how to do an article review apa

Journal Article Review in APA Style

Journal article reviews refer to the appraisal of potencies and limitations of an article’s opinion and subject matter. The article reviews offer the readers with an explanation, investigation and clarification to evaluate the importance of the article. A journal article review usually follows the APA style, which is in itself an exceptional mode of writing. Writing a journal article review in APA style requires a thorough reading of an article and then present our personal opinions on its subject matter.

In order to write a journal article review in APA style, one must necessarily conform to the detailed guidelines of APA style of writing. As such, a few tips for writing a journal article review in APA style have been provided in details below.

how to do an article review apa

Tips for Writing Journal Article Review in APA Style

Getting started.

Read the complete article. Most journal articles use highly complicated and difficult language and wording. Thus, it is suggested to read the article thoroughly several times to understand it perfectly. Select a statement that effectively conveys the main idea of your review. Present the ideas in a rational order, keeping in mind that all opinions must sustain the main idea.

Start with a header with citation

Journal article reviews start with a header, including citation of the sources being reviewed. This citation is mentioned at the top of the review, following the APA style (refer to the APA style manual for more information). We will need the author’s name for the article, title of the article, journal of the published article, volume and issue number, publication date, and page numbers for the article.

Write a summary

The introductory paragraph of the review should provide a brief summary of the article, strictly limiting it to one to three paragraphs depending on the article length. The summary should discuss only the most imperative details about the article, like the author’s intention in writing the article, how the study was conducted, how the article relates to other work on the same subject, the results and other relevant information from the article.

Body of the review

The succeeding paragraphs of the review should present your ideas and opinions on the article. Discuss the significance and suggestion of the results of the study. The body of the article review should be limited to one to two paragraphs, including your understanding of the article, quotations from the article demonstrating your main ideas, discussing the article’s limitations and how to overcome them.

Concluding the review

The concluding paragraphs of the review should provide your personal appraisal of the journal article. Discuss whether the article is well-written or not, whether any information is missing, or if further research is necessary on the subject. Also, write a paragraph on how the author could develop the study results, what the information means on a large scale, how further investigation can develop the subject matter, and how the knowledge of this field can be extended further.

Citation and Revision

In-text citation of direct quotes or paraphrases from the article can be done using the author’s name, year of publication and page numbers (refer to the APA-style manual for citation guidelines). After finishing the writing of journal article review in APA style, it would be advised to re-visit the review after a few days and then re-read it altogether. By doing this, you will be able to view the review with a new perspective and may detect mistakes that were previously left undetected.

The above mentioned tips will help and guide you for writing a journal article review in APA style. However, while writing a journal article review, remember that you are undertaking more than just a narrative review. Thus, the article review should not merely focus on discussing what the article is about, but should reveal your personal ideas and opinions on the article.

Related Posts

Conflict of interest disclosure.

A fundamental requisite of a publication in any reputed journal is the need to provide readers with unbiased and unambiguous research. Toward this objective, a published article should disclose whether the author or authors had any competing interest or conflict of interest while preparing the article. Consequently, the onus is on the journal to publish […]

Why journal articles face rejection?

When a manuscript is submitted to a journal, it undergoes a thorough quality check under the peer review process before being sent to the chief editor. Most articles face rejection during this process. There are several reasons for this. 1. The article is beyond the scope of the journal Your article can be immediately rejected […]

Writing Headings

Whether or not an audience will read the whole piece of content often relies on the effectiveness of its heading. Thus, for almost every kind of content, the heading is the most vital part. Due to this, every writer tries his best to write a heading that is, not only attractive and appealing, but also […]

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

how to do an article review apa

How to Write an Article Review: Tips and Examples

how to do an article review apa

Did you know that article reviews are not just academic exercises but also a valuable skill in today's information age? In a world inundated with content, being able to dissect and evaluate articles critically can help you separate the wheat from the chaff. Whether you're a student aiming to excel in your coursework or a professional looking to stay well-informed, mastering the art of writing article reviews is an invaluable skill.

Short Description

In this article, our research paper writing service experts will start by unraveling the concept of article reviews and discussing the various types. You'll also gain insights into the art of formatting your review effectively. To ensure you're well-prepared, we'll take you through the pre-writing process, offering tips on setting the stage for your review. But it doesn't stop there. You'll find a practical example of an article review to help you grasp the concepts in action. To complete your journey, we'll guide you through the post-writing process, equipping you with essential proofreading techniques to ensure your work shines with clarity and precision!

What Is an Article Review: Grasping the Concept 

A review article is a type of professional paper writing that demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. It is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison.

If you write a scientific review, you have to use database searches to portray the research. Your primary goal is to summarize everything and present a clear understanding of the topic you've been working on.

Writing Involves:

  • Summarization, classification, analysis, critiques, and comparison.
  • The analysis, evaluation, and comparison require the use of theories, ideas, and research relevant to the subject area of the article.
  • It is also worth nothing if a review does not introduce new information, but instead presents a response to another writer's work.
  • Check out other samples to gain a better understanding of how to review the article.

Types of Review

When it comes to article reviews, there's more than one way to approach the task. Understanding the various types of reviews is like having a versatile toolkit at your disposal. In this section, we'll walk you through the different dimensions of review types, each offering a unique perspective and purpose. Whether you're dissecting a scholarly article, critiquing a piece of literature, or evaluating a product, you'll discover the diverse landscape of article reviews and how to navigate it effectively.

types of article review

Journal Article Review

Just like other types of reviews, a journal article review assesses the merits and shortcomings of a published work. To illustrate, consider a review of an academic paper on climate change, where the writer meticulously analyzes and interprets the article's significance within the context of environmental science.

Research Article Review

Distinguished by its focus on research methodologies, a research article review scrutinizes the techniques used in a study and evaluates them in light of the subsequent analysis and critique. For instance, when reviewing a research article on the effects of a new drug, the reviewer would delve into the methods employed to gather data and assess their reliability.

Science Article Review

In the realm of scientific literature, a science article review encompasses a wide array of subjects. Scientific publications often provide extensive background information, which can be instrumental in conducting a comprehensive analysis. For example, when reviewing an article about the latest breakthroughs in genetics, the reviewer may draw upon the background knowledge provided to facilitate a more in-depth evaluation of the publication.

Need a Hand From Professionals?

Address to Our Writers and Get Assistance in Any Questions!

Formatting an Article Review

The format of the article should always adhere to the citation style required by your professor. If you're not sure, seek clarification on the preferred format and ask him to clarify several other pointers to complete the formatting of an article review adequately.

How Many Publications Should You Review?

  • In what format should you cite your articles (MLA, APA, ASA, Chicago, etc.)?
  • What length should your review be?
  • Should you include a summary, critique, or personal opinion in your assignment?
  • Do you need to call attention to a theme or central idea within the articles?
  • Does your instructor require background information?

When you know the answers to these questions, you may start writing your assignment. Below are examples of MLA and APA formats, as those are the two most common citation styles.

Using the APA Format

Articles appear most commonly in academic journals, newspapers, and websites. If you write an article review in the APA format, you will need to write bibliographical entries for the sources you use:

  • Web : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link}
  • Journal : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp.
  • Newspaper : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Publication Title. Magazine Title, pp. xx-xx.

Using MLA Format

  • Web : Last, First Middle Initial. “Publication Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
  • Newspaper : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print.
  • Journal : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.

Enhance your writing effortlessly with EssayPro.com , where you can order an article review or any other writing task. Our team of expert writers specializes in various fields, ensuring your work is not just summarized, but deeply analyzed and professionally presented. Ideal for students and professionals alike, EssayPro offers top-notch writing assistance tailored to your needs. Elevate your writing today with our skilled team at your article review writing service !

order review

The Pre-Writing Process

Facing this task for the first time can really get confusing and can leave you unsure of where to begin. To create a top-notch article review, start with a few preparatory steps. Here are the two main stages from our dissertation services to get you started:

Step 1: Define the right organization for your review. Knowing the future setup of your paper will help you define how you should read the article. Here are the steps to follow:

  • Summarize the article — seek out the main points, ideas, claims, and general information presented in the article.
  • Define the positive points — identify the strong aspects, ideas, and insightful observations the author has made.
  • Find the gaps —- determine whether or not the author has any contradictions, gaps, or inconsistencies in the article and evaluate whether or not he or she used a sufficient amount of arguments and information to support his or her ideas.
  • Identify unanswered questions — finally, identify if there are any questions left unanswered after reading the piece.

Step 2: Move on and review the article. Here is a small and simple guide to help you do it right:

  • Start off by looking at and assessing the title of the piece, its abstract, introductory part, headings and subheadings, opening sentences in its paragraphs, and its conclusion.
  • First, read only the beginning and the ending of the piece (introduction and conclusion). These are the parts where authors include all of their key arguments and points. Therefore, if you start with reading these parts, it will give you a good sense of the author's main points.
  • Finally, read the article fully.

These three steps make up most of the prewriting process. After you are done with them, you can move on to writing your own review—and we are going to guide you through the writing process as well.

Outline and Template

As you progress with reading your article, organize your thoughts into coherent sections in an outline. As you read, jot down important facts, contributions, or contradictions. Identify the shortcomings and strengths of your publication. Begin to map your outline accordingly.

If your professor does not want a summary section or a personal critique section, then you must alleviate those parts from your writing. Much like other assignments, an article review must contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Thus, you might consider dividing your outline according to these sections as well as subheadings within the body. If you find yourself troubled with the pre-writing and the brainstorming process for this assignment, seek out a sample outline.

Your custom essay must contain these constituent parts:

  • Pre-Title Page - Before diving into your review, start with essential details: article type, publication title, and author names with affiliations (position, department, institution, location, and email). Include corresponding author info if needed.
  • Running Head - In APA format, use a concise title (under 40 characters) to ensure consistent formatting.
  • Summary Page - Optional but useful. Summarize the article in 800 words, covering background, purpose, results, and methodology, avoiding verbatim text or references.
  • Title Page - Include the full title, a 250-word abstract, and 4-6 keywords for discoverability.
  • Introduction - Set the stage with an engaging overview of the article.
  • Body - Organize your analysis with headings and subheadings.
  • Works Cited/References - Properly cite all sources used in your review.
  • Optional Suggested Reading Page - If permitted, suggest further readings for in-depth exploration.
  • Tables and Figure Legends (if instructed by the professor) - Include visuals when requested by your professor for clarity.

Example of an Article Review

You might wonder why we've dedicated a section of this article to discuss an article review sample. Not everyone may realize it, but examining multiple well-constructed examples of review articles is a crucial step in the writing process. In the following section, our essay writing service experts will explain why.

Looking through relevant article review examples can be beneficial for you in the following ways:

  • To get you introduced to the key works of experts in your field.
  • To help you identify the key people engaged in a particular field of science.
  • To help you define what significant discoveries and advances were made in your field.
  • To help you unveil the major gaps within the existing knowledge of your field—which contributes to finding fresh solutions.
  • To help you find solid references and arguments for your own review.
  • To help you generate some ideas about any further field of research.
  • To help you gain a better understanding of the area and become an expert in this specific field.
  • To get a clear idea of how to write a good review.

View Our Writer’s Sample Before Crafting Your Own!

Why Have There Been No Great Female Artists?

Steps for Writing an Article Review

Here is a guide with critique paper format on how to write a review paper:

steps for article review

Step 1: Write the Title

First of all, you need to write a title that reflects the main focus of your work. Respectively, the title can be either interrogative, descriptive, or declarative.

Step 2: Cite the Article

Next, create a proper citation for the reviewed article and input it following the title. At this step, the most important thing to keep in mind is the style of citation specified by your instructor in the requirements for the paper. For example, an article citation in the MLA style should look as follows:

Author's last and first name. "The title of the article." Journal's title and issue(publication date): page(s). Print

Abraham John. "The World of Dreams." Virginia Quarterly 60.2(1991): 125-67. Print.

Step 3: Article Identification

After your citation, you need to include the identification of your reviewed article:

  • Title of the article
  • Title of the journal
  • Year of publication

All of this information should be included in the first paragraph of your paper.

The report "Poverty increases school drop-outs" was written by Brian Faith – a Health officer – in 2000.

Step 4: Introduction

Your organization in an assignment like this is of the utmost importance. Before embarking on your writing process, you should outline your assignment or use an article review template to organize your thoughts coherently.

  • If you are wondering how to start an article review, begin with an introduction that mentions the article and your thesis for the review.
  • Follow up with a summary of the main points of the article.
  • Highlight the positive aspects and facts presented in the publication.
  • Critique the publication by identifying gaps, contradictions, disparities in the text, and unanswered questions.

Step 5: Summarize the Article

Make a summary of the article by revisiting what the author has written about. Note any relevant facts and findings from the article. Include the author's conclusions in this section.

Step 6: Critique It

Present the strengths and weaknesses you have found in the publication. Highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed to the field. Also, write about any gaps and/or contradictions you have found in the article. Take a standpoint of either supporting or not supporting the author's assertions, but back up your arguments with facts and relevant theories that are pertinent to that area of knowledge. Rubrics and templates can also be used to evaluate and grade the person who wrote the article.

Step 7: Craft a Conclusion

In this section, revisit the critical points of your piece, your findings in the article, and your critique. Also, write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. Present a way forward for future research in the field of study. Before submitting your article, keep these pointers in mind:

  • As you read the article, highlight the key points. This will help you pinpoint the article's main argument and the evidence that they used to support that argument.
  • While you write your review, use evidence from your sources to make a point. This is best done using direct quotations.
  • Select quotes and supporting evidence adequately and use direct quotations sparingly. Take time to analyze the article adequately.
  • Every time you reference a publication or use a direct quotation, use a parenthetical citation to avoid accidentally plagiarizing your article.
  • Re-read your piece a day after you finish writing it. This will help you to spot grammar mistakes and to notice any flaws in your organization.
  • Use a spell-checker and get a second opinion on your paper.

The Post-Writing Process: Proofread Your Work

Finally, when all of the parts of your article review are set and ready, you have one last thing to take care of — proofreading. Although students often neglect this step, proofreading is a vital part of the writing process and will help you polish your paper to ensure that there are no mistakes or inconsistencies.

To proofread your paper properly, start by reading it fully and checking the following points:

  • Punctuation
  • Other mistakes

Afterward, take a moment to check for any unnecessary information in your paper and, if found, consider removing it to streamline your content. Finally, double-check that you've covered at least 3-4 key points in your discussion.

And remember, if you ever need help with proofreading, rewriting your essay, or even want to buy essay , our friendly team is always here to assist you.

Need an Article REVIEW WRITTEN?

Just send us the requirements to your paper and watch one of our writers crafting an original paper for you.

What Is A Review Article?

How to write an article review, how to write an article review in apa format.

Daniel Parker

Daniel Parker

is a seasoned educational writer focusing on scholarship guidance, research papers, and various forms of academic essays including reflective and narrative essays. His expertise also extends to detailed case studies. A scholar with a background in English Literature and Education, Daniel’s work on EssayPro blog aims to support students in achieving academic excellence and securing scholarships. His hobbies include reading classic literature and participating in academic forums.

how to do an article review apa

is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.

illustration essay

  • PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
  • EDIT Edit this Article
  • EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
  • Browse Articles
  • Learn Something New
  • Quizzes Hot
  • This Or That Game
  • Train Your Brain
  • Explore More
  • Support wikiHow
  • About wikiHow
  • Log in / Sign up
  • Education and Communications
  • Critical Reviews

How to Write an Article Review (With Examples)

Last Updated: April 24, 2024 Fact Checked

Preparing to Write Your Review

Writing the article review, sample article reviews, expert q&a.

This article was co-authored by Jake Adams . Jake Adams is an academic tutor and the owner of Simplifi EDU, a Santa Monica, California based online tutoring business offering learning resources and online tutors for academic subjects K-College, SAT & ACT prep, and college admissions applications. With over 14 years of professional tutoring experience, Jake is dedicated to providing his clients the very best online tutoring experience and access to a network of excellent undergraduate and graduate-level tutors from top colleges all over the nation. Jake holds a BS in International Business and Marketing from Pepperdine University. There are 12 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 3,118,238 times.

An article review is both a summary and an evaluation of another writer's article. Teachers often assign article reviews to introduce students to the work of experts in the field. Experts also are often asked to review the work of other professionals. Understanding the main points and arguments of the article is essential for an accurate summation. Logical evaluation of the article's main theme, supporting arguments, and implications for further research is an important element of a review . Here are a few guidelines for writing an article review.

Education specialist Alexander Peterman recommends: "In the case of a review, your objective should be to reflect on the effectiveness of what has already been written, rather than writing to inform your audience about a subject."

Article Review 101

  • Read the article very closely, and then take time to reflect on your evaluation. Consider whether the article effectively achieves what it set out to.
  • Write out a full article review by completing your intro, summary, evaluation, and conclusion. Don't forget to add a title, too!
  • Proofread your review for mistakes (like grammar and usage), while also cutting down on needless information.

Step 1 Understand what an article review is.

  • Article reviews present more than just an opinion. You will engage with the text to create a response to the scholarly writer's ideas. You will respond to and use ideas, theories, and research from your studies. Your critique of the article will be based on proof and your own thoughtful reasoning.
  • An article review only responds to the author's research. It typically does not provide any new research. However, if you are correcting misleading or otherwise incorrect points, some new data may be presented.
  • An article review both summarizes and evaluates the article.

Step 2 Think about the organization of the review article.

  • Summarize the article. Focus on the important points, claims, and information.
  • Discuss the positive aspects of the article. Think about what the author does well, good points she makes, and insightful observations.
  • Identify contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the text. Determine if there is enough data or research included to support the author's claims. Find any unanswered questions left in the article.

Step 3 Preview the article.

  • Make note of words or issues you don't understand and questions you have.
  • Look up terms or concepts you are unfamiliar with, so you can fully understand the article. Read about concepts in-depth to make sure you understand their full context.

Step 4 Read the article closely.

  • Pay careful attention to the meaning of the article. Make sure you fully understand the article. The only way to write a good article review is to understand the article.

Step 5 Put the article into your words.

  • With either method, make an outline of the main points made in the article and the supporting research or arguments. It is strictly a restatement of the main points of the article and does not include your opinions.
  • After putting the article in your own words, decide which parts of the article you want to discuss in your review. You can focus on the theoretical approach, the content, the presentation or interpretation of evidence, or the style. You will always discuss the main issues of the article, but you can sometimes also focus on certain aspects. This comes in handy if you want to focus the review towards the content of a course.
  • Review the summary outline to eliminate unnecessary items. Erase or cross out the less important arguments or supplemental information. Your revised summary can serve as the basis for the summary you provide at the beginning of your review.

Step 6 Write an outline of your evaluation.

  • What does the article set out to do?
  • What is the theoretical framework or assumptions?
  • Are the central concepts clearly defined?
  • How adequate is the evidence?
  • How does the article fit into the literature and field?
  • Does it advance the knowledge of the subject?
  • How clear is the author's writing? Don't: include superficial opinions or your personal reaction. Do: pay attention to your biases, so you can overcome them.

Step 1 Come up with...

  • For example, in MLA , a citation may look like: Duvall, John N. "The (Super)Marketplace of Images: Television as Unmediated Mediation in DeLillo's White Noise ." Arizona Quarterly 50.3 (1994): 127-53. Print. [9] X Trustworthy Source Purdue Online Writing Lab Trusted resource for writing and citation guidelines Go to source

Step 3 Identify the article.

  • For example: The article, "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS," was written by Anthony Zimmerman, a Catholic priest.

Step 4 Write the introduction.

  • Your introduction should only be 10-25% of your review.
  • End the introduction with your thesis. Your thesis should address the above issues. For example: Although the author has some good points, his article is biased and contains some misinterpretation of data from others’ analysis of the effectiveness of the condom.

Step 5 Summarize the article.

  • Use direct quotes from the author sparingly.
  • Review the summary you have written. Read over your summary many times to ensure that your words are an accurate description of the author's article.

Step 6 Write your critique.

  • Support your critique with evidence from the article or other texts.
  • The summary portion is very important for your critique. You must make the author's argument clear in the summary section for your evaluation to make sense.
  • Remember, this is not where you say if you liked the article or not. You are assessing the significance and relevance of the article.
  • Use a topic sentence and supportive arguments for each opinion. For example, you might address a particular strength in the first sentence of the opinion section, followed by several sentences elaborating on the significance of the point.

Step 7 Conclude the article review.

  • This should only be about 10% of your overall essay.
  • For example: This critical review has evaluated the article "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS" by Anthony Zimmerman. The arguments in the article show the presence of bias, prejudice, argumentative writing without supporting details, and misinformation. These points weaken the author’s arguments and reduce his credibility.

Step 8 Proofread.

  • Make sure you have identified and discussed the 3-4 key issues in the article.

how to do an article review apa

You Might Also Like

Write Articles

  • ↑ https://libguides.cmich.edu/writinghelp/articlereview
  • ↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548566/
  • ↑ Jake Adams. Academic Tutor & Test Prep Specialist. Expert Interview. 24 July 2020.
  • ↑ https://guides.library.queensu.ca/introduction-research/writing/critical
  • ↑ https://www.iup.edu/writingcenter/writing-resources/organization-and-structure/creating-an-outline.html
  • ↑ https://writing.umn.edu/sws/assets/pdf/quicktips/titles.pdf
  • ↑ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_works_cited_periodicals.html
  • ↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548565/
  • ↑ https://writingcenter.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/593/2014/06/How_to_Summarize_a_Research_Article1.pdf
  • ↑ https://www.uis.edu/learning-hub/writing-resources/handouts/learning-hub/how-to-review-a-journal-article
  • ↑ https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/editing-and-proofreading/

About This Article

Jake Adams

If you have to write an article review, read through the original article closely, taking notes and highlighting important sections as you read. Next, rewrite the article in your own words, either in a long paragraph or as an outline. Open your article review by citing the article, then write an introduction which states the article’s thesis. Next, summarize the article, followed by your opinion about whether the article was clear, thorough, and useful. Finish with a paragraph that summarizes the main points of the article and your opinions. To learn more about what to include in your personal critique of the article, keep reading the article! Did this summary help you? Yes No

  • Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Prince Asiedu-Gyan

Prince Asiedu-Gyan

Apr 22, 2022

Did this article help you?

how to do an article review apa

Sammy James

Sep 12, 2017

Juabin Matey

Juabin Matey

Aug 30, 2017

Vanita Meghrajani

Vanita Meghrajani

Jul 21, 2016

F. K.

Nov 27, 2018

Am I Smart Quiz

Featured Articles

Be Positive

Trending Articles

How to Plan and Launch a Fireworks Show

Watch Articles

Make Stamped Metal Jewelry

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Info
  • Not Selling Info

Don’t miss out! Sign up for

wikiHow’s newsletter

  • How to Cite
  • Language & Lit
  • Rhyme & Rhythm
  • The Rewrite
  • Search Glass

How to Write a Journal Article Review APA Style

Reviewing journal articles is an ideal way to learn more about a specific area of interest and how research is conducted. Knowing how to do this according to American Psychological Association (APA) standards helps prepare you to be a professional.

Begin With Citation

Start by citing the article according to APA style. Begin with the last name(s) and initial(s) of the author(s). This is followed by the year of publication in parentheses. The article name comes next, followed by the title of the journal (in italics), volume number (in italics) and issue number in parentheses. End with the page numbers.

Citation Example

Punctuate the citation as follows:

Shofner, W. P., & Chaney, M. (2013). Processing pitch in a nonhuman mammal (Chinchilla laniger). Journal of Comparative Psychology (italicized), 127 (italicized), (2). 142-153.

Text of Review

The body of your review varies according to the type of article and your instructor's requirements. You may have to include the intended audience, the research question, methodology, results, implications and your own assessment of how it relates to what you are studying.

  • Purdue Online Writing Lab: Reference List: Articles in Periodicals
  • University of South Carolina: Article Review
  • Journal of Comparative Psychology: Processing Pitch in a Nonhuman Mammal

Based in Southern California, A.T. Gardner has spent more than two decades writing articles, educational materials, video scripts and other content for corporations and organizations including The Walt Disney Company, TRW, Nissan and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). He has a bachelor's degree in communications.

How to Write an Article Review: Template & Examples

An article review is an academic assignment that invites you to study a piece of academic research closely. Then, you should present its summary and critically evaluate it using the knowledge you’ve gained in class and during your independent study. If you get such a task at college or university, you shouldn’t confuse it with a response paper, which is a distinct assignment with other purposes (we’ll talk about it in detail below).

In this article, prepared by Custom-Writing experts, you’ll find:

  • the intricacies of article review writing;
  • the difference between an article review and similar assignments;
  • a step-by-step algorithm for review composition;
  • a couple of samples to guide you throughout the writing process.

So, if you wish to study our article review example and discover helpful writing tips, keep reading.

❓ What Is an Article Review?

  • ✍️ Writing Steps

📑 Article Review Format

🔗 references.

An article review is an academic paper that summarizes and critically evaluates the information presented in your selected article.

This image shows what an article review is.

The first thing you should note when approaching the task of an article review is that not every article is suitable for this assignment. Let’s have a look at the variety of articles to understand what you can choose from.

Popular Vs. Scholarly Articles

In most cases, you’ll be required to review a scholarly, peer-reviewed article – one composed in compliance with rigorous academic standards. Yet, the Web is also full of popular articles that don’t present original scientific value and shouldn’t be selected for a review.

Not sure how to distinguish these two types? Here is a comparative table to help you out.

🗞️ Popular articles are:🎓 Scholarly articles are:
Written by a professional or non-professional author. Written by someone with academic credentials.
Meant for the general audience.Published for the peer academic community.
Featuring reader-friendly, simple language. Containing professional jargon and vocabulary.
Illustrated by simple and engaging visuals. Illustrated by tables and graphs.
Structured in a simple way.Structured according to a scholarly publication’s standards.
Checked by the magazine’s editorial staff only. Thoroughly reviewed by peer researchers.
Featuring no or scarce references.Featuring a full list of references.

Article Review vs. Response Paper

Now, let’s consider the difference between an article review and a response paper:

  • If you’re assigned to critique a scholarly article , you will need to compose an article review .
  • If your subject of analysis is a popular article , you can respond to it with a well-crafted response paper .

The reason for such distinctions is the quality and structure of these two article types. Peer-reviewed, scholarly articles have clear-cut quality criteria, allowing you to conduct and present a structured assessment of the assigned material. Popular magazines have loose or non-existent quality criteria and don’t offer an opportunity for structured evaluation. So, they are only fit for a subjective response, in which you can summarize your reactions and emotions related to the reading material.

All in all, you can structure your response assignments as outlined in the tips below.

✔️ Both a reaction paper and an article review will start with a content summary.
✔️ For scholarly material, you will present a structured review after the summary.
✔️ For popular magazine content, you will write a response that sums up your emotions, thoughts, and reactions that the material aroused.

✍️ How to Write an Article Review: Step by Step

Here is a tried and tested algorithm for article review writing from our experts. We’ll consider only the critical review variety of this academic assignment. So, let’s get down to the stages you need to cover to get a stellar review.

Read the Article

As with any reviews, reports, and critiques, you must first familiarize yourself with the assigned material. It’s impossible to review something you haven’t read, so set some time for close, careful reading of the article to identify:

  • The author’s main points and message.
  • The arguments they use to prove their points.
  • The methodology they use to approach the subject.

In terms of research type, your article will usually belong to one of three types explained below.

This type of research is the most common and highly valued in the scholarly community. It uses primary data collected by the author specifically for this article and offers original findings and insights into the discussed research area.
This research type examines a particular event, phenomenon, or object closely by considering its environment, details, and context. It’s a close-up of the research object that can be achieved via different observation and data collection techniques.
These articles address new research procedures or methods for testing hypotheses in a specific area of research.

Summarize the Article

Now that you’ve read the text and have a general impression of the content, it’s time to summarize it for your readers. Look into the article’s text closely to determine:

  • The thesis statement, or general message of the author.
  • Research question, purpose, and context of research.
  • Supporting points for the author’s assumptions and claims.
  • Major findings and supporting evidence.

As you study the article thoroughly, make notes on the margins or write these elements out on a sheet of paper. You can also apply a different technique: read the text section by section and formulate its gist in one phrase or sentence. Once you’re done, you’ll have a summary skeleton in front of you.

Evaluate the Article

The next step of review is content evaluation. Keep in mind that various research types will require a different set of review questions. Here is a complete list of evaluation points you can include.

cover the article’s purpose comprehensively?
in data presentation?

Write the Text

After completing the critical review stage, it’s time to compose your article review.

The format of this assignment is standard – you will have an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. The introduction should present your article and summarize its content. The body will contain a structured review according to all four dimensions covered in the previous section. The concluding part will typically recap all the main points you’ve identified during your assessment.

It is essential to note that an article review is, first of all, an academic assignment. Therefore, it should follow all rules and conventions of academic composition, such as:

  • No contractions . Don’t use short forms, such as “don’t,” “can’t,” “I’ll,” etc. in academic writing. You need to spell out all those words.
  • Formal language and style . Avoid conversational phrasing and words that you would naturally use in blog posts or informal communication. For example, don’t use words like “pretty,” “kind of,” and “like.”
  • Third-person narrative . Academic reviews should be written from the third-person point of view, avoiding statements like “I think,” “in my opinion,” and so on.
  • No conversational forms . You shouldn’t turn to your readers directly in the text by addressing them with the pronoun “you.” It’s vital to keep the narrative neutral and impersonal.
  • Proper abbreviation use . Consult the list of correct abbreviations, like “e.g.” or “i.e.,” for use in your academic writing. If you use informal abbreviations like “FYA” or “f.i.,” your professor will reduce the grade.
  • Complete sentences . Make sure your sentences contain the subject and the predicate; avoid shortened or sketch-form phrases suitable for a draft only.
  • No conjunctions at the beginning of a sentence . Remember the FANBOYS rule – don’t start a sentence with words like “and” or “but.” They often seem the right way to build a coherent narrative, but academic writing rules disfavor such usage.
  • No abbreviations or figures at the beginning of a sentence . Never start a sentence with a number — spell it out if you need to use it anyway. Besides, sentences should never begin with abbreviations like “e.g.”

Finally, a vital rule for an article review is properly formatting the citations. We’ll discuss the correct use of citation styles in the following section.

When composing an article review, keep these points in mind:

  • Start with a full reference to the reviewed article so the reader can locate it quickly.
  • Ensure correct formatting of in-text references.
  • Provide a complete list of used external sources on the last page of the review – your bibliographical entries.

You’ll need to understand the rules of your chosen citation style to meet all these requirements. Below, we’ll discuss the two most common referencing styles – APA and MLA.

Article Review in APA

When you need to compose an article review in the APA format , here is the general bibliographical entry format you should use for journal articles on your reference page:

  • Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year of Publication). Name of the article. Name of the Journal, volume (number), pp. #-#. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy

Horigian, V. E., Schmidt, R. D., & Feaster, D. J. (2021). Loneliness, mental health, and substance use among US young adults during COVID-19. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 53 (1), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2020.1836435

Your in-text citations should follow the author-date format like this:

  • If you paraphrase the source and mention the author in the text: According to Horigian et al. (2021), young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic.
  • If you paraphrase the source and don’t mention the author in the text: Young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic (Horigian et al., 2021).
  • If you quote the source: As Horigian et al. (2021) point out, there were “elevated levels of loneliness, depression, anxiety, alcohol use, and drug use among young adults during COVID-19” (p. 6).

Note that your in-text citations should include “et al.,” as in the examples above, if your article has 3 or more authors. If you have one or two authors, your in-text citations would look like this:

  • One author: “According to Smith (2020), depression is…” or “Depression is … (Smith, 2020).”
  • Two authors: “According to Smith and Brown (2020), anxiety means…” or “Anxiety means (Smith & Brown, 2020).”

Finally, in case you have to review a book or a website article, here are the general formats for citing these source types on your APA reference list.

Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year). Publisher.
Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year). . Name of Website. URL.

Article Review in MLA

If your assignment requires MLA-format referencing, here’s the general format you should use for citing journal articles on your Works Cited page:

  • Author’s last name, First name. “Title of an Article.” Title of the Journal , vol. #, no. #, year, pp. #-#.

Horigian, Viviana E., et al. “Loneliness, Mental Health, and Substance Use Among US Young Adults During COVID-19.” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs , vol. 53, no. 1, 2021, pp. 1-9.

In-text citations in the MLA format follow the author-page citation format and look like this:

  • According to Horigian et al., young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic (6).
  • Young adults experienced increased levels of loneliness, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic (Horigian et al. 6).

Like in APA, the abbreviation “et al.” is only needed in MLA if your article has 3 or more authors.

If you need to cite a book or a website page, here are the general MLA formats for these types of sources.

Author’s last name, First name. Publisher, Year.
Author’s last name, First name. “Webpage Title.” , Date, URL. Accessed Day Month Year.

✅ Article Review Template

Here is a handy, universal article review template to help you move on with any review assignment. We’ve tried to make it as generic as possible to guide you in the academic process.

Frequently, assignment instructions will ask you to include a full citation of your chosen text at the top of the first page of your article review.
In the introduction, you should summarize the background information and purpose of the research under review. In addition, consider explaining why you chose it for your assignment.
Next, summarize the article. If you review the original research, consider including the following points:
If you review a or a book, include the following in your summary: This section should be no more than a third of your total article review.
Then, you should critically evaluate the article. Consider answering these questions:
In the , share your reasoned opinion on the reviewed piece. Was it worth reading? Did you learn any lessons from it? Would you recommend it to someone else, and why?
In the end, add a separate page with bibliographic citations of your reviewed article and any other sources used in your paper.

📝 Article Review Examples

The theory is good, but practice is even better. Thus, we’ve created three brief examples to show you how to write an article review. You can study the full-text samples by following the links.

📃 Men, Women, & Money

This article review examines a famous piece, “Men, Women & Money – How the Sexes Differ with Their Finances,” published by Amy Livingston in 2020. The author of this article claims that men generally spend more money than women. She makes this conclusion from a close analysis of gender-specific expenditures across five main categories: food, clothing, cars, entertainment, and general spending patterns. Livingston also looks at men’s approach to saving to argue that counter to the common perception of women’s light-hearted attitude to money, men are those who spend more on average.

📃 When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism

This is a review of Jonathan Heidt’s 2016 article titled “When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism,” written as an advocacy of right-wing populism rising in many Western states. The author illustrates the case with the election of Donald Trump as the US President and the rise of right-wing rhetoric in many Western countries. These examples show how nationalist sentiment represents a reaction to global immigration and a failure of globalization.

📃 Sleep Deprivation

This is a review of the American Heart Association’s article titled “The Dangers of Sleep Deprivation.” It discusses how the national organization concerned with the American population’s cardiovascular health links the lack of high-quality sleep to far-reaching health consequences. The organization’s experts reveal how a consistent lack of sleep leads to Alzheimer’s disease development, obesity, type 2 diabetes, etc.

✏️ Article Review FAQ

A high-quality article review should summarize the assigned article’s content and offer data-backed reactions and evaluations of its quality in terms of the article’s purpose, methodology, and data used to argue the main points. It should be detailed, comprehensive, objective, and evidence-based.

The purpose of writing a review is to allow students to reflect on research quality and showcase their critical thinking and evaluation skills. Students should exhibit their mastery of close reading of research publications and their unbiased assessment.

The content of your article review will be the same in any format, with the only difference in the assignment’s formatting before submission. Ensure you have a separate title page made according to APA standards and cite sources using the parenthetical author-date referencing format.

You need to take a closer look at various dimensions of an assigned article to compose a valuable review. Study the author’s object of analysis, the purpose of their research, the chosen method, data, and findings. Evaluate all these dimensions critically to see whether the author has achieved the initial goals. Finally, offer improvement recommendations to add a critique aspect to your paper.

  • Scientific Article Review: Duke University
  • Book and Article Reviews: William & Mary, Writing Resources Center
  • Sample Format for Reviewing a Journal Article: Boonshoft School of Medicine
  • Research Paper Review – Structure and Format Guidelines: New Jersey Institute of Technology
  • Article Review: University of Waterloo
  • Writing Help: The Article Review: Central Michigan University Libraries
  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to LinkedIn
  • Share to email

How to Write a Short Essay: Format & Examples

Short essays answer a specific question on the subject. They usually are anywhere between 250 words and 750 words long. A paper with less than 250 words isn’t considered a finished text, so it doesn’t fall under the category of a short essay. Essays of such format are required for...

Compare and Contrast Essay Outline: Template and Example

High school and college students often face challenges when crafting a compare-and-contrast essay. A well-written paper of this kind needs to be structured appropriately to earn you good grades. Knowing how to organize your ideas allows you to present your ideas in a coherent and logical manner This article by...

How to Write a Formal Essay: Format, Rules, & Example

If you’re a student, you’ve heard about a formal essay: a factual, research-based paper written in 3rd person. Most students have to produce dozens of them during their educational career.  Writing a formal essay may not be the easiest task. But fear not: our custom-writing team is here to guide...

How to Write a Narrative Essay Outline: Template & Examples

Narrative essays are unlike anything you wrote throughout your academic career. Instead of writing a formal paper, you need to tell a story. Familiar elements such as evidence and arguments are replaced with exposition and character development. The importance of writing an outline for an essay like this is hard...

How to Write a Precis: Definition, Guide, & Examples

A précis is a brief synopsis of a written piece. It is used to summarize and analyze a text’s main points. If you need to write a précis for a research paper or the AP Lang exam, you’ve come to the right place. In this comprehensive guide by Custom-Writing.org, you’ll...

How to Write a Synthesis Essay: Examples, Topics, & Outline

A synthesis essay requires you to work with multiple sources. You combine the information gathered from them to present a well-rounded argument on a topic. Are you looking for the ultimate guide on synthesis essay writing? You’ve come to the right place! In this guide by our custom writing team,...

How to Write a Catchy Hook: Examples & Techniques

Do you know how to make your essay stand out? One of the easiest ways is to start your introduction with a catchy hook. A hook is a phrase or a sentence that helps to grab the reader’s attention. After reading this article by Custom-Writing.org, you will be able to...

How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay: Examples & Guide

A critical analysis essay is an academic paper that requires a thorough examination of theoretical concepts and ideas. It includes a comparison of facts, differentiation between evidence and argument, and identification of biases. Crafting a good paper can be a daunting experience, but it will be much easier if you...

How to Write a Critical Thinking Essay: Examples & Outline

Critical thinking is the process of evaluating and analyzing information. People who use it in everyday life are open to different opinions. They rely on reason and logic when making conclusions about certain issues. A critical thinking essay shows how your thoughts change as you research your topic. This type...

How to Write a Process Analysis Essay: Examples & Outline

Process analysis is an explanation of how something works or happens. Want to know more? Read the following article prepared by our custom writing specialists and learn about: So, let’s start digging deeper into this topic! ♻️ What Is Process Analysis? A process analysis describes and explains the succession of...

How to Write a Visual Analysis Essay: Examples & Template

A visual analysis essay is an academic paper type that history and art students often deal with. It consists of a detailed description of an image or object. It can also include an interpretation or an argument that is supported by visual evidence. In this article, our custom writing experts...

How to Write a Reflection Paper: Example & Tips

Want to know how to write a reflection paper for college or school? To do that, you need to connect your personal experiences with theoretical knowledge. Usually, students are asked to reflect on a documentary, a text, or their experience. Sometimes one needs to write a paper about a lesson...

How to Write an Article Review: Practical Tips and Examples

image

Table of contents

  • 1 What Is an Article Review?
  • 2 Different Types of Article Review
  • 3.1 Critical review
  • 3.2 Literature review
  • 3.3 Mapping review/systematic map
  • 3.4 Meta-analysis
  • 3.5 Overview
  • 3.6 Qualitative Systematic Review/Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
  • 3.7 Rapid review
  • 3.8 Scoping review
  • 3.9 Systematic review
  • 3.10 Umbrella review
  • 4 Formatting
  • 5 How To Write An Article Review
  • 6 Article Review Outline
  • 7 10 Tips for Writing an Article Review
  • 8 An Article Review Example

What Is an Article Review?

Before you get started, learn what an article review is. It can be defined as a work that combines elements of summary and critical analysis. If you are writing an article review, you should take a close look at another author’s work. Many experts regularly practice evaluating the work of others. The purpose of this is to improve writing skills.

This kind of work belongs to professional pieces of writing because the process of crafting this paper requires reviewing, summarizing, and understanding the topic. Only experts are able to compose really good reviews containing a logical evaluation of a paper as well as a critique.

Your task is not to provide new information. You should process what you have in a certain publication.

Different Types of Article Review

In academic writing, the landscape of article reviews is diverse and nuanced, encompassing a variety of formats that cater to different research purposes and methodologies. Among these, three main types of article reviews stand out due to their distinct approaches and applications:

  • Narrative. The basic focus here is the author’s personal experience. Judgments are presented through the prism of experiences and subsequent realizations. Besides, the use of emotional recollections is acceptable.
  • Evidence. There is a significant difference from the narrative review. An in-depth study of the subject is assumed, and conclusions are built on arguments. The author may consider theories or concrete facts to support that.
  • Systematic. The structure of the piece explains the approach to writing. The answer to what’s a systematic review lies on the surface. The writer should pay special attention to the chronology and logic of the narrative.

Understanding 10 Common Types

Don`t rush looking at meta-analysis vs. systematic review. We recommend that you familiarize yourself with other formats and topics of texts. This will allow you to understand the types of essays better and select them based on your request. For this purpose, we`ll discuss the typology of reviews below.

Critical review

The critical review definition says that the author must be objective and have arguments for each thought. Sometimes, amateur authors believe that they should “criticize” something. However, it is important to understand the difference since objectivity and the absence of emotional judgments are prioritized. The structure of this type of review article is as follows:

  • Introduction;
  • Conclusion.

“Stuffing” of the text is based on such elements as methodology, argumentation, evidence, and theory base. The subject of study is stated at the beginning of the material. Then follows the transition to the main part (facts). The final word summarizes all the information voiced earlier.

It is a mistake to believe that critical reviews are devoid of evaluation. The author’s art lies in maneuvering between facts. Smooth transition from one argument to another and lays out the conclusions in the reader. That is why such texts are used in science. The critical reviews meaning is especially tangible in medical topics.

Literature review

Literature is the basis for this type of work ─ books, essays, and articles become a source of information. Thus, the author should rethink the voiced information. After that, it is possible to proceed to conclusions. The methodology aims to find interconnections, repetitions, and even “gaps” in the literature. One important item is the referencing of sources. Footnotes are possible in the work itself or the list of resources used.

These types of research reviews often explore myths since there are often inconsistencies in mythology. Sometimes, there is contrary information. In this case, the author has to gather all existing theories. The essence does not always lie in the confirmation of facts. There are other different types of reviews for this purpose. In literary reviews, the object of study may be characters or traditions. This is where the author’s space for discovery opens up. Inconsistencies in the data can tell important details about particular periods or cultures. At the same time, patterns reveal well-established facts. Make sure to outline your work before you write. This will help you with essay writing .

Mapping review/systematic map

A mapping review, also known as a systematic map, is a unique approach to surveying and organizing existing literature, providing a panoramic view of the research landscape. This paper systematically categorizes and maps out the available literature on a particular topic, emphasizing breadth over depth. Its primary goal is to present a comprehensive visual representation of the research distribution, offering insights into the overall scope of a subject.

One of the strengths of systematic reviews is that they deeply focus on a research question with detailed analysis and synthesis, while mapping review prioritizes breadth. It identifies and categorizes a broad range of studies without necessarily providing in-depth critique or content synthesis. This approach allows for a broader understanding of the field, making it especially useful in the early stages of research. Mapping reviews excel in identifying gaps in the existing body of literature.

By systematically mapping the distribution of research, researchers can pinpoint areas where studies are scarce or nonexistent, helping to guide future research directions. This makes mapping reviews a valuable tool for researchers seeking to contribute meaningfully to a field by addressing unexplored or underexplored areas.

Meta-analysis

Meta-analysis is a powerful statistical technique. It systematically combines the results of multiple studies to derive comprehensive and nuanced insights. This method goes beyond the limitations of individual studies, offering a more robust understanding of a particular phenomenon by synthesizing data from diverse sources.

Meta-analysis employs a rigorous methodology. It involves the systematic collection and statistical integration of data from multiple studies. This methodological rigor ensures a standardized and unbiased approach to data synthesis. It is applied across various disciplines, from medicine and psychology to social sciences, providing a quantitative assessment of the overall effect of an intervention or the strength of an association.

In evidence-based fields, where informed decision-making relies on a thorough understanding of existing research, meta-analysis plays a pivotal role. It offers a quantitative overview of the collective evidence, helping researchers, policymakers, and practitioners make more informed decisions. By synthesizing results from diverse studies, meta-analysis contributes to the establishment of robust evidence-based practices, enhancing the reliability and credibility of findings in various fields. To present your research findings in the most readable way possible, learn how to write a summary of article .

If the key purpose of systematic review is to maximize the disclosure of facts, the opposite is true here. Imagine a video shot by a quadcopter from an altitude. The viewer sees a vast area of terrain without focusing on individual details. Overviews follow the same principle. The author gives a general picture of the events or objects described.

These types of reviews often seem simple. However, the role of the researcher becomes a very demanding one. The point is not just to list facts. Here, the search for information comes to the fore. After all, it is such reports that, in the future, will provide the basis for researching issues more narrowly. In essence, you yourself create a new source of information ─ students who worry that somebody may critique the author’s article love this type of material. However, there are no questions for the author; they just set the stage for discussions in different fields.

An example of this type of report would be a collection of research results from scientists. For example, statistics on the treatment of patients with certain diseases. In such a case, reference is made to scientific articles and doctrines. Based on this information, readers can speak about the effectiveness of certain treatment methods.

Qualitative Systematic Review/Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

One of the next types of review articles represents a meticulous effort to synthesize and analyze qualitative studies within a specific research domain.

The focus is synthesizing qualitative studies, employing a systematic and rigorous approach to extract meaningful insights. Its significance lies in its ability to provide a nuanced understanding of complex phenomena, offering a qualitative lens to complement quantitative analyses. Researchers can uncover patterns, themes, and contextual nuances that may elude traditional quantitative approaches by systematically reviewing and synthesizing qualitative data.

Often, you may meet discussion: is a systematic review quantitative or qualitative? The application of qualitative systematic reviews extends across diverse research domains, from healthcare and social sciences to education and psychology. For example, this approach can offer a comprehensive understanding of patient experiences and preferences in healthcare. In social sciences, it can illuminate cultural or societal dynamics. Its versatility makes it a valuable tool for researchers exploring, interpreting, and integrating qualitative findings to enrich their understanding of complex phenomena within their respective fields.

Rapid review

If you don’t know how to write an article review , try starting with this format. It is the complete opposite of everything we talked about above. The key advantage and feature is speed. Quick overviews are used when time is limited. The focus can go to individual details (key). Often, the focus is still on the principal points.

Often, these types of review papers are critically needed in politics. This method helps to communicate important information to the reader quickly. An example can be a comparison of the election programs of two politicians. The author can show the key differences. Or it can make an overview based on the theses of the opponents’ proposals on different topics.

Seeming simplicity becomes power. Such texts allow the reader to make a quick decision. The author’s task is to understand potential interests and needs. Then, highlight and present the most important data as concisely as possible. In addition to politics, such reports are often used in communications, advertising, and marketing. Experienced writers mention the one-minute principle. This means you can count on 60 seconds of the reader’s attention. If you managed to hook them ─ bravo, you have done the job!

Scoping review

If you read the official scoping review definition, you may find similarities with the systematic type of review. However, recall is a sequential and logical study in the second case. It’s like you stack things on a shelf by color, size, and texture.

This type of review can be more difficult to understand. The basic concept is to explore what is called the field of subjects. This means, on the one hand, exploring a particular topic through the existing data about it. The author tries to find gaps or patterns by drawing on sources of information.

Another good comparison between systematic and this type of review is imagining as if drawing a picture. In the first case, you will think through every nuance and detail, why it is there, and how it “moves the story.” In the second case, it is as if you are painting a picture with “broad strokes.” In doing so, you can explain your motives for choosing the primary color. For example: “I chose the emerald color because all the cultural publications say it’s a trend”. The same goes for texts.

Systematic review

Sometimes, you may encounter a battle: narrative review vs. systematic review. The point is not to compare but to understand the different types of papers. Once you understand their purpose, you can present your data better and choose a more readable format. The systematic approach can be called the most scientific. Such a review relies on the following steps:

  • Literature search;
  • Evaluating the information;
  • Data processing;
  • Careful analysis of the material.

It is the fourth point that is key. The writer should carefully process the information before using it. However, 80% of your work’s result depends on this stage’s seriousness.

A rigorous approach to data selection produces an array of factual data. That is why this method is so often used in science, education, and social fields. Where accuracy is important. At the same time, the popularity of this approach is growing in other directions.

Systematic reviews allow for using different data and methodologies,, but with one important caveat ─ if the author manages to keep the narrative structured and explain the reason for certain methods. It is not about rigor. The task of this type of review is to preserve the facts, which dictates consistency and rationality.

Umbrella review

An umbrella review is a distinctive approach that involves the review of existing reviews, providing a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on a specific topic. The methodology of an umbrella review entails systematically examining and summarizing findings from multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

This method ensures a rigorous and consolidated analysis of the existing evidence. The application of an umbrella review is broad, spanning various fields such as medicine, public health, and social sciences. It is particularly useful when a substantial body of systematic reviews exists, allowing researchers to draw overarching conclusions from the collective findings.

It allows the summarization of existing reviews and provides a new perspective on individual subtopics of the main object of study. In the context of the umbrella method, the comparison “bird’s eye view” is often cited. A bird in flight can see the whole panorama and shift its gaze to specific objects simultaneously. What becomes relevant at a particular moment? The author will face the same task.

On the one hand, you must delve into the offshoots of the researched topic. On the other hand, focus on the topic or object of study as a whole. Such a concept allows you to open up new perspectives and thoughts.

more_shortcode

Different types of formatting styles are used for article review writing. It mainly depends on the guidelines that are provided by the instructor, sometimes, professors even provide an article review template that needs to be followed.

Here are some common types of formatting styles that you should be aware of when you start writing an article review:

  • APA (American Psychological Association) – An APA format article review is commonly used for social sciences. It has guidelines for formatting the title, abstract, body paragraphs, and references. For example, the title of an article in APA format is in sentence case, whereas the publication title is in title case.
  • MLA (Modern Language Association): This is a formatting style often used in humanities, such as language studies and literature. There are specific guidelines for the formatting of the title page, header, footer, and citation style.
  • Chicago Manual of Style: This is one of the most commonly used formatting styles. It is often used for subjects in humanities and social sciences, but also commonly found in a newspaper title. This includes guidelines for formatting the title page, end notes, footnotes, publication title, article citation, and bibliography.
  • Harvard Style: Harvard style is commonly used for social sciences and provides specific guidelines for formatting different sections of the pages, including publication title, summary page, website publisher, and more.

To ensure that your article review paper is properly formatted and meets the requirements, it is crucial to adhere to the specific guidelines for the formatting style you are using. This helps you write a good article review.

  • Free unlimited checks
  • All common file formats
  • Accurate results
  • Intuitive interface

How To Write An Article Review

There are several steps that must be followed when you are starting to review articles. You need to follow these to make sure that your thoughts are organized properly. In this way, you can present your ideas in a more concise and clear manner. Here are some tips on how to start an article review and how to cater to each writing stage.

  • Read the Article Closely: Even before you start to write an article review, it’s important to make sure that you have read the specific article thoroughly. Write down the central points and all the supporting ideas. It’s important also to note any questions or comments that you have about the content.
  • Identify the Thesis: Make sure that you understand the author’s main points, and identify the main thesis of the article. This will help you focus on your review and ensure that you are addressing all of the key points.
  • Formulate an Introduction: The piece should start with an introduction that has all the necessary background information, possibly in the first paragraph or in the first few paragraphs. This can include a brief summary of the important points or an explanation of the importance.
  • Summarize the Article : Summarize the main points when you review the article, and make sure that you include all supporting elements of the author’s thesis.
  • Start with Personal Critique : Now is the time to include a personal opinion on the research article or the journal article review. Start with evaluating all the strengths and weaknesses of the reviewed article. Discuss all of the flaws that you found in the author’s evidence and reasoning. Also, point out whether the conclusion provided by the author was well presented or not.
  • Add Personal Perspective: Offer your perspective on the original article, do you agree or disagree with the ideas that the article supports or not. Your critical review, in your own words, is an essential part of a good review. Make sure you address all unanswered questions in your review.
  • Conclude the Article Review : In this section of the writing process, you need to be very careful and wrap up the whole discussion in a coherent manner. This is should summarize all the main points and offer an overall assessment.

Make sure to stay impartial and provide proof to back up your assessment. By adhering to these guidelines, you can create a reflective and well-structured article review.

Article Review Outline

Here is a basic, detailed outline for an article review you should be aware of as a pre-writing process if you are wondering how to write an article review.

Introduction

  • Introduce the article that you are reviewing (author name, publication date, title, etc.) Now provide an overview of the article’s main topic

Summary section

  • Summarize the key points in the article as well as any arguments Identify the findings and conclusion

Critical Review

  • Assess and evaluate the positive aspects and the drawbacks
  • Discuss if the authors arguments were verified by the evidence of the article
  • Identify if the text provides substantial information for any future paper or further research
  • Assess any gaps in the arguments
  • Restate the thesis statement
  • Provide a summary for all sections
  • Write any recommendations and thoughts that you have on the article
  • Never forget to add and cite any references that you used in your article

10 Tips for Writing an Article Review

Have you ever written such an assignment? If not, study the helpful tips for composing a paper. If you follow the recommendations provided here, the process of writing a summary of the article won’t be so time-consuming, and you will be able to write an article in the most effective manner.

The guidelines below will help to make the process of preparing a paper much more productive. Let’s get started!

  • Check what kind of information your work should contain. After answering the key question “What is an article review?” you should learn how to structure it the right way. To succeed, you need to know what your work should be based on. An analysis with insightful observations is a must for your piece of writing.
  • Identify the central idea: In your first reading, focus on the overall impression. Gather ideas about what the writer wants to tell, and consider whether he or she managed to achieve it.
  • Look up unfamiliar terms. Don’t know what certain words and expressions mean? Highlight them, and don’t forget to check what they mean with a reliable source of information.
  • Highlight the most important ideas. If you are reading it a second time, use a highlighter to highlight the points that are most important to understanding the passage.
  • Write an outline. A well-written outline will make your life a lot easier. All your thoughts will be grouped. Detailed planning helps not to miss anything important. Think about the questions you should answer when writing.
  • Brainstorm headline ideas. When choosing a project, remember: it should reflect the main idea. Make it bold and concise.
  • Check an article review format example. You should check that you know how to cite an article properly. Note that citation rules are different in APA and MLA formats. Ask your teacher which one to prioritize.
  • Write a good introduction. Use only one short paragraph to state the central idea of ​​the work. Emphasize the author’s key concepts and arguments. Add the thesis at the end of the Introduction.
  • Write in a formal style. Use the third person, remembering that this assignment should be written in a formal academic writing style.
  • Wrap up, offer your critique, and close. Give your opinion on whether the author achieved his goals. Mention the shortcomings of the job, if any, and highlight its strengths.

If you have checked the tips and you still doubt whether you have all the necessary skills and time to prepare this kind of educational work, follow one more tip that guarantees 100% success- ask for professional assistance by asking the custom writing service PapersOwl to craft your paper instead of you. Just submit an order online and get the paper completed by experts.

more_shortcode

An Article Review Example

If you have a task to prepare an analysis of a certain piece of literature, have a look at the article review sample. There is an article review example for you to have a clear picture of what it must look like.

Journal Article on Ayn Rand’s Works Review Example

“The purpose of the article is to consider the features of the poetics of Ayn Rand’s novels “Atlas Shrugged,” “We the living,” and “The Fountainhead.” In the analysis of the novels, the structural-semantic and the method of comparative analysis were used.

With the help of these methods, genre features of the novels were revealed, and a single conflict and a cyclic hero were identified.

In-depth reading allows us to more fully reveal the worldview of the author reflected in the novels. It becomes easier to understand the essence of the author’s ideas about the connection between being and consciousness, embodied in cyclic ideas and images of plot twists and heroes. The author did a good job highlighting the strong points of the works and mentioning the reasons for the obvious success of Ayn Rand.“

You can also search for other relevant article review examples before you start.

In conclusion, article reviews play an important role in evaluating and analyzing different scholarly articles. Writing a review requires critical thinking skills and a deep understanding of the article’s content, style, and structure. It is crucial to identify the type of article review and follow the specific guidelines for formatting style provided by the instructor or professor.

The process of writing an article review requires several steps, such as reading the article attentively, identifying the thesis, and formulating an introduction. By following the tips and examples provided in this article, students can write a worthy review that demonstrates their ability to evaluate and critique another writer’s work.

Learning how to write an article review is a critical skill for students and professionals alike. Before diving into the nitty-gritty of reviewing an article, it’s important to understand what an article review is and the elements it should include. An article review is an assessment of a piece of writing that summarizes and evaluates a work. To complete a quality article review, the author should consider the text’s purpose and content, its organization, the author’s style, and how the article fits into a larger conversation. But if you don’t have the time to do all of this work, you can always purchase a literature review from Papers Owl .

Readers also enjoyed

Various Types of Article Reviews: From Narrative to Systematic

WHY WAIT? PLACE AN ORDER RIGHT NOW!

Just fill out the form, press the button, and have no worries!

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.

how to do an article review apa

  • All eBooks & Audiobooks
  • Academic eBook Collection
  • Home Grown eBook Collection
  • Off-Campus Access
  • Literature Resource Center
  • Opposing Viewpoints
  • ProQuest Central
  • Course Guides
  • Citing Sources
  • Library Research
  • Websites by Topic
  • Book-a-Librarian
  • Research Tutorials
  • Use the Catalog
  • Use Databases
  • Use Films on Demand
  • Use Home Grown eBooks
  • Use NC LIVE
  • Evaluating Sources
  • Primary vs. Secondary
  • Scholarly vs. Popular
  • Make an Appointment
  • Writing Tools
  • Annotated Bibliographies
  • Summaries, Reviews & Critiques
  • Writing Center

Service Alert

logo

Article Summaries, Reviews & Critiques

  • Writing an article SUMMARY
  • Writing an article REVIEW

Writing an article CRITIQUE

  • Citing Sources This link opens in a new window
  • About RCC Library

Text: 336-308-8801

Email: [email protected]

Call: 336-633-0204

Schedule: Book-a-Librarian

Like us on Facebook

Links on this guide may go to external web sites not connected with Randolph Community College. Their inclusion is not an endorsement by Randolph Community College and the College is not responsible for the accuracy of their content or the security of their site.

A critique asks you to evaluate an article and the author’s argument. You will need to look critically at what the author is claiming, evaluate the research methods, and look for possible problems with, or applications of, the researcher’s claims.

Introduction

Give an overview of the author’s main points and how the author supports those points. Explain what the author found and describe the process they used to arrive at this conclusion.

Body Paragraphs

Interpret the information from the article:

  • Does the author review previous studies? Is current and relevant research used?
  • What type of research was used – empirical studies, anecdotal material, or personal observations?
  • Was the sample too small to generalize from?
  • Was the participant group lacking in diversity (race, gender, age, education, socioeconomic status, etc.)
  • For instance, volunteers gathered at a health food store might have different attitudes about nutrition than the population at large.
  • How useful does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest the findings could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied?
  • How could the study have been improved in your opinion?
  • Does the author appear to have any biases (related to gender, race, class, or politics)?
  • Is the writing clear and easy to follow? Does the author’s tone add to or detract from the article?
  • How useful are the visuals (such as tables, charts, maps, photographs) included, if any? How do they help to illustrate the argument? Are they confusing or hard to read?
  • What further research might be conducted on this subject?

Try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.

From the Center for Academic Excellence (opens in a new window), University of Saint Joseph Connecticut

Additional Resources

All links open in a new window.

Writing an Article Critique (from The University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center)

How to Critique an Article (from Essaypro.com)

How to Write an Article Critique (from EliteEditing.com.au)

  • << Previous: Writing an article REVIEW
  • Next: Citing Sources >>
  • Last Updated: Mar 15, 2024 9:32 AM
  • URL: https://libguides.randolph.edu/summaries
  • Our Writers
  • How to Order
  • Assignment Writing Service
  • Report Writing Service
  • Buy Coursework
  • Dissertation Writing Service
  • Research Paper Writing Service
  • All Essay Services

User Icon

Article Review

Barbara P

Article Review Writing: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide with Examples

Article Review

People also read

Learn How to Write an Editorial on Any Topic

Best Tips on How to Avoid Plagiarism

How to Write a Movie Review - Guide & Examples

A Complete Guide on How to Write a Summary for Students

Write Opinion Essay Like a Pro: A Detailed Guide

Evaluation Essay - Definition, Examples, and Writing Tips

How to Write a Thematic Statement - Tips & Examples

How to Write a Bio - Quick Tips, Structure & Examples

How to Write a Synopsis – A Simple Format & Guide

How to Write a Comparative Essay – A Complete Guide

Visual Analysis Essay - A Writing Guide with Format & Sample

List of Common Social Issues Around the World

Writing Character Analysis - Outline, Steps, and Examples

11 Common Types of Plagiarism Explained Through Examples

A Detailed Guide on How to Write a Poem Step by Step

Detailed Guide on Appendix Writing: With Tips and Examples

Struggling to write a review that people actually want to read? Feeling lost in the details and wondering how to make your analysis stand out?

You're not alone!

Many writers find it tough to navigate the world of article reviews, not sure where to start or how to make their reviews really grab attention.

No worries! 

In this blog, we're going to guide you through the process of writing an article review that stands out. We'll also share tips, and examples to make this process easier for you.

Let’s get started.

Arrow Down

  • 1. What is an Article Review?
  • 2. Types of Article Reviews
  • 3. Article Review Format
  • 4. How to Write an Article Review? 10 Easy Steps
  • 5. Article Review Outline
  • 6. Article Review Examples
  • 7. Tips for Writing an Effective Article Review

What is an Article Review?

An article review is a critical evaluation and analysis of a piece of writing, typically an academic or journalistic article. 

It goes beyond summarizing the content; it involves an in-depth examination of the author's ideas, arguments, and methodologies. 

The goal is to provide a well-rounded understanding of the article's strengths, weaknesses, and overall contribution to the field.

Order Essay

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

Types of Article Reviews

Article reviews come in various forms, each serving a distinct purpose in the realm of academic or professional discourse. Understanding these types is crucial for tailoring your approach. 

Here are some common types of article reviews:

Journal Article Review

A journal article review involves a thorough evaluation of scholarly articles published in academic journals. 

It requires summarizing the article's key points, methodology, and findings, emphasizing its contributions to the academic field. 

Take a look at the following example to help you understand better.

Example of Journal Article Review

Research Article Review

A research article review focuses on scrutinizing articles with a primary emphasis on research.

This type of review involves evaluating the research design, methodology, results, and their broader implications. 

Discussions on the interpretation of results, limitations, and the article's overall contributions are key. 

Here is a sample for you to get an idea.

Example of Research Article Review

Science Article Review

A science article review specifically addresses articles within scientific disciplines. It includes summarizing scientific concepts, hypotheses, and experimental methods.

The type of review assesses the reliability of the experimental design, and evaluates the author's interpretation of findings. 

Take a look at the following example.

Example of Science Article Review

Critical Review

A critical review involves a balanced critique of a given article. It encompasses providing a comprehensive summary, highlighting key points, and engaging in a critical analysis of strengths and weaknesses. 

To get a clearer idea of a critical review, take a look at this example.

Critical Review Example

Article Review Format

When crafting an article review in either APA or MLA format, it's crucial to adhere to the specific guidelines for citing sources. 

Below are the bibliographical entries for different types of sources in both APA and MLA styles:

: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link} : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp. : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Publication Title. Magazine Title, pp. Xx-xx.
: Last, First Middle Initial. “Publication Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed. : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print. : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.

How to Write an Article Review? 10 Easy Steps

Writing an effective article review involves a systematic approach. Follow this step-by-step process to ensure a comprehensive and well-structured analysis.

Step 1: Understand the Assignment

Before diving into the review, carefully read and understand the assignment guidelines. 

Pay attention to specific requirements, such as word count, formatting style (APA, MLA), and the aspects your instructor wants you to focus on.

Step 2: Read the Article Thoroughly

Begin by thoroughly reading the article. Take notes on key points, arguments, and evidence presented by the author. 

Understand the author's main thesis and the context in which the article was written.

Step 3: Create a Summary

Summarize the main points of the article. Highlight the author's key arguments and findings. 

While writing the summary ensure that you capture the essential elements of the article to provide context for your analysis.

Step 4: Identify the Author's Thesis

In this step, pinpoint the author's main thesis or central argument. Understand the purpose of the article and how the author supports their position. 

This will serve as a foundation for your critique.

Step 5: Evaluate the Author's Evidence and Methodology

Examine the evidence provided by the author to support their thesis. Assess the reliability and validity of the methodology used. 

Consider the sources, data collection methods, and any potential biases.

Step 6: Analyze the Author's Writing Style

Evaluate the author's writing style and how effectively they communicate their ideas. 

Consider the clarity of the language, the organization of the content, and the overall persuasiveness of the article.

Step 7: Consider the Article's Contribution

Reflect on the article's contribution to its field of study. Analyze how it fits into the existing literature, its significance, and any potential implications for future research or applications.

Step 8: Write the Introduction

Craft an introduction that includes the article's title, author, publication date, and a brief overview. 

State the purpose of your review and your thesis—the main point you'll be analyzing in your review.

Step 9: Develop the Body of the Review

Organize your review by addressing specific aspects such as the author's thesis, methodology, writing style, and the article's contribution. 

Use clear paragraphs to structure your analysis logically.

Step 10: Conclude with a Summary and Evaluation

Summarize your main points and restate your overall assessment of the article. 

Offer insights into its strengths and weaknesses, and conclude with any recommendations for improvement or suggestions for further research.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

Article Review Outline

Creating a well-organized outline is an essential part of writing a coherent and insightful article review.

This outline given below will guide you through the key sections of your review, ensuring that your analysis is comprehensive and logically structured.

Refer to the following template to understand outlining the article review in detail.

Article Review Format Template

Article Review Examples

Examining article review examples can provide valuable insights into the structure, tone, and depth of analysis expected. 

Below are sample article reviews, each illustrating a different approach and focus.

Example of Article Review

Sample of article review assignment pdf

Tips for Writing an Effective Article Review

Crafting an effective article review involves a combination of critical analysis, clarity, and structure. 

Here are some valuable tips to guide you through the process:

  • Start with a Clear Introduction

Kick off your article review by introducing the article's main points and mentioning the publication date, which you can find on the re-title page. Outline the topics you'll cover in your review.

  • Concise Summary with Unanswered Questions

Provide a short summary of the article, emphasizing its main ideas. Highlight any lingering questions, known as "unanswered questions," that the article may have triggered. Use a basic article review template to help structure your thoughts.

  • Illustrate with Examples

Use examples from the article to illustrate your points. If there are tables or figures in the article, discuss them to make your review more concrete and easily understandable.

  • Organize Clearly with a Summary Section

Keep your review straightforward and well-organized. Begin with the start of the article, express your thoughts on what you liked or didn't like, and conclude with a summary section. This follows a basic plan for clarity.

  • Constructive Criticism

When providing criticism, be constructive. If there are elements you don't understand, frame them as "unanswered questions." This approach shows engagement and curiosity.

  • Smoothly Connect Your Ideas

Ensure your thoughts flow naturally throughout your review. Use simple words and sentences. If you have questions about the article, let them guide your review organically.

  • Revise and Check for Clarity

Before finishing, go through your review. Correct any mistakes and ensure it sounds clear. Check if you followed your plan, used simple words, and incorporated the keywords effectively. This makes your review better and more accessible for others.

In conclusion , writing an effective article review involves a thoughtful balance of summarizing key points, and addressing unanswered questions. 

By following a simple and structured approach, you can create a review that not only analyzes the content but also adds value to the reader's understanding.

Remember to organize your thoughts logically, use clear language, and provide examples from the article to support your points. 

Ready to elevate your article reviewing skills? Explore the valuable resources and expert assistance at MyPerfectWords.com. 

Our team of experienced writers is here to help you with article reviews and other school tasks. 

So why wait? Place your " write my essays online " request today!

AI Essay Bot

Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!

Barbara P

Dr. Barbara is a highly experienced writer and author who holds a Ph.D. degree in public health from an Ivy League school. She has worked in the medical field for many years, conducting extensive research on various health topics. Her writing has been featured in several top-tier publications.

Get Help

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Keep reading

How to Write an Editorial

Georgia Gwinnett College Kaufman Library logo

APA (7th edition) Citation Guide

  • Critical Review of an article
  • What is New in the 7th edition?
  • Inclusive and bias-free language
  • Setting Up and Formatting a Student APA Paper
  • APA Paper format templates
  • Writing Process
  • Table and Figures
  • Annotated Bibliography Template
  • Paragraph Structure
  • Books, eBooks, Book chapter Examples
  • Article, Newspapers, Reviews Examples
  • Internet Resources Examples
  • More Examples
  • Works cited in another source
  • Figures and Tables
  • Audio Podcasts
  • More examples......
  • In-Text Citation
  • APA Website
  • NoodleTools
  • APA Annotated Bibliography
  • Journal Articles
  • APA Student Sample Paper Setup Guidelines

How to Integrate Critical Voice into Your Literature Review

Parts of a Critical Review

Introduction

To introduce the source, its main ideas, key details, and its place within the field

To present your assessment of the quality of the source

In general, the introduction of your critical review should include

An embedded citation of the source within the sentence, which includes 

Author(s) name

Title of the source 

A brief summary of the source. Use the following questions to guide you: 

What is the author's central purpose?

What methods or theoretical frameworks were used to accomplish this purpose?

What topic areas, chapters, sections, or key points did the author use to structure the source?

What were the results or findings of the study?

How were the results or findings interpreted? How were they related to the original problem (author's view of evidence rather than objective findings)?

The background or research context of this source. Use the following questions to guide you:

Who conducted the research? What were/are their interests?

Why did they do this research?

Was this research pertinent only within the author’s field, or did it have broader (even global) relevance?

On what prior research was this source-based? What gap is the author attempting to address?

How important was the research question posed by the researcher?

Your overall opinion of the quality of the source. Think of this like a thesis or main argument.

Present your evaluation of the source, providing evidence from the text (or other sources) to support your assessment.

In general, the body of your critical review should include

The strengths and weaknesses of the source. Use the following questions to guide you:

Overall 

Is the material organized logically and with appropriate headings?

Are there stylistic problems in logical, clarity or language?

Were the author(s) able to answer the question (test the hypothesis) raised

What was the objective of the study?

Does all the information lead coherently to the purpose of the study?

Are the methods valid for studying the problem or gap?

Could the study be duplicated from the information provided?

Is the experimental design logical and reliable?

How are the data organized? Is it logical and interpretable?

Do the results reveal what the researcher intended?

Do the authors present a logical interpretation of the results?

Have the limitations of the research been addressed?

Does the study consider other key studies in the field or other research possibilities or directions?

How was the significance of the work described?

A logical presentation of your ideas. You could select one of the following methods of organization:

Follow the structure of the journal article (e.g. Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) - highlighting the strengths and weaknesses in each section

Present the weaknesses of the article, and then the strengths of the article (or vice versa).

Group your ideas according to different research themes presented in the source

Group the strengths and weaknesses of the article into the following areas: originality, reliability, validity, relevance, and presentation

Purpose: 

To summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the article as a whole

To assert the article’s practical and theoretical significance

In general, the conclusion of your critical review should include

A restatement of your overall opinion

A summary of the key strengths and weaknesses of the research that support your overall opinion of the source

An evaluation of the significance or success of the research. Use the following questions to guide you:

Did the research reported in this source result in the formation of new questions, theories or hypotheses by the authors or other researchers?

Have other researchers subsequently supported or refuted the observations or interpretations of these authors?

Did the research provide new factual information, a new understanding of a phenomenon in the field, a new research technique?

Did the research produce any practical applications? 

What are the social, political, technological, or medical implications of this research?

How do you evaluate the significance of the research? 

Find out what style guide you are required to follow (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago) and follow the guidelines to create a reference list (may be called a bibliography or works cited).

Be sure to include citations in the text when you refer to the source itself or external sources. 

Check out our  Cite Your Sources  Guide for more information. 

How can I improve my critical review?

Read assignment instructions carefully and refer to them throughout the writing process.

Make an outline of your main sections before you write.

If your professor does not assign a topic or source, you must choose one yourself. Select a source that interests you and is written clearly so you can understand it.

 If you need any further assistance Book an Appointment with LSH Consultants

  • << Previous: Journal Articles
  • Next: APA Student Sample Paper Setup Guidelines >>
  • Last Updated: Jan 25, 2024 12:41 PM
  • URL: https://libguides.ecae.ac.ae/c.php?g=990111

Quick Links

  • Writing & Citing
  • Library Catalog
  • Learning Support Hub
  • eJournals Available
  • Library Subject guides
  • Electronic Resources
  • Clarity English
  • Library Databases
  • Library Calendar
  • Consultation Appointment
  • ECAE Portal
  • ECAE Home Page
  • Interlibrary Loan
  • Community Borrowers Form
  • Borrower Limits
  • Faculty Research
  • Google Scholar
  • Ask Librarian
  • Library Account

PSY290 - Research Methods

  • Identifying & Locating Empirical Research Articles
  • Survey & Test Instruments

Writing a Critical Review

Sample summaries, verbs to help you write the summary, how to read a scholarly article.

  • APA Citation Style Help

A critical review is an academic appraisal of an article that offers both a summary and critical comment. They are useful in evaluating the relevance of a source to your academic needs. They demonstrate that you have understood the text and that you can analyze the main arguments or findings. It is not just a summary; it is an evaluation of what the author has said on a topic. It’s critical in that you thoughtfully consider the validity and accuracy of the author’s claims and that you identify other valid points of view.

An effective critical review has three parts:

  • APA citation of article
  • Clearly summarizes the purpose for the article and identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the research. (In your own words – no quotations.)
  • Evaluates the contribution of the article to the discipline or broad subject area and how it relates to your own research.

Steps to Write a Critical Review:

  • Create and APA style citation for the article you are reviewing.
  • Skim the text: Read the title, abstract, introduction, and conclusion.
  • Read the entire article in order to identify its main ideas and purpose.

Q. What were the authors investigating? What is their thesis? Q. What did the authors hope to discover?

        D. Pay close attention to the methods used by the authors to collection information.

Q. What are the characteristics of the participants? (e.g.) Age/gender/ethnicity

Q. What was the procedure or experimental method/surveys used?

Q. Are their any flaws in the design of their study?

  E. Review the main findings in the “Discussion” or “Conclusion” section. This will help you to evaluate the validity of their evidence, and the credibility of the authors.             Q.   Are their conclusions convincing?            Q.   Were their results significant? If so, describe how they were significant.  F. Evaluate the usefulness of the text to YOU in the context of your own research.

Q. How does this article assist you in your research?

Q. How does it enhance your understanding of this issue?

Q. What gaps in your research does it fill?

Good Summary:

Hock, S., & Rochford, R. A. (2010). A letter-writing campaign: linking academic success and civic engagement. Journal  of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 3 (2), 76-82.

Hock & Rochford (2010) describe how two classes of developmental writing students were engaged in a service-learning project to support the preservation of an on-campus historical site. The goal of the assignment was to help students to see how they have influence in their community by acting as engaged citizens, and to improve their scores on the ACT Writing Sample Assessment (WSA) exam. The authors report that students in developmental classes often feel disempowered, especially when English is not their first language. This assignment not only assisted them in elevating their written communication skills, but it also gave real-life significance to the assignment, and by extension made them feel like empowered members of the community. The advancement in student scores serves as evidence to support my research that when students are given assignments which permit local advocacy and active participation, their academic performance also improves.

Bad Summary:

Two ELL classes complete a service-learning project and improve their writing scores. This article was good because it provided me with lots of information I can use. The students learned a lot in their service-learning project and they passed the ACT exam.  

Remember you're describing what someone else has said. Use verbal cues to make this clear to your reader.  Here are some suggested verbs to use: 

The article

The author

The researchers

* Adapted from: http://www.laspositascollege.edu/raw/summaries.php

  • << Previous: Survey & Test Instruments
  • Next: APA Citation Style Help >>
  • Last Updated: Jun 27, 2024 3:30 PM
  • URL: https://paradisevalley.libguides.com/PSY290

article review

How to Write an Article Review: Tips, Outline, Format

how to do an article review apa

Have you been assigned an article review paper, but you are unsure where to start, or what is a review article at all? There is no need to worry, as EssayService has put together a top guide for you! Find out all about an article review to master your assignment.

What is an Article Review?

In simple terms, an article review essay is like a summary and evaluation of another professional or expert's work. It may also be referred to as a literature review that includes an outline of the most recent research on the subject, or a critical review that focuses on a specific article with smaller scope. Article review can be used for many reasons; for example, a teacher or lecturer may wish to introduce their students to a new subject by reviewing a professional's piece. You can also learn about the most important works of specialists in your industry by looking at relevant article review examples.

Also, a newspaper article review example could be a journalist writing a critique about another competitor's published work.

In comparison, a book review article example could be critiqued by a fellow author or even a student in the chosen field.

Depending on the critique criteria and the work being reviewed, there could also be certain points asked for addition which should be checked and noted by the lecturer or supervisor. Otherwise, follow the article review guidelines from our write my essay service to complete the assignment in no time.

Key points when writing an article review:

Use the article review template from our paper writing service to get through the assignment as fast as possible so you will not waste any time.

review

How to Start an Article Review?

  • Firstly read the work being reviewed as much as possible and look up key phrases and words that are not understood.
  • Discuss the work with other professionals or colleagues to collect more opinions and get a more balanced impression.
  • Highlight important sections or sentences and refer this to your knowledge in the topic, do you agree or disagree and what does this contribute to the field?
  • Then re-write the key arguments and findings into your own words this will help gain better understanding into the paper. This can be just written as an outline also and will help decide which points are wanted to discuss later.

If you feel you do not have enough time to create a critique worthy of your time, then come to EssayService and order a custom Article review online.

You can order essay independent of type, for example:

  • nursing essay;
  • law essay writing;
  • history essays.

The best way to write an effective essay would be to draw up a plan or outline of what needs to be covered and use it for guidance throughout the critique.

how to do an article review apa

Article Review Formatting

There is no one-fits-all article format you can follow in your review. In fact, the formatting is dictated by the citation style specified by your professor in the task requirements. Thus, be sure to clarify the preferred style before you jump straight to writing to handle the given assignment right.

APA Format Article Review

Writing an APA style article review, you will most likely use articles from journals, websites, and newspapers. For each source, you will have to create properly formatted bibliographical entries.

Here is how to write an article review APA:

  • Journal: Author’s last name, First and middle initial. (Year of Publication). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp.
  • Website: Last name, initials. (Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link}
  • Newspaper: Last name, initials. (Date of Publication). Title. Magazine Title, pp. xx-xx.

MLA Format Article Review

Tips for citing sources in an article review MLA format:

  • Journal: Last name, First name Middle initial. “Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year of Publication): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Accessed.
  • Website: Last, First M. “Title.” Website Title. Publisher, Date Published. Web. Date Accessed.
  • Newspaper: Last, First M. “Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date of Publication: Page(s). Print.

Article Review Outline

Planning out an outline for your paper will help writing and to put it together so therefore saving you time in the long run.

Some questions to help with the outline of a critique:

  • What does the article set out to do or prove?
  • Are the main ideas clear and defined?
  • How substantial is the evidence?
  • Where does the article fit in its specific field?
  • Does it provide new knowledge on the topic?
  • What are the central theories and assumptions?
  • Is the writer conclusive at getting their point across?

Here is a typical article review format to follow:

review structure

Use our article review template to get through the assignment as fast as possible so you will not waste any time.

Article Review Title

Firstly start with creating a title for your critique, this should be something to do with the focus of the work that is being reviewed. An approach could be to make it descriptive or also in a more creative way think of something that intrigues the reader. After the title, this is a good place to correctly cite the paper being critiqued and include the important details for example, the author, title of publication, any page references. The style in which the citation is written will depend on which is best for this type of work being reviewed.

Article Review Introduction

The introduction should be a brief glimpse into what the author was writing about and any other details the audience will find interesting. Maybe some background details on the piece that is not already known or something that contributes to the review itself. It is a good idea to start by introducing the work at the start of the paragraph and then include a ' hook '. Include the writer's thesis if there is one and put it at the end but include your own thesis towards the critique near the beginning of this section.

Article Review Body

When constructing the summary section, write down the important points and findings in the piece in your own words. Include how the claims are supported and backed up with evidence but use direct quotes as sparing as possible. Do not put in any information known to professionals in the field or topic, but detail any conclusions the work came to. Make sure the paper is not just copied word for word and is actually summarized by yourself; this will also help the review stage.

To make an accurate critique, break down the work and express opinions on whether it achieves its goals and how useful it is in explaining the topics for an article review. Decide if the paper contributes to its field and is important and credible to the given field. Back up all the claims with evidence from the summary or another source. If using another text, remember to cite it correctly in the bibliography section. Look at how strong the points are and do they contribute to the argument. Try to identify any biases the writer might have and use this to make a fair critique. This part is only for opinions of the piece's significance, not including whether you liked it. Furthermore, the different types of audiences that would benefit from the paper can be mentioned in this section.

Article Review Conclusion

In the conclusion section of the critique, there should only be one or two paragraphs in which a summary of key points and opinions in the piece are included. Also, summarize the paper's significance to its field and how accurate the work is. Depending on the type of critique or work evaluated, it is also possible to include comments on future research or the topic to be discussed further.

If other sources have been used, construct a bibliography section and correctly cite all works utilized in the critique. 

The APA format is very common in an article review and stands for American Psychology Association. This will include a 'references list' at the end of the critique and in-text citations, mentioning the author's last name, page number, and publication date.

There are also MLA and Chicago formats for citations with slight differences in a name, like using a 'works cited' page for MLA. More can be found in this guide on the subtle differences between the types of citation methods under the heading 'Creating a bibliography.'

Article Review Example

Article review writing tips.

If you are interested in best scholarships for high school seniors , the following tips will be handy while writing your essay or article:

  • Allow enough time to complete the research and writing of the critique. The number one problem with creating a critique is running out of time to make it the best it can be. This can be avoided by effective planning and keeping on time with the deadlines you set out.
  • Collect twice more research than you think is needed to write a review. This will help when coming to the writing stage as not all the information collected will be used in the final draft.
  • Write in a style that is compatible with the work being critiqued. This will be better for whoever requested the critique and also will make paper easier to construct.
  • A summary and evaluation must be written. Do not leave out either part as one complements the other and is vital to create a critique worth reading.
  • Be clear and explain well every statement made about the piece . Everything that is unknown to professionals in the field should be explained and all comments should be easy to follow for the reader.
  • Do not just describe the work, analyze and interpret it. The critique should be in depth and give the audience some detailed interpretations of the work in a professional way.
  • Give an assessment of the quality in the writing and of what standard it is. Evaluate every aspect in the paper so that the audience can see where it fits into the rest of the related works. Give opinions based on fact and do not leave any comments without reason as this will not count for anything.

How to Write an Article Review?

Writing a review article is not that hard if you know what steps to take. Below is a step-by-step guide on how to write a review example quickly and easily.

  • Before You Start

Before you start writing your review essay, there are a few pre-writing steps to take. The pre-writing process should consist of the following steps:

  • Pick the subject of your review (if it wasn’t specified by your professor);
  • Read the article fully multiple times;
  • Summarize the main ideas, points, and claims made in the article;
  • Define the positive (strong) aspects;
  • Identify the gaps or inconsistencies;
  • Find the questions that remained unanswered.

All these steps are needed to help you define the direction for your review article and find the main ideas you’d like to cover in it.

After you review articles and define the key ideas, gaps, and other details, map out your future paper by creating a detailed outline.

Here are the core elements that must be included:

  • Pre-title page;
  • Corresponding author details (optional);
  • Running head (only for the APA style);
  • Summary page (optional);
  • Title page;
  • Introduction;
  • References/Works Cited;
  • Suggested Reading page (optional);
  • Tables and Figure Legends (if required by the professor).

This step is vital to organize your thoughts and ensure a proper structure of your work. Thus, be sure not to skip this step.

When you have an outline, students can move on to the writing stage by formulating compelling titles for their article reviews. Titles should be declarative, interrogative, or descriptive to reflect the core focus of the paper.

  • Article Citation

After the title should follow a proper citation of the piece you are going to review. Write a citation according to the required style, and feel free to check out a well-written article review example to see how it should look like.

  • Article Identification

Start the first paragraph of your review with concise and clear article identification that specifies its title, author, name of the resource (e.g., journal, web, etc.), and the year of publication.

Following the identification, write a short introductory paragraph. It should be to the point and state a clear thesis for your review.

  • Summary and Critique

In the main body of your article review, you should first make a detailed but not too extensive summary of the article you reviewed, its main ideas, statements, and findings. In this part, you should also reflect on the conclusion made by the author of the original article.

After a general summary should follow an objective critique. In this part of your paper, you have to state and analyze the main strengths and weaknesses of the article. Also, you need to point out any gaps or unanswered questions that are still there. And clarify your stance on the author’s assertions.

Lastly, you need to craft a compelling conclusion that recaps the key points of your review and gives the final, logical evaluation of the piece that was reviewed.

After this, proofread your work and submit it.

No Time Left For Your Due Assignment

Now we hope you understand how to write a review of an article. However, we know that writing a great article review requires a lot of time to properly research the work. To save your precious time, visit EssayService, where our team of top essay writers will help you. The team can even provide you with the best article review topics! You can learn more at the college essay writing service page where we have free guides with all the essay writing tips and tricks!

Frequently asked questions

She was flawless! first time using a website like this, I've ordered article review and i totally adored it! grammar punctuation, content - everything was on point

This writer is my go to, because whenever I need someone who I can trust my task to - I hire Joy. She wrote almost every paper for me for the last 2 years

Term paper done up to a highest standard, no revisions, perfect communication. 10s across the board!!!!!!!

I send him instructions and that's it. my paper was done 10 hours later, no stupid questions, he nailed it.

Sometimes I wonder if Michael is secretly a professor because he literally knows everything. HE DID SO WELL THAT MY PROF SHOWED MY PAPER AS AN EXAMPLE. unbelievable, many thanks

Gun Control Argumentative Essay

New Posts to Your Inbox!

Stay in touch

  • Link to facebook
  • Link to linkedin
  • Link to twitter
  • Link to youtube
  • Writing Tips

How to Cite a Review in APA Referencing

  • 2-minute read
  • 8th November 2020

Reviews of books, films, and other media can be great sources in academic writing. But how do you cite a review using APA referencing ? In this post, we explain the basics of citations and the reference list entry.

In-Text Citations for a Review in APA Style

Citations for a review in APA referencing are similar to those for other sources. This means you cite the reviewer’s surname and year of publication:

One review was especially scathing (Smith, 2001).

In addition, if you quote a print source, make sure to cite a page number:

Smith (2001) dismisses the argument as “puerile” (p. 16).

For more on APA citations, see our blog post on the topic .

Reviews in an APA Reference List

The format for a review in an APA reference list will depend on where it was published. For instance, for a review published in a newspaper, you would cite it as a newspaper article . But for a review published on a blog or website, you would cite it as a blog post or website instead.

Find this useful?

Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.

In all cases, though, you will need to adapt the format by adding details of the thing being reviewed in square brackets after the review title.

You can see APA-style references for reviews from an academic journal and a website below, complete with this extra information:

Smith, G. (2001). A backward step for applied ethics [Review of the book Righteous Thought, Righteous Action , by X. Morrison]. Journal of Applied Philosophy , 18(1), 16–24.

Bert, E. (2018). Neil Breen outdoes himself again [Review of the film Twisted Pair , by N. Breen, Dir.]. BadMovieCentral. http://www.badmoviecentral.com/reviews/twisted-pair/

This ensures the reader can identify both the review you’re citing and the thing being reviewed from the reference list entry alone.

Expert APA Proofreading

To make sure your references are all in order, as well as the rest of your academic writing, check out our free online APA guide . You might also want to get your work proofread by one of our APA experts. Learn more about our APA proofreading services here.

Share this article:

' src=

Post A New Comment

Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.

9-minute read

How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation

Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...

8-minute read

Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement

Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...

7-minute read

Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization

Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...

4-minute read

Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio

Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...

How to Ace Slack Messaging for Contractors and Freelancers

Effective professional communication is an important skill for contractors and freelancers navigating remote work environments....

3-minute read

How to Insert a Text Box in a Google Doc

Google Docs is a powerful collaborative tool, and mastering its features can significantly enhance your...

Logo Harvard University

Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

APA Formatting and Style Guide (7th Edition)

OWL logo

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

In-Text Citations

Resources on using in-text citations in APA style

Reference List

Resources on writing an APA style reference list, including citation formats

Other APA Resources

  • University Libraries

Q. How do I write a journal article review using APA format?

  • 4 Database Searching
  • 1 Dissertation
  • 1 Employment
  • 1 Full-Text
  • 1 Information Literacy Quizzes
  • 6 Interlibrary Loan
  • 1 Library Departments
  • 1 Library Hours
  • 21 Library Resources
  • 1 Newspapers
  • 2 Oklahoma Faculty Salary Survey
  • 76 Research
  • 1 Resources
  • 19 Username/Password
  • 4 Wegner Accounts
  • 3 Wegner accounts

Answered By: Alan Aldrich Last Updated: Jan 05, 2018     Views: 13620

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

I pasted the link to the Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University's section on APA formats. I think your instructor wants you to use APA citation style for the items (articles, books, etc.) that you are reviewing. In other words, you must cite the work in the format (APA) as part of your review. The OWL site will show examples for citing books, journal erticles, etc.

I hope this helps you out and answers your question. The OWL is a great resource for both APA and MLA citation styles.

  • Share on Facebook

Was this helpful? Yes 5 No 23

Comments (0)

Related topics.

How to Write an Article Review: Examples and Tips

article review

In today's information-rich world, mastering the skill of discerning valuable insights from the overwhelming noise is a game-changer. Whether you're a student striving for success or a professional aiming to stay sharp, knowing how to critique an article is your key.

Our article review writing service explains the intricacies of writing an article review, categorizes different types and shares insights into impactful formatting. It's not just theory – we'll guide you step by step, from pre-writing to a tangible review article example, and refine your abilities with essential proofreading tips.

What Is an Article Review?

An article review is more than a mere summary; it is a thoughtful analysis and critique that goes beyond the surface of the title. It's an intellectual exercise that challenges you to engage deeply with the author's ideas, question their methodology, and evaluate the significance of their findings.

Consider it as a journey through the landscape of someone else's thoughts. It's not just about where the writer takes you; it's about the path they choose, the landmarks they highlight, and the potential detours they overlook. An effective examination is a conversation with the author, a dialogue where you appreciate their insights, challenge assumptions, and perhaps even find alternative routes through the intellectual terrain they've explored.

As you start to understand how to review the article, encourage thought by asking questions.

  • What assumptions underlie the author's arguments? 
  • Are there alternative perspectives that could enrich the discussion?
  • How does the author's methodology shape their conclusions, and are there potential biases to consider?
  • How does the title contribute to the clarity and coherence of the author's arguments?
  • In what ways does the title influence the reader's perception of the author's

At EssayHub, our book review writing service experts believe an article review is an opportunity not just to absorb information but to actively engage with it, to question, to ponder, and to contribute your own insights to the scholarly conversation.

Types of Review

When tackling article reviews, there isn't a one-size-fits-all approach; it's a task that allows for versatile strategies. Think of understanding the different types of reviews as having a multifaceted toolkit ready for use. In this part, we'll guide you through the varied types of a review article, each showing a unique viewpoint and serving a specific purpose. Whether you're analyzing a scholarly piece on your own or asking someone to 'write an article review for me,' you'll get valuable insights.

article review types

Journal Article Review

A journal article review involves critically evaluating and analyzing scholarly pieces published in an academic journal. It requires a thorough understanding of the author's research, methodology, results, and conclusions. The reviewer assesses the journal's contributions to the field, its theoretical framework, and the validity of the research methods employed. The goal is to provide a comprehensive summary and critique that highlights both the strengths and limitations of the piece.

Research Article Review

A research article review focuses on the evaluation of a scientific or academic research paper. This type of examination involves examining the research question, experimental design, data collection methods, statistical analysis, and the interpretation of findings. For example, it can be research on teen vaping statistics , which includes all of above. The reviewer assesses the reliability and validity of the research, considers the implications of the study, and offers insights into its potential impact on the broader academic community.

Science Article Review

A science article review encompasses a critical analysis of a piece in the field of science, covering disciplines such as physics, chemistry, biology, or any other scientific domain. This review type involves assessing the clarity of scientific concepts presented, the validity of experimental procedures, and the significance of the study's findings. According to our literature review writing service , reviewers may also consider the article's potential contributions to advancing scientific knowledge and its relevance to current scientific debates or issues.

how to do an article review apa

Article Review Format

Ensuring the proper formatting of an article examination is crucial, and it should consistently align with the citation style specified by your instructor. If you're uncertain, don't hesitate to ask us - write my article review for me, along with additional guidelines to effectively structure your piece.

Meanwhile, here are some questions to consider:

  • What citation style (MLA, APA, ASA, Chicago, etc.) should you employ?
  • What is the recommended length for your article review?
  • Should your assignment encompass a summary, critique, or include personal opinions?
  • Is it necessary to highlight a theme or central idea from the articles?
  • Does your instructor expect background information to be incorporated?

APA Format Article Review

An APA review sticks to the rules of the American Psychological Association. When unsure how to write an article review in APA format, remember that it carefully cites the article, using a title page, intro, summary, critique, conclusion, and references. Citations follow the author-date format, focusing on being clear and objective. The review digs into the article's methods, results, and overall impact.

When you write an article review in APA, your in-text citation might read: (Anderson & Ramirez, 2019)

The corresponding entry in the reference list would be: Anderson, L., & Ramirez, C. (2019). Unveiling the Dynamics of Urban Green Spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 112-128.

MLA Format Article Review

For an MLA writing review, it follows the Modern Language Association's style. It's important to know how sources are cited in the text and in the Works Cited page. The structure usually has an intro, summary, critique, and conclusion. MLA citations often have the author's last name and page number in brackets in the text. This review might highlight the document's literary or humanities aspects, such as style, language, and cultural context.

In an MLA format publication, the citation within the text could look like: (Anderson and Ramirez 112)

The Works Cited entry for this publication: Anderson, Laura, and Carlos Ramirez. 'Exploring the Impact of Urban Green Spaces on Well-being.' Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 25, no. 3, 2019, pp. 112-128.

Review Article Outline

As you read your writing piece, organize your thoughts into sections in an outline. Note down key facts, contributions, and any contradictions. Identify strengths and weaknesses, and start mapping your outline.

If your professor doesn't want a summary or personal critique, skip those parts. Like other assignments, your examination needs an introduction, body, and conclusion. Consider dividing your outline accordingly, with subheadings in the body. If you need help starting, find a sample outline.

Your article assessment should have the following:

  • Pre-Title Page: Essential details like publication type, publication title, author names with affiliations, and corresponding author info.
  • Running Head (APA format): A concise title for consistent formatting.
  • Summary Page (optional but useful): Summarize the document in 800 words, covering background, purpose, results, and methodology.
  • Title Page: Full title, a 250-word abstract, and 4-6 keywords for discoverability.
  • Introduction: Engage your reader with an overview.
  • Body: Organize your analysis with headings and subheadings.
  • Works Cited/References: Properly cite all sources.
  • Optional Suggested Reading Page: If allowed, suggest further readings.
  • Tables and Figure Legends (if instructed): Include visuals when requested for clarity.

Writing an Article Review in 7 Steps

Use our essay writer service or move on to understanding how to write a review paper covering everything from creating the title to summarizing key points. This step-by-step guide breaks it down into seven simple steps, making the entire process more manageable.

how to write an article review

Step 1: Create the Title

The very first question you might have is how to start an article review. It's crucial to develop a title that not only captures the essence of the publication but also reflects your perspective. For instance, consider the title: ' Decoding Data: A Critical Exploration of Privacy Concerns in Online Health Platforms. ' This title not only introduces the main theme but also hints at the critical evaluation that will unfold in the writing. It sets the tone for your analysis and sparks interest from the outset.

Step 2: Reference the Article

In the second step, it's essential to ensure accurate citation by providing specific details. Take a look at this example:

  • Author: Rodriguez, M., & Chen, L.
  • Title: 'Privacy Matters: Analyzing the Impact of Health Apps on User Data'
  • Publication Date: 2023
  • Source: Journal of Digital Ethics, 8(2), 87-105.

By including these details, you not only acknowledge the authors and the publication but also provide your readers with the necessary information to locate and verify the article. This step lays the foundation for a credible and well-referenced examination.

Step 3: Article Identification

Identify key elements of the publication, such as the writer's main argument, methodology, and key findings. Pinpoint any theoretical frameworks or models used in the title.

For example: The writing by Garcia and Kim examines the correlation between social media usage and mental health outcomes among adolescents. The authors employ a longitudinal study approach, utilizing surveys and interviews to gather data.

Step 4: Make an Introduction

In your introduction, provide a brief overview of the title's subject and purpose. Capture the reader's attention and clearly state your thesis or main point related to the title. For instance, you might start your article review template like this.

In the digital age, the impact of social media on mental health has become a topic of increasing concern. Garcia and Kim's recent study delves into this issue, aiming to uncover the nuanced relationship between social media engagement and the psychological well-being of adolescents. This writing piece critically analyzes the methodology, findings, and implications of their research.

Step 5: Summarize the Article

Summarize the main points of your assessment, highlighting key arguments, evidence, and results. Offer a concise overview without adding personal opinions.

Example: Garcia and Kim's study reveals a significant positive association between increased social media use and heightened levels of anxiety and depression among the adolescent population. The longitudinal study tracked participants over a two-year period, employing both quantitative and qualitative measures to assess mental health outcomes.

Step 6: Provide Critique

Critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of the writing. Well, how to critique an article , you might wonder. Discuss aspects such as methodology, data interpretation, and potential biases.

Example: While the study offers valuable insights, the reliance on self-reported data may introduce response bias. Additionally, the research predominantly focuses on mainstream social media platforms, potentially overlooking the impact of emerging platforms. Despite these limitations, the study's comprehensive approach contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding the intersection of social media and mental health.

Step 7: Conclude

In the conclusion, summarize your overall assessment of the article and restate your main points. Offer insights into the broader implications of the research and suggest areas for future exploration. 

For example: To conclude, Garcia and Kim's study sheds light on the complex relationship between social media use and adolescent mental health. Despite certain methodological limitations, the research underscores the need for continued investigation in this field. As we navigate the digital landscape, understanding these dynamics becomes crucial for devising effective interventions and support systems for the well-being of our youth.

Example of an Article Review

Why are we taking the time to discuss article review examples in this article? It might not be immediately apparent, but exploring a well-crafted article review sample is a vital step in the writing process for the following reasons:

  • Introduction to Key Works: Helps you to familiarize yourself with the important works of experts in your field.
  • Identification of Key Figures: You can recognize key figures contributing to a specific scientific field.
  • Understanding Field Advancements: Helps you define significant discoveries and advances made in your area of study.
  • Identification of Knowledge Gaps: You can uncover major gaps in existing knowledge, contributing to the formulation of fresh solutions.
  • Reference and Argumentation Resources: You discover solid references and arguments that can enhance your own writing.
  • Idea Generation: Helps you generate ideas for potential future research directions.
  • Becoming an Expert: Assists in gaining a deeper understanding of the subject area, moving towards expertise.
  • Writing Guidance: You acquire a clear idea of how to craft a well-structured review.

how to do an article review apa

Can Anyone Write an Article Review for Me?

Is writing a review article worth it, how to write an apa format article review, how do you write an article review from the beginning, what is the proper article review format.

Ryan Acton is an essay-writing expert with a Ph.D. in Sociology, specializing in sociological research and historical analysis. By partnering with EssayHub, he provides comprehensive support to students, helping them craft well-informed essays across a variety of topics.

how to do an article review apa

  • Plagiarism Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • 24/7 Support

how to do an article review apa

How to Write an Article Review: A Simple Step-by-Step Guide

how to do an article review apa

Common Types of Review Writing

Formatting Tips

Prewriting Steps

Template & Outline

Step-by-Step Writing Guide

Proofreading and Editing

14 Dos and Don’ts

Paper Writing Help

An article review is one of those academic tasks students face quite often during their education. At first glance, it may seem like a very simple and straightforward task. But article review writing has its peculiarities and pitfalls that can make the process extremely challenging. Knowing how to avoid them can help you save lots of time and nerves and, at the same time, ensure an excellent result. But, how to do it?

If you were assigned to do such a task and have no clue how to write a review of an article, you’ve come to the right place! In this article, we will share with you the most effective tips and tricks that will make writing simple and enjoyable. Let’s dive in with our research paper writer !

What Is an Article Review?

An article review is quite a common form of academic assignment in schools and colleges. In a nutshell, this paper requires students to read a specific article, critically evaluate it, and write their observations in the review.

Basically, your review is a constructive, critical assessment of someone else’s work. It explores the strong and weak points of the given piece, gaps, inconsistencies, and other issues, and gives the whole piece an objective evaluation based on all these points.

Working on such an assignment requires excellent analytical and critical thinking skills, as well as the ability to present ideas and arguments in a well-structured way. Therefore, handling this task can be rather difficult.

To help you get on the right track, here are the basic features of article review writing:

  • It always includes summarization, classification, in-depth analysis, comparison, and critiques.
  • The evaluation and analysis should use research, ideas, and theories relevant to the subject matter.
  • Important: A review of an article should not provide new information. Instead, it should explore and evaluate the work of another writer.

Common Types of Article Review

All reviews follow a similar structure and pursue the same goal. However, there are different types of reviews that require a different approach to each.

All in all, we can distinguish three types of this paper based on the kind of article that is being reviewed.

Journal Article Review

If you are reviewing a journal article, you should focus on assessing the strong and weak points of the piece. You should share your own interpretation of the article and provide its in-depth analysis to highlight the value and importance of the piece.

This type of work is probably the easiest and least formal of all.

Research Article Review

When writing a review of the research article, you also have to read, analyze, and evaluate the piece. However, this type of paper needs to have more depth to it compared to a review of a journal article.

The biggest distinctive feature of this work is that along with assessing the strong and weak sides of the article, the author should also evaluate the research methods and use this assessment to conduct further analysis and critique.

Science Article Review

Finally, the last and the most complex type of review is a review of a scientific article. Since scientific articles provide more information on the background of the subject matter, you can use this info to make a more thorough analysis of the piece.

Article Review Format Tips

If you are wondering which format to use for your critical review of an article, the first thing you should do is check with your professor. Typically, a professor should provide you with clear guidelines for your paper writing . If you didn’t get any guidelines or something is unclear, don’t hesitate to ask your professor to clarify it for you.

Some of the main questions you should ask in terms of formating are:

  • What citation style is preferred?
  • What is the required word count?
  • Are you to include a summary, critique, or your personal opinion in the review?
  • Are you expected to drive attention to the main idea or theme within the articles?
  • Are you to provide background information?

Having the answers to these questions will help you create a high-quality paper that fully meets the requirements of your professor. So, be sure to clarify them.

Just to give you an idea of how everything should look, let’s consider the two most common formats for this type of work. Below, you can find examples of MLA and APA format article review.

APA Article Review

APA style article review is one of the two most common formats. In a nutshell, if you were assigned to write an article review APA, it means that you will need to format your citations according to this style manual. The rest of the paper will have standard formatting.

If you are wondering how to write a review in APA style, here are some tips that will help you create correct bibliographical entries for the most commonly-used sources:

  • Web: Author’s last name, initials. (Year, month date of publication). Title. Retrieved from (link to your source)
  • Journal: Author’s last name, initials. (Year of publication). Publication title . Periodical title, volume (issue), pp.-pp.
  • Newspaper: Author’s last name, initials. (Year, month date of publication). Publication title. The magazine title , pp. xx-xx.

MLA Article Review

The second common style is MLA. Here is how to format your citations if you are assigned to write an article review in MLA:

  • Web: Author’s last name, first name middle name initial. “Publication Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
  • Journal:   Author’s last name, first name middle name initial. “Publication Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed.
  • Newspaper:   Author’s last name, first name middle name initial. “Publication Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print.

Preparing for Writing an Article Review

Of course, writing a review itself is the biggest part of the task. However, as we all know, no task can be completed well without some basic planning and preparation. The pre-writing process is necessary to get you ready for the writing stage and that’s why it is so important.

So, what do you need to prepare?

‍ First and foremost, you need to understand the essence of this task. It is vital that you know what an article review is, what purpose it has, and what is expected of you. Once you know this, there are a few more pre-writing steps to take.

Figure Out How to Organize Your Paper

Before you can get to reading and evaluating the given article, you should have a clear idea of the organization of your future review. Knowing how your paper will be structured will give you an idea of what you should focus on when reading the article.

organize your paper

To help you get started, here is how your review should be set up:

  • Summary of the article. Begin your review by summarizing the article, its key ideas, statements, and information.
  • Discussion of the strong points. Next, focus on the positive things. Tell the readers what the author does well, what good ideas he or she brings up, and share some insightful observations.
  • Discussion of drawbacks, gaps, contradictions, and inconsistencies of the article . To complete your review, tell the readers about the negative aspects you’ve noticed. Discuss if there is an information gap, lack of research, or unanswered questions.

Go Over the Text

Start by quickly skimming the article. During your first reading, don’t cling to any details. Instead, go over the article’s title and abstract, study the headings, opening sentences of the paragraphs, etc. Then only read the first several paragraphs and jump to the concluding paragraph. These tricks will help you quickly grasp the overall idea of the article and the main points the author makes.

Next, read the entire article to get a complete picture. Here are a few tips to help you make the first reading as effective as possible:

  • Look for the general idea and key points.
  • Note down any terms, concepts, or words that are not familiar to you.
  • Write down all questions you get while reading the article.
  • Before you move to the next step, be sure to look up the definitions of the unfamiliar words.

Read the Text Attentively

After you give it the first round of superficial reading and note down everything that seems unclear, you can finally read the article closely.

Follow these tips to make the most of this stage:

  • Read the article multiple times to ensure that you got the main idea right.
  • Make notes on everything that sounds important or unclear.
  • Highlight the most important points and helpful quotes that you can refer to later.
  • Connect the content of the article with your own knowledge of the topic. Define if the article agrees or disagrees with what you already know.

Interpret the Article In Your Own Words

Putting the article into your own words is a great trick that will help you define how well you understood the main points. Also, this is a good practice for your writing stage.

After writing down your own interpretation of the article, highlight the main parts that you’d like to discuss in your review. 

Based on your interpretation and highlighted points, make a preliminary outline. Then review your outline to cross out everything unnecessary or unimportant.

Create a Detailed Outline

The last stage of preparation is making an outline. Get back to your notes, summary, and preliminary outline to define what to include in your review. Based on this, create a clear, well-organized, and detailed outline. In the next section of our guide, we will give you more tips for making an effective outline.

Your professor has given you an assignment, but you don't know how to write a reflection paper ? Our authors have created a great guide that is sure to help you.

Just don't feel like it? Let us handle your task and go on with your life!

how to do an article review apa

Article Review Template & Outline

Writing an outline is the best way to organize all your thoughts and create a solid base for your future paper. It will help you follow the right structure and focus on the right points in your review. Also, an outline will help you see if anything is missing or, on the contrary, if there is anything else you should exclude from your paper.

How to create a good outline? First of all, ensure you are well aware of your teacher’s requirements. There are two sections of the review that are optional - a personal critique and a summary section. You should define if your professor wants you to include these sections or not. If yes, you will also have to add them to your outline. If not, you can follow a standard template.

What parts are included in an outline? The review itself, like any other academic paper, should consist of an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, additionally, you may need to include some other sections to your review, such as:

  • Pre-title page that shares full information about the article that is being reviewed (i.e. the type of the article, author(s), the title of the publication, etc.)
  • Optional author’s contact details (e.g. email, address, phone number, etc.)
  • Running head (this element only applies to papers in the APA format)
  • Summary page (used to communicate the background, define why the work was done, sum up results and discuss methods)
  • Works Cited or References
  • Suggested Reading Page (optional)
  • Tables and Figure Legends (if required)

Need more help with making an article review outline? Here is a basic sample outline that can serve as a template for your future review:

  • Introduction
  • Background information
  • Article classification
  • A brief summary 
  • Paragraph 1: A strong point or insightful observation + analysis and critique + supporting evidence
  • Paragraph 2: A strong point or insightful observation + analysis and critique + supporting evidence
  • Paragraph 3: A drawback, gap, inconsistency, or another weak point + analysis and critique + supporting evidence
  • Paragraph 4…
  • Summary of all discussed points
  • Critical evaluation of the author’s work

A Step-by-Step Guide to Article Review Writing

guide

  • Choose the Title

First, create a relevant title that goes in line with the core focus of your paper. Make sure it is clear and concise, but attention-grabbing.

  • Cite the Article

Next, you will need to cite the article you are reviewing according to the required citation style.

Here is a sample citation in the MLA style:

Abraham John. “The World of Dreams.” Virginia Quarterly 60.2(1991): 125-67. Print.
  • Article Identification

Following the citation, you need to provide the identification details of the article, such as:

  • Name of the journal
  • Year of publication
The article, “The World of Dreams,” was written by John Abraham and published in Virginia Quarterly in 1991.
  • ‍ Make a Good Introduction

To create a great introduction, start with the basic info about the article and the thesis for your paper. Move on to a brief summary of the article and its main points. 

  • Summarize the Article

Provide a more thorough summary of the article. Pay close attention to the key statements, ideas, theories, and findings offered by the author.

  • Critique It

Make a critical assessment of the article. First, discuss the positive aspects of the work, explain what the author did well, and support your ideas with arguments. After the positive aspects, discuss what gaps, inconsistencies, and other drawbacks are present in the article.

  • Write a Conclusion

Revisit all the points you’ve discussed in your review and shape a clear and logical conclusion.

You might be interested in reading the religion essay topics . Many of our readers find the article helpful.

The Last Stage: Proofreading and Editing

If you take a look at a truly well-written example of an article review, you will not find any typos or grammar mistakes there. Although the content of your review plays a big role in your success, the quality of the text is also vital.

Although many students still prefer to skip the post-writing process, they make a huge mistake here. If you don’t bother to proofread and edit your review, you risk getting a low grade just because you didn’t fix the errors. That would be a pity, right? That’s true, so here you have all the reasons to devote some more time and energy to revise your draft.

But how to proofread and edit your review effectively? Here are some key tips that should help:

  • First of all, be sure to give yourself a few days to rest after you are done with writing. Often, when you start proofreading the text right after you finished it, you are too tired to notice all the mistakes that might be there. So, it is always a good idea to let it rest for a few days.
  • One more tip is to read your review several times. As a rule, reading it only once is not enough to notice all the drawbacks.
  • Focus on one type of mistake at a time. When revising your work for all types of mistakes at once, you will most likely miss something. But, if you focus on one specific type of mistake during each round of revision, you will be able to identify and eliminate all the errors.
  • Use available tools. Finally, we encourage you to make use of the tools you have to simplify and speed up the process. There are many great tools for proofreading and editing that can come in handy. Don’t rely on them completely, but let them save you some time.

Checklist for Revision

how to do an article review apa

Now that you have all the tips for effective proofreading, here is a checklist that will help you define whether you checked everything:

  • Text structure
  • Tone of voice
  • Sentence structure
  • Presentation
  • Punctuation
  • Referencing and citations

Writing an Article Review: 14 Dos and Don’ts

If you have never dealt with this type of assignment before, you are probably wondering how to write article review the right way and avoid common mistakes. We already told you about the main steps in writing and shared some handy article review examples to help you get started. But, we have even more tips in store and we are willing to share them with you.

In the list below, we’ve gathered some of the main tips on what you should and should not do when writing.

  • Read the article several times to define its main idea and understand it fully.
  • Take notes while you are reading.
  • Focus on the impression the article makes.
  • If there are any unknown terms, be sure to look them up before writing.
  • Base your work on an analysis with insightful observations.
  • Check at least one example to know what it should look like.
  • Write in the third person and stick to the formal style.
  • Make an emphasis on your introduction to engage the readers and make a strong thesis statement.
  • Don’t think it is enough to read the article only once.
  • Don’t neglect the importance of creating an outline.
  • Don’t go with just any title, brainstorm ideas to find a title that is both concise and attention-grabbing.
  • Don’t focus only on the positive or, on the contrary, only the negative sides of the article. Instead, make an all-rounded review that highlights both strong points and drawbacks.
  • Don’t skip the proofreading and editing stage.
  • Don’t be afraid to ask for help if you really need it.

The Bottom Line

If after reading all the guidelines, tips, and examples you are still not sure how to review an article, we’ve got something else for you! There is one more solution to your academic matters that always guarantees 100% success - it is turning for professional help to the team of PaperWriter.

PaperWriter is a professional article review writing service with a huge pool of top-rated writers. Here, students of all academic levels can get any kind of help they need. Whether you need mathematics homework help or any other assistance - PaperWriter has got you covered. Trust us to take care of your article review and we will make sure that you get the highest grade with literally no effort.

Best AI Essay Writer Tools

Best AI Essay Writer Tools

How to Write a Reflective Essay?

Reflective Essay

How to Write a Persuasive Essay that Spurs Action - Expert Tips

persuasive essay

How to Write an Illustration Essay?

Illustration Essay

How to Write an Essay: Advice From Professionals

writing an essay

Good Persuasive Speech Topics That Spark Intrigue

how to do an article review apa

Business Essay Topics to Help Students Stay Ahead

business essay topics

How to Write a Synthesis Essay with Strong Arguments

How to Structure Your Synthesis Essays

How to Write a Critical Analysis Step-by-Step Guide

Critical Analysis

Examples

Article Critique

Ai generator.

how to do an article review apa

In the realm of academia and intellectual discourse, the art of critiquing articles holds significant importance. It not only refines one’s skills but also contributes to the growth of knowledge. A well-executed article critique showcases your ability to analyze, evaluate, and engage with scholarly work. This article delves into the concept of article critiques, offering insights into their purpose and benefits, along with a step-by-step guide on how to craft one effectively.

What is an Article Critique?

An article critique is a detailed evaluation and analysis of a scholarly article or research paper . It involves an objective assessment of the author’s arguments, evidence, methodology, and conclusions. An effective critique goes beyond summarizing the content; it delves into the strengths, weaknesses, and implications of the article. Developing this skill allows you to identify the characteristics that contribute to a compelling scholarly work, while also honing your ability to engage critically with academic literature.

Article Critique Format

1. introduction.

  • Article Information : Mention the title of the article, the author’s name, the source ( journal , magazine , etc.), and the publication date.
  • Thesis Statement : Summarize the main argument or purpose of the article.
  • Scope of the Critique : Briefly outline the main points you will discuss in your critique.

2. Summary of the Article

  • Main Points : Summarize the key points and arguments presented by the author.
  • Purpose and Scope : Explain the purpose of the article and the main topics covered.
  • Findings and Conclusions : Highlight the primary findings and conclusions drawn by the author.

3. Critical Analysis

A. structure and organization.

  • Introduction : Evaluate the effectiveness of the introduction. Does it set the stage for the article?
  • Body : Assess the organization of the main sections. Are the arguments and evidence presented logically?
  • Conclusion : Examine the conclusion. Does it effectively summarize the article and provide closure?

b. Content and Arguments

  • Clarity : Determine if the article is clear and easy to understand.
  • Evidence : Analyze the evidence used to support the arguments. Is it relevant and convincing?
  • Consistency : Check for logical consistency in the arguments.

c. Research Methodology

  • Approach : Evaluate the research methods used in the article. Are they appropriate for the research question ?
  • Data Collection : Assess the reliability and validity of the data collection methods.
  • Analysis : Examine the thoroughness and accuracy of the data analysis .

d. Writing Style

  • Tone : Assess the appropriateness of the tone for the target audience.
  • Language : Evaluate the use of language. Is it precise and concise?
  • Grammar and Syntax : Check for grammatical correctness and syntactical clarity.

e. Contribution to the Field

  • Originality : Determine the originality of the article. Does it offer new insights?
  • Impact : Assess the potential impact of the article on the field. Does it advance knowledge or understanding?

4. Personal Response

  • Strengths : Identify the strengths of the article. What did the author do well?
  • Weaknesses : Point out the weaknesses or areas for improvement.
  • Overall Impression : Provide your overall impression of the article.

5. Conclusion

  • Summary : Summarize your main points of critique.
  • Recommendation : Offer any recommendations for future research or improvements to the article.

6. References

  • Citation : Provide a full citation of the article in the appropriate format (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).
  • Additional Sources : Include citations for any additional sources referenced in your critique.

Examples of Article Critique For Students

Psychology article critique.

Reference: Smith, J. A., & Brown, R. L. (2022). The impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance. Journal of Psychological Research , 34(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1001/jpsychres.2022.01.001 Introduction In their article “The Impact of Sleep Deprivation on Cognitive Performance,” Smith and Brown (2022) examine the effects of sleep deprivation on various cognitive functions. The authors aim to highlight the importance of adequate sleep for maintaining cognitive health and performance. Summary Smith and Brown (2022) conducted a series of cognitive tests on participants who were sleep-deprived for 24 hours. The results indicated significant declines in memory retention, attention span, and problem-solving skills among the sleep-deprived group. The article also discusses potential long-term consequences of chronic sleep deprivation on brain health. Critique Smith and Brown (2022) provide compelling evidence linking sleep deprivation to cognitive decline. Their methodology is robust, featuring a well-defined participant group and controlled variables. However, the study’s sample size is relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the article does not sufficiently explore potential confounding factors, such as stress and caffeine intake, which could influence cognitive performance. Conclusion Overall, Smith and Brown (2022) effectively underscore the critical role of sleep in cognitive health. Despite some methodological limitations, their findings contribute valuable insights to the field of sleep research. Future studies should aim to address the identified limitations to strengthen the generalizability and applicability of the results.

Education Article Critique

Reference: Johnson, L. M., & White, P. D. (2023). The impact of technology integration on student learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology , 29(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeduc.2023.01.002 Introduction In the article “The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes,” Johnson and White (2023) explore how incorporating digital tools and resources in the classroom affects students’ academic performance. The authors aim to identify both the benefits and challenges of technology integration in education. Summary Johnson and White (2023) evaluate various forms of technology integration, including interactive whiteboards, educational software, and online resources. They analyze the effects of these tools on student engagement, motivation, and achievement across different subjects and grade levels. The study presents data from several schools that have implemented these technologies, showing improvements in test scores and classroom participation. Critique The article by Johnson and White (2023) provides a comprehensive analysis of the positive impacts of technology on student learning. The use of multiple case studies strengthens the validity of their conclusions. However, the study’s focus on urban schools may not reflect the experiences of students in rural or underfunded schools, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the reliance on short-term data does not capture the long-term effects of technology integration on student learning. Conclusion Johnson and White (2023) make a compelling case for the positive impact of technology on student learning outcomes. While the article effectively demonstrates the benefits of digital tools, addressing the identified limitations would provide a more comprehensive understanding of technology integration in education. Future research should focus on long-term effects, diverse educational settings, and the challenges of teacher training and equitable access to technology.

Business Article Critique

Reference: Davis, K. L., & Roberts, J. H. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and business success: A review of recent research. Journal of Business Ethics , 38(4), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbuseth.2021.02.003 Introduction In their article “Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Success: A Review of Recent Research,” Davis and Roberts (2021) explore how corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives impact business performance. The authors aim to demonstrate the benefits of CSR in enhancing corporate reputation and customer loyalty. Summary Davis and Roberts (2021) review several studies that analyze the outcomes of CSR initiatives across different industries. The article highlights positive correlations between CSR activities and financial performance, as well as improvements in brand reputation and customer satisfaction. The authors also discuss the potential challenges businesses face when implementing CSR programs. Critique Davis and Roberts (2021) provide a thorough review of the literature on CSR and its impact on business success. The article effectively synthesizes findings from various studies, supporting their argument that CSR can be beneficial for companies. However, the article could be improved by including more critical perspectives on CSR, such as potential drawbacks or instances where CSR initiatives have failed. Additionally, the authors do not provide detailed guidelines on how companies can measure the effectiveness of their CSR efforts. Conclusion Overall, Davis and Roberts (2021) make a strong case for the positive impact of CSR on business success. Their review underscores the importance of socially responsible practices in building a positive corporate image and achieving long-term profitability. Future research should address the limitations noted, particularly by exploring the challenges and failures of CSR initiatives and providing actionable metrics for evaluating their success.

Health Sciences Article Critique

Reference: Nguyen, M. T., & Kim, H. S. (2020). The effects of a plant-based diet on cardiovascular health: A systematic review. Journal of Nutritional Science , 17(3), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutrsci.2020.03.005 Introduction In the article “The Effects of a Plant-Based Diet on Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review,” Nguyen and Kim (2020) investigate the impact of plant-based diets on heart disease prevention and management. The authors aim to provide evidence supporting dietary recommendations for cardiovascular health. Summary Nguyen and Kim (2020) review multiple studies comparing the cardiovascular outcomes of individuals on plant-based diets versus those on omnivorous diets. Their findings suggest that plant-based diets are associated with lower cholesterol levels, reduced blood pressure, and decreased incidence of heart disease. The authors discuss potential mechanisms, such as reduced intake of saturated fats and increased consumption of fiber and antioxidants. Critique Nguyen and Kim (2020) present a comprehensive review of the cardiovascular benefits of plant-based diets. The inclusion of various studies strengthens the validity of their conclusions. However, the review would benefit from a more balanced discussion of potential challenges, such as the risk of nutrient deficiencies and the social and cultural barriers to adopting a plant-based diet. Additionally, the article focuses primarily on short-term studies, and more research on the long-term sustainability of these diets is needed. Conclusion Overall, Nguyen and Kim (2020) provide strong evidence supporting the cardiovascular benefits of plant-based diets. Their systematic review contributes valuable insights to the field of nutritional science. Future research should address the limitations identified, particularly regarding long-term sustainability and potential challenges in adhering to plant-based diets.

Social Sciences Article Critique

Reference: Lopez, G. R., & Thompson, S. L. (2021). Urban poverty and social policy: Examining the effectiveness of welfare programs. Journal of Social Policy , 43(2), 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.04.007 Introduction In the article “Urban Poverty and Social Policy: Examining the Effectiveness of Welfare Programs,” Lopez and Thompson (2021) analyze the impact of various welfare programs on reducing urban poverty. The authors aim to assess the effectiveness of these programs in improving the socioeconomic conditions of urban populations. Summary Lopez and Thompson (2021) evaluate several welfare programs, including food assistance, housing subsidies, and employment training initiatives. Their analysis reveals mixed outcomes, with some programs showing significant positive effects on poverty reduction, while others have minimal impact. The authors discuss factors contributing to these varied results, such as program design, implementation quality, and participant engagement. Critique Lopez and Thompson (2021) provide a detailed analysis of the effectiveness of welfare programs in addressing urban poverty. The article’s strength lies in its comprehensive evaluation of multiple programs and consideration of various influencing factors. However, the study relies on data from a limited number of cities, which may not be representative of broader urban contexts. Additionally, the authors could have included more qualitative data to provide deeper insights into the lived experiences of program participants. Conclusion Overall, Lopez and Thompson (2021) offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of welfare programs in reducing urban poverty. Their findings highlight the need for well-designed and effectively implemented programs to achieve meaningful poverty reduction. Future research should aim to include a more diverse range of urban settings and incorporate qualitative data to enrich the understanding of program impacts.

Examples of Thesis Statements for Article Critiques

Psychology article critique thesis statements.

  • “The article successfully links mindfulness practices to reduced anxiety levels, yet it overlooks the potential variability in individual responses, which could affect the generalizability of the results.”
  • “While the study provides significant insights into the effects of social media on adolescent self-esteem, its cross-sectional design limits the ability to infer causality.”

Literature Article Critique Thesis Statements

  • “The article provides a nuanced analysis of the themes of isolation in ‘Frankenstein,’ but its limited engagement with contemporary critical perspectives reduces its impact.”
  • “Although the article offers a compelling interpretation of symbolism in ‘Moby Dick,’ its narrow focus on literary devices neglects the broader socio-political context of the novel.”

Business Article Critique Thesis Statements

  • “The article effectively highlights the benefits of agile project management in tech startups, but it fails to consider the potential downsides, such as the risk of scope creep and resource strain.”
  • “Despite presenting a well-researched argument for the advantages of remote work, the article’s lack of empirical data on long-term productivity effects weakens its conclusions.”

Health Sciences Article Critique Thesis Statements

  • “The article convincingly argues for the role of gut microbiota in mental health, though it would benefit from a more thorough exploration of the mechanisms underlying this relationship.”
  • “While the study provides strong evidence for the benefits of intermittent fasting on metabolic health, its reliance on short-term studies limits the understanding of long-term effects.”

Education Article Critique Thesis Statements

  • “The article makes a strong case for the use of gamification in education to enhance student motivation, yet it neglects to address potential challenges related to accessibility and equity.”
  • “Despite effectively demonstrating the positive impacts of project-based learning on student engagement, the article lacks consideration of the additional resources and training required for successful implementation.”

Environmental Science Article Critique Thesis Statements

  • “The article offers a comprehensive review of the impacts of deforestation on climate change, but it would be strengthened by incorporating more case studies from diverse geographic regions.”
  • “While the article effectively discusses the potential of urban green spaces to mitigate air pollution, it underestimates the complexities of urban planning and maintenance costs.”

Social Sciences Article Critique Thesis Statements

  • “The article provides valuable insights into the influence of cultural norms on gender roles, but its limited geographic focus restricts the applicability of its findings to a global context.”
  • “Although the study sheds light on the relationship between economic inequality and crime rates, its reliance on correlational data makes it difficult to draw definitive causal conclusions.”

Example of Article Critique About Education

Article Title : The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes Introduction The article “The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes” investigates how the use of digital tools and resources in the classroom influences students’ academic performance. The research aims to identify the benefits and potential drawbacks of incorporating technology into educational settings. Summary The study evaluates various forms of technology integration, including interactive whiteboards, educational software, and online resources. It examines their effects on student engagement, motivation, and achievement across different subjects and grade levels. The article presents data from several schools that have implemented these technologies, showcasing improvements in test scores and classroom participation. Critique The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the positive impacts of technology on student learning. The use of multiple case studies strengthens the validity of its conclusions. However, the article could improve by addressing some critical aspects: Sample Size and Diversity : The study primarily focuses on schools in urban areas, which may not reflect the experiences of students in rural or underfunded schools. Expanding the sample size to include a more diverse range of schools would enhance the generalizability of the findings. Longitudinal Data : The research relies heavily on short-term data, which may not capture the long-term effects of technology integration on student learning. Longitudinal studies are necessary to understand the sustained impact of these tools. Teacher Training and Support : While the article highlights the benefits of technology, it overlooks the challenges teachers face in integrating these tools effectively. Providing adequate training and ongoing support is crucial for the successful implementation of technology in the classroom. Equity and Access : The article briefly mentions the digital divide but does not delve into how disparities in access to technology can affect educational outcomes. A more thorough examination of equity issues would provide a balanced perspective on the advantages and limitations of technology integration. Conclusion Overall, the article makes a compelling case for the positive impact of technology on student learning outcomes. It effectively demonstrates how digital tools can enhance engagement and academic performance. However, to provide a more comprehensive understanding, future research should address the limitations identified, particularly regarding sample diversity, long-term effects, teacher support, and equity issues. By doing so, the research could offer more actionable insights for policymakers and educators striving to harness the full potential of technology in education.

More Examples & Samples Article Critique in PDF

1. quantitative article critique.

Quantitative Article Critique

2. Article Critique Guidelines

Article Critique Guidelines

4. Critiquing Research Articles

Critiquing Research Article

4. Article Review & Critiques

Article Review Critiques

5. Instructions for Article Critiques

Instructions for Article Critiques

6. Critique of an Academic Article

Critique of an Academic Article

7. Critique and Review of Research Articles

Critique and Review of Research Articles

8. Article Critique Assignment

Article Critique Assignment

9. Book Review or Article Critique

Book Review or Article Critique

10. Press Article Critique

Press Article Critique

Purpose of Article Critique

An article critique serves multiple essential purposes in both academic and professional contexts. Below, we delve into the primary objectives of conducting an article critique, which are vital for developing critical thinking, analytical skills, and subject-specific knowledge.

1. Developing Critical Thinking Skills

Critical Evaluation:

  • Encourages students and professionals to go beyond surface-level reading.
  • Promotes a deeper understanding of the material by questioning the validity and reliability of the arguments presented.

Analytical Reasoning:

  • Helps in identifying logical fallacies, biases, and unsupported claims.
  • Facilitates the assessment of evidence and methodologies used in the article.

2. Enhancing Understanding of Subject Matter

In-Depth Analysis:

  • Requires a thorough examination of the article’s content, including the main arguments, evidence, and conclusions.
  • Enhances comprehension of complex concepts and theories within a specific field.

Contextual Awareness:

  • Places the article within the broader context of existing literature.
  • Identifies gaps in the research and suggests areas for further investigation.

3. Improving Academic Writing Skills

Structured Writing:

  • Teaches students how to organize their thoughts coherently.
  • Develops skills in writing clear, concise, and structured critiques.

Evidence-Based Arguments:

  • Encourages the use of evidence to support evaluations and opinions.
  • Helps in the practice of citing sources correctly and ethically.

4. Facilitating Peer Review and Feedback

Constructive Criticism:

  • Provides a framework for giving and receiving constructive feedback.
  • Enhances collaborative learning by engaging in discussions about the strengths and weaknesses of an article.

Quality Assurance:

  • Plays a crucial role in academic publishing and professional fields by ensuring the quality and credibility of published work.
  • Helps maintain high standards in research and scholarship.

5. Encouraging Lifelong Learning

Continual Improvement:

  • Fosters a habit of continuous learning and improvement.
  • Keeps individuals updated with the latest research, trends, and advancements in their field.

Adaptability:

  • Prepares students and professionals to adapt to new information and changing paradigms.
  • Cultivates a mindset that is open to questioning and re-evaluating established knowledge.

Components of an Article Critique

Components of an Article Critique

An effective article critique includes several key components to ensure a thorough evaluation and analysis. Below are the main components:

  • Provide an overview of the article.
  • Introduce the main thesis and key points.

Components:

  • Title and Author: State the article’s title and author.
  • Publication Details: Include publication name, date, etc.
  • Thesis Statement: Summarize the article’s main argument.
  • Purpose of the Critique: Explain your objective.
  • Summarize the article’s content.
  • Main Points: Highlight key arguments.
  • Methodology: Describe research methods briefly.
  • Findings and Conclusions: Outline main findings and conclusions.

3. Analysis

  • Critically examine the article’s structure, content, and logic.
  • Structure and Organization: Evaluate clarity and coherence.
  • Content Evaluation: Assess relevance and depth.
  • Argumentation: Analyze logical flow and evidence strength.
  • Methodology: Critique research methods and identify biases.
  • Sources and References: Evaluate quality and relevance of cited sources.

4. Evaluation

  • Assess the article’s overall contribution.
  • Strengths: Highlight strengths such as originality and depth.
  • Weaknesses: Identify weaknesses like gaps and biases.
  • Contribution to the Field: Discuss the article’s impact.
  • Summarize the critique and provide final thoughts.
  • Summary of Evaluation: Recap key points.
  • Overall Assessment: Provide a final judgment.
  • Recommendations: Suggest future research or improvements.
  • List sources cited in your critique.
  • Citations: Format according to the appropriate style (e.g., APA, MLA).

How to Write an Article Critique

Mastering the art of crafting an effective article critique requires a systematic approach. Here is a step-by-step guide to help you navigate this process with finesse.

Step 1: Reading and Observation

Before diving into the critique, thoroughly read the article. Take notes on the main points, observation ,  objectives , and tone of the article. Identify the author’s goals and the case study , if applicable. This step is crucial for grasping the nuances of the work.

Step 2: Analyzing Structure and Content

Evaluate the structure of the article. Identify the introduction, main arguments, supporting evidence, and conclusion. Examine the use of verbs and analogies , as well as the cause-and-effect relationships presented. Analyze how effectively the author communicates their ideas.

Step 3: Assessing Methodology and Evidence

Scrutinize the methodology used by the author. Is it appropriate for the objectives of the article? Evaluate the quality and relevance of the evidence presented. Consider whether the evidence supports the author’s claims adequately.

Step 4: Critical Evaluation

Engage in a critical evaluation of the article. Identify its strengths and weaknesses. Does the author effectively address counterarguments? Are there any gaps in the logic? Assess the overall coherence and effectiveness of the article’s presentation.

Why is article critique important?

It develops critical thinking, enhances understanding of the subject, improves academic writing skills, and provides constructive feedback.

What are the main components of an article critique?

Introduction, Summary, Analysis, Evaluation, Conclusion, and References.

How do I start an article critique?

Begin with an introduction that provides the article’s title, author, publication details, and a brief summary of its thesis and purpose.

What should be included in the summary?

Key points, research methods, findings, and conclusions of the article.

How do I analyze an article?

Examine the structure, content, logic, argumentation, methodology, and sources for clarity, relevance, and evidence strength.

What makes a good evaluation?

Balanced assessment of the article’s strengths and weaknesses, and its contribution to the field.

How should I conclude an article critique?

Summarize your findings, provide an overall assessment, and offer suggestions for improvement or future research.

How do I cite sources in an article critique?

Follow the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA) and ensure all references are correctly formatted.

What are common pitfalls to avoid in an article critique?

Avoid biased or overly negative reviews, lack of evidence for claims, and failure to provide a balanced perspective.

How can I ensure my critique is objective?

Use evidence to support your points, acknowledge both strengths and weaknesses, and avoid personal biases.

Twitter

Text prompt

  • Instructive
  • Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

sports-logo

Article Menu

how to do an article review apa

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

A scoping review on the influence of contextual factors on training load in adolescent soccer players: what do we know.

how to do an article review apa

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 2.1. identifying relevant studies, 2.2. consultation, 2.3. data extraction, 3.1. literature search, 3.2. sample characteristics, 3.3. breadth and extent of relationship between contextual factors and training load, 3.4. co-occurrence of contextual factors with training load indicators, 3.5. effect of contextual factors on training load, 3.6. potential underlying mechanisms, 4. discussion, 4.1. general discussion, 4.2. limitations, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

SECTIONITEMPRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEMREPORTED
ON PAGE #
Title1Identify the report as a scoping review.# 1
Structured summary2Provide a structured summary that includes (as applicable): background, objectives, eligibility criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods, results, and
conclusions that relate to the review questions and objectives.
# 1
Rationale3Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Explain why the review
questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping review approach.
# 1–3
Objectives4Provide an explicit statement of the questions and objectives being addressed with reference to their key elements (e.g., population or participants, concepts, and context) or other relevant key elements used to
conceptualize the review questions and/or objectives.
# 3
Protocol and registration5Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if and where it can be accessed (e.g., a web address), and if available, provide registration information, including the registration number.# 3
Eligibility criteria6Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered, language,
and publication status) and provide a rationale.
# 4
Information sources *7Describe all information sources in the search (e.g., databases with dates of coverage and contact with authors to identify additional sources), as well as the date the most recent search was executed.# 3–5
Search8Present the full electronic search strategy for at least one
database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated.
# 5/ , , , and
Selection of sources of evidence †9State the process for selecting sources of evidence (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the scoping review.# 4–5/
Data charting process ‡10Describe the methods of charting data from the included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms or forms that have been tested by the team before their use, and whether data charting was done independently or in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and
confirming data from investigators.
#7
Data items11List and define all variables for which data were sought and any assumptions and simplifications made.# 5
Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence §12If carried out, provide a rationale for conducting a critical appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe the
methods used and how this information was used in any data synthesis (if appropriate).
NA
Synthesis of results13Describe the methods of handling and summarizing the data that were charted.# 7

Selection of sources of evidence14Give numbers of sources of evidence screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with
reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally using a flow diagram.
# 6/
Characteristics of sources of evidence15For each source of evidence, present characteristics for which data were charted and provide the citations.# 8–12/
Critical appraisal within sources of evidence16If carried out, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12).NA
Results of
individual sources of evidence
17For each included source of evidence, present the
relevant data that were charted that relate to the review questions and objectives.
# 13–14
Synthesis of results18Summarize and/or present the charting results as they relate to the review questions and objectives.# 14–15
Summary of evidence19Summarize the main results (including an overview of concepts, themes, and types of evidence available), link to the review questions and objectives, and consider the relevance to key groups.# 15
Limitations20Discuss the limitations of the scoping review process.# 16
Conclusions21Provide a general interpretation of the results with respect to the review questions and objectives, as well
as potential implications and/or next steps.
# 17
Funding22Describe sources of funding for the included sources of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the scoping
review. Describe the role of the funders of the scoping review.
# 17
#QueryLimiters/Expanders
S104S63 AND S87 AND S96 AND S102Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsNarrow by Language: englishSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S103S63 AND S87 AND S96 AND S102Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S102S97 OR S98 OR S99 OR S100 OR S101Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S101DE “Soccer”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S100(AB football players OR AB “football player*”) OR (TI football players OR TI “football player*”)Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S99(AB (soccer players or soccer athletes) OR AB “soccer player*”) OR (TI (soccer players or soccer athletes) OR TI “soccer player*”)Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S98AB football or TI footballExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S97AB soccer OR TI soccerExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S96S88 OR S89 OR S90 OR S91 OR S92 OR S93 OR S94 OR S95Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S95DE “Gifted” OR DE “Savants”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S94DE “Early Adolescence”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S93AB collegiate OR TI collegiateExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S92AB junior OR TI juniorExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S91AB talent* OR TI talent*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S90AB youth OR TI youthExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S89AB young OR TI youngExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S88AB adolescen* OR TI adolescen*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S87S64 OR S65 OR S66 OR S67 OR S68 OR S69 OR S70 OR S71 OR S72 OR S73 OR S74 OR S75 OR S76 OR S77 OR S78 OR S79 OR S80 OR S81 OR S82 OR S83 OR S84 OR S85 OR S86Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S86DE “Velocity”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S85DE “Heart Rate” OR DE “Heart Rate Variability” OR DE “Heart Rate Variability”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S84DE “Perceived Stress”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S83DE “Work Load”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S82AB “very-high speed running” OR TI “very-high speed running”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S81AB “high speed running” OR TI “high speed running”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S80AB sprint* OR TI sprint*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S79AB deceleration* OR TI deceleration*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S78AB acceleration* OR TI acceleration*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S77AB distance* OR TI distance*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S76AB “speed zone*” OR TI “speed zone*”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S75AB velocit* OR TI velocit*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S74AB speed OR TI speedExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S73AB itrimp OR TI itrimpExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S72AB trimp OR TI trimpExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S71AB heart rate OR TI heart rateExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S70AB exertion OR TI exertionExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S69AB drpe OR TI drpeExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S68AB “differential rpe” OR TI “differential rpe”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S67(AB (rpe or rate of perceived exertion or perceived exertion or borg scale)) OR (TI (rpe or rate of perceived exertion or perceived exertion or borg scale))Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S66AB load OR TI loadExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S65(AB (internal load or external load or workload or physical demands or activity profile)) OR (TI (internal load or external load or workload or physical demands or activity profile))Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S64(AB (training load or training intensity or training volume) OR AB “training load”) OR (TI (training load or training intensity or training volume) OR AB “training load”)Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S63S1 OR S2 OR S3 OR S4 OR S5 OR S6 OR S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11 OR S12 OR S13 OR S14 OR S15 OR S16 OR S17 OR S18 OR S19 OR S20 OR S21 OR S22 OR S23 OR S24 OR S25 OR S26 OR S27 OR S28 OR S29 OR S30 OR S31 OR S32 OR S33 OR S34 OR S35 OR S36 OR S37 OR S38 OR S39 OR S40 OR S41 OR S42 OR S43 OR S44 OR S45 OR S46 OR S47 OR S48 OR S49 OR S50 OR S51 OR S52 OR S53 OR S54 OR S55 OR S56 OR S57 OR S58 OR S59 OR S60 OR S61 OR S62Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S62DE “Occupations” OR DE “Employment Status” OR DE “Job Characteristics” OR DE “Job Search” OR DE “Nontraditional Careers” OR DE “Occupational Choice” OR DE “Occupational Mobility” OR DE “Occupational Tenure”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S61DE “Dual Careers”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S60DE “Screen Time”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S59DE “Social Media” OR DE “Online Social Networks”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S58DE “Medical Personnel” OR DE “Dentists” OR DE “Military Medical Personnel” OR DE “Nurses” OR DE “Optometrists” OR DE “Pharmacists” OR DE “Physical Therapists” OR DE “Physicians” OR DE “Psychiatric Hospital Staff”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S57DE “Coaching” OR DE “Coaches” OR DE “Executive Coaching” OR DE “Life Coaching” OR DE “Sports Coaching” OR DE “Test Coaching” OR DE “Coaches”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S56DE “Siblings” OR DE “Brothers” OR DE “Multiple Births” OR DE “Sisters” OR DE “Only Children” OR DE “Sibling Relations”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S55DE “Parents” OR DE “Adoptive Parents” OR DE “Expectant Parents” OR DE “Fathers” OR DE “Foster Parents” OR DE “Homosexual Parents” OR DE “Mothers” OR DE “Parental Characteristics” OR DE “Single Parents” OR DE “Stepparents” OR DE “Surrogate Parents (Humans)”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S54DE “Family” OR DE “Biological Family” OR DE” Dual Careers” OR DE “Dysfunctional Family” OR DE “Extended Family” OR DE “Family Background” OR DE “Family History” OR DE “Family Members” OR DE “Family of Origin” OR DE “Family Relations” OR DE “Family Resemblance” OR DE “Family Structure” OR DE “Family Work Relationship” OR DE “Interethnic Family” OR DE “Interracial Family” OR DE “Military Families” OR DE “Nepotism” OR DE “Nuclear Family” OR DE “Schizophrenia” OR DE “Stepfamily” OR DE “Family Relations” OR DE “Child Discipline” OR DE “Childrearing Practices” OR DE “Family Conflict” OR DE “Family Separation” OR DE “Intergenerational Relations” OR DE “Marital Relations” OR DE “Parent Child Relations” OR DE “Parental Role” OR DE “Sibling Relations” OR DE “Transgenerational Patterns” OR DE “Biological Family”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S53DE “Friendship”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S52DE “Peer Evaluation” OR DE “Peer Tutoring” OR DE “Peer Relations” OR DE “Peer Pressure” OR DE “Peer Pressure” OR DE “Peers” OR DE “Significant Others”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S51(DE “Academic Stress” OR DE “Academic Environment” OR DE “Classroom Environment” OR DE “Same Sex Education” OR DE “School Environment”) OR (DE “Academic Settings” OR DE “Schools”)Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S50DE “Education” OR DE “Academic Settings” OR DE “Academic Specialization” OR DE “Adult Education” OR DE “Bilingual Education” OR DE “Client Education” OR DE “Coeducation” OR DE “Consumer Education” OR DE “Counselor Education” OR DE “Curriculum” OR DE “Death Education” OR DE “Distance Education” OR DE “Education Policy” OR DE “Educational Degrees” OR DE “Educational Financial Assistance” OR DE “Educational Placement” OR DE “Educational Programs” OR DE “Educational Quality” OR DE “Educational Reform” OR DE “Educational Standards” OR DE “Elementary Education” OR DE “Environmental Education” OR DE “Family Life Education” OR DE “Gifted Education” OR DE “Grade Level” OR DE “High School Education” OR DE “Higher Education” OR DE “Homework” OR DE “Middle School Education” OR DE “Multicultural Education” OR DE “Nontraditional Education” OR DE “Nursing Education” OR DE “Paraprofessional Education” OR DE “Personnel Training” OR DE “Preschool Education” OR DE “Private School Education” OR DE “Public School Education” OR DE “Religious Education” OR DE “Remedial Education” OR DE “School Attendance” OR DE “School Enrollment” OR DE “School Graduation” OR DE “School Readiness” OR DE “School Retention” OR DE “School Transition” OR DE “Secondary Education” OR DE “Social Work Education” OR DE “Special Education” OR DE “STEM” OR DE “Student Admission Criteria” OR DE “Student Records” OR DE “Teacher Education”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S49DE “College Environment”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S48DE “Psychosocial Factors” OR DE “Protective Factors” OR DE “Psychodynamics” OR DE “Psychosocial Outcomes” OR DE “Risk Factors”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S47DE “Psychological Stress”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S46DE “Social Support”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S45DE “Social Stress”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S44DE “Daily Activities” OR DE “Leisure Time”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S43DE “Ecological Factors” OR DE “Pollution” OR DE “Topography”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S42DE “Environment” OR DE “Built Environment” OR DE “Environmental Enrichment” OR DE “Environmental Planning” OR DE “Facility Environment” OR DE “Learning Environment” OR DE “Nature (Environment)” OR DE “Person Environment Fit” OR DE “Physical Comfort” OR DE “Public Space” OR DE “Single Sex Environments” OR DE “Social Environments” OR DE “Sustainability” OR DE “Therapeutic Environment” OR DE “Virtual Environment”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S41AB professionExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S40AB work OR TI workExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S39AB “dual-career” OR TI “dual-career”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S38AB “screen time” OR TI “screen time”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S37AB “social media” OR TI “social media”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S36AB teammate* OR TI teammate*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S35AB trainer* OR TI trainer*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S34AB manager* OR TI manager*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S33AB staff OR TI staffExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S32AB coach* OR TI coach*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S31AB sibling* OR TI sibling*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S30AB parents OR TI parentsExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S29AB parent OR TI parentExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S28AB family OR TI familyExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S27AB friend* OR TI friend*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S26AB peers OR TI peersExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S25AB peer OR TI peerExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S24(AB education* OR AB (education or school or learning or teaching or classroom or education system)) OR (TI education* OR TI (education or school or learning or teaching or classroom or education system))Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S23AB academic* OR TI academic*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S22AB college OR TI collegeExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S21AB universit* OR TI universit*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S20AB school OR TI schoolExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S19AB “opponent*” OR TI “opponent*”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S18AB “opposition” OR TI “opposition”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S17AB “match outcome” OR TI “match outcome”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S16AB “match location” OR TI “match location”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S15AB “match-related” OR TI “match-related”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S14AB “life load” OR TI “life load”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S13AB “psychosocial load” OR TI “psychosocial load”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S12AB “psychosocial stress” OR TI “psychosocial stress”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S11AB “psychological load” OR TI “psychological load”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S10AB “psychological stress” OR TI “psychological stress”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S9(AB (daily life or everyday life or daily activities or activities of daily living) OR AB daily life) OR (TI (daily life or everyday life or daily activities or activities of daily living) OR TI daily life)Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S8(AB (social support or social networks or social relationships or social inclusion or social exclusion or social isolation)) OR (TI (social support or social networks or social relationships or social inclusion or social exclusion or social isolation))Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S7AB “social stress” OR TI “social stress”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S6AB “social load” OR TI “social load”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S5AB ecological OR TI ecologicalExpanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S4AB environmental OR AB evironment* OR TI environmental OR TI evironment*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S3AB situation* OR TI situation*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S2AB contextual factors OR AB “contextual factor*” OR TI contextual factors OR TI “contextual factor*”Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
S1AB context* OR TI context*Expanders-Apply equivalent subjectsSearch modes-Boolean/Phrase
  • Morgans, R.; Bezuglov, E.; Orme, P.; Burns, K.; Rhodes, D.; Babraj, J.; Di Michele, R.; Oliveira, R.F.S. The physical demands of match-play in academy and senior soccer players from the Scottish Premiership. Sports 2022 , 10 , 150. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Impellizzeri, F.M.; Jeffries, A.C.; Weisman, A.; Coutts, A.J.; McCall, A.; McLaren, S.J.; Kalkhoven, J. The ‘training load’ construct: Why it is appropriate and scientific. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2022 , 25 , 445–448. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Jeffries, A.C.; Marcora, S.M.; Coutts, A.J.; Wallace, L.; McCall, A.; Impellizzeri, F.M. Development of a Revised Conceptual Framework of Physical Training for Use in Research and Practice. Sports Med. 2022 , 52 , 709–724. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Impellizzeri, F.M.; Marcora, S.M.; Coutts, A.J. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perf. 2019 , 14 , 270–273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Pensgaard, A.M.; Ivarsson, A.; Nilstad, A.; Solstad, B.E.; Steffen, K. Psychosocial stress factors, including the relationship with the coach, and their influence on acute and overuse injury risk in elite female football players. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2018 , 4 , e000317. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Coyne, J.O.C.; Coutts, A.J.; Newton, R.U.; Haff, G.G. The Current State of Subjective Training Load Monitoring: Follow-Up and Future Directions. Sports Med. Open 2022 , 8 , 53. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Mellalieu, S.; Jones, C.; Wagstaff, C.; Kemp, S.; Cross, M.J. Measuring Psychological Load in Sport. Int. J. Sports Med. 2021 , 42 , 782–788. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Hamlin, M.J.; Wilkes, D.; Elliot, C.A.; Lizamore, C.A.; Kathiravel, Y. Monitoring Training Loads and Perceived Stress in Young Elite University Athletes. Front. Physiol. 2019 , 10 , 34. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Bergeron, M.F.; Mountjoy, M.; Armstrong, N.; Chia, M.; Côté, J.; Emery, C.A.; Faigenbaum, A.; Hall, G.; Kriemler, S.; Léglise, M.; et al. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development. Br. J. Sports Med. 2015 , 49 , 843–851. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Salmela-Aro, K. Stages of adolescence. In Encyclopedia of Adolescence , 1st ed.; Brown, B.B., Prinstein, M.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 360–368. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Reeves, C.W.; Nicholls, A.R.; McKenna, J. Stressors and Coping Strategies among Early and Middle Adolescent Premier League Academy Soccer Players: Differences According to Age. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2009 , 21 , 31–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lopes Dos Santos, M.; Uftring, M.; Stahl, C.A.; Lockie, R.G.; Alvar, B.; Mann, J.B.; Dawes, J.J. Stress in Academic and Athletic Performance in Collegiate Athletes: A Narrative Review of Sources and Monitoring Strategies. Front. Sports Act. Living 2020 , 2 , 42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Verhagen, E.; Gabbett, T. Load, capacity and health: Critical pieces of the holistic performance puzzle. Br. J. Sports Med. 2019 , 53 , 5–6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Bertollo, M.; Santi, G.; di Fronso, S. Comment on: Development of a Revised Conceptual Framework of Physical Training for Use in Research. Sports Med. 2022 , 52 , 949–951. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Draper, G.; Wright, M.D.; Ishida, A.; Chesterton, P.; Portas, M.; Atkinson, G. Do environmental temperatures and altitudes affect physical outputs of elite football athletes in match conditions? A systematic review of the ‘real world’ studies. Sci. Med. Footb. 2022 , 7 , 81–92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Kiely, J. Periodization Theory: Confronting an Inconvenient Truth. Sports Med. 2018 , 48 , 753–764. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Kenttä, G.; Hassmén, P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med. 1998 , 26 , 1–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Andersen, M.B.; Williams, J.M. A model of stress and athletic injury: Prediction and prevention. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1988 , 10 , 294–306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Otter, R.T.; Brink, M.S.; Diercks, R.L.; Lemmink, K.A. A Negative Life Event Impairs Psychosocial Stress, Recovery and Running Economy of Runners. Int. J. Sports Med. 2016 , 37 , 224–229. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Fletcher, D.; Hanton, S.; Mellalieu, S.D. An Organizational Stress Review: Conceptual and Theoretical Issues in Competitive Sport. In Literature Reviews in Sport Psychology ; Hanton, S., Mellalieu, S.D., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 1–53. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mellalieu, S.D.; Neil, R.; Hanton, S.; Fletcher, D. Competition stress in sport performers: Stressors experienced in the competition environment. J. Sports Sci. 2009 , 27 , 729–744. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Henriksen, K.; Stambulova, N.; Roessler, K.K. Holistic approach to athletic talent development environments: A successful sailing milieu. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2010 , 11 , 212–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Larsen, C.H.; Louise, S.K.; Pyrdol, N.; Sæther, S.A.; Henriksen, K. A world class academy in professional football: The case of Ajax Amsterdam. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2020 , 2 , 33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Knight, C.J.; Harwood, C.G.; Sellars, P.A. Supporting adolescent athletes’ dual careers: The role of an athlete’s social support network. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2018 , 38 , 137–147. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dunn, R.; Kim, J.; Poucher, Z.A.; Ellard, C.; Tamminen, K.A. A Qualitative Study of Social Media and Electronic Communication among Canadian Adolescent Female Soccer Players. J. Adolesc. Res. 2021 , 39 , 272–297. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sabiston, C.M.; Vani, M.; de Jonge, M.; Nesbitt, A. Scoping reviews and rapid reviews. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2022 , 15 , 91–119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Peters, M.D.; Godfrey, C.M.; Khalil, H.; McInerney, P.; Parker, D.; Soares, C.B. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015 , 13 , 141–146. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018 , 169 , 467–473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Keown, K.; Van Eerd, D.; Irvin, E. Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: Knowledge transfer for policy and practice. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 2008 , 28 , 67–72. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Brito, J.; Hertzog, M.; Nassis, G.P. Do Match-Related Contextual Variables Influence Training Load in Highly Trained Soccer Players? J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016 , 30 , 393–399. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Curtis, R.M.; Huggins, R.A.; Benjamin, C.L.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Adams, W.M.; Arent, S.M.; Jain, R.; Miller, S.J.; Walker, A.J.; Casa, D.J. Contextual Factors Influencing External and Internal Training Loads in Collegiate Men’s Soccer. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2020 , 34 , 374–381. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Curtis, R.M.; Huggins, R.A.; Benjamin, C.L.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Arent, S.M.; Armwald, B.C.; Pullara, J.M.; West, C.A.; Casa, D.J. Seasonal Accumulated Workloads in Collegiate Men’s Soccer: A Comparison of Starters and Reserves. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2021 , 35 , 3184–3189. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dalen, T.; Lorås, H. Monitoring Training and Match Physical Load in Junior Soccer Players: Starters versus Substitutes. Sports 2019 , 7 , 70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Furtado Mesa, M.; Stout, J.R.; Redd, M.J.; Fukuda, D.H. Accumulated Workload Differences in Collegiate Women’s Soccer: Starters versus Substitutes. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2023 , 8 , 78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Leiper, J.B.; Junge, A.; Maughan, R.J.; Zerguini, Y.; Dvorak, J. Alteration of subjective feelings in football players undertaking their usual training and match schedule during the Ramadan fast. J. Sports Sci. 2008 , 26 (Suppl. S3), 55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Leiper, J.B.; Watson, P.; Evans, G.; Dvorak, J. Intensity of a training session during Ramadan in fasting and non-fasting Tunisian youth football players. J. Sports Sci. 2008 , 26 (Suppl. S3), 71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Los Arcos, A.; Mendez-Villanueva, A.; Martínez-Santos, R. In-season training periodization of professional soccer players. Biol. Sport 2017 , 34 , 149–155. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Martins, A.D.; Oliveira, R.; Brito, J.P.; Loureiro, N.; Querido, S.M.; Nobari, H. Intra-Season Variations in Workload Parameters in Europe’s Elite Young Soccer Players: A Comparative Pilot Study between Starters and Non-Starters. Healthcare 2021 , 9 , 977. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Maughan, P.C.; MacFarlane, N.G.; Swinton, P.A. The influence of season phase on multivariate load relationships in professional youth soccer. J. Sports Sci. 2022 , 40 , 345–350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • McLean, B.D.; Petrucelli, C.; Coyle, E.F. Maximal power output and perceptual fatigue responses during a Division I female collegiate soccer season. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2012 , 26 , 3189–3196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nobari, H.; Aquino, R.; Clemente, F.M.; Khalafi, M.; Adsuar, J.C.; Pérez-Gómez, J. Description of acute and chronic load, training monotony and strain over a season and its relationships with well-being status: A study in elite under-16 soccer players. Physiol. Behav. 2020 , 225 , 113117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nobari, H.; Kharatzadeh, M.; Khalili, S.M.; Pérez-Gómez, J.; Ardigò, L.P. Fluctuations of Training Load Variables in Elite Soccer Players U-14 throughout the Competition Season. Healthcare 2021 , 9 , 1418. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nobari, H.; Vahabidelshad, R.; Pérez-Gómez, J.; Ardigò, L.P. Variations of Training Workload in Micro- and Meso-Cycles Based on Position in Elite Young Soccer Players: A Competition Season Study. Front. Physiol. 2021 , 12 , 668145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Oliva-Lozano, J.M.; Gómez-Carmona, C.D.; Pino-Ortega, J.; Moreno-Pérez, V.; Rodríguez-Pérez, M.A. Match and Training High Intensity Activity-Demands Profile During a Competitive Mesocycle in Youth Elite Soccer Players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2020 , 75 , 195–205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Pass, J.; Nelson, L.; Doncaster, G. Real world complexities of periodization in a youth soccer academy: An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach. J. Sports Sci. 2022 , 40 , 1290–1298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Watson, A.; Brickson, S. Relationships between Sport Specialization, Sleep, and Subjective Well-Being in Female Adolescent Athletes. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2019 , 29 , 384–390. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nobari, H.; Alves, A.R.; Haghighi, H.; Clemente, F.M.; Carlos-Vivas, J.; Pérez-Gómez, J.; Ardigò, L.P. Association between Training Load and Well-Being Measures in Young Soccer Players during a Season. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021 , 18 , 4451. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Murray, A. Managing the Training Load in Adolescent Athletes. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2017 , 12 , S242–S249. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Coyne, J.O.C.; Gregory Haff, G.; Coutts, A.J.; Newton, R.U.; Nimphius, S. The Current State of Subjective Training Load Monitoring-a Practical Perspective and Call to Action. Sports Med. Open 2018 , 4 , 58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Anyadike-Danes, K.; Donath, L.; Kiely, J. Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey. Sports Med. 2023 , 53 , 2505–2512. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Montull, L.; Slapšinskaitė-Dackevičienė, A.; Kiely, J.; Hristovski, R.; Balagué, N. Integrative Proposals of Sports Monitoring: Subjective Outperforms Objective Monitoring. Sports Med. Open 2022 , 8 , 41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Inclusion CriteriaExclusion Criteria
Full text availableNo full text available
English languageNot English language
Adolescents (mean age 11–19 years old) of either sexNot adolescents or unable to differentiate between adolescents and other age groups in the study
Healthy subjectsDoes not involve healthy subjects (e.g., injured or return-to-play)
Association SoccerOther football codes than Association Soccer (e.g., Rugby)
Training load is (partly) measured during (part of) training sessionsTraining load is not measured during (part of) training sessions (e.g., during matches)
Describing the relationship between a contextual factor and training load (external load and/or internal load)Only describes contextual factor(s) or training load and not the relation between those
Only describes the relationship between contextual factor(s) with other factors than training load (e.g., injury or concussion)
Describes the relationship between contextual factors during a training session and training load
Primary study design with original data Not a primary study or original data (e.g., conference proceedings, abstracts, editorials, reviews or commentaries)
ReferenceCountryAim of the StudyGeneral MethodologyDurationPopulation DescriptionKey Findings
Brito et al., 2016 [ ]FranceTo examine match-related contextual factors concerning perceived TL and fatigue in soccer. To investigate the seasonal variation of self-reported TL and fatigue.Observational design. Perceived exertion and fatigue were collected weekly. 1 season (2009–2010)13 highly trained U-19 players (age 18.6 ± 0.5 yrs) from a first league club in France.
Curtis et al., 2020 [ ]United States of AmericaTo examine seven separate contextual factors’ influence on EL and IL in men’s collegiate soccer. Observational design with four teams in total.
EL and IL measures were collected.
August-November 2016 and 2017107 NCAA Division I male collegiate soccer players (age 20 ± 2 yrs)
Curtis et al., 2021 [ ]United States of AmericaTo quantify and compare seasonal total, match-, and training-accumulated TL by player status in men’s collegiate soccer.Observational design. All training sessions and matches were captured for physical and physiological workloads.August-November 2016 and 2017107 NCAA Division I male collegiate soccer players (age 20 ± 2 yrs)
Dalen et al., 2019 [ ]NorwayTo investigate differences in physical and physiological in-season TL between starters and non-startersObservational design. Players were monitored for TL during on-pitch training sessions and matches.10 weeks (during the 2018 season)18 junior soccer players (age 15.7 ± 0.5 yrs)
Furtado Mesa et al., 2023 [ ]United States of AmericaTo estimate workloads accumulated across one season between starters and non-startersObservational design.
All training sessions and official matches were monitored for TL.
August 2019–November 201919 NCAA Division I college female collegiate soccer players (age 20 ± 1.61 yrs)
Leiper et al., 2008 [ ]TunisiaTo investigate the psychosomatic factors in young Muslim football players during normal training and competitive schedules during Ramadan.Observational design. A fasting and non-fasting group were monitored and tested over several weeks regarding multiple aspects (e.g., daily TL, physical testing, sleep quality).7 weeks (during 2006 Ramadan)87 Tunisian junior players from four teams from League 1 (N = 3) or League 3 (N = 1) clubs of the Tunisian National Senior Leagues (age 18 ± 1 yrs).
Leiper et al., 2008 [ ]TunisiaTo determine whether the TL of fasting players was similar to that of non-fasting players.Observational design. A fasting and non-fasting players were monitored for one training session during the third week of Ramadan. HR and RPE were measured.One training session (during 2006 Ramadan)79 young male football players from four Tunisian teams (age 18 ± 1 yrs)
Los Arcos et al., 2017 [ ]SpainTo compare the respiratory and muscular perceived TL accumulation in elite-oriented young soccer players depending on starting status.Observational design. Players were monitored regarding perceived TL. The competitive season was divided into 5 blocks of 6–8 weeks.35 weeks (2012–2013)24 young outfield professional soccer players (age 20.3 ± 2.0 yrs) from a reserve team of a Spanish La Liga club.
Martins et al., 2021 [ ]PortugalTo describe and compare the within-season variations of EL and IL indicators between starters and non-starters.Observational design. IL was monitored. Only normal training sessions were included.12 months from June 2017 to July 2018 17 U-17 soccer players from a Portuguese elite team: starters (age 16.2 ± 0.4 yrs) and non-starters (age 16.2 ± 0.2 yrs)
Maughan et al., 2022 [ ]ScotlandTo quantify and describe the relationship between IL and EL variables across phases of the season.Observational design. Both subjective and objective TL measures were obtained. Normal training sessions and matches were included.47 weeks (2018/2019 season)20 male youth soccer players (age 17.4 ± 1.3 yrs) from a professional Scottish club
McLean et al., 2012 [ ]United States of AmericaTo examine how Pmax changes during a female collegiate soccer season. Furthermore, to describe changes in perceptual fatigue responses during the in-season period.Observational design.
A women’s collegiate soccer team was monitored. Training sessions and matches were monitored using sRPE. Pmax was assessed nine times in-season.
16 weeks (1 season during the 2010 season)19 division I female collegiate soccer players (age 19.9 ± 1.2 yrs).
Nobari et al., 2020 [ ]IranTo describe the weekly variations of TL metrics and well-being status and to analyse the associations between TL metrics and weekly reports of well-being status.Observational design. Daily TL data were analysed to report changes in weekly load during the match season and wellness status.20 weeks29 young elite soccer players (age 15 ± 0.2 yrs from one team competing in the Iran national under-16 competitions.
Nobari et al., 2021 [ ]IranTo describe daily TL throughout the competition season, analyse weekly differences among phases of the season and playing positions, and compare the TL variables over the competition period for the whole team.Observational design. Daily monitoring was conducted. The competition was split into three macrocycles: early season, mid-season, and end-season.26 weeks (1 season)26 young male soccer players (age 13.3 ± 0.2 yrs) from one team competing in the Iran U-14 national team competitions.
Nobari et al., 2021 [ ]IranTo investigate the variations of training workload in micro- and mesocycles, based on position.Observational design. Daily player monitoring with the season divided into three mesocycles: early, mid-, and end-season.20 weeks (1 season)26 young soccer players (age 15.5 ± 0.2 yrs) playing in Iran’s U-16 competitions.
Oliva-Lozano et al., 2020 [ ]SpainTo describe training and match activity demands profile in U-19 soccer players; to compare the profile depending on the type of session and differentiate between the profiles depending on the match location.Observational design. Type of session and match location were used for comparison. Using Wireless Inertial Measurements Units, data were collected.5 weeks (during 2017–2018 season)25 U-19 soccer players (age 18.2 ± 0.87 yrs) from a U-19 team playing in the Spanish National League Championship.
Pass et al., 2022 [ ]EnglandTo assess the TL experienced during pre-season and in-season mesocycles in youth soccer, and investigate how the intended periodized approach was implemented as planned.Mixed-design study with two phases.
Phase 1: Observational design. Four sessions were monitored for EL per seasonal phase.
Phase 2: Multiple semi-structured interviews with the strength and conditioning coach.
One season (2018–2019)Phase 1: 17 youth soccer players (age 17.2 ± 1.0 yrs) from a professional English Category 2 EPPP soccer academy.
Phase 2: One Strength and conditioning coach
Watson et al., 2019 [ ]United States of AmericaTo evaluate the relationships between sport specialization, sleep, and subjective well-being in female youth soccer players, while adjusting for the influence of TL and age.Observational design.
sRPE was collected together with sleep and well-being data.
4 month season54 Female players from U-14 to U-18 teams within a community soccer organization (age 15.2 ± 1.5 yrs)
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Nijland, R.; Toering, T.; Watson, C.G.; de Jong, J.; Lemmink, K.A.P.M. A Scoping Review on the Influence of Contextual Factors on Training Load in Adolescent Soccer Players: What Do We Know? Sports 2024 , 12 , 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12070172

Nijland R, Toering T, Watson CG, de Jong J, Lemmink KAPM. A Scoping Review on the Influence of Contextual Factors on Training Load in Adolescent Soccer Players: What Do We Know? Sports . 2024; 12(7):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12070172

Nijland, Rick, Tynke Toering, Cameron G. Watson, Johan de Jong, and Koen A. P. M. Lemmink. 2024. "A Scoping Review on the Influence of Contextual Factors on Training Load in Adolescent Soccer Players: What Do We Know?" Sports 12, no. 7: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12070172

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

VIDEO

  1. How To Reference A Journal Article Using APA 7th Edition

  2. Learn How to Write an Article Review with Examples

  3. How to cite an article in APA?

  4. HOW TO CONDUCT ARTICLE REVIEW

  5. How do you write an article title in APA?

  6. How to find a DOI And what to do if there is no DOI

COMMENTS

  1. Journal Article Review in APA Style

    Journal article reviews start with a header, including citation of the sources being reviewed. This citation is mentioned at the top of the review, following the APA style (refer to the APA style manual for more information). We will need the author's name for the article, title of the article, journal of the published article, volume and ...

  2. Writing a Literature Review

    Writing a Literature Review. A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels ...

  3. How to Write an Article Review: Tips and Examples

    When writing an article review in APA format, start with a title page that includes the title of the article, author(s), and your name. In the body of the review, use APA style guidelines for formatting citations and references. Include an introduction, summary of the article, critical evaluation, and conclusion.

  4. How to Write an Article Review (With Samples)

    3. Identify the article. Start your review by referring to the title and author of the article, the title of the journal, and the year of publication in the first paragraph. For example: The article, "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS," was written by Anthony Zimmerman, a Catholic priest.

  5. Writing Help: The Article Review

    For an article review, your task is to identify, summarize, and evaluate the ideas and information the author has presented. You are being asked to make judgments, positive or negative, about the content of the article. The criteria you follow to do this will vary based upon your particular academic discipline and the parameters of your ...

  6. How to Write a Journal Article Review APA Style

    Start by citing the article according to APA style. Begin with the last name (s) and initial (s) of the author (s). This is followed by the year of publication in parentheses. The article name comes next, followed by the title of the journal (in italics), volume number (in italics) and issue number in parentheses. End with the page numbers.

  7. Learn How to Review a Manuscript

    Video resources and online tutorials. Check out our free tutorial and video resources on how to review manuscripts submitted to scholarly journals. An interactive tutorial from the APA Center for Learning and Career Development about the process of reviewing a manuscript of quantitative research.

  8. How to Write an Article Review: Template & Examples

    Both a reaction paper and an article review will start with a content summary. ️. For scholarly material, you will present a structured review after the summary. ️. For popular magazine content, you will write a response that sums up your emotions, thoughts, and reactions that the material aroused.

  9. How to Write an Article Review [Practical Tips + Examples]

    Here is a basic, detailed outline for an article review you should be aware of as a pre-writing process if you are wondering how to write an article review. Introduction. Introduce the article that you are reviewing (author name, publication date, title, etc.) Now provide an overview of the article's main topic.

  10. How to Review a Manuscript

    Purpose of Review; A 6-Step-Approach to Successful Manuscript Review; Step 1: Prepare for the Review; A Sample Journal Rating Form; 3 Points to Remember; Step 2: Read the Introduction; Step 3: Move to the Methods Section; Step 4: Examine Results Section; Step 5: Move to Discussion Section; Step 6: Overall Assessment; Rating the Manuscript: A ...

  11. Article Summaries, Reviews & Critiques

    A critique asks you to evaluate an article and the author's argument. You will need to look critically at what the author is claiming, evaluate the research methods, and look for possible problems with, or applications of, the researcher's claims.

  12. How to Write an Article Review: Types, Format, & Examples

    Step 4: Identify the Author's Thesis. In this step, pinpoint the author's main thesis or central argument. Understand the purpose of the article and how the author supports their position. This will serve as a foundation for your critique.

  13. Literature Review

    Literature Review via APA Style.org "a narrative summary and evaluation of the findings or theories within a literature base. Also known as 'narrative literature review'. " Key takeaways from the Psi Chi webinar So You Need to Write a Literature Review via APA Style.org. Examples of Literature Reviews.

  14. How to review a manuscript

    9: Be honest and upfront. When an editor sends out a manuscript for review, he or she is doing so with a fair amount of trust. That means, among other things, that you cannot share the manuscript with anyone and that you must keep your thoughts about the unpublished manuscript to yourself.

  15. Peer Review

    A key convention in the publication of research is the peer review process, in which the quality and potential contribution of each manuscript is evaluated by one's peers in the scientific community. Like other scientific journals, APA journals utilize a peer review process to guide manuscript selection and publication decisions. Toward the ...

  16. Critical Review of an article

    Follow the structure of the journal article (e.g. Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) - highlighting the strengths and weaknesses in each section. Present the weaknesses of the article, and then the strengths of the article (or vice versa). Group your ideas according to different research themes presented in the source

  17. LibGuides: PSY290

    An effective critical review has three parts: APA citation of article; Clearly summarizes the purpose for the article and identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the research. (In your own words - no quotations.) Evaluates the contribution of the article to the discipline or broad subject area and how it relates to your own research.

  18. How to Write an Article Review: Tips, Outline, Format

    Start the first paragraph of your review with concise and clear article identification that specifies its title, author, name of the resource (e.g., journal, web, etc.), and the year of publication. Intro. Following the identification, write a short introductory paragraph.

  19. How to Cite a Review in APA Referencing

    Citations for a review in APA referencing are similar to those for other sources. This means you cite the reviewer's surname and year of publication: One review was especially scathing (Smith, 2001). In addition, if you quote a print source, make sure to cite a page number: Smith (2001) dismisses the argument as "puerile" (p. 16).

  20. APA Formatting and Style Guide (7th Edition)

    Resources on writing an APA style reference list, including citation formats. Basic Rules Basic guidelines for formatting the reference list at the end of a standard APA research paper Author/Authors Rules for handling works by a single author or multiple authors that apply to all APA-style references in your reference list, regardless of the ...

  21. Q. How do I write a journal article review using APA format?

    I think your instructor wants you to use APA citation style for the items (articles, books, etc.) that you are reviewing. In other words, you must cite the work in the format (APA) as part of your review. The OWL site will show examples for citing books, journal erticles, etc. I hope this helps you out and answers your question.

  22. How to Write an Article Review: Quick & Handy Guide

    Step 4: Make an Introduction. In your introduction, provide a brief overview of the title's subject and purpose. Capture the reader's attention and clearly state your thesis or main point related to the title. For instance, you might start your article review template like this.

  23. Learn How to Write an Article Review and Get an A

    Start by quickly skimming the article. During your first reading, don't cling to any details. Instead, go over the article's title and abstract, study the headings, opening sentences of the paragraphs, etc. Then only read the first several paragraphs and jump to the concluding paragraph.

  24. Article Critique

    "The article offers a comprehensive review of the impacts of deforestation on climate change, but it would be strengthened by incorporating more case studies from diverse geographic regions." ... APA, MLA). How to Write an Article Critique. Mastering the art of crafting an effective article critique requires a systematic approach. Here is a ...

  25. Full article: Barriers and facilitators for HIV rapid testing among

    Review Article. Barriers and facilitators for HIV rapid testing among transgender women and gay and other men who have sex with men in Brazil: A scoping review ... 17.5% of 337 TGW in a 2010 cross-sectional study in Rio Grande do Sul and São Paulo reported to be afraid of getting a positive result (Costa et al., Citation 2018).

  26. How are guidelines developed?

    APA staff and other stakeholders provide input, draft guidelines documents undergo a public comment period and review by APA's Office of General Counsel, comments are reviewed and addressed; once finalized, it goes to the Council of Representatives for approval. As BPA and COPPS focus on identifying current and future needs of practitioners ...

  27. Sports

    This scoping review aimed to systematically explore the breadth and extent of the literature regarding the relationship between contextual factors (CFs) and training load (TL) in adolescent soccer players. Further aims included comprehending potential underlying mechanisms and identifying knowledge gaps. CFs were defined as factors not part of the main training process, such as the coach ...