ielts essay on cruelty to animals

Talk to our experts

1800-120-456-456

• Cruelty to Animals Essay

Introduction

Our planet Earth is a very beautiful place. Here, all the living organisms are dependent on each other and live together. We, humans, are considered as the most intelligent species on Earth. But, we sometimes become very insensitive to the creatures who cannot express themselves, especially the animals. We harm them just to fulfill our needs. We have an essay here on cruelty towards animals which will cover the questions like - write an article on cruelty towards animals, cruelty towards animals paragraph, paragraph on stop cruelty towards animals, article on cruelty towards animals class 9 and so on.

Long Paragraph on Cruelty to Animals

Animals, just like human beings, deserve a peaceful life. Animals are an important part of our ecosystem and are very useful to us. But, we sometimes forget that they are also living creatures. We keep on harassing them and these poor creatures can't even express their feelings and grief. Cruelty towards animals have become an international matter of concern. This needs to be addressed as soon as possible and should be eliminated for ever.

We become cruel towards animals for two reasons - one to fulfill our needs and other for fun. We use animals for their fur, their skin, their meat, their teeth and horns too. Sometimes, we apply colours on them which harm their skin, we also burn crackers without thinking about them. Sometimes , the tea-shop keeper pours the hot water on the street dogs, which is a great example of cruel behaviour towards the animals.

The animal skins are used in textile industries. Their skin and body hairs are used to make exotic fabrics for us to use. Animal’s teeth, horns, skin and fur are used to make home decor items which we beautifully use to decorate our homes without thinking how much pain animals go through for giving us these luxuries.

Another industry that contributes in cruelty to animals is the cosmetic industry. Whenever we buy any cosmetic products, we always make sure that the product is safe on our skin. But, we hardly realise that these products are tested on animals before it reaches us. The chemicals are often injected in animal’s bodies or applied on their skin. Sometimes, these are tested on their eyes too. And if the test fails, it sometimes leads to the animal's death also. These tests cause itching and burning too. But,we the human beings, keep on torturing the animals for our own purposes.

Our progressing medical science also has a big role in harassing the animals and showing our cruelty towards them. For the trials of medicines, animals are selected. They are then injected with the trial medicines without thinking about their pain. They are often kept in freezing temperatures for the experiments. We also ill treat the animals at zoos and circuses. The place where they are kept is not cleaned often. Also, the feeding methods are not too hygienic. These result in various diseases and often to their death.

Many animals and birds, in the name of pets, are being sold everyday. These animals are kept in cages or are kept tied with a chain. Most often, they are beaten up. The street dogs are often beaten up by the shopkeepers if they are found roaming around. Many cows are found roaming around the garbage heaps finding food. Many times many animals are hit by the fast moving traffic. These all are the examples of cruelty towards animals.

But now it's enough! We, the human beings, who are considered as the most intelligent creatures on Earth have to stop playing with these poor creatures' lives. We have to raise our voice and stop being cruel to the animals. We have to bring new strong laws to protect the animals. Every school should teach students how to respect and protect our fellow creatures - animals. Parents themselves should treat the animals with respect and love and should teach their wards the same.

We should always keep one thing in mind that we cannot survive without animals. Everything on Earth has its own purpose. The animals help in balancing our ecosystem. We have to take a call and save our environment, our mother Earth and our animals.

Short Paragraph on Stop Cruelty Towards Animals

Cruelty means a behaviour that harms others physically or mentally. But it's a matter of shame that we only consider human beings when it comes to cruelty. We forget that animals are also living creatures and we should not be cruel to them. Just because these creatures can not express themselves as we do, we forget that what we are doing to them if someone does to us, we will die.

Human industries that contribute to this cruelty are - Textile, Cosmetics, Home Decor and many more. Animal skins and furs are used in textile industries, animal skin, fur, horns and teeths are used to make home decor items. Many animals are killed for their meat also. Animals are ill-treated in laboratories where they are used for testing and experiments. They are often kept in freezing conditions or in boiling conditions.

It is high time now that we stop abusing these poor animals. They are also living beings and are very very important to us as without them the whole ecosystem will disbalance. We should raise awareness and stop these cruelties against animals.

Conclusion:

Cruelty to animals has become a nationwide problem nowadays. The government has already imposed a few laws and a few more are needed. Along with that, social awareness is also required. Students should learn how to treat animals in schools. Parents should also treat their pets well and teach their children. Our planet Earth is a very beautiful place. Here, all the living organisms are dependent on each other and live together. We, humans, are considered the most intelligent species on Earth. But, we sometimes become very insensitive to the creatures who cannot express themselves, especially the animals. We harm them just to fulfil our needs.

We have an essay here on cruelty towards animals which will cover the questions like - write an article on cruelty towards animals, cruelty towards animals paragraph, paragraph on stop cruelty towards animals, article on cruelty towards animals class 9 and so on.

To access these study materials, students will just have to complete this simple process:

Click on the download link provided on Vedantu's website for these study materials

Sign in with Gmail Id

Download the study material and start reaping the utmost benefits of it.

Students can also use Vedantu's mobile application. This mobile application is created by Vedantu to cater to students' needs of convenience and a better user experience. The mobile app is created by top-level app developers. Students who are using this app will not experience any inconvenience. All of these study materials are available on the app for free. Students can also find Vedantu's higher-level study materials like one to one coaching, video lectures, etc. 

This essay on cruelty to animals is created by experts working with Vedantu. These experts have a ton of experience in their particular fields. That's why these experts are hired by Vedantu to provide students with the highest quality of study materials. The experts who wrote this essay on cruelty to animals have a lot of experience and background in this topic. They have taken their time and written this and many other essays for students to use any time and access from anywhere. Just because these essays are created by experts, the chance of these essays scoring full marks in any test or examination is pretty high. 

Students can read this essay right now and can get ready for any tests or exams on it with confidence.

FAQs on Cruelty to Animals Essay

1. List Some Animal Protection Laws.

Here are a few laws and acts to prevent animals:

• Article 51A(g) - It states that it is the fundamental duty of every citizen to be compassionate towards other living creatures.
• IPC Section 428 & 429 - Killing animals is a punishable offence.
• Section 11 (1)(i) & Section 11(1)(j), PCA Act, 1960 - Abandoning animals can lead to a prison of upto three months.
• Monkeys have been protected under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
• Section 22(ii), PCA Act, 1960 - Animals such as Monkeys, Tigers, Bears, Lions, Panthers, Bull can not be trained and can not be used for entertainment purposes.

2. How do we Use Animal Teeth and Horns?

We use animal teeth and horns to make decorative pieces with which we decorate our home and offices. These decorative items are truly expensive for nature and its habitats. The most common example of animal cruelty is hunting. Animals are hunted for their meat, bones, leather or any other precious body parts. This can cause the species to be endangered or even go extinct. Another example of animal cruelty is enslaving them for entertainment or hard work. There are a lot of examples of animals being cruelty trained in circuses, kept as prisoners in zoos, or used as labourers to get the hardest jobs done.

3. What is meant by cruelty to animals?

Animal cruelty is defined as harming animals by either subjecting them to slavery, product-testing, or hunting. Killing endangered species for their meat, bones, or leather also comes under animal cruelty and is a punishable offence. The government of India has passed a lot of laws that prevent cruelty to animals from happening on a large scale. But still, in some neglected places like undeveloped villages, slums, or forests, these activities are followed illegally. And the government and some big governing bodies like PETA are working hard towards eradicating any kind of animal cruelty.

4. How does cruelty affect animals?

Cruelty towards animals can be dangerous for their overall species. There are a lot of examples like dodos, sabre tooth tigers, etc that have gone extinct because of excessive hunting. It is also morally incorrect to torture any living thing to die for the sake of an experiment. That's why animal testing is also banned. Animal testing is another example of animal cruelty and can hurt animals and even cruelly kill them. Animal cruelty should be banned completely.

5. How can we prevent animal cruelty?

There are very clear action steps to take to prevent animal cruelty. We can be responsible pet owners and start showing love and affection towards the animals at our home. We can adopt or at least hand over the abandoned baby animals we find on the streets to animal care centres. We can prohibit the use of animal-tested cosmetics or any products. We can even file a complaint against anyone who is abusing stray animals or harming them.

Guide 2 IELTS

Visit our YouTube Channel for more content. Contact: [email protected]

Search This Blog

Ielts sample essay -- zoos (cruel or useful) (discuss both views; give opinion).

IELTS Writing Task 2 (Essay) Question

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However, others think that zoos are useful to protect rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

For a step-by-step guide on how to plan and write this essay, visit our YouTube channel: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZYptep42Go&t=115s

Sample Essay #1 

(Using 3 points arguing that zoos are useful and 1 point arguing that zoos are cruel; Conclusion: conditionally agree with the opinion that zoos are useful)

Visit to a zoo is part of fond childhood memories of almost everyone. Yet, it has become a contentious subject in recent years whether zoos serve an overall positive purpose.  Since there seem to be valid supporting arguments for both perspectives, this essay will discuss them and reach a logical conclusion based on the presented line of reasoning.

Firstly, these establishments provide a safe place for wild animals from poachers and other risks. This is especially crucial for rare and endangered species. For example, tigers and pandas are kept in different zoos across the globe because of which their numbers have grown manifold over the years.  Secondly, these zoological parks are needed by researchers and scientists to study animals.  Lastly, menageries, such as zoos, are an ideal location for edutainment. That is to say, these establishments are not only an ideal source of entertainment for people of all age groups but they are also a way to impart education to children regarding animals. As a result of visit to such places, children may feel an affinity towards animals. What is more, zoos are a brilliant means of creating awareness about environmental issues.

On the other hand, those who oppose zoos and want them to be closed assert that animals are not treated well in zoos. These animals are caged in confined spaces. The cages and enclosures are tiny compared to the natural habitat of these animals. For instance, a tiger which is one of the fastest animals is sometimes kept in small cages. Similarly, monkeys which can jump from one tree to another in seconds are at times confined to a small area with just 2-3 trees.

In conclusion, my opinion is that zoos have many benefits which have been proven over the years and they should certainly not be closed. We should, however, ensure that the animals in zoos have larger spaces where they can move about.

Sample Essay #2 

(Using 3 points arguing that zoos are useful and 3 points arguing that zoos are cruel; Conclusion: zoos are cruel)

(first two paragraphs are almost the same as the previous essay)

Firstly, these establishments provide a safe place for wild animals from poachers and other risks. This is especially crucial for rare and endangered species. For example, tigers and pandas are kept in different zoos across the globe because of which their numbers have grown manifold over the years.  Secondly, these zoological parks are needed by researchers and scientists to study animals.  Lastly, menageries, such as zoos, are an ideal location for edutainment. That is to say, these establishments are not only an ideal source of entertainment for people of all age groups but they are also a way to impart education to children regarding animals. As a result of visits to such places, children may feel an affinity towards animals. What is more, zoos are a brilliant means of creating awareness about environmental issues.

On the other hand, it is necessary to accept that no creature should be treated as if it is for the entertainment of humankind. Hence, the treatment of wild animals in zoos has to be considered as brutal as their freedom is hampered. What is worse, the animals bred in captivity are incapable of adapting to the wild environment and thus can never be released into the wild. For instance, if a chimpanzee is born in a zoo environment, it would never be able to live in a forest. This chimpanzee would not know how to live with other wild animals or find food for itself.

In conclusion, although it seems that there are quite a few positives of zoos, I strongly believe they are an atrocity and closing is the only ethical recourse.

Sample Essay #3

(Using 3 points arguing that zoos are useful and 3 points arguing that zoos are cruel; Conclusion: zoos are cruel + alternatives to benefits of zoos)

(first three paragraphs are almost the same as the previous essay)

In conclusion, although it seems that there are quite a few positives of zoos, I strongly believe they are an atrocity and closing them is the only ethical recourse. As far as education is concerned, we now have a wide range of audio-visual media for this purpose. A practical example of this is the fact that no child has ever seen a dinosaur but through movies, documentaries, animations, and museums, they are very familiar with these extinct creatures. Similarly, for research and conservation purposes, wildlife sanctuaries and national parks should be encouraged where the focus is the well-being of the animals and not the amusement of human visitors.

Different ways of writing the first paragraph for this essay

• Visit to a zoo is part of fond childhood memories of almost everyone. Yet, it has become a contentious subject in recent years whether zoos serve an overall positive purpose.
• Zoos are looked upon as an important source of edutainment where children can acquire knowledge of a variety of flora and fauna in an entertaining environment. However, in recent times, animal rights activists have raised a question over whether these zoos are in reality proof of cruelty to animals by us humans.
• Since humans are a curious race, they find different means to know about nature. One such method is to visit a zoo and observe animals in a leisurely manner. The problem is that not everyone agrees that zoos are beneficial. Actually, certain sections of society believe zoos to be establishments of cruelty towards the animals which are kept there.
• Should zoos be encouraged because they serve a useful purpose or should they be shut down because animals in zoos are treated inhumanely? This has become a contentious subject in recent times which deserves serious thought and discussion.

Different ways of writing the topic sentence (first sentence of second paragraph)  for this essay

• There are many ways through which zoos are beneficial.
• The useful impact of zoos have long been known.
• The useful benefits of zoos have long been known.
• Many past generations have advocated the benefits of zoos.
• There are a number of useful applications of zoos.

Different ways of writing the conclusion for this essay

• Conditionally agree Both sides have valid arguments in their favour because of which, in my opinion, zoos are important but we need to ensure that the animals there are treated humanely.
• More points for one side than the other Although there are a few reasons to support the closing of zoos, the arguments for the benefits of zoos are more. Therefore, in my opinion, zoos are helpful to society and should remain open. However, it should be ensured that the animals in zoos are treated humanely.  

Step 1: Read & understand the question

Step 2: Plan the answer (points for both views)

Step 3: Think about the vocabulary

Step 4: Write

Step 5: Revise

Basic format/template:

Paragraph 1 : Introduction

•        General statement (optional)

•        Paraphrasing of the question

•        This essay will discuss both the opinions before reaching a conclusion based on the arguments presented.

Paragraph 2 (body paragraph 1): Discuss one viewpoint

•        Topic sentence (E.g., There are a number of reasons to support this opinion)

•        Beginning phrases (Firstly/To begin with); Supporting points (Secondly/Thirdly; Moreover/Furthermore)

Paragraph 3 (body paragraph 2): Discuss the other viewpoint

•        Topic sentence (E.g., On the other hand, the opposing viewpoint can also have valid supporting arguments)

•        Supporting points

Paragraph 4 : Conclusion

Copyright © www.Guide2IELTS.com 2022. All rights reserved.

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog, consumerism (part 3--ielts speaking), online reviews (part 3--ielts speaking), letters--writing task 1 ielts general training (templates).

IELTS Essay: Animals

by Dave | Real Past Tests | 5 Comments

Here is my newest IELTS essay on the topic of animals! Specifically, if humans should protect all wild animals or just some specific ones.

Be sure to check out my Ebooks here .

Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective. In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species.

Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors. These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. For instance, tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments. Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances. A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation. The tiger, to continue the previous example, is greatly valued for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.

However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment. Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years, humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. Without such forward-looking protections, there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction, it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms.

In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized. Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress.

1. Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective. 2. In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species.

• Paraphrase the overall essay topic.
• Write a clear opinion. Read more about introductions here .

1. Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors. 2. These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. 3. For instance, tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments. 4. Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances. 5. A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation. 6. The tiger, to continue the previous example, is greatly valued for its elegance. 7. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.

• Write a topic sentence with a clear main idea at the end.
• Explain your main idea.
• Develop it with specific or hypothetical examples.
• Keep developing it fully.
• Add more deatil.
• Include some long and complex sentences.
• Finish the paragraph strong.

1. However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment. 2. Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years, humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. 3. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. 4. Without such forward-looking protections, there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally. 5. Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction, it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms.

• Write a new topic sentence with a new main idea at the end.
• Explain your new main idea.
• Include specific details and examples.
• Add as much information as you can and make sure it links logically.
• Develop the example fully.

1. In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized. 2. Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress.

• Summarise your main ideas.
• Include a final thought. Read more about conclusions here .

What do the words in bold below mean? Make some notes on paper to aid memory and then check below.

Some have suggested that protection of wild animals should be selective . In my opinion, humanity has responsibility for all wild animals, though it is occasionally justified to divert resources towards more valuable species .

Those in favor of safeguarding certain wild animals argue the circumstantial factors . These factors can range from the threat the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. For instance , tigers are an endangered wild animal and require intensive conservation efforts compared with animals such as rats and pigeons, which have adapted skillfully to urban environments . Most would admit that there is little logic in providing equal support to species in different circumstances . A more extreme critic could add that some animals are more deserving of preservation . The tiger, to continue the previous example , is greatly valued for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their usefulness to humanity.

However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the catalyst for their endangerment . Before the rapid industrialization and surging populations of the last several hundred years , humans and animals lived on relatively equal terms and shared the Earth. Since human development has outpaced nature and now threatens the habitats of countless species, it is a duty for mankind to enact safeguards for all animals. Without such forward-looking protections , there is likely to be a “domino effect” as species die out and impair fragile ecosystems globally . Therefore even if an animal is not on the verge of extinction , it might be important to maintain their population levels so as to not start a cycle of irreversible harms .

In conclusion, humans should endeavor to protect as many animals as possible although there are exceptional cases where some species may be prioritized . Governments and individuals should collaborate to ensure wild animals are not unduly threatened by human progress .

For extra practice, write an antonym (opposite word) on a piece of paper to help you remember the new vocabulary:

suggested advised

protection keeping safe

selective chosen

humanity mankind

responsibility duty

occasionally justified sometimes supported

divert resources towards sent in another direction at

valuable species important kind of animal

those in favor of people who support

safeguarding keeping safe

certain definite

argue point out

circumstantial factors contextual elements

range from include

threat risk

For instance for example

endangered near extinction

require intensive conservation efforts need lots of help

compared with relative to

adapted skillfully changed masterfully

urban environments cities

Most would admit that many would concede

little logic not much reason

providing equal support giving the same amount of help

different circumstances changing situations

extreme critic people strongly against

deserving should get

preservation staying alive and protected

previous example instance mentioned before

greatly valued considered important

usefulness utility

catalyst spark, cause

endangerment putting in danger

rapid industrialization becoming more and more developed

surging populations more and more people

last several hundred years since the 1800s or so

lived on continue to be alive

relatively equal terms almost living like equals

shared both using it

outpaced got a lot faster than

habitats places where animals live

countless limitless

duty responsibility

enact safeguards create protection

forward-looking protections progressive safeguards

“domino effect” will cause ramifications

die out go extinct

impair fragile ecosystems hurt a chain of animals

globally all around the world

not on the verge of extinction not about to die out completely

maintain keep the same

population levels how many are alive

cycle chain

irreversible harms can’t be fixed

endeavor try hard

exceptional cases extreme examples

prioritized considered most important

collaborate work together

ensure make sure

unduly unjustifiably

human progress mankind advancing

Pronunciation

Practice saying the vocabulary below and use this tip about Google voice search :

səˈʤɛstɪd   prəˈtɛkʃən   sɪˈlɛktɪv hju(ː)ˈmænɪti   rɪsˌpɒnsəˈbɪlɪti   əˈkeɪʒnəli ˈʤʌstɪfaɪd   daɪˈvɜːt rɪˈsɔːsɪz təˈwɔːdz   ˈvæljʊəbl ˈspiːʃiːz ðəʊz ɪn ˈfeɪvər ɒv   ˈseɪfgɑːdɪŋ   ˈsɜːtn   ˈɑːgjuː   ˌsɜːkəmˈstænʃəl ˈfæktəz reɪnʤ frɒm   θrɛt   fɔːr ˈɪnstəns ɪnˈdeɪnʤəd   rɪˈkwaɪər ɪnˈtɛnsɪv ˌkɒnsə(ː)ˈveɪʃən ˈɛfəts   kəmˈpeəd wɪð   əˈdæptɪd ˈskɪlf(ə)li   ˈɜːbən ɪnˈvaɪərənmənts məʊst wʊd ədˈmɪt ðæt   ˈlɪtl ˈlɒʤɪk   prəˈvaɪdɪŋ ˈiːkwəl səˈpɔːt   ˈdɪfrənt ˈsɜːkəmstənsɪz ɪksˈtriːm ˈkrɪtɪk   dɪˈzɜːvɪŋ   ˌprɛzə(ː)ˈveɪʃən ˈpriːviəs ɪgˈzɑːmpl , ˈgreɪtli ˈvæljuːd   ˈjuːsfʊlnəs   ˈkætəlɪst   ɪnˈdeɪnʤəmənt ˈræpɪd ɪnˌdʌstrɪəlaɪˈzeɪʃən   ˈsɜːʤɪŋ ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃənz   lɑːst ˈsɛvrəl ˈhʌndrəd jɪəz lɪvd ɒn   ˈrɛlətɪvli ˈiːkwəl tɜːmz   ʃeəd   aʊtˈpeɪst   ˈhæbɪtæts   ˈkaʊntlɪs   ˈdjuːti   ɪˈnækt ˈseɪfgɑːdz   ˈfɔːwədˈlʊkɪŋ prəˈtɛkʃənz “ ˈdɒmɪnəʊ ɪˈfɛkt “ daɪ aʊt   ɪmˈpeə ˈfræʤaɪl ˈiːkəʊˌsɪstəmz   ˈgləʊbəli   nɒt ɒn ðə vɜːʤ ɒv ɪksˈtɪŋkʃən meɪnˈteɪn   ˌpɒpjʊˈleɪʃən ˈlɛvlz   ˈsaɪkl   ˌɪrɪˈvɜːsəbl hɑːmz ɪnˈdɛvə   ɪkˈsɛpʃənl ˈkeɪsɪz   praɪˈɒrɪˌtaɪzd kəˈlæbəreɪt   ɪnˈʃʊə   ʌnˈdjuːli   ˈhjuːmən ˈprəʊgrəs

Vocabulary Practice

I recommend getting a pencil and piece of paper because that aids memory. Then write down the missing vocabulary from my sample answer in your notebook:

Some have s____________d that p______________n of wild animals should be s_______________e . In my opinion, h_______________y has r__________________y for all wild animals, though it is o______________________d to d______________________s more v___________________s .

T________________________________________________n wild animals a_______e the c___________________________s . These factors can r_____________m the t_________t the specific animals face to the value of the animal itself. F______________e , tigers are an e______________d wild animal and r_________________________________s c_____________________h animals such as rats and pigeons, which have a_____________________y to u____________________s . M_____________________t there is l_________________c in p_______________________t to species in d___________________________s . A more e__________________c could add that some animals are more d______________g of p_______________n . The tiger, to continue the p___________________e , is g__________________d for its elegance. Other animals, such as bees, are valuable not for their beauty but their u______________s to humanity.

However, all animals should be protected as humanity has been the c_________t for their e________________t . Before the r_______________________________n and s______________________s of the l________________________________s , humans and animals l______________________________s and s_______d the Earth. Since human development has o___________d nature and now threatens the h_________s of c__________s species, it is a d____y for mankind to e______________s for all animals. Without such f_______________________s , there is likely to be a “d_______________t” as species die out and i___________________________y . Therefore even if an animal is n____________________________n , it might be important to m__________n their p___________________s so as to not start a c________e of i__________________s .

In conclusion, humans should e______________r to protect as many animals as possible although there are e_ ______________ s where some species may be p________________d . Governments and individuals should c________________e to e________e wild animals are not u__________y threatened by h________________s .

Listening Practice

Learn more about this topic by watching videos from The New York Times YouTube channel below and practice with these activities :

Speaking Practice

Practice with the following speaking questions from the real IELTS speaking exam :

• What was your favorite animal as a child?
• Do people in your country keep pets?
• What kind of pet would you not like to have?
• Is environmental protection important?

Writing Practice

Practice with the related IELTS essay topic below:

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.

Do you agree or disagree?

IELTS Essay: Extinction

Recommended For You

Latest IELTS Writing Task 1 2024 (Graphs, Charts, Maps, Processes)

by Dave | Sample Answers | 147 Comments

These are the most recent/latest IELTS Writing Task 1 Task topics and questions starting in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and continuing into 2024. ...

Recent IELTS Writing Topics and Questions 2024

by Dave | Sample Answers | 342 Comments

Read here all the newest IELTS questions and topics from 2024 and previous years with sample answers/essays. Be sure to check out my ...

Find my Newest IELTS Post Here – Updated Daily!

by Dave | IELTS FAQ | 18 Comments

IELTS Essay: Celebrating Family Events

by Dave | Real Past Tests | 2 Comments

This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of celebrating family events from the real IELTS general training exam. ...

IELTS Essay: Clothes, Culture, & Character

This is an IELTS writing task 2 sample answer essay on the topic of clothes, culture, and character from the real IELTS exam. ...

IELTS Band 7 Essays (with Corrections and Comments – Task 2)

by Dave | Understanding Task 2 Writing | 7 Comments

Here are some band 7 IELTS essays for writing task 2 that I have marked and corrected for past students. *I update this ...

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sir, can we use the phrase a ‘postcode lottery’ in writing T2 to explain the disparity of public services in different areas.

I’m not familiar with that term… – if you explain it and use quotes that would be fine!

Thanks, Sir. I saw this term in a few BBC news articles. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41346237 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-59211183

I think, to be on the safe side, I’d rather not use it.

Every year a significant number of wild creatures are in danger of extinction. For that some individuals argue that all wild animals should be saved while others believe that only certain animals should be preserved. In this essay I will be discussing both views and why in my opinion all animals live matter.

To begin with , people who are in favour of the opinion that only some types of animals should be saved argue that there are some animals that are dangerous predators and their existence are a threat to human kind. Moreover , it will take a lot of money to conserve and save them and they believe this money could be invested in other areas such as education or infrastructure.

On the other hand, the predominant reason why we should protect animals is to maintain a healthy ecosystem. Moreover , some wild animals could be used for medicinal purposes. For instance, snake venom is used as a medical tool. Furthermore , because of human habitation and overuse of natural resources those creatures are in danger of extinction so at least we could make some effort to conserve them all without any exception.

In conclusion, we should save all wild animals that are still present in the world , selecting some of them is an idea why we should discard since it will bring more devastating outcomes.

Discuss both views and give your opinion

Safeguarding wild lives is a topical issue globally. While it is considered by some that all wild animals should be taken care of, other believed that a selected few should benefit from this arrangement. In this essay I will discuss both views and make a conclusion.

One the one hand, the proponent of an holistic animal preservation believed that all wild animals are facing enormous dangers in the woods . For instance many beasts are devastated by green house effects thus dying at a tender age therefore they need to be nurtured to prevent them from extinction The resultant effect of this will foster ecosystem diversification and balance Additionally, keeping all wild lives will be a welcome development for the advocates of animal right. It is a common view that no animal is more important than another so if the wild lives will benefit from human intervention, it has to be all encompassing.

On the other hand, however, the critics of the above opinion believed that it is not financially sustainable. They argue that money meant for other essential services such as civil service, infrastructural development and human development will be channelled into building parks, zoos, provision of food and drugs to tend animals at the expense of man.

Furthermore, overpopulation of games in manmade habitats can bring a handful of issues. Animal becomes more aggressive posing danger to their carers and in the extreme of cases escapes and cause serious threats to mankind. An Australian magazine reported of a family of five who was killed by a lion that escaped zoos. This kind of disaster won’t have happened if wild animal that can’t be tamed easily is left in the forest.

To conclude, all wild animals deserve some protection but this should be limited to selected few in order to limit harm to the people and prevent economic catastrophe.

Exclusive Ebooks, PDFs and more from me!

Sign up for patreon.

Don't miss out!

"The highest quality materials anywhere on the internet! Dave improved my writing and vocabulary so much. Really affordable options you don't want to miss out on!"

Minh, Vietnam

Hi, I’m Dave! Welcome to my IELTS exclusive resources! Before you commit I want to explain very clearly why there’s no one better to help you learn about IELTS and improve your English at the same time... Read more

Patreon Exclusive Ebooks Available Now!

All Experimentation on Animals Is Bad And Should be Outlawed - IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay

Get your personalised   IELTS Essay Feedback   from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks ,   get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Model Essay 1

The debate over animal experimentation is complex, pivoting on ethical considerations and the pursuit of scientific advancements. Proponents of animal testing argue that it is indispensable for developing medical treatments and ensuring safety in consumer products. However, opponents question its morality and the suffering it causes to animals, advocating for alternatives.

The use of animals in scientific research is often justified by the physiological similarities they share with humans. These similarities enable researchers to glean insights that are directly applicable to human conditions. For instance, studies involving non-human primates have been crucial in evolving our understanding of Parkinson's disease, significantly enhancing treatment options. Such research is generally considered essential during the initial phases of medical studies, aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of new treatments before they are trialed in humans. This necessary step ensures that potential therapies have been rigorously tested, thereby safeguarding human health during clinical trials.

Despite the current necessity of animal testing in some areas of research, there is a growing emphasis on developing alternatives that could one day eliminate the need for animal subjects entirely. Innovations like sophisticated computer simulations and organ-on-a-chip technology are at the forefront of this shift. Organ-on-a-chip, for example, replicates human organ systems on microchips, enabling researchers to observe the effects of drugs on human tissues in real-time. This technology not only provides data that are potentially more relevant to humans but also reduces the reliance on animal testing. Such advancements underscore the scientific community's commitment to the '3Rs' principle - Reduce, Refine, and Replace - aiming to minimize and eventually end animal testing.

In conclusion, while the current scientific landscape still often requires animal testing, the development of alternative methods is imperative. By investing in and prioritizing these innovations, we can look forward to a future where animal testing is no longer necessary. This not only aligns with ethical standards but also enhances the applicability of research results to human health.

Model Essay 2

The contentious issue of animal experimentation hinges on ethical concerns versus scientific benefits. This essay contends that while animal testing can be justified by its critical role in medical advancements, it is imperative to enforce stringent ethical guidelines and prioritize the development of alternative methods. The ensuing discussion will explore the necessity of such practices for medical progress and the evolving viability of non-animal testing techniques.

Firstly, the justification for animal testing primarily rests on its indispensability in advancing medical science. Many life-saving treatments, including insulin and vaccines, were developed through research involving animals. For instance, the polio vaccine, which has saved countless lives globally, was pioneered using non-human primates to study the disease's progression and test preliminary vaccine trials. Such examples underscore the argument that when human lives are at stake, animal experimentation can be considered a necessary albeit regrettable option. However, this necessity is contingent upon the absence of alternative methods that could achieve the same results without using animal subjects. Moreover, strict ethical guidelines must govern such experiments to minimize suffering and ensure that such measures are truly the last resort.

Secondly, the increasing availability and advancement of alternatives to animal testing highlight the potential for reducing reliance on animal subjects. Techniques such as in vitro testing, computer modeling, and the use of human cell cultures offer promising results without ethical compromises. For example, organs-on-chips technology uses human cells to simulate organ functions, allowing researchers to conduct experiments in ways that mimic human responses more accurately than animal testing. The adoption of these technologies not only enhances the ethical standards of research but also improves the reliability of scientific outcomes by reducing interspecies variability in test results. This shift not only reflects a more humane approach to research but also aligns with scientific advancements that could ultimately render animal testing obsolete.

In conclusion, while the necessity of animal testing in certain critical research areas remains, it is imperative that it is conducted with the utmost ethical standards and only when there are no suitable alternatives. Simultaneously, the development and validation of non-animal methods should be actively pursued to ensure that the scientific community moves towards more humane and scientifically robust research practices.

Model Essay 3

It is undeniable that many research centres around the world still perform experiments on lab animals. Many people, especially animal lovers and pet owners, are against the practice. In my opinion, this movement against animal testing, though it is  noble and benevolent, is not yet one hundred percent achievable.

In order to make any product safe for human consumption, be it a next generation vaccine or a new type of cosmetic cream, the most reliable method to ensure its safety is to test it  thoroughly under stringent processes. In doing so, sometimes, this  inevitably includes exposing animals to these new products first. The main reason is  because some animals' biological markups are very similar to human beings, and we can achieve more accurate and direct results. For example, mice are used in research on Alzheimer’s diseases. Additionally, for some cases, we simply do not have a  technology advanced enough to test without live animals. Moreover, testing without live animals may drive up the research costs and make the end product's prices higher for the general public. 

However, this does not mean that we should continue this practice indefinitely and unnecessarily. First of all, governments should establish well-defined rules and regulations to ensure humane treatment of all animals used in research environments. This will help to provide a level of protection for the animals. Another measure is to outlaw animal testing on all non-essential products such as make-up and beauty products. Last but not least, research organizations should dedicate parts of their effort in advancing the research methodologies so that animal testing can one day be completely eliminated.

In conclusion, though removing the animal testing from the science and research field is not yet possible as of now, we can be kind towards animals by establishing strict welfare guidelines and supporting cruelty-free methods.

• Task 2 Essays

Recent Posts

Demand for Online Coaching Services And Video Courses Has Grown Significantly - IELTS Band 9 Essay

Social Media Platforms Has Made It Easier for People to Vent Their Frustrations - IELTS Band 9 Essay

The Education of Young People Is Highly Prioritized in Many Countries - IELTS Band 9 Essay

Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. IELTS writing essay sample asnwer

Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. discuss both opinions and give your own opinion., sample answer: 1.

People often visit zoos. Zoos can be local, national and sometimes international. Zoos may be the best option for animals which are endangered or extinct. however, the healthy ones would not strive in zoos.  it could be cruel even inhuman to keep animals as  prisoners in zoos even if the intention is to protect them. I think animals have some benefits when they are kept in zoos but the disadvantages surely outweighs the pros.

In zoos animals are trapped in artificial environment which is not suitable for their ecological cycle, it could  affect on their natural behavior. They are dependent on human and facilities of zoo. If lions or tiger are kept in the zoos for long time then they might be losing their hunting technique because they are habituated to typical system. Moreover, in zoo animals were annoyed by children; they throw stones on them and irritate them in a harmful way. Furthermore, not every zoos have proper management  and facilities. because of the  have limited natural resources, and space for keeping them. It could be a major impact on the natural growth of particular animals.

however, zoo plays crucial role for saving endangered or wild animals. It is a boon for extinct animals. They provide them all the facilities and environment for surviving. This includes medical treatment, proper diet and safety. In addition people can learn more about animals and nature. Zoos could reduce barrier between humans and wild animals.

To sum up, I think animals should be kept in zoos only for purpose of protecting which are in danger of extinction. Otherwise they feel like in jail. it affects on their natural behavior. We should let them live freely in environment.

Sample Answer: 2

A zoo a place at which animals are kept inside a small area and can also be watched by the tourists. It is a bit controversial topic nowadays, whether the zoos are really beneficial for animals or they are just a piece of entertainment for the tourist in the name of protecting animals.

Firstly, it is considered that decreasing an animal’s freedom is cruel itself. Most people who admire wildlife believe that putting a wild animal behind bars inside a small cage is against the laws of nature and even cruel. They believe that putting any animal inside a zoo is similar to considering them as criminal and those people take it as an offence.

Additional, according to some experts wild animal usually lose their natural behavior after getting into the zoo. The reason behind this belief is that the wild animals do not need to perform the action in zoo which they used to perform in their own natural habitat in order to service. Experts consider it as a major problem because changing the behavior of a single animal can affect the whole ecology of the biodiversity. One famous scientist quotes, “extinction of a single species of honey bees could affect the ecology of whole earth.”

On the other hand, scientist also believes that, zoos are the best place to prevent the loss of some endangered species. Species which are near to extinction could be taken care in fine way at zoo; even such species can also be protected from getting extinct. Arguing this many people believe it is very rare that an extinction is being prevented by the assistance of zoos.

People around the globe have mixed opinions about the zoo. It is considered as one of the biggest chaos between the people. Even experts haven’t come to an agreement about this topic as their opinions are also very contrasting in their community.

In my opinion, zoos are very helpful for the protection of some species. However, we can’t disagree to the point that is affects the natural biodiversity and ecology.

Sample Answer: 3

In this modern world, zoos are made to keep the wild animals and for the purpose of providing information about animals to people, but it is believed that zoos are hazardous for animals to live, whereas some people concur that zoos are the best place for protecting animals in safe way. As far as the lives of animal are concerned, zoos would not be a best place for them.

To begin with, zoo is a kind of artificial place for animals to live where they are given a limited space to wonder and they are treated as a domestic animal which is not good idea. Because, according to government acts animals have right to live in free space and in the zoos, animals are not given a perfect aid, so after some time they become weak by their body and they cannot live longer in this situation, so it would be worse idea to keep wild animals in zoos.

Furthermore, after spending longtime in zoos, wild animals forget their natural talent. In the zoos animals are kept as toy and they are treated, as a result, they forget their natural talent such as hunting animals for food. It was surveyed in 2015. That one; lion which was kept in zoo for longtime, had given freedom and when he returned to forest, he forget how to hunt animals, so this shows that zoos are not good place for them.

On the other hand, it is true that in the zoos animals are safe and they can live without having any fear of killed by someone. But it does not mean that zoos are the best place to protect them. They can give protection through many other ways such as, keep them in national parks, so zoos should be banned and animals should be given freedom to live their live in their own comfort.

To sum up, it is right that zoos are cruel for wildlife, that is why zoos should be closed down and animals should be given freedom to live their lives in forest or any protected area.

Sample Answer: 4

Nowadays, people have different view regarding to the question about the zoos and people have different perspective about zoos need to be maintained or not. It is thought by some people that zoos are merciless and should be closed, whereas other people contradict and assert that zoos are always beneficial to protect wild animals. I will discuss both views and give my opinion in the conclusion.

On the one hand, first and foremost there are two main reasons why zoos are considered heinous places and should be closed or banned. Firstly, zoos are often aimed to entertain people and earn money from them, which means that zoos held animals not because of responsibility or take care but because of making profits. Secondly, many zoos limit the freedom of their animal by providing poor- quality environments and facilities. Many researchers have shown that the house of any animals in zoos is far smaller than that of them in nature. This prevents animals from doing daily activities the same way as they do in the wild, which is likely to make them feel depress and developmental illnesses. So many people assert that zoos are cruel and should be closed down.

On the other hand, some people believe that zoos play important part in preventing animals from extinction. Nowadays, many people hunting several animals, which is because their body parts are seen as luxury items and status symbols and as well as other purpose of doing that is earning more money. For example, some animals are the level of the extinction. In wild area, people killed this animal and held in captivity because their bones and skin are highly valued in the black market. That’s why some people argue that in the zoos these animals are safe and secure compare to the nature.

In conclusion, although different people believe in different views but in my personal belief, zoos are beneficial as well as useful for protecting extinct animals.

Sample Answer: 5

As far as the topic of animals is concerned the animal lovers always put their debatable arguments for the protection of the animals, where putting animals in artificial zones away from their natural habitat is one of the controversial question around the word. Some people believe that this has a devastating effect on animals. However, others see as beneficial point of view in terms of saving endangered animals. In my opinion, under proper scrutiny and safety with the maintaining the need of animals, Zoos can be lifesaving homes for the rare animals in this cruel world. Both opinions should get proper analysis before reaching to any conclusion.

On the one hand, some people see zoos as a prison and condemn the idea of keeping them in limited space where they cannot get their freedom and nurturing of the breed. This is because of the condition of many zoos are horrifying for the animals and animals forget their nature of living, for instance it is found that many wild animals after the upbringing  in zoos forget the hunting for their survival, which is against the environmental cycle. Therefore the viewpoints of the skeptics hold the water for their side.

On the other hand, the concern of the advocates is reliable in this debate as the animals are on the verge of being extinct where only zoos can protect those rare species of the animals. Zoos protect animals from illegal hunters and poachers. For instance, there are wild animals like tiger and lion are being killed for their nails and skin for selling. Moreover due to imbalance in the weather conditions animals are being endangered which cannot be neglected. Thus keeping animals in zoos is advantageous from this perceptive.

After taking both sides into consideration, it seems to me that zoos plays vital role for preserving rare animals and keeping them alive from illegal activities of humans. However, the rights and welfare of animals must be prioritized by all zoos and animal organizations around the world and zoos must get safety for the security of the animals.

Sample Answer: 6

There is a common idea that zoos are protecting rare species when gone argue that they are cruel and should be closed down in their essay arguments for both the sides and my opinion will be considered.

One of the major anxiety is that the zoos have limited activities for the wild animals and their way of living for example lion which have habit to live in big land which are taken to small cages because of this they losing their instinct, when the reproduction of them were broker, conditions for mating were increase that goes for the wild animal who can live in a wild habitat by themselves, but some institutes take some animal to training because of entertainment people earn money.

Zoos are useful for some animal which is near to extinct for example panda, panda is one of the most extinct animal on earth which is not habitat in wild nature the live in silent habitats they have troubles for reproduction there for they help then for increasing their population due to some natural calamities some spices lose their homes for some endangered animals it may be plausible to keep then in captivity where they can walk freely.

Zoos are useful as long as they satisfy the needs of all species which are captured there and they donate abuses them. They take care of all animals there like they are their family members.

In my opinion, it all depends on how well they care all extinct species of animals there they have large park and kind worker which were not harm them, there are no problem for the animal who were near to extinct and taken to the zoos. It is very comfortable for them to live.

Animal testing IELTS essay

More help for ielts exam.

• A Beginner’s Guide to IELTS
• Common Grammar Mistakes [for IELTS Writing Candidates]

Writing Correction Service

• Free IELTS Resources
• Practice Speaking Test

Select Page

Animal Testing Essay

Posted by David S. Wills | Oct 21, 2022 | Model Essays | 0

There is a wide range of topics used in the IELTS writing test and many of them overlap. Today, we are going to look at a question that falls between the topics of animals and ethics and science. It will require you to write an animal testing essay .

In this article, I will analyse the question for you, give you some pointers on useful language, and then show you my own sample band 9 answer.

The Task: Animal Testing

Here is a question that appeared in the IELTS exam several years ago:

Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

(Note that questions can be re-used or re-written, so it is possible that you might see this recycled in the future.)

This is a “discuss both views” question , so your task is ultimately to do three things:

• Explain why some people think animal testing is acceptable
• Explain why some people think animal testing is unacceptable
• Give your opinion

Even if you feel really strongly that it is wrong, for example, you still need to explain the opposing view. You don’t need to give a balanced answer , but you do need to acknowledge both sides of the debate. This is important for Task Response.

Planning your Answer

I almost always write a four-paragraph essay for my sample band 9 answers but today I’m going to write five. It could easily have been four paragraphs but I wanted to separate my anti-animal testing arguments into two separate paragraphs for better organisation. (You can read about 4- vs 5-paragraph essay structures here .)

My essay is going to look like this:

When it comes to a task 2 introduction , please make sure that you have a clear outline sentence and also that your opinion (if one is required) is stated clearly.

Body paragraph 1 will act as a sort of concession paragraph , so it will be imperative that I make it clear that this is not my opinion but rather what some other people think. If I fail to do this, then the reader might be confused.

The ideas in body paragraphs 2 and 3 will be separated but could also have been condensed into two paragraphs. However, I felt that for this topic it was a little more effective to split them. It also made my argument slightly more persuasive.

For the conclusion , I will be careful not to repeat myself too much and instead just summarise and reaffirm my stance.

Language for an Animal Testing Essay

The topic of animal testing is obviously controversial and so people will have different ideas. What you say will be largely based upon your own opinions. However, keep in mind that it covers those three topics I mentioned:

You don’t really need to know a lot about each, but it definitely would have some benefit if you knew a little about these areas and had some good vocabulary to use. I wrote about the IELTS topic of animals here , and there is plenty of good vocabulary that you can borrow. You can also search “animals” in the search bar at the top of the page.

I also recommend that you read and listen on issues that are related to IELTS topics like this. I particularly recommend the SYSK podcast episode on animal testing, which I think it is informative and accessible. You may learn some good language and get some inspiration for what you could write in your own animal testing essay. Other sources include this argument against animal testing by PETA and this one in favour of it by Stanford.

Language for Contentious Issues

In my essay, I will use the following phrases, which could be modified and applied to other contentious issues. I will put the specific language in brackets, so that you could swap it out when discussing other topics:

• [animal testing] has been fiercely debated due to the ethical problems inherent in this area of [science]
• The people who believe that [animal testing] is necessary tend to say…
• this is wrong for several reasons
• [animal testing] is not as helpful in [developing medicines] as people think
• There are many other reasons why [experimenting with animals] is wrong
• it is grossly unethical to [subject these creatures to painful and demeaning experiences]
• people may argue that there are benefits that come from [experimenting on animals], but in fact there is no good reason to continue doing this

You can try using and modifying these phrases in your own practice essays. If you want an expert to correct them for you, try my IELTS writing correction service .

Language about Animal Testing

The following phrases will also appear in my essay and can be used for talking about animal testing:

• this area of science
• animal testing should be banned
• testing medicines before using them on human beings
• figure out the cures to many serious illnesses
• Medicines that work on animals do not always work on humans
• if scientists give a mouse diabetes and then try various drugs to cure the problem
• subject these creatures to painful and demeaning experiences
• They are sentient beings
• subjected to cruel and often unnecessary experiments
• harmful both to humans and animals

It is also important to avoid repetition and that means finding ways to say “animal testing” without repeating the say words over and over. You could say:

• testing on animals
• experimenting on animals
• subjecting animals to medical experiments
• using animals in experiments

Again, it would be helpful to read articles and listen to podcasts on this topic in order to improve your vocabulary.

Sample Band 9 Answer

Over the past few decades, animal testing has been fiercely debated due to the ethical problems inherent in this area of science. This essay will look at both sides of the debate, before concluding that animal testing should be banned.

The people who believe that animal testing is necessary tend to say that there are serious benefits to humanity, such as testing medicines before using them on human beings. They believe that this will help to figure out the cures to many serious illnesses, which will make the world a better place for humans. However, this is wrong for several reasons.

Firstly, animal testing is not as helpful in developing medicines as people think. Medicines that work on animals do not always work on humans, and vice versa. As such, these trials are not just unnecessary but also profoundly unhelpful. For example, if scientists give a mouse diabetes and then try various drugs to cure the problem, they may find that there are twelve drugs that do not work on the mouse. However, maybe one of those drugs would have worked on a human. As such, animal testing would have caused more problems than it solved.

There are many other reasons why experimenting with animals is wrong. Perhaps most importantly, it is grossly unethical to subject these creatures to painful and demeaning experiences for the benefit of humanity. Animals do not exist for the benefit of people. They are sentient beings that deserve better than to be caged and subjected to cruel and often unnecessary experiments.

In conclusion, people may argue that there are benefits that come from experimenting on animals, but in fact there is no good reason to continue doing this. At best, these experiments are useless and at worst they are unethical and harmful both to humans and animals.

Final Notes

You can see that I have carefully crafted an argument that is strong. You may not agree with it, but it is hard to deny my points, which makes it effective in terms of Task Response. The structure is also solid and the ideas were well connected, making it very good in terms of Coherence and Cohesion . Note the inclusion of realistic and interesting ideas as well as concrete examples. My explanation of testing on mice was particularly effective here. It is better than giving some vague or unexplained idea.

About The Author

David S. Wills

David S. Wills is the author of Scientologist! William S. Burroughs and the 'Weird Cult' and the founder/editor of Beatdom literary journal. He lives and works in rural Cambodia and loves to travel. He has worked as an IELTS tutor since 2010, has completed both TEFL and CELTA courses, and has a certificate from Cambridge for Teaching Writing. David has worked in many different countries, and for several years designed a writing course for the University of Worcester. In 2018, he wrote the popular IELTS handbook, Grammar for IELTS Writing and he has since written two other books about IELTS. His other IELTS website is called IELTS Teaching.

Related Posts

2x Task 1 Model Essays

June 14, 2017

2 Model IELTS Essays

June 11, 2017

Task 2 Sample Answer

June 28, 2017

Sports Facilities: Discuss Both Views [Sample Answer]

June 27, 2020

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Download my IELTS Books

Recent Posts

• Exams vs Continual Assessement [Model Essay]
• British vs American Spelling
• How to Improve your IELTS Writing Score
• Past Simple vs Past Perfect
• Complex Sentences

Recent Comments

• David S. Wills on Writing Correction Service
• kenji on Writing Correction Service
• Pop Pop on Straw No More, by Molly Steer
• Francisca on Adverb Clauses: A Comprehensive Guide
• Mariam on IELTS Writing Task 2: Two-Part Questions
• Lesson Plans
• Model Essays
• TED Video Lessons
• Weekly Roundup

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

• Skip to content
• Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

• IELTS Sample

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

Ielts essay # 1369 - raising animals for human consumption is cruel, ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay:, people should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel., to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

• IELTS Essay
• Writing Task 2
• Agree/Disagree Essay
• Opinion Essay

IELTS Materials

• IELTS Bar Graph
• IELTS Line Graph
• IELTS Table Chart
• IELTS Flow Chart
• IELTS Pie Chart
• IELTS Letter Writing
• Academic Reading

Useful Links

• IELTS Secrets
• Band Score Calculator
• Exam Specific Tips
• Useful Websites
• IELTS Preparation Tips
• Academic Reading Tips
• Academic Writing Tips
• GT Writing Tips
• Listening Tips
• Speaking Tips
• IELTS Grammar Review
• IELTS Vocabulary
• IELTS Cue Cards
• IELTS Life Skills
• Letter Types

• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Copyright Notice
• HTML Sitemap

IELTS General Training

A hub for IELTS GT test takers to help them reach their goal.

Essay 270 – Raising animals for human consumption is cruel

Gt writing task 2 / essay sample # 270.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

People should never eat meat because raising animals for human consumption is cruel.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer 1:

Whether it is brutal and inhuman to raise animals for our consumption is a hotly debated issue nowadays. In this case, the writer strongly disagrees with the claim because it is a natural process and part of human history and culture.

There is no brutality in eating meat. From time immemorial, animals have been eating other animals for meat to survive. Eagles kill and eat snakes, and snakes eat the mouse, and it is a natural process. Human is also part of the animal kingdom when it comes to the food pyramid. Moreover, meat is an important source of nutrients for the human being. For instance, ruminants such as cows, sheep, and goats, convert indigestible plant parts into a form the human body can absorb. That is to say that our digestive system cannot break down cellulose, which is an elementary component of fibre. They consume high-fibre plants like grasses and translate them into valuable protein for humans. The food chain is an essential part of ecosystem service, so to claim that rearing livestock for meat is inhumane is unnatural.

Aside from this, farmers breed ruminants, feed these animals, and protect these animals. These animals are domesticated so as to earn their bread. If rearing livestock for human consumption ceased, then the impulse of raising livestock would be gone. Farmers would no longer be there for looking after these animals, this, in turn, would endanger their existence. On top of that, these animals have survived over the generations due to their importance to humans. Besides, animal agriculture is a substantial part of human culture as well as history. Farmers and ranchers deem livestock rearing as more than a job. It is a lifestyle that is deeply ingrained in their existence and objectives here on earth. Thus, there is no brutality in rearing livestock for human consumption.

In conclusion, raising ruminants for human consumption is not cruelty to animals, but rather a natural process. However, we can introduce regulations so that farmers or corporations deter themselves from malpractice in raising and slaughtering animals.

Model Answer 2:

Whether people should abstain from consuming meat due to the perceived cruelty involved in raising animals for human consumption has ignited a heated debate. While some argue vehemently for the complete avoidance of meat, I respectfully disagree with this viewpoint. In my opinion, the decision to consume meat should be approached with mindfulness and consideration for ethical and sustainable practices.

First and foremost, it is essential to acknowledge that the mistreatment of animals in industrial farming practices is a genuine concern. The intensive farming methods employed to meet the growing demand for meat often involve cramped living conditions, inhumane treatment, and the use of growth hormones and antibiotics. These practices contradict the principles of compassion and respect for animal welfare.

However, it is important to note that not all meat production follows these unethical practices. There are alternative approaches, such as organic farming and free-range systems, that prioritize the well-being of animals, providing them with a more natural environment and access to pasture.

Furthermore, humans have evolved as omnivores, with meat being an integral part of our dietary history. Meat consumption, when practised responsibly, can provide essential nutrients that contribute to a balanced diet. It is worth noting that certain nutrients, such as vitamin B12, iron, and high-quality protein, are predominantly found in animal products. For individuals, particularly those with specific dietary requirements or cultural traditions, complete abstinence from meat may pose challenges in meeting their nutritional needs.

In conclusion, while the mistreatment of animals in industrial farming is a legitimate concern, I believe that a blanket statement advocating for the complete avoidance of meat oversimplifies a complex issue. Responsible meat consumption, encompassing ethical and sustainable practices, can coexist with animal welfare considerations. By supporting organic, free-range, and sustainably sourced meat, individuals can make informed choices that strike a balance between personal health, ethical considerations, and environmental sustainability.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Overview

• Listening Tests
• Academic Tests
• General Tests
• IELTS Writing Checker
• IELTS Writing Samples
• Speaking Club
• IELTS AI Speaking Test Simulator
• Latest Topics
• Vocabularying
• 2024 © IELTS 69

Some people say zoos are cruelty to wild animals, while others think they can only be protected there. to what extent do you agree?

IELTS essay Some people say zoos are cruelty to wild animals, while others think they can only be protected there.

• Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
• ? One main idea per paragraph
• Include an introduction and conclusion
• Support main points with an explanation and then an example
• Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
• Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
• Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
• Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
• Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
• Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
• Check your writing for errors
• Answer all parts of the question
• ? Present relevant ideas
• Fully explain these ideas
• Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
• ? Currently is not available
• Meet the criteria
• Doesn't meet the criteria
• 5.5 band Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel but other think that animals are neccessary part of diet. Ehat do you think? It is consider by individuals that killing of animal for human consumption is not akind act. While, ither have conflicting views that meat is an indispensable part of diet. According to my opinion, it is normal act to kill animals for food as some terrains do not have agricultural land and imperativ ...
• 6 band Today most people are choosing to live alone or with friends. It can effect badly to society. What extend Today may people prefer to live with mates or lonely than with their families. It may cause to have a negative effect on society. In my opinion most people live together with their families and according to current figures, this is not so dangerous. However, provided that, they increase, it will hav ...
• Language comes first. It’s not that language grows out of consciousness, if you haven’t got language, you can’t be conscious. Alan Moore
• 6 band Art galleries and museums preserve important artifacts of history hence they have historical significance. Some people opine that entry to the museums should be free. Artifacts and ancient texts, which are showcased in museums reflect the rich history behind our successful civilization. Some individuals contemplate that they should be allowed entry in museums without any charges. I strongly agree that people should be allowed in museums free of cost as it will ge ...
• 6.5 band Should cyclists pass a test before they are allowed to ride on public roads? Owing to the problems which a growing number of cyclists cause for safe road traffic, some specialists think that the key to solving these issues is to conduct tests for cyclists before they are allowed to ride on streets. I completely agree that this is the best way to tackle the issue of road safe ...
• The limits of my language are the limits of my world. Ludwig Wittgenstein
• 5 band Houses are essential. So government should provide it who are needed. Allocation of essential things such as house, food and cloths should be provided by government for those who are not able to afford it. I am completely disagree with the statment. In the following paragraphs I will discuss my views on it. Firstly, If government provides free houses, it will lead to ...
• 6 band Effects of the new normal on social life Over the past two years, the Covid-19 pandemic has led to severe social damage worldwide and posed unprecedented challenges to humanity. This essay will discuss the three main effects of the new normal on social life, likes medical declaration, distance & distraction, masks & disinfection during the ...
• The most intimate temper of a people, its deepest soul, is above all in its language. Jules Michelet

50 Latest Animals IELTS Topics

• Unlimited Task 1 checks Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
• Unlimited Task 2 checks Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
• Personalized suggestions Know how to boost your score.
• Detailed mistakes analysis Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
• Topic ideas generator Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
• Vocabulary helper Get the right words for any topic.
• Progress tracking Track your writing improvements.

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Why You’re Paying Your Veterinarian So Much

People have grown more attached to their pets — and more willing to spend money on them — turning animal medicine into a high-tech industry worth billions.

By Katie Thomas

Heather Massey brought Ladybird to the veterinarian when the 9-year-old mutt began having seizures. A scan from an M.R.I. machine revealed bad news: brain cancer.

With the prognosis grim, Ms. Massey decided against further treatment at the animal hospital near her home in Athens, Ga., and Ladybird died four months later. The M.R.I. scan and related care had cost nearly $2,000, which Ms. Massey put on a specialty credit card she had learned about at a previous vet visit.

That was in 2018. She is still paying off the debt, with more than 30 percent interest.

“Could I afford to do that? Not really,” said Ms. Massey, 52, who is disabled and does not work. “Was it worth it to me? Yes.”

Ms. Massey’s experience illustrates the expensive new realities of owning a pet. For decades, veterinarians typically operated their own clinics, shepherding generations of pets from birth to death. They neutered, vaccinated and pulled thorns from paws and noses. When animals became seriously ill, vets often had little to offer beyond condolences and a humane death.

But in recent years, as people have grown more attached to their pets — and more willing to spend money on them — animal medicine has transformed into a big business that looks a lot like its human counterpart. Many veterinary offices have been replaced by hospitals outfitted with expensive M.R.I. machines, sophisticated lab equipment and round-the-clock intensive care units. Dogs and cats often see highly trained specialists in neurology, cardiology and oncology.

This high-tech care has spurred a booming market. Veterinary prices have soared more than 60 percent over the past decade, according to federal statistics. Private equity firms and large corporations have bought hundreds of facilities around the country, an acquisition spree reminiscent of the corporate roll-ups of doctors’ offices.

Veterinary care prices have soared in the past decade

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .