piecewise linear bidding curves. This model aimed to address the uncertainty and variability present in bidding scenarios by incorporating stochastic elements into the bidding curve construction process. The study conducted by 30 proposes a grid-connected charging station that operates as a price-taker and provides multiple products. To facilitate coordinated bidding for this station, a two-stage stochastic program is developed.

The optimal bidding strategy for EV aggregators in day-ahead markets is a key area of research, with various studies exploring different aspects of this strategy 31 . introduced the concept of two agent modes, the centralized protocol management mode (CPMM) and the decentralized demand response mode (DDRM), and developed a stochastic optimization model to maximize the expected profits of the EV aggregator 32 . focused on the problem of an aggregator bidding into the day-ahead electricity market, with the former proposing a strategy to minimize charging costs while satisfying the flexible demand for plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). Both studies highlight the potential cost reductions and the importance of flexible charging.

This study proposes a novel approach that combines charging plans, routing optimization, and the electricity market to determine the optimal charging demand for EVs while minimizing social costs for both users and charging providers. Traditional studies in the literature have predominantly focused on either user preferences, such as minimizing distance or minimizing charging operations at charging stations. However, our approach takes a comprehensive perspective by integrating these two objectives into a unified framework. By leveraging the electricity market, we enable the purchase of the total power grid capacity necessary to fulfill the charging demands of EVs, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective solution. We optimize the routing and charging plans for electric vehicles considering the remaining energy levels between origin-destination (OD) demands. By taking into account the current energy levels of electric vehicles, the proposed model can plan efficient routes and determine when and where charging is necessary. This approach helps minimize unnecessary charging stops and ensures that vehicles reach their destinations without running out of charge. Bidding prices for EV charging stations can be estimated by incorporating actual charging demands at charging stations and estimating the power needed for charging stations based on the power requirements for charging vehicles. Accurately predicting bidding prices through market analysis enables charging infrastructure operators to set competitive prices, efficiently allocate energy resources, and minimize costs.

The proposed optimization model for EV charging operations had significant impacts on real charging stations, benefiting both users and charging providers. By integrating charging and routing plans with the electricity market, the model aimed to minimize social costs, resulting in more efficient and sustainable mobility. One notable contribution was the accurate estimation of charging demands at stations and evaluation of power grid requirements, ensuring successful trip completion and an optimized charging plan considering EV range and requirements.

The model also considered the total power availability from the electricity grid, aligning charging operations with the grid capacity to prevent overloading and maintain stability. Load balancing was also addressed by optimizing the distribution of charging loads across different stations, reducing peak demand periods, and avoiding strain on the grid. The model actively monitored the state of charge (SOC) of charging station batteries, optimizing the utilization of energy storage systems to ensure a reliable power supply for vehicle charging. Effective battery SOC management helped mitigate the impact of fluctuating power demands and provided a stable charging experience for EV users.

The model was enhanced by incorporating renewable energy sources such as wind turbines and photovoltaic cells into the charging stations, thereby promoting environmentally friendly charging operations and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. This integration of renewable energy aligns to establish a sustainable and low-carbon transportation system. Additionally, when estimating the PV and wind energy, capacity factors are taken into account. Capacity factors assess the actual energy output of a renewable energy system relative to its maximum potential output, accounting for factors such as weather conditions and system efficiency. By considering these capacity factors, a more precise estimation of energy production from PV and wind systems can be achieved, facilitating improved planning and utilization of renewable energy resources at electric charging stations.

The model incorporated a dynamic bidding strategy for charging stations in both the day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets. This allowed charging providers to adjust their bidding prices based on real-time pricing and estimated power needs, minimizing costs while meeting station power demands. By integrating bidding prices and optimizing charging plans, the model promoted cost-effective charging operations. It considered estimated power needs, real-time pricing, and available power resources, enabling charging providers to make informed decisions on electricity procurement. This optimization made charging EVs at stations economically viable and cost-effective for providers and users alike.

This model offers capabilities for analyzing factors such as remaining battery charge, distance to be traveled, and the availability of charging infrastructure, making it useful for both autonomous vehicles (AVs) and AV charging stations. It can provide recommendations for the most suitable charging station based on proximity, charging speed, and compatible connectors, as well as estimate the required charging duration or energy capacity considering variables such as battery capacity, energy consumption rate, and planned routes. By utilizing these features, the model can contribute to efficient AV charging and operation, ensuring optimal access to charging infrastructure and enhancing the overall charging experience.

Future research directions in electric vehicle charging infrastructure can explore an integrated model that accommodates both electric and hydrogen vehicles, considering the unique requirements of hydrogen fueling stations. This research should focus on hydrogen storage, dispensing technologies, and safety considerations. Advancements in vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology, coupled with the ability to sell surplus energy to the grid during high-demand hours, offer numerous benefits to electric vehicle (EV) users, charging stations, and grid stability. Furthermore, as the frequency of disaster events such as wildfires 33 , cyber attacks 34 , and earthquakes 35 has risen in recent years, harnessing surplus energy during these critical periods can significantly enhance overall grid stability and resilience. These research directions have been actively explored in future studies. Moreover, the government’s role in providing incentives for renewable energy integration and electric vehicle adoption, including financial support and streamlined processes, should be further investigated 36 , 37 . Developing efficient algorithms to address variable charging demands for commercial purposes and integrating real-time traffic data into charging infrastructure planning models are also crucial areas for future exploration 38 , 39 . Lastly, in the current model, energy consumption is estimated by converting distance, but it can be enhanced by incorporating an energy consumption function to more accurately estimate the state of charge for electric vehicles between their origin-destination demands.

The proposed framework

Efficient charging infrastructure and operations are crucial to ensure the seamless integration of EVs into the existing transportation system. Figure 2 presents a system designed to improve the optimization of EV charging operations. The proposed model incorporates routing decisions and charging plans for all origin-destination (OD) demands within the transportation network, aiming to enhance the efficiency and convenience of EV charging operations. By considering the remaining energy levels of EVs and accurately estimating the total charging demands of charging stations, the model ensures that EVs are directed to the most suitable charging stations along their routes. This optimization process minimizes travel distance and alleviates anxiety for travelers by providing a reliable and accessible charging infrastructure throughout their journeys. Moreover, the model incorporates setup time and charging time at charging stations to provide a more precise estimation of the overall charging time needed for each EV.

The proposed framework of electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning.

The power sources in the electric charging station are depicted in Fig. 2 by the dashed red line, representing the combination of power grid and renewable energy. Combining renewable energy sources like solar and wind power in electric vehicle charging stations offers a holistic solution. By integrating wind turbines and photovoltaic (PV) cells, these stations can access a reliable and steady energy supply, capitalizing on the synergistic generation profiles of wind and solar power. This synergistic approach optimizes energy generation, effectively utilizing available space, ensuring resilience in diverse weather conditions, enabling load balancing, and facilitating the storage or sale of surplus energy. Incorporating both wind and solar power not only promotes sustainability and decreases carbon emissions but also enhances the public perception of the charging station as a pioneering entity that embraces clean energy for transportation systems.

In the electricity market, suppliers, such as power plants, submit bids indicating the amount of electricity they are willing to supply at various price levels. These bids are typically based on the production costs of the suppliers. The proposed model incorporates an economic perspective by addressing the cost aspect of EV charging operations. It achieves this by considering bidding prices in day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets. By accurately estimating the prices for purchasing electricity at charging stations, the model enables the optimization of charging costs and enhances the efficient utilization of available resources. This advanced approach empowers charging station operators to make well-informed decisions regarding the procurement of electricity. By considering market dynamics and pricing fluctuations, the model assists operators in balancing the cost-effectiveness of charging operations. By providing accurate estimations of bidding prices, the model contributes to the overall cost optimization of EV charging, delivering advantages to both charging station operators and EV owners. With the utilization of these economic insights, stakeholders can enhance the efficiency of their charging operations, minimize expenses, and advance sustainable transportation practices. The model not only supports the growth of the EV market but also facilitates the integration of electric vehicles into the existing energy market ecosystem.

During the bidding process for each hour, a collection of points known as scenarios is utilized on a bidding curve. These scenarios correspond to specific bid prices and bid volumes, providing a comprehensive representation of the various pricing and quantity options offered by suppliers. However, due to the non-linear nature of the formulation resulting from selecting both bid prices and volumes, an approach is taken to linearize the problem. To achieve linearity, the bid prices are treated as fixed exogenous parameters, while the bid volumes are modeled as decision variables. The bidding curve is constructed by interpolating linearly between adjacent price-volume pairs, resulting in a piece-wise linear curve that represents the bids. This linearization simplifies the problem while still capturing the essential characteristics of the bidding process.

Figure 3 depicts a bidding curve characterized by three line segments, serving as an illustrative example. The bidding curve is typically depicted graphically, with the price plotted on the vertical axis and the quantity on the horizontal axis. Each point on the curve represents a specific price-quantity combination that a supplier is willing to offer. The shape of the curve reflects the supply-side behavior and competitiveness of the market. Equation ( 1 ) and Equation ( 2 ) represent the bidding curve using different variables. Equation ( 1 ) expresses the curve in terms of prices, while Equation ( 2 ) expresses it in terms of volumes.

Electricity market bidding curve.

Furthermore, the proposed model takes into account the state of charging for batteries at the charging stations through the consideration of charging and discharging functions. Installing backup power systems, such as batteries, can enable charging stations to continue operating during power outages. These systems can provide electricity to the charging infrastructure, ensuring that electric vehicles can still be charged even when the grid is down. It’s important to properly size and maintain backup power systems to ensure they have sufficient capacity and reliability. By continuously monitoring the charging levels and managing the flow of electricity, the model ensures that the charging stations operate within their capacity limits and prioritize the needs of EVs. This functionality optimizes the charging process, avoiding overloading of the charging infrastructure and maintaining a reliable and stable charging experience for EV owners. The model’s ability to regulate the state of charging at charging stations contributes to the overall efficiency and effectiveness of EV charging operations, enhancing the charging experience and promoting widespread EV adoption. The proposed model aims to generate a set of outputs that collectively contribute to the optimization and improvement of EV charging operations. The outputs derived from the proposed model encompass:

The model provides optimized routing decisions for EVs, considering factors such as travel costs, charging station availability, and energy consumption. By optimizing the routes, EVs can reach their destinations efficiently while minimizing energy consumption and charging requirements.

The model generates charging plans that determine when and where EVs should charge along their travel routes. By considering the OD demands, the model ensures that there are sufficient charging stations available to meet the charging needs of EVs throughout their journeys.

The model takes into account the remaining energy levels of EVs and considers them in the routing and charging decisions. By factoring in the remaining energy, the model aims to reduce traveler anxiety by ensuring that EVs have adequate energy reserves to reach their destinations and avoid running out of charge.

The model optimizes the charging demands for charging stations by considering factors such as charging station capacities, electricity grid constraints, and EV charging requirements. This optimization helps in efficiently utilizing the charging infrastructure and minimizing charging congestion.

The model considers the availability and variability of renewable energy sources. By optimizing the utilization of these sources, it helps stabilize the power grid. The intermittent nature of renewable energy can be managed by smart charging systems that can adjust charging rates based on the availability of renewable energy, reducing grid stress and balancing electricity supply and demand.

Efficient battery management is crucial for optimizing the operation of charging stations. The proposed model facilitates the effective utilization of battery resources by optimizing the charging and discharging functions at charging stations. It considers factors such as station capacity, battery state monitoring, grid integration, energy pricing, and battery health to ensure the efficient utilization of resources, support grid stability, minimize operational costs, and promote the longevity of batteries.

The model considers bidding prices for electricity markets to make informed procurement decisions regarding the purchase of electricity for charging operations. By considering market prices, the model aims to optimize the cost-effectiveness of EV charging while ensuring reliable and sustainable energy supply.

By generating these outputs, the proposed model aims to contribute to the optimization and improvement of EV charging operations. This, in turn, promotes the adoption of electric vehicles, fosters the transition to a sustainable transportation system, and helps overcome the challenges associated with the integration of EVs into the existing infrastructure.

Optimal integration model for electric charging stations

In this section, we present an optimization model for electric vehicle charging stations that takes into account renewable energy sources such as photovoltaic (PV) cells and wind turbines. Then, we explore incorporating these renewable energy sources into the proposed model, allowing for a more sustainable and efficient charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Integrating an optimization model that combines charging and routing plans with the electricity market can indeed help minimize social costs for both users and charging providers. This integrated model can effectively optimize charging and routing plans by considering various factors such as vehicle range, charging infrastructure availability, electricity prices, and user preferences, leading to cost savings and improved efficiency. The model incorporates several factors associated with the value of time, such as travel cost, setup time at the station, and charging duration. By considering these factors, the model provides an accurate assessment of the overall time-related costs involved in charging at a charging station.

The first element of the objective function incorporates the expenditure associated with purchasing electricity from both the day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets. We incorporate scenarios that are generated using probability distributions for bid prices. This approach allows us to explore a range of potential situations that could occur during a bidding process. Rather than relying on a singular fixed bid price, we consider the probabilities associated with different bid prices, thereby taking into account the likelihood of various bid prices arising. The second component denotes the travel time from point O to point D, assuming a consistent speed. The third component of the objective function accounts for the cumulative time spent on setup at each station. The last component corresponds to the duration of charging at the station. The notations used in the proposed framework are provided in Table 1 .

Constraints ( 4 ) and ( 5 ) in this context serve as a condition related to the inclusion of a specific arc (i, j) in the path. When the decision variable x i j t k v (representing the inclusion of arc ( i ,  j ) in the path) is equal to 1, it means that the arc is indeed included in the path. In this scenario, constraint ( 4 ) becomes active and imposes a requirement on the variables a j t k v , a i t k v , b i t k v , and d i j 14 .

On the other hand, if x i j t k v is equal to 0, indicating that the arc ( i ,  j ) is not included in the path, constraints ( 4 ) and ( 5 ) become redundant. In this case, it does not contribute any additional information or place any additional constraints on the variables. It effectively becomes inactive and does not affect the optimization problem 14 .

Constraints ( 6 ), ( 7 ), and ( 8 ) play a vital role in maintaining the flow balance equation within the transportation network problem. Constraint ( 6 ) ensures that the flow of electric vehicles into the set of source nodes \(O\left(k\right)\) is equal to the flow out of it, while

Constraint ( 7 ) extends this requirement to all intermediate nodes, ensuring that the flow into and out of each intermediate node is balanced.

Constraint ( 8 ) ensures a similar balance for the set of destination nodes \(D\left(k\right)\) , enabling the network to maintain flow balance and integrity while designating the set \(O\left(k\right)\) as source nodes, nodes in \(D\left(k\right)\) as destination nodes, and the remaining nodes as intermediaries. This structural enforcement preserves the network’s functionality and integrity.

Constraint ( 9 ) specifies that the charging amount at node i should not exceed the charging capacity ( δ ) minus the remaining charge level at that node.

Constraint ( 10 ) states that the charging amount at node i is the difference between the charging capacity and the charge adjustment at that node. To prevent overcharging beyond the available capacity of the battery, a parameter r i t k v is used to calibrate the amount of charge replenished at a site. This is achieved by satisfying the inequality δ y i t k v  −  r i t k v  ≤  δ  −  a i t k v (where b i t k v in Constraint ( 9 ) is replaced by δ y i t k v  −  r i t k v in Constraint ( 10 )). Ideally, the desired formula would be δ y i t k v L  ≤  δ  −  a i t k v , where L is a recharging coefficient ranging of 0-1, based on the available capacity of the battery at each stop. The recharging coefficient regulates the amount of charge replenished at a specific site. However, solving this nonlinear equation is currently challenging. Therefore, we introduce a linear formula with an adjustment variable r i t k v to approximate the desired behavior 18 .

Constraint ( 11 ) establishes a direct relationship between the inclusion of a node in the path and the possibility of charging at that node. It stipulates that charging at a particular node can occur if and only if that node is included in the travel path 14 .

Constraint ( 12 ) implies that the EV is fully charged at the starting point 18 .

The bidding curves enable the efficient allocation of electricity resources by facilitating the matching of supply and demand at equilibrium prices. Equation ( 13 ) formulates the bidding curve for the day-ahead market. This curve describes the relationship between the bid price and the corresponding quantity of electricity that market participants are willing to supply or demand in the day-ahead market. It helps determine the market clearing price and quantity for the day-ahead market 29 , 30 .

Equation ( 14 ) formulates the bidding curve for the intra-day market. This curve represents the price-quantity relationship for electricity bids in the intra-day market. It reflects the willingness of market participants to buy or sell electricity at different prices in the intra-day market, allowing the determination of the market clearing price and quantity for intra-day transactions. By formulating these bidding curves, market participants can express their preferences and strategies for buying or selling electricity at different price levels 29 , 30 .

Constraint ( 15 ) in the day-ahead market ensures that the bidding curve submitted by market participants follows a non-increasing pattern. This means that as the quantity of electricity increases, the corresponding bid prices must decrease or remain the same. This rule helps maintain fairness and efficiency in the day-ahead market by discouraging participants from artificially inflating prices as the quantity increases.

In the intra-day market, Constraint ( 16 ) serves a similar purpose but with a slight difference. The bidding curves in the intra-day market are based on the realized scenario from the day-ahead market. This means that the bidding volume in the intra-day market is influenced by the specific conditions and outcomes observed in the day-ahead market. The scenario index is introduced to reflect these conditions and ensure that the bidding curve remains non-increasing within the context of the realized scenario.

Equation ( 17 ) is a critical component in maintaining power balance within the sequential markets. It establishes the requirement that the combined power purchased from both the day-ahead and intra-day markets must equal the dedicated power allocation designated for charging electric vehicles and charging the battery. This equation ensures that the total power procured from the markets aligns precisely with the power demand necessary for the specific tasks of electric vehicle charging and battery charging.

Constraint ( 18 ) effectively meets the power demand of the charging station by considering both the purchased power and the power discharged from the battery for electric vehicle charging. The equation accounts for the combined power from these sources to ensure that the station’s charging requirements are adequately fulfilled.

where ρ e is the energy consumption rate per kilometer, which converts the distance to energy.

The charging equation establishes a relationship between the charge current, \({I}_{its}^{c}\) (measured in amperes, A), the charge power, \({\Theta }_{its}^{C}\) , and the state of charge (SOC) of the battery. In this equation, V i represents the battery voltage, which is a measure of the electrical potential difference across the battery terminals. The term \({\eta }_{i}^{C}\) denotes the charging efficiency, which accounts for any energy losses that occur during the charging process. Hence, it can be represented as:

By dividing the charge power, \({\Theta }_{its}^{C}\) , by the product of the battery voltage, V, and the charging efficiency, \({\eta }_{i}^{C}\) , the charging equation determines the charge current required to deliver the specified charge power to the battery.

During the discharging process, the battery releases stored energy to power an external load. The discharge current, denoted as \({I}_{its}^{D}\) , represents the rate at which electrical charge flows out of the battery and is typically measured in amperes (A). This equation shows that the discharge current is equal to the discharge power divided by the product of the battery voltage and the efficiency of the discharge process.

The change in SOC over time can be calculated based on the charge and discharge currents. Equation ( 21 ) represents the net charge or discharge during the time interval, divided by the battery capacity. Assuming a small time interval Δ t , the change in SOC, Δ S O C , can be expressed as:

To update the State of Charge (SOC) of a battery, the initial SOC is modified based on the change in SOC. The updated SOC ( S O C i t s ) is obtained by adding the change in SOC (Δ S O C ) to the initial SOC. This calculation helps track the battery’s energy level and reflects any charge or discharge that has occurred. By continuously updating the SOC, it becomes possible to monitor the battery’s remaining capacity, estimate runtime, and optimize charging and discharging strategies.

Maintaining the State of Charge within the recommended range of \(SO{C}_{its}^{Min}\) to \(SO{C}_{its}^{Max}\) is essential for optimal battery performance, longevity, and safe operation. \(SO{C}_{its}^{Max}\) defines the maximum allowable level of charge for a battery, beyond which overcharging may occur, leading to potential damage and safety risks. \(SO{C}_{its}^{Min}\) , on the other hand, represents the minimum acceptable level of charge to avoid deep discharge, which can cause irreversible damage and loss of capacity.

Constraints ( 24 ) and ( 25 ) sets the nonnegativity and the binary condition of the variables.

Modeling of wind turbine

To model wind turbines in charging stations for electric vehicles, it is necessary to comprehend the principles of wind energy conversion and its connection to power generation. A widely employed mathematical model for this purpose is the power curve model. This model establishes a relationship between the wind speed and the power output of the turbine. The power output ( \({\Theta }_{it}^{W}\) ) of a wind turbine can be represented using the following equation 40 , 41 :

where ρ i t represents the air density, A i is the swept area of the rotor, \({C}_{i}^{p}\) is the power coefficient that quantifies the turbine’s efficiency, and \({V}_{it}^{w}\) denotes the wind speed. By employing this equation, one can determine the wind turbine’s power output based on the prevailing wind conditions.

Modeling of PV array

To model photovoltaic (PV) arrays in charging stations for electric vehicles, it is essential to utilize mathematical representations that accurately capture the conversion of solar energy into electrical power. One prevalent approach involves employing the single-diode model, which effectively describes the current voltage (I-V) characteristics of the PV array. The single-diode model represents the I-V relationship of a PV module or array using the following equation 41 , 42 :

The mathematical model for a photovoltaic cell involves several parameters that describe its electrical behavior. In this model, the cell’s output current ( \({I}_{it}^{S}\) ) is related to its output voltage ( \({V}_{it}^{s}\) ) through various factors. These factors include the photocurrent generated by the cell under illumination ( \({I}_{it}^{ph}\) ), the reverse saturation current (or dark current) of the cell ( \({I}_{it}^{0}\) ), the series resistance of the cell ( \({R}_{it}^{s}\) ), the diode ideality factor ( n ), and the thermal voltage ( \({V}_{it}^{th}\) ). The thermal voltage is calculated as the product of Boltzmann’s constant ( B k ), the temperature in Kelvin ( T s ), and the elementary charge ( q ). Additionally, the model accounts for the shunt resistance of the cell ( \({R}_{it}^{sh}\) ). Together, these parameters provide insights into the electrical characteristics and performance of the photovoltaic cell.

The power ( \({\Theta }_{it}^{S}\) ) generated by a photovoltaic (PV) cell can be calculated by multiplying the current ( \({I}_{it}^{S}\) ) generated by the cell with the voltage ( \({V}_{it}^{S}\) ) across its terminals. Mathematically, it can be expressed as:

To incorporate renewable energy sources, specifically solar and wind, for charging stations, we modify Equation ( 17 ). Other formulations remain unchanged. The updated equation now reflects the contribution of solar and wind energy to power the charging stations. The equation is as follows:

In equation ( 29 ), the left-hand side represents the combined power purchased from both the day-ahead (DA) and intra-day (ID) markets, as well as the renewable energy provided by solar (S) and wind (W). The right-hand side represents the dedicated power allocation designated for charging electric vehicles (V) and charging the battery (C). This equation ensures that the total power procured from the markets aligns precisely with the power demand necessary for the specific tasks of electric vehicle charging and battery charging.

Findings and Analysis

This paper presents two examples that demonstrate the application of an integrated model for optimal charging, routing, and grid-aware operations in the context of EV charging. The first example focuses on a transportation network with seven nodes. It considers two charging stations located at nodes 3 and 5, which rely solely on the electricity grid for charging operations. The nodes within the network represent various locations, such as residential areas, workplaces, and charging stations. EVs travel between these nodes to complete their trips. The model optimizes the charging, routing, and grid-aware operations to ensure efficient EV charging within the network. The second example involves a transportation network consisting of 25 nodes. Simulation tests were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Two strategically placed charging stations within the network, located at nodes 5 and 12, accommodate the growing demand for EVs. These stations consider both the electricity grid and renewable energy sources, such as solar panels and wind turbines, to provide sustainable charging options. Both examples highlight the versatility and effectiveness of the integrated model in addressing the challenges of EV charging, including optimal power allocation, renewable energy integration, and grid-aware operations.

The model was implemented in Julia 1.7.1 programming language. To solve the optimization model, we utilized the Jump package 43 in Julia. Additionally, we leveraged the CPLEX software for the optimization process. The CPLEX software, which was utilized in solving the optimization model, is based on the Branch-and-Bound (B&B) algorithm for Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) problems. The proposed model was solved on a laptop computer with the following specifications: a 2.50 GHz processor, 12 GB of RAM, Intel Core i7-2450, and a 64-bit Windows 10 Professional operating system.

An illustration example

In this numerical example, we have a transportation network consisting of seven nodes. The specific layout of this network can be observed in Fig. 4 . We consider two charging stations located at node 3 and node 5, which utilize the electricity grid for charging operations. The seven nodes represent different locations within the transportation network where EVs travel between. The network displays the distances between nodes measured in kilometers. Each node represents a specific point or destination within the network. EVs in this network travel between these nodes to complete their trips. The network includes two origin nodes, node 1 and node 2, marked as O = [2, 1]. These nodes represent residential areas or starting points for EV trips. Conversely, node 6 and node 7 are designated as destination nodes, indicated by D = [7, 6]. These nodes represent the desired endpoints for the EV journeys. We consider a total of 10 electric vehicles for each OD demand in this example. The charging stations located at node 3 and node 5 rely on the electricity grid to cater to the charging needs of the EVs within the network. Let’s consider the following example with the given parameters: u i t = 30 min/stop, π i t = 2 min/km, and v = 1 km/min. Other parameters that will be made publicly available at https://github.com/homase2003/ElectricChargingStations . In this paper, we present a simplified version of the model where we assume a constant travel time. However, the model can be enhanced by incorporating the Bureau of Public Roads (BPR) function. The BPR function allows for a more accurate representation of travel time by considering factors such as traffic congestion and road conditions.

Seven-node test road network.

Charging stations play a crucial role in providing the necessary charging infrastructure to support the operation of EVs in the transportation network. The example focuses on these two charging stations to analyze the power energy needed for charging the EVs traveling between the nodes. Charging station 1 is located at node 3, while charging station 2 is located at node 5. The charging requirements of the EVs at each OD demand are determined in this model, and the calculations are performed based on this information. We assume that the vehicle can travel up to 60 kilometers, δ  = 60 km, on a full charge before requiring a recharge. The battery capacity of electric vehicles plays a significant role in route planning and necessitates strategic placement of charging stations within the network to accommodate the range limitations of the vehicles effectively. The average EV consumes 0.20 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per kilometer 44 . We also consider five scenarios in which the probability of each scenario is 0.2. We solve this example using these scenarios.

The results of solving the model provide specific routes for each origin-destination pair, indicating the sequence of nodes the EVs should follow. Additionally, the solutions identify the charging stations where the EVs need to stop to recharge their batteries. The optimal charging plans specify the required amount of energy or distance to charge at each station, ensuring that the EVs have enough energy to complete their journeys. The routing and charging plan for EVs in the transportation network aims to optimize their routes and ensure they have sufficient energy to reach their destinations. Table 2 presents the outcomes of our model for two specific origin-destination (OD) pairs involving EVs, along with comprehensive information on their routing and charging specifics. The table represents two specific origin-destination (OD) pairs, OD1 and OD2. For OD1, the EVs start at node 2 and their destination is node 7. They follow the route 2 → 3 → 5 → 7. To charge, they stop at charging station 5, which is strategically positioned along their route, and charge 45 km. For OD2, the EVs start at node 1 and their destination is node 6. They follow the route 1 → 2 → 3 → 6. To charge, they stop at charging station 3 and charge 10 km, which is then converted into the corresponding travelable distance.

This example also investigates the available battery capacities, initial state of charge, and charge efficiency of the charging stations to determine how much power energy they need to obtain to fulfill the allocated charge requirements. The integration of the state of charge (SOC) of batteries at the charging station, along with the inclusion of bidding prices for electricity, brings valuable contributions to charging efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Monitoring the state of charge is important for managing battery usage, estimating range or runtime, and determining when to recharge or replace the battery. It helps users understand how much energy is available and plan their usage accordingly. Figures 5 and 6 show the state of charge (SOC) of a battery which refers to the amount of energy stored in the battery at a given time, usually expressed as a percentage of its total capacity. It indicates how much charge is remaining in the battery.

The state of charge of a battery at charging station 3 within 24 h.

The state of charge of battery at charging station 5 within 24 h.

By considering the SOC, the model enables optimal charging prioritization, efficient resource allocation, accurate charging time estimation, and improved charging station efficiency. Moreover, the inclusion of bidding prices allows the EV battery to store electricity during low-price periods and utilize it efficiently during high peak-price periods. This integrated approach not only reduces charging costs for EV owners but also contributes to overall grid stability by shifting the charging load to times when electricity prices are lower. The model’s consideration of both SOC and bidding prices provides an effective solution that optimizes charging operations, enhances cost-effectiveness, and supports grid management.

In the context of electricity markets, charging stations that require power to charge electric vehicles participate as buyers in the market. They submit bids indicating the price they are willing to pay for a certain volume of electricity during specific hours. Bidding curves visually represent these bids and show the relationship between the price and the corresponding volume of power the charging station intends to purchase. Bidding curves for two selected hours from a 24-hour analysis are presented in Figs. 7 and 8 . These figures illustrate the variation in bidding patterns during different hours for charging stations 3 and 5, respectively. When prices are low, the charging station tends to buy larger volumes of power. Prices are presented in cents per kilowatt hour (kWh). This strategy allows the station to take advantage of the lower-priced electricity available in the market and meet the charging demands of electric vehicles efficiently. By purchasing more power at lower prices, the station can accommodate a higher number of charging sessions without significantly increasing its costs. Conversely, as the prices increase, the charging station’s purchases decrease. This behavior reflects the station’s attempt to manage costs by reducing its power purchases when prices are higher. By limiting power procurement during periods of higher prices, the station aims to optimize its operational expenses and maintain a favorable cost structure.

a Hour 3. b Hour 17.

a Hour 3. b Hour 4.

The bidding curves provide valuable insights into the charging station’s decision-making process and its response to fluctuating electricity prices. It illustrates the station’s strategy of adjusting its power purchases based on price signals, aligning its buying behavior with market conditions. Such flexibility allows the station to optimize its operations, manage costs, and make efficient use of available electricity resources. Understanding the bidding patterns of charging stations is crucial for market participants, regulators, and system operators as it helps them analyze and forecast electricity demand, assess market dynamics, and make informed decisions regarding supply and pricing. By studying the bidding curves, stakeholders can gain insights into the behavior of charging stations and develop strategies to promote efficient and sustainable electricity markets in the context of electric vehicle charging.

25-node test network

Numerical tests were performed on a 25-node test road network 45 . The specific layout of this network can be observed in Fig. 9 . In our consideration, 125 electric vehicles make trips between OD nodes. Two charging stations have been strategically placed within the network to accommodate the growing demand for electric vehicles. These stations consider both the electricity grid and renewable energy sources such as solar panels and wind turbines to provide sustainable charging options. The charging stations are located at nodes 5 and 12. We assume that the EV can travel up to 100 kilometers on a single charge before requiring a recharge. The origin-destination (OD) demands and scenarios are randomly generated. We have generated additional parameters randomly, and these will be publicly available for access in the following URL: https://github.com/homase2003/ElectricChargingStations . Other input parameters required to solve the proposed model are presented in Table 3 .

Twenty-five-node test road network.

We explore two cases using the given network. In the first case, where renewable energy is considered as input parameters, it means that we use information about renewable energy sources as inputs to a network or model. The purpose of using these inputs could be to analyze or predict the availability or output of renewable energy sources, or to optimize the utilization of renewable energy in certain applications.

In the second case, where renewable powers are considered as decision variables for charging stations, it implies that we apply renewable energy generation as a factor in determining the operation or behavior of charging stations. This could involve designing charging station systems that take into account the availability of renewable energy sources when deciding how and when to charge electric vehicles. The goal here is to maximize the use of renewable energy for charging stations and minimize reliance on non-renewable energy sources.

The proposed model for charging stations of electric vehicles integrates the power grid with renewable energy sources such as wind power and solar power. In this case, wind power and solar power are defined as input parameters, which are determined by Equations ( 27 ) to ( 29 ) that consider factors such as wind speed, solar radiation levels, and the efficiency of wind turbines and solar cells. One important factor considered during the optimization process is the availability of wind power and solar power. The model assesses the potential of wind power and solar radiation levels in the region where the charging station is situated. This information helps determine the capacity of renewable energy generation from wind turbines and solar cells. By accurately estimating the renewable energy potential, the model can optimize the energy production to meet the charging requirements of electric vehicles. This model also considers grid electricity prices. By comparing the cost of electricity from the grid with the cost of producing renewable energy, the model can make informed decisions about the optimal energy mix. This helps charging stations balance the economic factors of renewable energy production and grid electricity usage, ensuring cost-effective operations while promoting sustainability.

Energy storage systems can store excess renewable energy during periods of high generation and release it during periods of high demand. This helps balance the supply and demand dynamics of the grid, ensuring a stable and reliable power supply to charging stations. Figure 10 illustrates the state of charge (SOC) of the battery at charging station 5 over a 24-hour period. The data in the figure allows us to observe various charging scenarios and patterns. In scenario 1 exhibits a gradual decrease in SOC values over time, with intermittent charging and discharging cycles. In Scenario 2, the SOC values start low but increase gradually, accompanied by intermittent periods of zero SOC and rapid increases. Scenario 3 demonstrates consistently low SOC values with intermittent charging events. Scenario 4 shows a quick initial charge to full capacity, followed by gradual discharge and intermittent periods of zero SOC. Lastly, Scenario 5 displays moderate fluctuations in SOC values, with intermittent charging and discharging cycles.

Figure 11 illustrates the State of Charge (SOC) of the battery at charging station 12 over a 24-hour duration. This visualization provides valuable insights into various charging scenarios and patterns that occurred during this period. By analyzing the information presented in the figure, we can identify and examine the distinct characteristics of each scenario. In the first scenario, the SOC values start at relatively high levels and gradually decrease over time. This pattern is accompanied by intermittent charging and discharging cycles, indicating a dynamic utilization of the battery’s energy. The second scenario showcases SOC values starting at low levels and gradually increasing. Intermittent periods of zero SOC are observed, followed by rapid increases in SOC. This pattern suggests a progressive charging process with intermittent high-demand periods. The third scenario demonstrates a combination of zero SOC points and charging events. It signifies instances where the battery’s charge is completely depleted and subsequently replenished. In the fourth scenario, there is an initial rapid charge to full capacity, followed by a gradual discharge. Intermittent periods of zero SOC are also observed in this scenario, reflecting intermittent utilization of the battery’s stored energy. The fifth scenario exhibits fluctuations in SOC values, accompanied by intermittent charging and discharging cycles. This pattern indicates a dynamic usage of the battery’s energy reserves. By analyzing and interpreting these different charging scenarios and patterns, valuable insights can be gained regarding the battery’s behavior and usage patterns.

The state of charge of battery at charging station 12 within 24 h.

Power allocation at charging stations refers to distributing and managing the available electrical power among the charging stations for EVs. Charging stations typically have a limited capacity of electrical power that can be delivered simultaneously to multiple vehicles. Efficient power allocation at charging stations is crucial for supporting the growing number of electric vehicles on the road and ensuring a reliable and convenient charging experience for EV owners. It helps prevent overloading of the electrical grid, optimizes energy consumption, and enables the integration of renewable energy sources into the charging infrastructure.

Visual representations of the electricity dispatching for charging electric vehicles and charging batteries at different charging stations are provided in Figs. 12 and 13 . Figure 12 illustrates the electricity dispatching for charging electric vehicles at Station 5, while Fig. 13 showcases the dispatching process at Station 12. These findings illustrate how electricity usage is distributed across the stations, offering insights into allocation patterns and potentially highlighting variations in electricity consumption among the charging stations. The results indicate that charging stations prioritize non-renewable energy sources for battery charging due to concerns about bid prices and the necessity of storing power for future use. However, when renewable energy is incorporated, it enhances power grid stability, enabling charging stations to optimize battery charging while lowering costs. By harnessing renewable energy, charging stations can benefit from a dependable and sustainable energy supply, resulting in efficient battery charging and potential cost savings. This highlights the advantages of integrating renewable energy into charging infrastructure, as it not only promotes grid stability but also facilitates cost optimization for charging station operators.

a Power allocation for charging electric vehicles at charging station 5. b Power allocation for charging the battery at charging station 5.

a Power allocation for charging electric vehicles at charging station 12. b Power allocation for charging the battery at charging station 12.

Figure 14 illustrates the bidding curves for selected hours of each charging station within a 24-hour period analysis. Bidding curves play a crucial role in the electricity market, allowing charging stations to strategically bid for power supply based on prevailing market conditions. In the day-ahead market, where electricity is traded a day in advance, bidding curves are considered first-stage variables. These curves represent the charging station’s anticipated power purchase behavior and are independent of specific scenarios. Prices are presented in cents per kilowatt hour (kWh).

a Charging station 5: Hour 9. b Charging station 12: Hour 9.

However, the intra-day market operates closer to real-time, allowing market participants to adjust their power purchase decisions based on actual conditions. In this market, bidding curves become second-stage variables that depend on the realized scenario from the day-ahead market. The charging stations submit different bidding curves to the intra-day market based on the specific scenario that materialized. This allows them to adapt their bidding strategies to the current market situation and optimize their power purchases accordingly. Figure 15 illustrates the differences in bidding curves for various hours of the day. It visually represents how charging stations adjust their bids in response to changing market prices. The curves show that the stations aim to procure more power during hours when prices are low, indicating a cost-conscious approach. As the prices increase, the stations decrease their power purchases, possibly to minimize expenses or align with their operational costs. Prices are presented in cents per kilowatt hour (kWh).

a Charging station 5: Hour 2. b Charging station 12: Hour 3.

In this case, the model considers both wind power and solar power as variables in determining the optimal amount of renewable energy required. One of the main objectives of the model is to find the optimal amount of renewable energy that charging stations should generate to meet the demands of their customers. By accurately determining the optimal energy requirement, charging stations can effectively plan their renewable energy production and ensure they have sufficient capacity to meet the charging needs of electric vehicles. Furthermore, the model also assists charging stations in designing their equipment by considering the optimal number of wind turbines and solar cells needed. These design decisions are based on the identified optimal energy requirement and consider factors such as the rated capacity of the turbines and cells. By optimizing the equipment design, charging stations can efficiently harness wind power and solar power to generate the necessary renewable energy for charging electric vehicles.

In this scenario, the total power required for charging the battery at the stations is satisfied solely by the power provided by renewable energy sources. The State of Charge (SOC) results for the battery being charged at the stations are shown in Fig. 16 . The reported SOC results provide information on the battery’s charging progress and its current energy level. This allows for monitoring and analysis of the charging process, ensuring that the battery is adequately charged while utilizing renewable energy sources exclusively. As a consequence, the total power demand required for charging the battery at the stations is entirely met by renewable sources, resulting in the SOC reaching 100% by the end of the day. However, it is worth noting that in case 2, the model incorporates renewable energy sources without considering the cost of power from these sources. Exploring the cost implications of renewable energy can provide valuable insights for future studies.

a Charging station 5. b Charging station 12.

The transition to sustainable energy systems has sparked significant interest in integrating renewable energy sources into electric vehicle charging infrastructure. In this section, we delve into the process of determining the total electricity required to charge batteries and vehicles within a day, with a specific emphasis on leveraging renewable energy sources at charging stations. Figure 17 illustrates the total power allocation at charging stations across various scenarios. Utilizing renewable energy sources, our findings reveal notable reductions in electricity demand for charging batteries at specific charging stations. Charging station 5 experiences a substantial decrease of up to 42%, while charging station 12 sees a more modest reduction of 3%. Furthermore, the integration of renewable energy sources at the charging station resulted in a cost reduction of approximately 69% compared to the scenario without renewable energy, showcasing the significant financial benefits of utilizing sustainable power. Therefore, integrating renewable energy sources into electric vehicle charging infrastructure brings significant advantages, such as reducing reliance on non-renewable energy and contributing to sector-wide decarbonization. Furthermore, by strategically aligning charging sessions with periods of high renewable energy generation, we can optimize the use of renewable sources, minimizing the need for energy storage or grid reliance. The observed reductions in electricity demand for charging batteries underscore the potential of renewable energy integration in advancing sustainable transportation practices.

a Electricity for charging battery. b Electricity for charging electric vehicles.

InternationalEnergyAgency. International energy agency (IEA). International Energy Agency (IEA) https://www.iea.org/ (2022).

Ou, S., Lin, Z., He, X., Przesmitzki, S. & Bouchard, J. Modeling charging infrastructure impact on the electric vehicle market in China. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 81 , 102248 (2020).

Article   Google Scholar  

American Automobile Association. American automobile association. American Automobile Association https://www.aaa.com/ (2023).

EAMA. European automobile manufacturers’ association. European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association https://www.acea.be/ (2022).

European Commission. European commission. European Commission https://commission.europa.eu (2023).

PodPoint. How long does it take to charge an electric car? PodPoint https://pod-point.com/guides/driver/how-long-to-charge-an-electric-car (2023).

Tesla. Tesla supercharger. Tesla https://www.tesla.com/supercharger (2023).

Sayarshad, H. R. & Mahmoodian, V. An intelligent method for dynamic distribution of electric taxi batteries between charging and swapping stations. Sustain. Cities Soc. 65 , 102605 (2021).

ENTSO-E. European network of transmission system operators for electricity. ENTSO-E https://www.entsoe.eu (2023).

Sayarshad, H. R., Mahmoodian, V. & Gao, H. O. Non-myopic dynamic routing of electric taxis with battery swapping stations. Sustainable Cities and Society 57 , 102113 (2020).

Sayarshad, H. R., Mahmoodian, V. & Bojović, N. Dynamic inventory routing and pricing problem with a mixed fleet of electric and conventional urban freight vehicles. Sustainability 13 , 6703 (2021).

Shen, Z.-J. M., Feng, B., Mao, C. & Ran, L. Optimization models for electric vehicle service operations: a literature review. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 128 , 462–477 (2019).

He, F., Yin, Y. & Zhou, J. Deploying public charging stations for electric vehicles on urban road networks. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 60 , 227–240 (2015).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Jeong, I.-J. & Boy, C. A. I. Routing and refueling plans to minimize travel time in alternative-fuel vehicles. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 12 , 583–591 (2018).

Schoenberg, S. & Dressler, F. Reducing waiting times at charging stations with adaptive electric vehicle route planning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 8 , 95–107 (2023).

Qiang, X., Zhong, C., Ziqi, Z., Xueliang, H. & Xiaohui, L. Route planning and charging navigation strategy for electric vehicles based on real-time traffic information and grid information. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 752 , 012011 (2020).

Yang, H. et al. Electric vehicle route selection and charging navigation strategy based on crowd sensing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 13 , 2214–2226 (2017).

Wang, Y.-W. & Wang, C.-R. Locating passenger vehicle refueling stations. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 46 , 791–801 (2010).

Guo, F., Yang, J. & Lu, J. The battery charging station location problem: Impact of users’ range anxiety and distance convenience. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 114 , 1–18 (2018).

Frade, I., Ribeiro, A., Gonçalves, G. & Antunes, A. P. Optimal location of charging stations for electric vehicles in a neighborhood in Lisbon, Portugal. Transp. Res. Record 2252 , 91–98 (2011).

Riemann, R., Wang, D. Z. & Busch, F. Optimal location of wireless charging facilities for electric vehicles: Flow-capturing location model with stochastic user equilibrium. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 58 , 1–12 (2015).

Wu, F. & Sioshansi, R. A stochastic operational model for controlling electric vehicle charging to provide frequency regulation. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 67 , 475–490 (2019).

Donadee, J. & Ilić, M. Stochastic co-optimization of charging and frequency regulation by electric vehicles. In 2012 North American Power Symposium (NAPS) , 1–6 (2012).

Donadee, J. & Ilić, M. D. Stochastic optimization of grid to vehicle frequency regulation capacity bids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 5 , 1061–1069 (2014).

Caramanis, M. & Foster, J. M. Management of electric vehicle charging to mitigate renewable generation intermittency and distribution network congestion. In Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference , 4717–4722 (2009).

Gountis, V. & Bakirtzis, A. Bidding strategies for electricity producers in a competitive electricity marketplace. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19 , 356–365 (2004).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Kwon, R. H. & Frances, D. Optimization-Based Bidding in Day-Ahead Electricity Auction Markets: A Review of Models for Power Producers, 41–59 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23193-3_2 .

Hou, X., Liu, W., Chen, S. & Guo, Y. Analysis of optimal bidding strategy of electric vehicle aggregators in real-time energy market. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 714 , 042086 (2021).

Fleten, S.-E. & Pettersen, E. Constructing bidding curves for a price-taking retailer in the norwegian electricity market. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 20 , 701–708 (2005).

Sohrabi, F., Rohaninejad, M., Hesamzadeh, M. R. & Bemš, J. Coordinated bidding of multi-product charging station in electricity markets using rolling planning and sample average approximation. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 146 , 108786 (2023).

Zheng, Y., Yu, H., Shao, Z. & Jian, L. Day-ahead bidding strategy for electric vehicle aggregator enabling multiple agent modes in uncertain electricity markets. Appl. Energy 280 , 115977 (2020).

González Vayá, M. & Andersson, G. Optimal bidding strategy of a plug-in electric vehicle aggregator in day-ahead electricity markets under uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30 , 2375–2385 (2015).

Sayarshad, H. R. Preignition risk mitigation model for analysis of wildfires caused by electrical power conductors. Int. J. Electric. Power Energy Syst. 153 , 109353 (2023).

Li, B. et al. Graphical evolutionary game model of virus-based intrusion to power system for long-term cyber-security risk evaluation. IEEE Access 7 , 178605–178617 (2019).

Sayarshad, H. R., Sabarshad, O. & Amjady, N. Evaluating resiliency of electric power generators against earthquake to maintain synchronism. Electric Power Syst. Res. 210 , 108127 (2022).

Li, K. & Wang, L. Optimal electric vehicle subsidy and pricing decisions with consideration of ev anxiety and ev preference in green and non-green consumers. Transport. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 170 , 103010 (2023).

Sayarshad, H. R. Personal protective equipment market coordination using subsidy. Sustain. Cities Soc. 85 , 104044 (2022).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Sayarshad, H. R. & Ghoseiri, K. A simulated annealing approach for the multi-periodic rail-car fleet sizing problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 36 , 1789–1799 (2009).

Sayarshad, H. R. Using bees algorithm for material handling equipment planning in manufacturing systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48 , 1009–1018 (2010).

Merabet, A., Ahmed, K. T., Ibrahim, H. & Beguenane, R. Implementation of sliding mode control system for generator and grid sides control of wind energy conversion system. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7 , 1327–1335 (2016).

Zhang, X. et al. Transform from gasoline stations to electric-hydrogen hybrid refueling stations: An islanding dc microgrid with electric-hydrogen hybrid energy storage system and its control strategy. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 136 , 107684 (2022).

Mahmoud, Y. & El-Saadany, E. F. A photovoltaic model with reduced computational time. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62 , 3534–3544 (2015).

Google Scholar  

Lubin, M. & Dunning, I. Computing in operations research using julia. INFORMS J. Comput. 27 , 238–248 (2015).

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

ElectricVehicleDatabase. Energy consumption of full electric vehicles. Electric Vehicle Database https://ev-database.org/cheatsheet/energy-consumption-electric-car (2023).

Simchi-Levi, D. & Berman, O. A heuristic algorithm for the traveling salesman location problem on networks. Operations Res. 36 , 478–484 (1988).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

Hamid R. Sayarshad

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

H.S. has completed all sections of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid R. Sayarshad .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Sayarshad, H.R. Optimization of electric charging infrastructure: integrated model for routing and charging coordination with power-aware operations. npj. Sustain. Mobil. Transp. 1 , 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44333-024-00004-6

Download citation

Received : 12 December 2023

Accepted : 25 April 2024

Published : 27 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s44333-024-00004-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.