sex education dissertation

• Search Menu
• Advance Articles
• Editor's Choice
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• About Health Education Research
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction, purpose of the study, literature search and selection criteria, coding of the studies for exploration of moderators, decisions related to the computation of effect sizes.

• < Previous

The effectiveness of school-based sex education programs in the promotion of abstinent behavior: a meta-analysis

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Mónica Silva, The effectiveness of school-based sex education programs in the promotion of abstinent behavior: a meta-analysis, Health Education Research , Volume 17, Issue 4, August 2002, Pages 471–481, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.4.471

• Permissions Icon Permissions

This review presents the findings from controlled school-based sex education interventions published in the last 15 years in the US. The effects of the interventions in promoting abstinent behavior reported in 12 controlled studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the analysis indicated a very small overall effect of the interventions in abstinent behavior. Moderator analysis could only be pursued partially because of limited information in primary research studies. Parental participation in the program, age of the participants, virgin-status of the sample, grade level, percentage of females, scope of the implementation and year of publication of the study were associated with variations in effect sizes for abstinent behavior in univariate tests. However, only parental participation and percentage of females were significant in the weighted least-squares regression analysis. The richness of a meta-analytic approach appears limited by the quality of the primary research. Unfortunately, most of the research does not employ designs to provide conclusive evidence of program effects. Suggestions to address this limitation are provided.

Sexually active teenagers are a matter of serious concern. In the past decades many school-based programs have been designed for the sole purpose of delaying the initiation of sexual activity. There seems to be a growing consensus that schools can play an important role in providing youth with a knowledge base which may allow them to make informed decisions and help them shape a healthy lifestyle ( St Leger, 1999 ). The school is the only institution in regular contact with a sizable proportion of the teenage population ( Zabin and Hirsch, 1988 ), with virtually all youth attending it before they initiate sexual risk-taking behavior ( Kirby and Coyle, 1997 ).

Programs that promote abstinence have become particularly popular with school systems in the US ( Gilbert and Sawyer, 1994 ) and even with the federal government ( Sexual abstinence program has a $250 million price tag, 1997 ). These are referred to in the literature as abstinence-only or value-based programs ( Repucci and Herman, 1991 ). Other programs—designated in the literature as safer-sex, comprehensive, secular or abstinence-plus programs—additionally espouse the goal of increasing usage of effective contraception. Although abstinence-only and safer-sex programs differ in their underlying values and assumptions regarding the aims of sex education, both types of programs strive to foster decision-making and problem-solving skills in the belief that through adequate instruction adolescents will be better equipped to act responsibly in the heat of the moment ( Repucci and Herman, 1991 ). Nowadays most safer-sex programs encourage abstinence as a healthy lifestyle and many abstinence only programs have evolved into `abstinence-oriented' curricula that also include some information on contraception. For most programs currently implemented in the US, a delay in the initiation of sexual activity constitutes a positive and desirable outcome, since the likelihood of responsible sexual behavior increases with age ( Howard and Mitchell, 1993 ).

Even though abstinence is a valued outcome of school-based sex education programs, the effectiveness of such interventions in promoting abstinent behavior is still far from settled. Most of the articles published on the effectiveness of sex education programs follow the literary format of traditional narrative reviews ( Quinn, 1986 ; Kirby, 1989 , 1992 ; Visser and van Bilsen, 1994 ; Jacobs and Wolf, 1995 ; Kirby and Coyle, 1997 ). Two exceptions are the quantitative overviews by Frost and Forrest ( Frost and Forrest, 1995 ) and Franklin et al . ( Franklin et al ., 1997 ).

In the first review ( Frost and Forrest, 1995 ), the authors selected only five rigorously evaluated sex education programs and estimated their impact on delaying sexual initiation. They used non-standardized measures of effect sizes, calculated descriptive statistics to represent the overall effect of these programs and concluded that those selected programs delayed the initiation of sexual activity. In the second review, Franklin et al . conducted a meta-analysis of the published research of community-based and school-based adolescent pregnancy prevention programs and contrary to the conclusions forwarded by Frost and Forrest, these authors reported a non-significant effect of the programs on sexual activity ( Franklin et al ., 1997 ).

The discrepancy between these two quantitative reviews may result from the decision by Franklin et al . to include weak designs, which do not allow for reasonable causal inferences. However, given that recent evidence indicates that weaker designs yield higher estimates of intervention effects ( Guyatt et al ., 2000 ), the inclusion of weak designs should have translated into higher effects for the Franklin et al . review and not smaller. Given the discrepant results forwarded in these two recent quantitative reviews, there is a need to clarify the extent of the impact of school-based sex education in abstinent behavior and explore the specific features of the interventions that are associated to variability in effect sizes.

The present study consisted of a meta-analytic review of the research literature on the effectiveness of school-based sex education programs in the promotion of abstinent behavior implemented in the past 15 years in the US in the wake of the AIDS epidemic. The goals were to: (1) synthesize the effects of controlled school-based sex education interventions on abstinent behavior, (2) examine the variability in effects among studies and (3) explain the variability in effects between studies in terms of selected moderator variables.

The first step was to locate as many studies conducted in the US as possible that dealt with the evaluation of sex education programs and which measured abstinent behavior subsequent to an intervention.

The primary sources for locating studies were four reference database systems: ERIC, PsychLIT, MEDLINE and the Social Science Citation Index. Branching from the bibliographies and reference lists in articles located through the original search provided another source for locating studies.

The process for the selection of studies was guided by four criteria, some of which have been employed by other authors as a way to orient and confine the search to the relevant literature ( Kirby et al ., 1994 ). The criteria to define eligibility of studies were the following.

Interventions had to be geared to normal adolescent populations attending public or private schools in the US and report on some measure of abstinent behavior: delay in the onset of intercourse, reduction in the frequency of intercourse or reduction in the number of sexual partners. Studies that reported on interventions designed for cognitively handicapped, delinquent, school dropouts, emotionally disturbed or institutionalized adolescents were excluded from the present review since they address a different population with different needs and characteristics. Community interventions which recruited participants from clinical or out-of-school populations were also eliminated for the same reasons.

Studies had to be either experimental or quasi-experimental in nature, excluding three designs that do not permit strong tests of causal hypothesis: the one group post-test-only design, the post-test-only design with non-equivalent groups and the one group pre-test–post-test design ( Cook and Campbell, 1979 ). The presence of an independent and comparable `no intervention' control group—in demographic variables and measures of sexual activity in the baseline—was required for a study to be included in this review.

Studies had to be published between January 1985 and July 2000. A time period restriction was imposed because of cultural changes that occur in society—such as the AIDS epidemic—which might significantly impact the adolescent cohort and alter patterns of behavior and consequently the effects of sex education interventions.

Five pairs of publications were detected which may have used the same database (or two databases which were likely to contain non-independent cases) ( Levy et al ., 1995 / Weeks et al ., 1995 ; Barth et al ., 1992 / Kirby et al ., 1991 /Christoper and Roosa, 1990/ Roosa and Christopher, 1990 and Jorgensen, 1991 / Jorgensen et al ., 1993 ). Only one effect size from each pair of articles was included to avoid the possibility of data dependence.

The exploration of study characteristics or features that may be related to variations in the magnitude of effect sizes across studies is referred to as moderator analysis. A moderator variable is one that informs about the circumstances under which the magnitude of effect sizes vary ( Miller and Pollock, 1994 ). The information retrieved from the articles for its potential inclusion as moderators in the data analysis was categorized in two domains: demographic characteristics of the participants in the sex education interventions and characteristics of the program.

Demographic characteristics included the following variables: the percentages of females, the percentage of whites, the virginity status of participants, mean (or median) age and a categorization of the predominant socioeconomic status of participating subjects (low or middle class) as reported by the authors of the primary study.

In terms of the characteristics of the programs, the features coded were: the type of program (whether the intervention was comprehensive/safer-sex or abstinence-oriented), the type of monitor who delivered the intervention (teacher/adult monitor or peer), the length of the program in hours, the scope of the implementation (large-scale versus small-scale trial), the time elapsed between the intervention and the post-intervention outcome measure (expressed as number of days), and whether parental participation (beyond consent) was a component of the intervention.

The type of sex education intervention was defined as abstinence-oriented if the explicit aim was to encourage abstinence as the primary method of protection against sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy, either totally excluding units on contraceptive methods or, if including contraception, portraying it as a less effective method than abstinence. An intervention was defined as comprehensive or safer-sex if it included a strong component on the benefits of use of contraceptives as a legitimate alternative method to abstinence for avoiding pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.

A study was considered to be a large-scale trial if the intervention group consisted of more than 500 students.

Finally, year of publication was also analyzed to assess whether changes in the effectiveness of programs across time had occurred.

The decision to record information on all the above-mentioned variables for their potential role as moderators of effect sizes was based in part on theoretical considerations and in part on the empirical evidence of the relevance of such variables in explaining the effectiveness of educational interventions. A limitation to the coding of these and of other potentially relevant and interesting moderator variables was the scantiness of information provided by the authors of primary research. Not all studies described the features of interest for this meta-analysis. For parental participation, no missing values were present because a decision was made to code all interventions which did not specifically report that parents had participated—either through parent–youth sessions or homework assignments—as non-participation. However, for the rest of the variables, no similar assumptions seemed appropriate, and therefore if no pertinent data were reported for a given variable, it was coded as missing (see Table I ).

Once the pool of studies which met the inclusion criteria was located, studies were examined in an attempt to retrieve the size of the effect associated with each intervention. Since most of the studies did not report any effect size, it had to be estimated based on the significance level and inferential statistics with formulae provided by Rosenthal ( Rosenthal, 1991 ) and Holmes ( Holmes; 1984 ). When provided, the exact value for the test statistic or the exact probability was used in the calculation of the effect size.

Alternative methods to deal with non-independent effect sizes were not employed since these are more complex and require estimates of the covariance structure among the correlated effect sizes. According to Matt and Cook such estimates may be difficult—if not impossible—to obtain due to missing information in primary studies ( Matt and Cook, 1994 ).

Analyses of the effect sizes were conducted utilizing the D-STAT software ( Johnson, 1989 ). The sample sizes used for the overall effect size analysis corresponded to the actual number used to estimate the effects of interest, which was often less than the total sample of the study. Occasionally the actual sample sizes were not provided by the authors of primary research, but could be estimated from the degrees of freedom reported for the statistical tests.

The effect sizes were calculated from means and pooled standard deviations, t -tests, χ 2 , significance levels or from proportions, depending on the nature of the information reported by the authors of primary research. As recommended by Rosenthal, if results were reported simply as being `non-significant' a conservative estimate of the effect size was included, assuming P = 0.50, which corresponds to an effect size of zero ( Rosenthal, 1991 ). The overall measure of effect size reported was the corrected d statistic ( Hedges and Olkin, 1985 ). These authors recommend this measure since it does not overestimate the population effect size, especially in the case when sample sizes are small.

The homogeneity of effect sizes was examined to determine whether the studies shared a common effect size. Testing for homogeneity required the calculation of a homogeneity statistic, Q . If all studies share the same population effect size, Q follows an asymptotic χ 2 distribution with k – 1 degrees of freedom, where k is the number of effect sizes. For the purposes of this review the probability level chosen for significance testing was 0.10, due to the fact that the relatively small number of effect sizes available for the analysis limits the power to detect actual departures from homogeneity. Rejection of the hypothesis of homogeneity signals that the group of effect sizes is more variable than one would expect based on sampling variation and that one or more moderator variables may be present ( Hall et al ., 1994 ).

To examine the relationship between the study characteristics included as potential moderators and the magnitude of effect sizes, both categorical and continuous univariate tests were run. Categorical tests assess differences in effect sizes between subgroups established by dividing studies into classes based on study characteristics. Hedges and Olkin presented an extension of the Q statistic to test for homogeneity of effect sizes between classes ( Q B ) and within classes ( Q W ) ( Hedges and Olkin, 1985 ). The relationship between the effect sizes and continuous predictors was assessed using a procedure described by Rosenthal and Rubin which tests for linearity between effect sizes and predictors ( Rosenthal and Rubin, 1982 ).

Q E provides the test for model specification, when the number of studies is larger than the number of predictors. Under those conditions, Q E follows an approximate χ 2 distribution with k – p – 1 degrees of freedom, where k is the number of effect sizes and p is the number of regressors ( Hedges and Olkin, 1985 ).

The search for school-based sex education interventions resulted in 12 research studies that complied with the criteria to be included in the review and for which effect sizes could be estimated.

The overall effect size ( d +) estimated from these studies was 0.05 and the 95% confidence interval about the mean included a lower bound of 0.01 to a high bound of 0.09, indicating a very minimal overall effect size. Table II presents the effect size of each study ( d i ) along with its 95% confidence interval and the overall estimate of the effect size. Homogeneity testing indicated the presence of variability among effect sizes ( Q (11) = 35.56; P = 0.000).

An assessment of interaction effects among significant moderators could not be explored since it would have required partitioning of the studies according to a first variable and testing of the second within the partitioned categories. The limited number of effect sizes precluded such analysis.

Parental participation appeared to moderate the effects of sex education on abstinence as indicated by the significant Q test between groups ( Q B(1) = 5.06; P = 0.025), as shown in Table III . Although small in magnitude ( d = 0.24), the point estimate for the mean weighted effect size associated with programs with parental participation appears substantially larger than the mean associated with those where parents did not participate ( d = 0.04). The confidence interval for parent participation does not include zero, thus indicating a small but positive effect. Controlling for parental participation appears to translate into homogeneous classes of effect sizes for programs that include parents, but not for those where parents did not participate ( Q W(9) = 28.94; P = 0.001) meaning that the effect sizes were not homogeneous within this class.

Virginity status of the sample was also a significant predictor of the variability among effect sizes ( Q B(1) = 3.47 ; P = 0.06). The average effect size calculated for virgins-only was larger than the one calculated for virgins and non-virgins ( d = 0.09 and d = 0.01, respectively). Controlling for virginity status translated into homogeneous classes for virgins and non-virgins although not for the virgins-only class ( Q W(5) = 27.09; P = 0.000).

The scope of the implementation also appeared to moderate the effects of the interventions on abstinent behavior. The average effect size calculated for small-scale intervention was significantly higher than that for large-scale interventions ( d = 0.26 and d = 0.01, respectively). The effects corresponding to the large-scale category were homogeneous but this was not the case for the small-scale class, where heterogeneity was detected ( Q W(4) = 14.71; P = 0.01)

For all three significant categorical predictors, deletion of one outlier ( Howard and McCabe, 1990 ) resulted in homogeneity among the effect sizes within classes.

Univariate tests of continuous predictors showed significant results in the case of percentage of females in the sample ( z = 2.11; P = 0.04), age of participants ( z = –1.67; P = 0.09), grade ( z = –1.80; P = 0.07) and year of publication ( z = –2.76; P = 0.006).

All significant predictors in the univariate analysis—with the exception of grade which had a very high correlation with age ( r = 0.97; P = 0.000)—were entered into a weighted least-squares regression analysis. In general, the remaining set of predictors had a moderate degree of intercorrelation, although none of the coefficients were statistically significant.

In the weighted least-squares regression analysis, only parental participation and the percentage of females in the study were significant. The two-predictor model explained 28% of the variance in effect sizes. The test of model specification yielded a significant Q E statistic suggesting that the two-predictor model cannot be regarded as correctly specified (see Table IV ).

This review synthesized the findings from controlled sex education interventions reporting on abstinent behavior. The overall mean effect size for abstinent behavior was very small, close to zero. No significant effect was associated to the type of intervention: whether the program was abstinence-oriented or comprehensive—the source of a major controversy in sex education—was not found to be associated to abstinent behavior. Only two moderators—parental participation and percentage of females—appeared to be significant in both univariate tests and the multivariable model.

Although parental participation in interventions appeared to be associated with higher effect sizes in abstinent behavior, the link should be explored further since it is based on a very small number of studies. To date, too few studies have reported success in involving parents in sex education programs. Furthermore, the primary articles reported very limited information about the characteristics of the parents who took part in the programs. Parents who were willing to participate might differ in important demographic or lifestyle characteristics from those who did not participate. For instance, it is possible that the studies that reported success in achieving parental involvement may have been dealing with a larger percentage of intact families or with parents that espoused conservative sexual values. Therefore, at this point it is not possible to affirm that parental participation per se exerts a direct influence in the outcomes of sex education programs, although clearly this is a variable that merits further study.

Interventions appeared to be more effective when geared to groups composed of younger students, predominantly females and those who had not yet initiated sexual activity. The association between gender and effect sizes—which appeared significant both in the univariate and multivariable analyses—should be explored to understand why females seem to be more receptive to the abstinence messages of sex education interventions.

Smaller-scale interventions appeared to be more effective than large-scale programs. The larger effects associated to small-scale trials seems worth exploring. It may be the case that in large-scale studies it becomes harder to control for confounding variables that may have an adverse impact on the outcomes. For example, large-scale studies often require external agencies or contractors to deliver the program and the quality of the delivery of the contents may turn out to be less than optimal ( Cagampang et al ., 1997 ).

Interestingly there was a significant change in effect sizes across time, with effect sizes appearing to wane across the years. It is not likely that this represents a decline in the quality of sex education interventions. A possible explanation for this trend may be the expansion of mandatory sex education in the US which makes it increasingly difficult to find comparison groups that are relatively unexposed to sex education. Another possible line of explanation refers to changes in cultural mores regarding sexuality that may have occurred in the past decades—characterized by an increasing acceptance of premarital sexual intercourse, a proliferation of sexualized messages from the media and increasing opportunities for sexual contact in adolescence—which may be eroding the attainment of the goal of abstinence sought by educational interventions.

In terms of the design and implementation of sex education interventions, it is worth noting that the length of the programs was unrelated to the magnitude in effect sizes for the range of 4.5–30 h represented in these studies. Program length—which has been singled out as a potential explanation for the absence of significant behavioral effects in a large-scale evaluation of a sex education program ( Kirby et al ., 1997a )—does not appear to be consistently associated with abstinent behavior. The impact of lengthening currently existing programs should be evaluated in future studies.

As it has been stated, the exploration of moderator variables could be performed only partially due to lack of information on the primary research literature. This has been a problem too for other reviewers in the field ( Franklin et al ., 1997 ). The authors of primary research did not appear to control for nor report on the potentially confounding influence of numerous variables that have been indicated in the literature as influencing sexual decision making or being associated with the initiation of sexual activity in adolescence such as academic performance, career orientation, religious affiliation, romantic involvement, number of friends who are currently having sex, peer norms about sexual activity and drinking habits, among others ( Herold and Goodwin, 1981 ; Christopher and Cate, 1984 ; Billy and Udry, 1985 ; Roche, 1986 ; Coker et al ., 1994 ; Kinsman et al ., 1998 ; Holder et al ., 2000 ; Thomas et al ., 2000 ). Even though randomization should take care of differences in these and other potentially confounding variables, given that studies can rarely assign students to conditions and instead assign classrooms or schools to conditions, it is advisable that more information on baseline characteristics of the sample be utilized to establish and substantiate the equivalence between the intervention and control groups in relevant demographic and lifestyle characteristics.

In terms of the communication of research findings, the richness of a meta-analytic approach will always be limited by the quality of the primary research. Unfortunately, most of the research in the area of sex education do not employ experimental or quasi-experimental designs and thus fall short of providing conclusive evidence of program effects. The limitations in the quality of research in sex education have been highlighted by several authors in the past two decades ( Kirby and Baxter, 1981 ; Card and Reagan, 1989 ; Kirby, 1989 ; Peersman et al ., 1996 ). Due to these deficits in the quality of research—which resulted in a reduced number of studies that met the criteria for inclusion and the limitations that ensued for conducting a thorough analysis of moderators—the findings of the present synthesis have to be considered merely tentative. Substantial variability in effect sizes remained unexplained by the present synthesis, indicating the need to include more information on a variety of potential moderating conditions that might affect the outcomes of sex education interventions.

Finally, although it is rarely the case that a meta-analysis will constitute an endpoint or final step in the investigation of a research topic, by indicating the weaknesses as well as the strengths of the existing research a meta-analysis can be a helpful aid for channeling future primary research in a direction that might improve the quality of empirical evidence and expand the theoretical understanding in a given field ( Eagly and Wood, 1994 ). Research in sex education could be greatly improved if more efforts were directed to test interventions utilizing randomized controlled trials, measuring intervening variables and by a more careful and detailed reporting of the results. Unless efforts are made to improve on the quality of the research that is being conducted, decisions about future interventions will continue to be based on a common sense and intuitive approach as to `what might work' rather than on solid empirical evidence.

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

Description of moderator variables

Effect sizes of studies

Tests of categorical moderators for abstinence

Weighted least-squares regression and test of model specification

Barth, R., Fetro, J., Leland, N. and Volkan, K. ( 1992 ) Preventing adolescent pregnancy with social and cognitive skills. Journal of Adolescent Research , 7 , 208 –232.

Billy, J. and Udry, R. ( 1985 ) Patterns of adolescent friendship and effects on sexual behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly , 48 , 27 –41.

Brown, L., Barone, V., Fritz, G., Cebollero, P. and Nassau, J. ( 1991 ) AIDS education: the Rhode Island experience. Health Education Quarterly , 18 , 195 –206.*

Cagampang, H., Barth, R., Korpi, M. and Kirby, D. ( 1997 ) Education Now And Babies Later (ENABL): life history of a campaign to postpone sexual involvement. Family Planning Perspectives , 29 , 109 –114.

Card, J. and Reagan, R. ( 1989 ) Strategies for evaluating adolescent pregnancy programs. Family Planning Perspectives , 21 , 210 –220.

Christopher, F. and Roosa, M. ( 1990 ) An evaluation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program: is `just say no' enough? Family relations , 39 , 68 –72.

Christopher, S. and Cate, R. ( 1984 ). Factors involved in premarital sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex Research , 20 , 363 –376.

Coker, A., Richter, D., Valois, R., McKeown, R., Garrison, C. and Vincent, M. ( 1994 ) Correlates and consequences of early initiation of sexual intercourse. Journal of School Health , 64 , 372 –377.

Cook, T. and Campbell, D. (1979) Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings . Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

Denny, G., Young, M. and Spear, C. ( 1999 ) An evaluation of the Sex Can Wait abstinence education curriculum series. American Journal of Health Behavior , 23 , 134 –143.*

Dunkin, M. ( 1996 ) Types of errors in synthesizing research in education. Review of Educational Research , 66 , 87 –97.

Eagly, A. and Wood, W. (1994) Using research synthesis to plan future research. In Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. (eds), The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 485–500.

Franklin, C., Grant, D., Corcoran, J., Miller, P. and Bultman, L. ( 1997 ) Effectiveness of prevention programs for adolescent pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family , 59 , 551 –567.

Frost, J. and Forrest, J. ( 1995 ) Understanding the impact of effective teenage pregnancy prevention programs. Family Planning Perspectives , 27 , 188 –195.

Gilbert, G. and Sawyer, R. (1994) Health Education: Creating Strategies for School and Community Health. Jones & Bartlett, Boston, MA.

Guyatt, G., Di Censo, A., Farewell, V., Willan, A. and Griffith, L. ( 2000 ) Randomized trials versus observational studies in adolescent pregnancy prevention. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 53 , 167 –174.

Hall, J., Rosenthal, R., Tickle-Deignen, L. and Mosteller, F. (1994) Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. (eds), The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 457–483.

Hedges, L. and Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Herold, E. and Goodwin, S. ( 1981 ) Adamant virgins, potential non-virgins and non-virgins. Journal of Sex Research , 17 , 97 –113.

Holder, D., Durant, R., Harris, T., Daniel, J., Obeidallah, D. and Goodman, E. ( 2000 ) The association between adolescent spirituality and voluntary sexual activity. Journal of Adolescent Health , 26 , 295 –302.

Holmes, C. ( 1984 ) Effect size estimation in meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Education , 52 , 106 –109.

Howard, M. and McCabe, J. ( 1990 ) Helping teenagers postpone sexual involvement. Family Planning Perspectives , 22 , 21 –26.*

Howard, M. and Mitchell, M. ( 1993 ) Preventing teenage pregnancy: some questions to be answered and some answers to be questioned. Pediatric Annals , 22 , 109 –118.

Hunter, J. ( 1997 ) Needed: a ban on the significance test. Psychological Science , 8 , 3 –7.

Jacobs, C. and Wolf, E. ( 1995 ) School sexuality education and adolescent risk-taking behavior. Journal of School Health , 65 , 91 –95.

Johnson, B. (1989) DSTAT: Software for the Meta-Analytic Review of Research Literatures . Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Jorgensen, S. ( 1991 ) Project taking-charge: An evaluation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program. Family Relations , 40 , 373 –380.*

Jorgensen, S, Potts, V. and Camp, B. ( 1993 ) Project Taking Charge: six month follow-up of a pregnancy prevention program for early adolescents. Family Relations , 42 , 401 –406

Kinsman, S., Romer, D., Furstenberg, F. and Schwarz, D. ( 1998 ) Early sexual initiation: the role of peer norms. Pediatrics , 102 , 1185 –1192.

Kirby, D. ( 1989 ) Research on effectiveness of sex education programs. Theory and Practice , 28 , 165 –171.

Kirby, D. ( 1992 ) School-based programs to reduce sexual risk-taking behaviors. Journal of School Health , 62 , 280 –287.

Kirby, D. and Baxter, S. ( 1981 ) Evaluating sexuality education programs. Independent School , 41 , 105 –114.

Kirby, D. and Coyle, K. ( 1997 ) School-based programs to reduce sexual risk-taking behavior. Children and Youth Services Review , 19 , 415 –436.

Kirby, D., Barth, R., Leland, N. and Fetro, J. ( 1991 ) Reducing the risk: impact of a new curriculum on sexual risk-taking. Family Planning Perspectives , 23 , 253 –263.*

Kirby, D., Short, L., Collins, J., Rugg, D., Kolbe, L., Howard, M., Miller, B., Sonenstein, F. and Zabin, L. ( 1994 ) School-based programs to reduce sexual-risk behaviors: a review of effectiveness. Public Health Reports , 109 , 339 –360.

Kirby, D., Korpi, M., Barth, R. and Cagampang, H. ( 1997 ) The impact of Postponing Sexual Involvement curriculum among youths in California. Family Planning Perspectives , 29 , 100 –108.*

Kirby, D., Korpi, M., Adivi, C. and Weissman, J. ( 1997 ) An impact evaluation of Project Snapp: an AIDS and pregnancy prevention middle school program. AIDS Education and Prevention , 9 (A), 44 –61.*

Levy, S., Perhats, C., Weeks, K., Handler, S., Zhu, C. and Flay, B. ( 1995 ) Impact of a school-based AIDS prevention program on risk and protective behavior for newly sexually active students. Journal of School Health , 65 , 145 –151.

Main, D., Iverson, D., McGloin, J., Banspach, S., Collins, J., Rugg, D. and Kolbe, L. ( 1994 ) Preventing HIV infection among adolescents: evaluation of a school-based education program. Preventive Medicine , 23 , 409 –417.*

Matt, G. and Cook, T. (1994) Threats to the validity of research synthesis. In Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. (eds), The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 503–520.

Miller, N. and Pollock, V. (1994) Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development. In Cooper, H. and Hedges, L. (eds), The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 457–483.

O'Donnell, L., Stueve, A., Sandoval, A., Duran, R., Haber, D., Atnafou, R., Johnson, N., Grant, U., Murray, H., Juhn, G., Tang, J. and Piessens, P. ( 1999 ) The effectiveness of the Reach for Health Community Youth Service Learning Program in reducing early and unprotected sex among urban middle school students. American Journal of Public Health , 89 , 176 –181.*

Peersman, G., Oakley, A., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J. (1996) Review of Effectiveness of Sexual Health Promotion Interventions for Young People . EPI Centre Report, London.

Quinn, J. ( 1986 ) Rooted in research: effective adolescent pregnancy prevention programs. Journal of Social Work and Human Sexuality , 5 , 99 –110.

Repucci, N. and Herman, J. ( 1991 ) Sexuality education and child abuse: prevention programs in the schools. Review of Research in Education , 17 , 127 –166.

Roche, J. ( 1986 ) Premarital sex: attitudes and behavior by dating stage. Adolescence , 21 , 107 –121.

Roosa, M. and Christopher, F. ( 1990 ) Evaluation of an abstinence-only adolescent pregnancy prevention program: a replication. Family Relations , 39 , 363 –367.*

Rosenthal, R. (1991) Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D. ( 1982 ) Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin , 92 , 500 –504.

Sexual abstinence program has a $250 million price tag (1997) The Herald Times , Bloomington, Indiana, March 5, p. A3.

St Leger, L. ( 1999 ) The opportunities and effectiveness of the health promoting primary school in improving child health—a review of the claims and evidence. Health Education Research , 14 , 51 –69.

Thomas, G., Reifman, A., Barnes, G. and Farrell, M. ( 2000 ) Delayed onset of drunkenness as a protective factor for adolescent alcohol misuse and sexual risk taking: a longitudinal study. Deviant Behavior , 21 , 181 –210.

Visser, A. and Van Bilsen, P. ( 1994 ) Effectiveness of sex education provided to adolescents. Patient Education and Counseling , 23 , 147 –160.

Walter, H. and Vaughan, R. ( 1993 ) AIDS risk reduction among multiethnic sample of urban high school students. Journal of the American Medical Association , 270 , 725 –730.*

Weeks, K., Levy, S., Chenggang, Z., Perhats, C., Handler, A. and Flay, B. ( 1995 ) Impact of a school-based AIDS prevention program on young adolescents self-efficacy skills. Health Education Research , 10 , 329 –344.*

Zabin, L. and Hirsch, M. (1988) Evaluation of Pregnancy Prevention Programs in the School Context . Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

• least-squares analysis
• sex education

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1465-3648
• Print ISSN 0268-1153
• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Sex education: A review of its effects

• Published: April 1981
• Volume 10 , pages 177–205, ( 1981 )

Cite this article

• Peter R. Kilmann Ph.D. 1 ,
• Richard L. Wanlass B.A. 1 ,
• Robert F. Sabalis Ph.D. 1 &
• Bernard Sullivan B.A. 1  

561 Accesses

25 Citations

Explore all metrics

This paper reviewed 33 empirical studies which assessed the effectiveness of sex education. Methodological issues were considered within six sections: (a) populations, (b) instructors, (c) program formats, (d) time format, (e) program goals, and (f) outcome measures. College students were the most frequently assessed population, followed by educators and counselors, and then medical-school populations. Most investigators did not include control subjects. In the studies which included them, they were usually nonequivalent to the experimental subjects. The results were almost exclusively dependent upon questionnaire data. Only a few studies included a followup. In general, the subjects reported gains in sexual knowledge and shifts toward more tolerant and liberal sexual attitudes. However, it was not clear whether or to what extent these changes affected the subjects' behavior. The surprising lack of studies evaluating the effects of sex education on elementary, junior high, and high school students was noted in light of the controversy surrounding the presentation of sex-related information to these populations. In addition to the recommendation that sex education presented to “normal” students who are below the college level should be evaluated, suggestions for future research included the use of equivalent experimental and control subjects, the reporting of instructor characteristics, the specification of program goals, and the inclusion of follow-up evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Alternatives to School Sex Education

Sex Education Programs for Preteens: A Review of Relevant Outcome Studies in Nine Countries

Thoughts on “Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education”

Barnum, B. M. (1973). The evaluation of a process-oriented workshop to train teachers of sex education (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, 1973). Diss. Abstr. Int. 34A: 6490A–6491A (University Microfilms No. 74-8844).

Bernard, H. S. (1973). Evaluation of the impact of a sex education program (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Rochester, 1973). Diss. Abstr. Int. 34A: 2377A–2378A (University Microfilms No. 73-25, 791).

Bloom, J. L. (1969). An investigation of the effect of presenting a sex education course to high school students who have been removed from the regular classroom situation because of severe emotional or physical problems (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1968). Diss. Abstr. Int. 30A: 483A–484A.

Brantlinger, E. A. (1979). Effects of in-service training on attitudes of residential care staff about the sexual needs and rights of mentally retarded residents (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1978). Diss. Abstr. Int. 39A: 5444A (University Microfilms No. 7905986).

Burleson, D. L. (1976). Guidelines for selecting instructional materials in sex education. J. Res. Dev. Ed. 10: 79–82.

Google Scholar  

Byrd, J. W. (1978). The effects of sexually explicit films on the sexual knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of college students (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1977). Diss. Abstr. Int. 38A: 5933A–5934A (University Microfilms No. 780422).

Craig, R. P., and Middleton, C (1977). Sexuality and religious education. Rel. Ed. 72: 595–605.

Davidow, T. D. (1976). The effect of a course in human sexuality on participants' knowledge, attitude and behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University School of Education, 1976). Diss. Abstr. Int. 37A: 1398A-1399A (University Microfilms No. 16-21, 224).

Doyle, A. M. (1976). Effect of graduate training in human sexuality on the counselor's ability to deal with sexually related problems in the counseling setting (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, 1975). Diss. Abstr. Int. 36A: 7203A (University Microfilins No. 76-11, 484).

Dykstra, L. A. H. (1978). The influence of a human sexuality workshop upon sex knowledge and attitudes (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1977). Diss. Abstr. Int. 38A: U532A (University Microfilms No. 7805174).

Elwood, L. K. (1978). A study of the effectiveness of a brief sex education program on the sexual attitudes and anxieties of institutionalized physically disabled males (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1977). Diss. Abstr. Int. 39A: 771A–772A (University Microfilms No. 7811937).

Feinstein, A. R. (1977). Clinical Biostatistics C. V. Mosby, St. Louis.

Flatter, J. C. (1975). The influence of human sexuality workshops on educators' degree of sexual liberalism: An exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1975). Diss. Abstr. Int. 36A: 2626A–2627A (University Microfilms No. 75-25, 282, 202).

Garrard, J., Vaitkus, A., and Chilgren, R. A. (1972). Evaluation of a course in human sexuality. J. Med. Ed. 47: 772–778.

Garrard, J., Vaitkus, A., Held, J., and Chilgren, R. A. (1976). Follow-up effects of a medical school course in human sexuality. Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 331–340.

Golden, J. S., and Liston, E. H. (1972). Medical sex education: The world of illusion and the practical realities. J. Med. Ed. 47: 761–771.

Gough, H. G. (1974). A 24-item version of the Miller-Fisk Sexual Knowledge Questionnaire. J. Psychol. 87: 183–192.

Hayman, H. S. (1970). Should we teach sexual ethics in our schools? J. Sch. Health 10: 339–346.

Iverson, S. R. (1973). Sex education and adolescent attitudes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1973). Diss. Abstr. Int. 34A: 7584A–7585A (University Microfilms No. 74-13, 181).

Karas, S. F., and Elliot, G. A. (1972). The effectiveness of a sex education program on the teacher's sex knowledge and attitudes. Comp. Gro. Stud. 3: 213–220.

Karpen, M. L., and Lipke, L. A. (1974). Sex education as a part of an agency's four-week summer workshop for visually impaired young people. New Outlook for the Blind 68(6): 260–267.

Kelly, G. G. (1971). Group guidance on sex education. Pers. Guid. J. 49(10): 809–814.

Kilmann, P. R. (1978). The treatment of female orgasmic dysfunction: A methodological review of the literature since 1970. J. Sex Marital Ther. 4: 155–176.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Kilmann, P. R., and Auerbach, R. R. (1979). Treatments of premature ejaculation and psychogenic impotence: A critical review of the literature. Arch. Sex. Behav. 8: 81–100.

Kirkendall, L. A., and Miles, G. J. (1968). Sex education research. Rev. Ed. Res. 38(5): 528–541.

Kleinerman, G., Grossman, M., Breslow, J., and Goldman, R. (1971). Sex education in a ghetto school. J. Sch. Health 41: 29–33.

Krizmis, R. (1978). Selected results of participation in a human sexuality course at an urban university (Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago, 1978). Diss. Abstr. Int. 39A: 1440A (University Microfilms No. 7815874).

Lamberti, J. W., and Chapel, J. L. (1977) Development and evaluation of a sex education program for medical students. J. Med. Ed. 52: 582–586.

Levine, M. I. (1962). Sex education in the public elementary and high school curriculums. J. Sch. Health. 37: 30–39.

Libby, R. W., Acock, A. C., and Payne, D. C. (1974). Configurations of parental preferences concerning sources of sex education for adolescents. Adolescence 9(33): 73–80.

Mandetta, A. F., and Woods, N. F. (1974). Learning about human sexuality—A course model. Nurs. Outlook 22: 525–527.

Marcotte, D. B. (1973). Sex education and the medical student. J. Med. Ed. 48: 285–286.

Marcotte, D. B., and Kilpatrick, D. G. (1974). Preliminary evaluation of a sex education course. J. Med. Ed. 49: 703–705.

Marcotte, D. B., and Logan, C. (1977). Medical sex education: Allowing attitude alteration. Arch. Sex. Behav. 6: 155–162.

McCary, J. L. (1975). Teaching the topic of human sexuality. Teach. Psychol. 2: 16–21.

Mims, F. H., Brown, L., and Lubow, R. (1976). Human sexuality course evaluation. Nurs. Res. 25: 187–191.

Mims, F., Yeaworth, R., and Hornstein, S. (1974). Effectiveness of an interdisciplinary course in human sexuality. Nurs. Res. 23: 248–253.

Nagy, F. J. (1978). The effects of human sexuality instruction on sexual guilt, psychological androgyny, and attitudes toward the sexual behaviors of others (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Florida, 1977). Diss. Abstr. Int. 38A: 6541A (University Microfilms No. 7806736).

Orlovick, R. H. (1979). The evaluation of a new form of adult sex education: The human sexuality seminar (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 1978). Diss. Abstr. Int. 39A: 4062A–4063A (University Microfilms No. 7900008).

Poinsett, S. B. (1976). The impact of a workshop on human sexuality for the handicapped on school personnel (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, 1976). Diss. Abstr. Int. 37A: 1499A–1500A (University Microfilms No. 76-19, 218).

Rees, B., and Zimmerman, S. (1974). The effects of formal sex education on the sexual behaviors and attitudes of college students. J. Am. Col. Health Assoc. 22: 370–371.

Reichelt, P. A., and Werley, H. H. (1975). A sex information program for sexually active teenagers. J. Sch. Health 45: 100–107.

Richards, D. L. (1978). Sexual knowledge and attitudes: The effectiveness of a human sexuality course on counselors' level of facilitative functioning (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1977). Diss. Abstr. Int. 39A: 134A–135A (University Microfilms No. 7810657).

Richardson, G. E. (1976). The systematic development and efficacy of a human sexuality workshop for health care professionals (Doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, 1976). Diss. Abstr. Int. 37A: 4156A (University Microfilms No. 77-772).

Rosenberg, P., and Children, R. (1973). Sex education discussion groups in a medical setting. Int. J. Group Psychother. 23: 23–41.

Scholl, G. T. (1974). The psychosocial effects of blindness: Implications for program planning in sex education. New Outlook for The Blind. 68: 201–209.

Sheppe, W. M., and Hain, J. D. (1966). Sex and the medical student. J. Med. Ed. 41: 457–464.

Shofer, L. M. (1973). The relationship between college course work on sex education, students' reasons for enrolling in the course, students' reactions to course components and changes in their self concept (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1972). Diss. Abstr. Int. 34B: 286B (University Microfilms No. 73-17, 051).

Sotile, W. M., and Kilmann, P. R. (1977). Treatments of psychogenic female sexual dysfunctions. Psychol. Bull. 84: 619–633.

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Formal and informal sex education as determinants of premarital sexual behavior. Arch. Sex. Behav. 5: 39–67.

Story, M. D. (1979). A longitudinal study of the effects of a university human sexuality course on sexual attitudes. J. Sex Res. 15: 184–204.

Vennewitz, P. J. (1975). A study to determine the effects of a college human sexuality course upon student sex knowledge and attitudes toward selected sexual topics (Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, 1975). Diss. Abstr. Int. 36A: 618A (University Microfilms No. 75-16, 824).

Vorgeas, M. (1973). Changes in knowledge, attitudes and psychophysiological responses associated with a family life and sex education unit administered to college freshmen (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University School of Education, 1973). Diss. Abstr. Int. 34B 1603B–1604B (University Microfilms No. 73-23, 624.)

Voss, J. R. (1980). Sex education: Evaluation and recommendations for future study. Arch. Sex. Behav. 9: 37–59.

Voss, J. R., and McKillip, J. (1979). Program evaluation in sex education: Outcome assessment of sexual awareness weekend workshops. Arch. Sex. Behav. 8: 507–522.

Woods, N. F., and Mandetta, A., (1975a). Changes in students' knowledge and attitudes following a course in human sexuality: Report of pilot study. Nurs. Res. 24: 10–15.

Woods, N. F., and Mandetta, A. F. (1975b). Changes in students' knowledge and attitudes following a course in human sexuality: A case control comparison. J. Sex Ed. Ther. 1: 47–59.

Zuckerman, M., Tushup, R., and Finner, S. (1976). Sexual attitudes and experience: Attitude and personality correlates and changes produced by a course in sexuality. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 7–19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 29208, Columbia, South Carolina, USA

Peter R. Kilmann Ph.D., Richard L. Wanlass B.A., Robert F. Sabalis Ph.D. & Bernard Sullivan B.A.

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Kilmann, P.R., Wanlass, R.L., Sabalis, R.F. et al. Sex education: A review of its effects. Arch Sex Behav 10 , 177–205 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542178

Download citation

Issue Date : April 1981

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542178

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• sex education
• college students
• medical school populations
• human sexuality
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Clin Diagn Res
• v.11(3); 2017 Mar

Knowledge Attitude and Perception of Sex Education among School Going Adolescents in Ambala District, Haryana, India: A Cross-Sectional Study

Randhir kumar.

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Anmol Goyal

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Parmal Singh

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Anu Bhardwaj

4 Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Anshu Mittal

5 Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Sachin Singh Yadav

6 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Introduction

Adolescence is a highly dynamic period characterised by rapid growth and development. Adolescents have limited knowledge about sexual and reproduction health, and know little about the natural processes of puberty, sexual health, pregnancy or reproduction. Sex education should be an integral part of the learning process beginning in childhood and continuing into adult life, because it is lifelong process.

This study was carried out to identify the knowledge and attitude of imparting sex education in school going adolescents in rural and urban area of Ambala district

Materials and Methods

A cross sectional study design was used to study the knowledge of reproductive and sexual health among school going children. A total of 743 adolescents from age group of 13-19 year were studied, using self designed semi-structured questionnaire to assess the knowledge regarding reproductive and sexual health among adolescents

The mean age of study subjects was 15.958±1.61 years, majority of adolescents i.e., 93.5% favour sex education. An 86.3% said sex education can prevent the occurrence of AIDS and 91.5% of adolescents prefer doctors should give them sex education followed by 83.0% school/teacher and least preference was parents 37.3%.

There were substantial lacunae in the knowledge about reproductive and sexual health. Students felt that sex education is necessary and should be introduced in the school curriculum.

The term adolescence comes from Latin word meaning “to grow to maturity” [ 1 ]. According to WHO 10-19 years is called adolescents [ 2 ]. It is the period when maximum amount of physical, psychological, emotional and behavioural changes take place [ 3 ].

Physical health, sexual and behavioural problems of adolescents are interrelated and these factors are related to unhealthy development in adolescents stem from the social environment. It also includes poverty, unemployment, crime, sexual harassment, gender and ethic discrimination and impact of social change on individual, family and communities. So adolescents need to provide preventive interventions for these behaviours are the same and all contribute to positive personal growth and development [ 4 ].

Adolescents need to know how to protect themselves from HIV/STDs and premature pregnancies, for this sex education is the best way, it should be a lifelong learning process based on the knowledge and skills and positive attitude, it helps to young people to enjoy sex and relationships that are based on qualities such as positive knowledge, mutual respect, trust, negotiation and enjoyment.

Age appropriate knowledge among youth and adolescents about the changes during puberty, sexuality, modes of transmission and prevention of sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and to maintaining a healthy and safe sexual life is important for the health and welfare and aware them to prevent unwanted pregnancies and of HIV/AIDS [ 5 ].

Sex education should be an integral part of the learning process beginning in childhood and continuing into adult life and its lifelong learning process. It should be for all children, young people and adults, including those with physical learning or emotional difficulties. It should encourage exploration of values and morale values, consideration of sexuality and personnel relationships and the development of communication and decision making skills. It should foster self-esteem, self-awareness, a sense of moral responsibility and the skills to avoid and resist sexual experience [ 6 ].

Health education plays important roles in human life and it is also a fundamental right. It can help to increase self-esteem, develop effective communication skills and encourage awareness about health and disease related knowledge. The mixture of myths/stigma secrecy, lack of knowledge, social disparity and negative media messages confuses young people and encourages poor self-esteem resulting in uninformed choices being made and it may lead to incorrect knowledge about sex, unprotected sex, unplanned pregnancy; STI’S including HIV/AIDS or deeply unhappy and damaging relationship [ 7 ].

Because of lack of clear protocol for sex education, like content, way of approaches, rules and regulation etc., for educational services and how these services should be fulfilled in different socioeconomic and cultural environments is not clear [ 8 ]. So, this study was done to identify the knowledge attitude and perception of sex education among school going adolescents.

A school based cross-sectional study was conducted among school going adolescents in a rural and urban area of district Ambala, Haryana for a period of six months from January 2015 to July 2015. Adolescent in the age group 13-19 years studying in class 9 th to 12 th were included and those who had not given consent and who had not completed questionnaires were excluded from study. The sample size was calculated on the basis of prevalence of knowledge regarding reproductive and sexual health with confidence limit 95% and margin of sampling error 10% by using the formula n=4pq/l 2 , to work out the required sample size the following equation was applied n=4pq/l 2 . Literature review reveals that the prevalence of knowledge regarding reproductive and sexual health among school going adolescents in India is 35% (WHO/MOHFW [ 9 ] and Mittal k et al., [ 10 ]). As the data on knowledge regarding reproductive and sexual health for Haryana state is not available, so the sample size was calculated by presuming the prevalence of knowledge regarding reproductive and sexual health in school going children in India to be 35% and thus the sample size for the study came out 743. These samples were divided into 4 strata rural/urban, government/private, class wise and sex wise were taken through stratified random sampling technique and then use simple random sampling technique to reach the total sample size. Ambala district has 224 higher and senior secondary schools only co-educational schools were taken for study. There were 134 government and 69 private co-educational schools in the six community development blocks of district Ambala. As the number government and private schools were in 2:1 ratio, so eight government and four private schools were selected randomly [ 11 ], and the number of students included in the study was 446 and 297 from government and private schools respectively. The number of schools in the government sector was more in rural areas and greater numbers of private schools were located in urban areas so the Probability Proportionate To Size (PPS) technique was used to cover the sample size of 743 student. One section of each class from selected school was included in the study, which was taken at random. Only those students were enrolled in the study those fulfilled the inclusion criteria, interview was continued till total sample were covered. Special care was taken to include the students in age group from 13-19 years by ensuring participation of all classes from 9 th to 12 th . A self designed, semi-structured, self-report pretested questionnaire was used to screen students regarding knowledge and attitude about sex education. The questionnaires were divided in to two groups. Part-1: Socio demographic profile and part-2: sexual health and knowledge, attitude and source of giving sex education. Most of the questions were structured with 3-5 options. Students were to answer one option unless specified otherwise. Open-ended question were given wherever description of answers was required. The questions were framed in English and translated into Hindi. Both Hindi and English questionnaires were used as per choice of the respondents. The study was conducted after obtaining written permission from district education officer, Ambala. Permission was also obtained from the principals of the selected schools. Informed and written consent was also obtained from parents during teacher- parents meeting. Completed questionnaires were compiled and entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using Stastical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21, chi-square test and bar diagram.

The present study was a cross-sectional study conducted in rural and urban areas of district Ambala, Haryana. A total of 743 school- going adolescents studying in classes 9 th to 12 th in the selected government and private schools situated in different parts of urban and rural areas were included in the study. A total of 743 students of 13-19 years age-group those responded well, without hiding any problem were the subjects of the present study. [ Table/Fig-1 ] shows that 294(39.5%) of adolescents belonged to 15-16 year age group. The mean age of studied subjects was 15.958±1.61. Female were 358 (48.2%) and 385 (51.8%) were male. There were more students from government schools 446 (60%). More number of students were studying in class 10 th and 11 th i.e., 27.2% each, and in urban area 204 (53.5%) belongs to nuclear family and in rural area 198 (54.7%) belongs to joint family. Maximum 211 (28.4%) of adolescents belongs to SES class III and lowest number from class I 84 (11.3%). Whereas in rural area majority of adolescents belongs to SES class V and in urban area majority of adolescents belongs to class II. It was statistically highly significant (p<0.001).

[Table/Fig-1]:

Socio demographic profile of respondents.

Present study [ Table/Fig-2 ] reveals the association between different socio-demographic profile and perception of need of sex education among adolescents; it shows that majority of adolescents 695 (93.5%) favour sex education. However, boys 374 (97.1%) were more likely to favour sex education as compared to girls 321 (89.7%). It was found that adolescents with higher age group, belongs to urban area and private school with higher SES favours sex education in school. It was considered statistically significant.

[Table/Fig-2]:

Perception of sex education according to their socio-demographic profile of adolescents.

[ Table/Fig-3 ] reveals the reason for sex education among adolescents, out of 695 adolescents who are in favour of sex education, 600 (86.3%) said sex education can prevent the occurrence of AIDS, whereas 396 (57.0%) removes myth, 373 (53.7%) believe knowledge of sex makes future life easy, 275 (39.5%) thought that protects from other diseases and 102 (13.7%) don’t give any reason for sex education.

[Table/Fig-3]:

Perception of the reasons of sex education among adolescents (n=695).

(*Multiple responses)

[ Table/Fig-4 ] reveals that majority of adolescents thought 615 (86.9%) sex education and STDs, 581 (82.2%) menstruation and its hygiene, 512 (72.3%) changes occurring during puberty and 503 (71.0%) drug abuse was the most common topic that should be discussed in class. However, 349 (49.4%) urban adolescents thought menstrual and its hygiene topic and about 280 (39.5%) rural adolescents sex education and STDs related topic should discuss in class.

[Table/Fig-4]:

Perception of students about content of sex education.

[ Table/Fig-5 ] shows the area wise distribution of respondents according to their preference for getting sex education. It was found that majority 680 (91.5%) of adolescents prefers doctors should give them sex education followed by 617 (83.0%) school/teacher and least preference was parents 277 (37.3%). However, in urban adolescents most common preference for sex education was school/teacher i.e., 357(48.0%) and in rural area 347 (46.7%) doctor was the most common preference for getting sex education.

Distribution of respondents according to their preference for getting sex education.

This study has tried to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices regarding reproductive health and sexual problems, to assess the perception regarding reproductive and sexual health among adolescents and to identify the need of imparting sex education in school going adolescents (13-19 year) from urban and rural area of district Ambala Haryana.

Regarding the need of sex education among adolescents, it shows that majority of adolescents (93.5%) favour the sex education. However, boys (97.1%) were more likely to favour sex education as compared to girls (89.7%). A similar study was conducted by Jaideep K et al., in Chandigarh found that 95% of students were in favours of mainstreaming of sex education [ 12 ]. Another study done by Benzaken T et al., shows 90% favours sex education and study by Thakur HG et al., shows that 90% and 97% favours sex education, among boys 82.9% and among girls 75.6% respectively [ 13 , 14 ]. A study done by Dorle AS et al., from Karnataka found only 48% of student favours sex education in higher and senior secondary school and it was lower than our study it might be because of regional and cultural difference and also study was conducted five year back [ 15 ].

To find out the reason of sex education, 86.3% participants said that sex education can prevent the occurrence of AIDS, whereas 57.0% remove myth, 53.7% knowledge of sex makes future life easy, 39.5% protect from other disease and 102 (13.7%) don’t give any reason for sex education. A study done by Mueller TE et al., reported that majority of adolescents said sex education reduce the risks of potentially negative outcome from sexual behaviour such as fear and stigma of menstruation, unwanted and unplanned pregnancies and infection with STIs including HIV [ 16 ]. To know the preference for getting sex education, present study found that majority 680 (91.5%) of adolescents prefers doctors followed by 617 (83.0%) school/teacher and least preference was parents 277 (37.3%) respectively. A similar study was conducted by Jaideep K et al., in Chandigarh found that 76.74% students choose the teacher as the best source to provide sex education [ 12 ]. Similar observation was found by Wong WC et al., in Hongkong and Zhang L et al., in China [ 17 , 18 ]. All these variation might be because of regional and cultural difference. A study done by Dorle AS et al., from Karnataka found girls favours parents and boys favours friend as a source of information about sex [ 15 ]. A view point given by Datta SS et al., favours school and college should give sex education to adolescents [ 19 ].

This study suffers from the usual limitation of a cross-sectional study. We only include the co-education school so it cannot be generalizes to all school adolescent. As sex education is a sensitive topic, we cannot guarantee about the honest answers as it covered the sensitive issue i.e., recall bias. Participants may agree with statements as presented to them, especially when in doubt i.e., acquiescence bias and also social desirability bias.

Recommendation

Sex Education must be introduced in the school which should start from the primary school and brings about the age appropriate topics as they go through the high school. It should contain a package of information about life skills, reproductive health, safe sex, pregnancy and STI’s including HIV/AIDS. A socio cultural research is needed to find the right kind of sexual health education services for boys and girls separately from the teacher of same gender. It is the responsibility of parents, teachers, social workers, politicians, administrators, medical and paramedical profession so that adolescent girl or boy got legitimate due to education and empowerment and change over to adult men or women is smooth and streamlined with nil or least medical, social or psychological problems.

In this present study knowledge and perception of sex education was good, majority believe that sex education should implemented in school curriculum and majority of them gave good reason for sex education implementation in school. The most common preference for getting sex education was from doctor and teacher/school followed by friend respectively. Sex education and sexuality is unaccepted in many communities and also among some parents, adolescents feel shy and scared to talk about sex education, some adolescents hesitate to reply about sex education especially girls.

Financial or Other Competing Interests