IRBIS does NOT generate these documents with application-specific information.
Concise Summary examples can be found here .
Guidance on the use of plain language in consent forms:
There are a few additional forms that are not provided online and may be accessed below. As needed, these should be completed and uploaded to your IRB application.
COVID-19 Related Forms:
Informed Consent Short Form (for a single subject who may be illiterate, or otherwise unable to read the consent form — used when full consent form has to be read or translated for subject).
Editable documents containing required information.
New IRBMED studies should most often use the latest Standard Informed Consent template available on this webpage.
Specialty Consent Templates may be appropriate for low-risk studies with simpler study methodologies.
The working version template containing blue and orange text boxes is updated with additional instructions and required language. IRBMED recommends using the working version template for creating the consent document. If using the outline version (without the blue-box instructions), always use the working version as a companion document for additional information and as-applicable required language.
April 2024: Extensive revisions, including a new section
To better organize consent document information by clearly separating main study information from all information about data and biospecimen storage, future use, and sharing, this document contains a new section. The new section 12 shifts the signature section to a new section 13.
Turn on “Track Changes” feature in Word.
Save “Track Changes” version in .docx or .doc format.
Upload ONLY "Track Changes" document on the previous tracked-changes stack in 10-1.1 using the ellipsis (three dots) next to the version number column.
Contact us at [email protected] or 734-763-4768 / (Fax 734-763-1234) 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 520, Room 3214, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800
A list of IRBMED staff is available through our website .
Edited By: [email protected] Last Updated: April 15, 2024 9:00 AM
Templates by topic / unit.
Office of Research University of Michigan Medical School 1301 Catherine Street SPC 5624 Ann Arbor, MI 48109
North Campus Research Complex (NCRC) 2800 Plymouth Road Building 520, 3rd Floor Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800
Phone: 734-615-1332 Fax: 734-615-9458 Email: [email protected]
As part of our continued efforts to improve the IRB application and review process, we have developed new ICF templates that address the issues identified by our stakeholders:
These new and improved ICF templates replace all previous versions posted to our site as of May 17th, 2023; any new intakes initiated within WRG-HS as of June 12th, 2023, must utilize these new templates.
Make sure your Informed Consent Form is a readable document!
See our Guidance Document on how to prepare a readable consent form .
See our list of Medical Terms in Lay Language for use in Informed Consent Forms.
Refer to the Program for Readability in Science & Medicine (PRISM) Readability Toolkit
Refer to the MRCT Research Glossary for easy-to-understand clinical research definitions.
Will i have to start using these new consents today.
Any new studies initiated in WRG-HS starting 6/12, must use the new ICF templates.
Any existing study using the previous consent templates can continue to use their IRB-approved consent. Any new studies initiated in WRG-HS starting 6/12, must use the new ICF templates.
Studies with an external IRB are expected to use consent forms provided by the lead IRB. Once the externally reviewed ICF is provided to the WCM IRB, we will conduct a local context review to confirm any required language (i.e. research-related injury, NYS Genetic testing requirements, etc.). The new WCM ICF templates are available as a resource if needed, but not required for externally reviewed studies.
You can continue to use the same ICF.
Weill Cornell Medicine Human Research Protections 575 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: (646) 962-8200
The templates below were created to help you create the documents you will need to communicate to participants what they will do in the study. The documents you provide participants will range from recruitment materials to post-debrief consent forms, and you need to submit everything that you provide to a participant to our Board for review. For more information about the consent process see Consent .
Biomedical Research Consent Templates
These templates are appropriate for social, behavioral, and educational ("SBER") research that does not include any biomedical procedures.
We appreciate your suggestions for improving templates and/or adding sample language to the standards documents. Please email OHRPPEQI@research.ucla.edu to provide your feedback.
An EQUIP-TIPS Guidance document providing lay language for common medical / scientific terminology (source:
As part of the informed consent process, the consent document is designed to provide information to potential subjects about a research study so they can make an informed decision about their participation. The use of a form to document the consent process is required unless specifically waived by the IRB. One of the most common reasons for delay in IRB approval is an incomplete, inaccurate, and/or unclear consent form document. Informed consent templates (biomedical and social/behavioral versions) are available on the IRB Applications and Forms page. You can download a template and customize it to your research study.
Describe the purpose(s) of this research study in lay terms. Include a statement that indicates why this is considered a research study (e.g., testing how a non-FDA approved drug works and whether it is safe). Provide definitions for specific research design features (e.g., double-blind, randomization, placebo-controlled).
Include a thorough description of the specific procedures involved in the study, which procedures are considered experimental and why. Include detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria, length of involvement. If the subject will be interviewed or asked to complete a questionnaire, describe the types of questions that he/she will be asked to answer. Provide a procedures table if subjects would benefit from the addition of a table.
This element will ask if the study involves more than minimal risk. If so you will be prompted for a detailed description of the potential risks and discomforts involved (physical, psychological, social, and economic). For some procedures you may choose to use standard text (e.g., blood draw). If applicable, include a statement that the treatment or procedure may involve risks, which are currently unforeseeable, to the subject (or to the embryo or fetus, if the subject is or may become pregnant). You may build a table or cut and paste an existing table into the Word document.
Describe all expected benefits and who will benefit. Note: Compensation for participation is not a benefit; provision for free drugs or procedures is not a benefit.
If subjects will be compensated for their participation or reimbursed for costs (e.g., parking), describe in detail the type of payment, amount, and terms. Specify any additional costs to the subject that may result from participation in this study that will not be reimbursed.
When applicable, subjects should be informed of circumstances under which their participation may be terminated by the investigator without the subject’s consent. Subjects should also be informed of procedures for safe and orderly termination should they decide to withdraw from the study before it is completed.
Include information about the protection of subject’s privacy, method of protecting research data, and who may have access to study records.
Standard text explains that significant new information will be provided to the subject by the investigator.
Include applicable information on alternative procedures or courses of treatment that may be advantageous to the potential subject if he/she refuses to participate or withdraws from the study. Social/behavioral research - if compensation for participation in the research is extra course credit, explain that the course instructor is to provide a reasonable alternative way to earn extra course credit.
Standard non-alterable text describes the provision for subject injury incurred as a result of this study, if applicable.
If a research team member has a disclosable financial interest in the outcome of this particular study or research program, a statement to that effect should be inserted. If the study involves collection of specimens, the appropriate standard language should be included.
Includes contact information to answer study questions and standard text that instructs subjects to contact the Research Protections office if they have any comments or questions regarding the conduct of the study and/or their rights as research subjects.
Standard text emphasizes that the decision to participate, or not participate, is solely up to the subject.
Signature lines should be included for the subject and for the researcher obtaining informed consent. A “Legally-Authorized Representative” signature line should be included if you will obtain surrogate consent or are developing a parental permission form for enrollment of a minor in research. Also, you may obtain the assent of a minor ages 13-17 (as well as parental permission) using this consent form.
A “Witness” signature line must be included for specific types of research. See How to Consent for more information on this topic.
An IRB may waive the requirement to obtain a signed informed consent document in two situations:
In cases where the documentation requirement for informed consent is waived, the IRB often requires the researchers to provide participants with a written statement regarding the research. This written statement requires IRB approval. The template Study Information Sheet can be used as a guide.
Researchers interested in obtaining a waiver of written (signed) informed consent should make sure that their research qualifies for one of the above options, and should address how the research qualifies for each of the option's requirements in the IRB Application.
An IRB may approve a consent procedure which does not include, or which alters, some or all of the elements of informed consent , or waive the requirements to obtain informed consent if:
When an IRB waives the requirement to obtain informed consent, it waives the entire requirement for the informed consent process. However, when the IRB grants an alteration of some or all of the elements of the informed consent (e.g., removes a required element of consent from the document), the process of obtaining informed consent is still required. Researchers interested in obtaining a waiver or an alteration of the consent process should address how the research qualifies for each of the above requirements in the IRB Application.
UCL Research Ethics
Recruitment documents help people make informed choices about whether to participate in a research study. Find out how to write a Participant Information Sheet, example forms and further guidance.
Participant Information Sheets must be designed to assist participants to make informed choices. Potential recruits must be given sufficient information to allow them to decide whether or not they want to take part. The process of obtaining consent and the accompanying documentation must be approved by a research ethics committee and, where only verbal consent to research is contemplated include consideration of an appropriate process for witnessing the consent.
Researchers must take the steps necessary to ensure that all participants in the research understand the process in which they are to be engaged, including why their participation is necessary, how it will be used, and how and to whom it will be reported so that the prospective participant can make an informed decision about whether they really do want to take part.
It is highly recommended that the information provided is presented on headed paper and is accurate, clear and simple so that someone with a reading age of 8 would understand the contents (use short words, sentences and paragraphs). The information should be specific to the proposed research and appropriate for the social and cultural context in which is it being given. It is important to avoid technical terms, jargon and abbreviations, bias, coercion or any inappropriate inducements.
It is highly recommended that the information provided is presented on headed paper and is accurate, clear, and simple. The information should be specific to the proposed research and appropriate for the social and cultural context in which is it being given. It is important to avoid technical terms, jargon, and abbreviations, bias, coercion, or any inappropriate inducements.
The following points should be considered when writing an information sheet:
Ask someone else to review your information sheet before it is circulated.
Page last updated: June 2024
Templates for informed consent forms
Notes to researchers
The language used throughout form should be at the level of a local student of class 6th/8th
Please note that these are templates developed by the WHO ERC to assist the Principal Investigator in the design of their informed consent forms (ICF). It is important that Principal Investigators adapt their own ICFs to the outline and requirements of their particular study. The logo of the Institution must be used on the ICF and not the WHO logo.
The informed consent form consists of two parts: the information sheet and the consent certificate.
Do not be concerned by the length of these templates. They are long only because they contain guidance and explanations which are for you and which you will not include in the informed consent forms that you develop and provide to participants in your research.
These templates include examples of key questions that may be asked at the end of each section, that could ensure the understanding of the information being provided, especially if the research study is complex. These are just examples, and suggestions, and the investigators will have to modify the questions depending upon their study.
In these templates:
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
1 University of Messina, “G. Martino” Hospital, Messina, Italy
2 University of Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Current biomedical research on human subjects requires clinical trial, which is defined as “any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions [ i.e. drugs, cells or other biological products, surgical procedures, devices] to evaluate the effects on health outcomes” [1]. In our modern ethical conception, all research conducted on humans must be pre-emptively accepted by the subjects themselves through the procedure known as informed consent, which is a process by which “a subject voluntarily confirms his or her willingness to participate in a particular trial, after having been informed of all aspects of the trial that are relevant to the subject’s decision to participate”, as stated in the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines [2]. Informed consent is documented by means of a written, signed and dated informed consent form. This form is required in the following cases: 1) when the research involves patients, children, incompetent/incapacitated persons, healthy volunteers, immigrants or others ( e.g. prisoners); 2) when the research uses/collects human genetic material, biological samples or personal data [3].
The process of obtaining informed consent for clinical trials is tightly regulated; complications arise in circumstances when consent may be waived, or when needed from vulnerable populations http://ow.ly/rEMe30j5MVq
Current biomedical research on human subjects requires clinical trial, which is defined as “any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions [ i.e. drugs, cells or other biological products, surgical procedures, devices] to evaluate the effects on health outcomes” [ 1 ]. In our modern ethical conception, all research conducted on humans must be pre-emptively accepted by the subjects themselves through the procedure known as informed consent, which is a process by which “a subject voluntarily confirms his or her willingness to participate in a particular trial, after having been informed of all aspects of the trial that are relevant to the subject’s decision to participate”, as stated in the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines [ 2 ]. Informed consent is documented by means of a written, signed and dated informed consent form. This form is required in the following cases: 1) when the research involves patients, children, incompetent/incapacitated persons, healthy volunteers, immigrants or others ( e.g. prisoners); 2) when the research uses/collects human genetic material, biological samples or personal data [ 3 ].
The informed consent form must be written in language easily understood by the subjects, it must minimise the possibility of coercion or undue influence, and the subject must be given sufficient time to consider participation. However, informed consent is not merely a form that is signed, but is a process in which the subject has an understanding of the research and its risks, and it is tightly described in ethical codes and regulations for human subject research [ 2 ].
The voluntary expression of the consent by a competent subject and the adequate information disclosure about the research are critical and essential elements of the informed consent process [ 4 ]. Competent subjects able to comprehend the research-related information should personally decide and provide the consent on research participation. Conditions posing practical challenges in obtaining informed consent from the real subject may include situations of medical emergency or obtaining consent from “vulnerable” subjects and/or children [ 5 ].
Research-related information must be presented to enable people to voluntarily decide whether or not to participate as a research subject. For an ethically valid consent, information provided to a research subject should include, but not be limited to: information about the health condition for which the research is proposed; details of the nature and purpose of the research; the expected duration of the subject’s participation; a detailed description of study treatment or intervention and of any experimental procedures (including, in the case of randomised clinical trials (RCTs), also blinding and randomisation); a statement that participation in research is voluntary; probable risks and benefits associated with research participation; details of the nature of the illness and possible outcome if the condition is left untreated; availability, risks and benefits of alternative treatments; information about procedures adopted for ensuring data protection/confidentiality/privacy, including duration of storage of personal data; details about the handling of any incidental findings of the research; description of any planned genetic tests; details of insurance coverage in case of injury; reference contacts for any further answers to pertinent questions about the research and the subject’s rights and in case of any research-related injury to the subject; and any other information that seems necessary for an informed decision to be taken by the subject. Of particular importance, a statement offering the subject the opportunity to withdraw at any time from the research without consequences must be provided during the information disclosure [ 2 ]. Specific information should be provided in case of research projects involving children, incapacitated adults not able to give informed consent, illiterate populations, etc. (as will be described later in this article).
The information about the research should be given by a physician or by other individuals ( i.e. researchers) with appropriate scientific training and qualifications [ 6 ]. Furthermore, the location where the informed consent is being discussed, and the subject’s physical, emotional and psychological capability, must be taken into consideration when taking consent from a human subject.
After institutional review board (IRB) or independent ethics committee approval is achieved, obtaining informed consent from each human subject prior to his/her participation in clinical trial is mandatory [ 5 ]. However, when specific circumstances occur, the informed consent can be waived, and “research without consent” is possible, which allows enrolment of patients without their consent, under strict regulation [ 7 ]. In order that research without consent is considered justifiable, the following three conditions have to be met: 1) it is impracticable to obtain consent, 2) the research does not infringe the principle of self-determination, and 3) the research provides significant clinical relevance [ 8 ].
The first condition, of “impracticability”, occurs when obtaining informed consent is burdened by high impact in terms of time and economic resources or could compromise the study’s validity [ 8 ]. The second condition means that, although physicians are requested to ensure that the patient has understood the aim of the research and the risks and/or benefits associated with study participation, the researchers are also advised to respect the patient’s decision-making capacity, not interfering with his/her decisions and acting always in the patient’s best interest [ 9 ]. The third condition leads to justification of waiving consent when the clinical relevance and public health importance are potentially high [ 8 ].
The formal literature identifies different types of RCTs and classifies them into three macro-areas: 1) RCTs based on infeasibility of informed consent; 2) RCTs that omit informed consent only for control groups; and 3) RCTs that omit informed consent entirely.
Emergency clinical studies, involving critically ill subjects, represent an exception to the requirement of informed consent. The investigated life-saving therapy and the medical intervention may be required immediately, not permitting the researchers to wait and respect all procedures of obtaining informed consent. Within this context, the researchers will be able to proceed with patient recruitment, also without the subject’s consent to treatment, when, prior to the study, the IRB has ascertained the presence of mandatory conditions ( table 1 ) [ 10 ].
Conditions to be met in emergency clinical study
• Subjects affected by a life-threatening condition |
• The treatment is experimental |
• The clinical research allows verification of both the effectiveness and safety of the treatment |
• It is impracticable to obtain consent |
• The waiver of informed consent is needed for the clinical trial |
• The researcher will contact the legally authorised representative |
• The family members can decline the patient’s participation in the study |
Cluster randomised studies include cluster-cluster and individual-cluster research [ 11 ]. In cluster-cluster designs ( e.g. studies on infectious disease prevention), the intervention involves the entire target community, so that single subjects cannot refuse it [ 12 ]. Conversely, in individual-cluster designs ( e.g. studies on primary care), although the intervention involves all the selected community, the right to refuse treatment is allowed. Under this circumstance, the omission of informed consent is justified only when the treatment refusal undermines the validity of the research study and/or procedures [ 13 ].
In Zelen’s single-consent model ( e.g. RCTs in infectious or oncological diseases), randomisation occurs prior to any consent, and informed consent is sought only from individuals assigned to experimental treatment [ 14 ]. In the control group, the physicians do not make substantial changes in routine patient care, so informed consent is not required for patient enrolment [ 8 ].
In order to improve study recruitment, Zelen developed the double-consent design. Specifically, informed consent is requested for subjects to be involved in the study but not for the randomisation, preventing psychological distress [ 14 ].
In follow-up studies, the nested consent model ( e.g. for single cohort studies) or cohort multiple RCTs model ( e.g. for multiple cohort studies) is applied. In these variants, patients give their consent for prospective follow-up; however, they remain blinded to any randomised experimental interventions [ 15 ].
In trials using the model of “consent to postponed information”, the informed consent process is carried out after the study is completed [ 16 ].
All these RCT types aim to avoid unnecessary stress in patients who will not receive the new promising experimental treatment. Moreover, these clinical study designs do not affect the standard therapeutic approach or infringe the rights of the patients in the control group; therefore, the clinical trial can proceed without obtaining informed consent [ 8 ].
Based on the fact that patients are assigned to standard care interventions, no informed consent is sought either in low-risk pragmatic RCTs [ 17 ] or in prompted optional randomisation trials [ 18 , 19 ]. However, in a low-risk pragmatic RCT, patients do not have the possibility to choose one of the two standard treatments, whereas in a prompted optional randomisation trial, both the researchers and the enrolled patients can choose one type of treatment over another, despite the randomisation results [ 6 ].
A “vulnerable population” is defined as a disadvantaged community subgroup unable to make informed choices, protect themselves from inherent or intended risks, or keep their own interests safeguarded [ 20 ]. In the health domain, “vulnerable populations” refers to physical vulnerability ( e.g. pregnant women, fetuses, children, orphans, students, employees, prisoners, the military, and those who are chronically or terminally ill), psychological vulnerability (cognitively and intellectually impaired individuals) and social vulnerability (those who are homeless, from ethnic minorities, are immigrants or refugees) [ 20 ].
Due to a compromised free will and inability to make conscious decisions, several ethical dilemmas (related to communications, privacy and treatment) often arise when research involves these populations. Guaranteeing protection of rights, safety, data privacy and confidentiality of vulnerable subjects are prerogatives of good clinical practice, and law dispositions are regulated and strictly monitored by the applicable authorities [ 21 ].
For a long time, pregnant women were excluded from clinical research because of their “vulnerability”. Although pregnant women are able to make informed and conscious choices, they have been considered “vulnerable” due to the potential risks to the fetus, who is also considered as a “patient” [ 22 ]. More recently, with the consideration of pregnant women as “scientifically complex” rather than “vulnerable” subjects, it has been permitted to involve this category in research trials [ 23 ]. The “scientific complexity” reflects both ethical and physiological complexity. The ethical aspects are secondary to the need to find a balance between interests of the fetus and the mother. The physiological aspects are strictly related to the pregnancy status [ 24 ].
Research studies involving pregnant women and fetuses have to satisfy specific federal regulations ( table 2 ). The following appropriate precautions should be taken in research studies involving pregnant women: no pregnant woman may be involved as a subject in a human clinical research project unless the purpose of the research is to meet the health needs of the mother and the fetus will be placed at risk only to the minimum extent necessary to meet such needs, or the risk to the fetus is minimal [ 25 ].
Conditions to be met in research studies involving pregnant women and fetuses
• studies have also been conducted on pregnant animals |
• Clinical studies have been conducted on nonpregnant women |
• Clinical findings assessing potential harms to pregnant women and fetuses are available |
• The risk to the fetus is minimal and caused exclusively by the procedure/intervention |
• The study will achieve crucial knowledge not obtainable by any other means |
• The researchers will have no part in any decision influencing fetal viability or pregnancy |
• No incentive will be provided to influence the course of pregnancy |
Researchers can enrol pregnant women only when the mother and/or the father are legally competent. In fact, the consent to participate in research may be either self-directed (only the mother’s consent is required) or made with the guidance of the woman’s partner. However, the father’s consent need not be obtained when: 1) the research activity is directed to the health needs of the mother; 2) the father’s identity is doubtful; 3) the father is absent; or 4) a pregnancy from rape has occurred [ 26 ]. The consent signature requirements from the mother and father are summarised in table 3 . Once the informed consent is obtained, the pregnant women will be included into any phase of the study unless the research project will be compromised or the patient’s health (mother and/or fetus) will be in danger.
Consent signature requirements for pregnant women and children
Direct benefit to mother | Mother |
Direct benefit to mother and fetus | Mother |
Direct benefit to fetus | Mother and father |
Direct benefit to individual subjects | One parent or guardian |
No direct benefit to individual subjects | Both parents |
No direct benefit to the subject or societal (indirect) benefit | Both parents |
Medical care related to pregnancy | Parental consent is not needed |
Medical care related to mental health treatment, or the diagnosis or treatment of infectious, contagious or communicable diseases | Parental consent is not needed |
Self-sufficient minors | Parental consent is not needed |
Aged ≥15 years | |
Living alone | |
Managing their own financial affairs | |
Emancipated minors | Parental consent is not needed |
Married or divorced | |
On active duty in the US armed forces | |
By a court | |
Having the legal right to consent on their own behalf to medical, dental or mental health treatment |
# : consent requirements are the same whether the risk is “no more than minimal” or “more than minimal”.
Medical students and employees, who take part in numerous aspects of patient care in primary, secondary and tertiary care settings, are often invited to participate in human studies as volunteers. Frequently, the requesting researcher is their supervisor or instructor, who may push them to participate in the study, which can negatively influence their decision and also violate the consent legitimacy. Therefore, in order to protect these subjects against “coercion” or “undue influence”, when an investigator wishes to recruit medical students or employees, they must first obtain IRB approval for inclusion in the study of these vulnerable subgroups [ 27 ].
Prisoners, defined as any individual involuntarily confined or detained in a penal institution, are considered as “vulnerable” because they may be coerced into study participation, and also, due to both cognitive and psychiatric disorders, they can show an impaired ability to provide voluntary informed consent [ 28 ]. To protect this population, the Office for Human Research Protections has stipulated federal regulations according to which the only studies that may involve prisoners are those with independent and valid reasons for involving them ( table 4 ) [ 25 ].
Studies that may involve prisoners
• Studies on the possible causes, processes and effects of incarceration |
• Studies on prisons as institutional structures or on prisoners as incarcerated persons |
• Studies on special conditions affecting prisoners |
• Studies on practices of improving the health or well-being of the prisoners |
• Epidemiological studies |
Due to the context of war in which they work, as well as the critical care setting in which they are treated, military subjects often receive medical care and/or participate in biomedical research under an “implied consent” condition. Moreover, the superior–subordinate relationship contributes to favour coercion or undue influence, making this population vulnerable [ 29 ]. To curb this phenomenon and to ensure that participation is truly voluntary, the US Dept of Defense agencies have adopted requirements similar to those that govern medical research that applies to the civilian population. Accordingly, the medical research recruitment session happens in the absence of superiors, and the informed consent is obtained prior to participating in a medical research study. The presence of an ombudsman guarantees and verifies that the participation is voluntary and that the information provided during recruitment is complete, accurate and clear. A payment as an incentive is acceptable but it must not be used to legitimise a coercive interference. Additional protection is provided to students at service academies, especially those aged <18 years. However, when emergency research is conducted or the research study advances the development of a medical product needed by the armed forces, informed consent will not be required [ 29 ].
Mental disability may compromise the self-determination and decision-making capacities [ 30 ]. Researchers interested in enrolling individuals with cognitive disorders are invited to apply different strategies to promote a better understanding of information-gathering processes. Simplifying the questions and content, adopting supportive technologies, using a more simple language, and spending more time for the information process have been suggested as useful and valid measures. When all these strategies prove to be insufficient, the investigators are required to obtain consent from a legally authorised representative [ 30 ].
Similarly to other vulnerable populations, research involving the homeless, ethnic minorities, immigrants and refugees is regulated by laws and specific procedures. Cultural and language differences, “undocumented” migrant status, and the precarious legal positions of these subjects raise several ethical issues, such as whether the participation is truly voluntary, or there are unrealistic expectations, or any benefits for their “status”.
Obtaining informed consent in these groups is extremely complex. A friendly procedure has been identified as the best way to adequately involve these vulnerable groups. A health centre or community building could represent an accessible location. The reimbursement of travel expenses for applicants can be a valid solution to obtain a representative sample for the clinical research. Clear and simple language, emphasising confidentiality, with the help of professional interpreters, can tempt migrants to sign the consent form. Lastly, the possibility of receiving something back in return for their contribution may enable successful enrolment of migrants in research [ 31 ].
Because of their young age as well as their limited emotional and intellectual abilities, children are considered to be legally incompetent to give valid informed consent; thus, to enrol a child in a research study, the permission by at least one parent or legal representative is mandatory ( table 3 ). For subjects aged <18 years, biological or adoptive parents or legal guardians (persons having both legal capacity and responsibility) can give consent on behalf of their child, exercising free power of choice without any form of coercion. While married mothers and fathers both have parental responsibility, unmarried parents can exert parental responsibility only if they are named individually on the child’s birth certificate. Also, divorced parents maintain parental responsibility, but it is necessary to know to whom the child’s custody has been assigned [ 32 ]. However, on this matter, the European laws and regulations are not harmonised and several discrepancies are present in each country [ 33 ].
Despite potential benefits for the research subjects, the failure of parents to give consent (or their refusal to give consent) is not a rare circumstance [ 34 ]. It can be the case that researchers are dealing with underage parents, so that, although underage parents are responsible for representing their children, as minors themselves they are not considered to be sufficiently mature; therefore, they will be not able to give valid consent. Literacy and socioeconomic levels have been identified as the most common reasons for parental non-response [ 34 ]. Clarity and adequate explanation of research information materials should be part of effective planning to overcome language and social barriers.
In clinical studies in which the adopted methodology constitutes “less than minimal risks” for children, passive parental consent represents a possible way to more easily obtain informed parental consent [ 34 ]. Furthermore, parents can be informed with regard to a possible study involving their children, and, at the time of data collection, only the child’s assent is required. In fact, although the child’s decision-making capacity and understanding of the research project in which he/she will be involved may be limited, the Medical Research Council have shown that, when study details are provided and communicated in a clear and adequate manner, the child can be able to reach a decision and participate consciously in the research [ 35 ]. “Assent” is the term coined to express the child’s willingness to participate in clinical trials despite their young age. The “assent” should include and respect the following key points: 1) helping the child to acquire disease awareness; 2) explaining the potential impact of the experimental treatment; 3) evaluating the child’s ability to understand and adapt to new situations or challenges; and 4) positively influencing the patient’s willingness to participate in clinical trials [ 36 ]. Although the “assent” is not mandatory for research offering a direct benefit for the child, it arises from the need to respect paediatric research subjects [ 37 ]. The evaluation of the capacity to provide the “assent” is based on developmental stage, intellectual abilities and life or disease experience. Usually, the cut-off age of 7 years is used for the beginning of logical thought processes and rational decision making [ 38 ]. However, “assent” for children aged <7 years can be also required once the ability to read and write has been verified [ 32 ]. Figures 1 and and2 2 summarise the parental and assent permission requirements, respectively.
Flow chart of parental permission requirements.
Flow chart of child assent requirements.
When conducting clinical research, the obtaining of informed consent is required. Informed consent is a procedure through which a competent subject, after having received and understood all the research-related information, can voluntarily provide his or her willingness to participate in a clinical trial. However, when it is impracticable to obtain consent, and the research does not infringe the principle of self-determination and also provides significant clinical relevance, the researcher is legally authorised to proceed without informed consent. Furthermore, in order to preserve the self-determination and decision-making rights, specific law dispositions are applied when vulnerable populations are enrolled in clinical trials.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
COMMENTS
se this template if your research is NOT. derally-sponsore. A. D participants are adults.Avoid Common Problems with Consent Forms. Read these tips!1. ustomize this template to reflect the specifics of your study and participan. population.Text in [brackets] represents study-specific information that must be added.A ba.
A collection of informed consent, assent, and debriefing templates that can be used for your human participant research study. General Consent Form Templates Social and Behavioral Research Projects (last updated 03/16/2023)
The informed consent form (ICF) templates provided by the IRB comply with federal regulations. ... To expedite approval of the study consent forms, study teams should use these examples. ... For a study where you receive a model consent use the following local consent template when research will occur in the Clinical Center (CC): ...
Consent Addendum This is a consent addendum to allow already enrolled participants to agree to additional study procedures not disclosed in the initial consent form. This form supplements the consent and HIPAA authorization the subject already provided for a research study. Consent Addendum. 3-11-2020.
Informed consent is the process of telling potential research participants about the key elements of a research study and what their participation will involve. The informed consent process is one of the central components of the ethical conduct of research with human subjects. The consent process typically includes providing a written consent ...
Informed consent is a cornerstone principal of ethical human subjects research. Researchers must ensure prospective participants receive information about the study, sufficiently detailed to facilitate a truly informed choice, in a manner that facilitates voluntary consideration of whether to participate. This ethical obligation exists for all ...
2023-04-10. Assent Form Ages 7-14. 2023-06-27. Consent Addendum for Unencrypted Communication. 2020-10-26. Information or Fact Sheet. 2023-04-10. The following documents are samples. IRBIS does NOT generate these documents with application-specific information.
CONSENT FORM GUIDELINES AND TEMPLATE Informed consent is an ongoing process that should be revisited throughout the life of your research study and procedures for obtaining it may need to be modified over time. This process documents the informed consent relationship that you have with research participants, and
Sub-studies: Help text in section 4.1 (study procedures) now directs researchers to describe their sub-study(-ies) in one of several parts of the consent document: Sub-studies that involve factors, such as procedures or risks, that are similar to those in the main study, or that involve only storage and/or use of samples and information ...
Informed Consent Templates. As part of our continued efforts to improve the IRB application and review process, we have developed new ICF templates that address the issues identified by our stakeholders: Different templates have been created for different types of studies (SBER, Biomed, etc.). Guidance language has been added to each template ...
The forms should be provided to participants in addition to the main study consent form. The language in these forms can also be adapted and added to consent forms for studies in which COVID-19 screening and testing procedures are being done for study purposes, i.e., the results of the screening and/or testing will be used as study data. To do ...
Informed Consent Template Guidance V-1/16/2019 Page 2 Color Code Key Black Blue Red Green Standard Template Text Required Element of Informed Consent Required Element, when applicable Suggested Language/ Phrasing Consent for Research Participation Title: [Title] Sponsor: [Name of Study Sponsor, if sponsored. If no sponsor, delete this line]
For multi-centre research studies, a common consent form will be taken as a minimum requirement to which additions may be made as dictated by local circumstances. In such cases, the common consent form ... To assist researchers, WHO has developed Informed Consent Form templates for various types of research studies.
Consent Templates. The templates below were created to help you create the documents you will need to communicate to participants what they will do in the study. The documents you provide participants will range from recruitment materials to post-debrief consent forms, and you need to submit everything that you provide to a participant to our ...
These templates are appropriate for social, behavioral, and educational ("SBER") research that does not include any biomedical procedures. Study Information Sheet (no signature) Consent Form (includes signature) Consent Form for Federally Funded Research. Parent Permission Form (parents provide permission for child to participate)
This is a template to assist researchers in the design of their informed consent form. You must adapt this template to the requirements of your particular study, using the notes and suggestions provided. Before using this template, check whether your organisation provides a template consent form and if so, incorporate their requirements into ...
Sample Informed Consent Form - ©NCPI. The following is a sample consent form for a research project. It is a research project on faculty life on campus, carried out by the principle investigator (PI) of this project from the fake-named Century University. The interviewer (the investigator) should have the interviewee read this form carefully ...
As part of the informed consent process, the consent document is designed to provide information to potential subjects about a research study so they can make an informed decision about their participation. The use of a form to document the consent process is required unless specifically waived by the IRB. One of the most common reasons for ...
1. Please note that this is a template developed by the Research Ethics Review Office to assist research proponents in the design of their informed consent forms (ICF). Researchers are encouraged to use this when creating their informed consent forms to best suit the design of their study. Use of alternative wording or format is allowed. 2.
Researchers must take the steps necessary to ensure that all participants in the research understand the process in which they are to be engaged, including why their participation is necessary, how it will be used, and how and to whom it will be reported so that the prospective participant can make an informed decision about whether they really do want to take part.
The informed consent form consists of two parts: the information sheet and the consent certificate. Do not be concerned by the length of these templates. They are long only because they contain guidance and explanations which are for you and which you will not include in the informed consent forms that you develop and provide to participants in ...
The consent signature requirements from the mother and father are summarised in table 3. Once the informed consent is obtained, the pregnant women will be included into any phase of the study unless the research project will be compromised or the patient's health (mother and/or fetus) will be in danger.
Informed Consent form for patient. This Informed Consent Form is for men and women who attend clinic Epicura Hornu and who we are inviting to participate in research on adjunctive system to increase oxygenation. The title of our research project is: addition effect of the double trunk mask above nasal prongs for high flow oxygenation during ...
Consider and Sample Language for Future Use and/or Sharing . KEY POINTS: 1. The use of this resource is . completely voluntary. 2. This resource provides points to consider and sample language for informed consent documents of research studies which plan to store and share data and/ or biospecimens for future use. 3.